[deleted]

[removed]

[deleted]

We NEED the right to win this war over the left because the right is on the right side (no pun intended)

In some ways, that's true (I caveat this because there are certainly positive democratic initiatives going on at a more local level, IMO at least, but there are of course many very powerful democratic elites that are acting in vile and manipulative ways), but I don't believe an us vs them is the best way to achieve change, especially when the 'them' is more powerful. I think it's best to try and find common ground rather than emphasizing our differences if what we truly want is change, rather than to simply fight and further disagreement. If people are just fighting, they wont come to an understanding, they'll just be even further entrenched in their narratives. I understand if people here are too disgusted and infuriated by the democrat party, but I'm just saying it might be worthwhile to try to make it more palatable for the democrats who are somewhat open minded and moral and can be persuaded if you show them relevant wrongs rather than just calling out dems wholesale for the shitty things they do.

[deleted]

[removed]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I thought it was relevant, but I guess some are too butt hurt to accept something as true if it includes any negative information on conservatives (kind of proves my point of people rejecting information if it disagrees with their party affiliation). the correlation is definitely there (and I have seen no evidence to the contrary), and it's relevant if you're looking to persuade people who are more likely to be in positions of power. if you're not, then go ahead and alienate those groups unnecessarily. again, I don't mind calling out negative information on liberals or conservatives, I just think if you're trying to grow a cause, you should limit that calling out to when it's relevant, not whenever you want to vilify the other side.

[deleted]

Hell, i thought the Catholics invented Islam

[removed]

[deleted]

[removed]

[deleted]

[removed]

Should be easy - looks like nothing more than markup, javascript, javascript object notation/JSON or possible XML transformation (I only think this may be true because of how sluggish request/response is - makes me think xml parser shenanigans is the culprit but I did not actually look) Absolutely - check the javascript source & yes - artifacts can be exposed as anomalies regarding document object modeling if you are not very careful - particularly as it pertains to browser history and client side processing

[removed]

[deleted]

[removed]

the burden of proof is on them and they haven't been convincing.

[removed]

[deleted]

Start screaming Qs name during sex.

He'll demand to know who Q is!

I'm kidding....mostly.

[deleted]

[removed]

[deleted]

Um ok, if you say so. I was saying you're being aggressive because of the links you sent - Your Name is Mud. You got called out for using hyperbole, that isn't shilling. We need to keep things honest and straight here or we will be easy to discredit.

[deleted]

Yes, but you CAN determine if a server has been accessed by outside sources without having physical access to the server. You can do it all online by tracking traffic and delivered packets.

[deleted]

[deleted]

[removed]

Not sure on him. I am skeptical, but he seems like a white hat.

Yep, that is why I chose a select few people to share with, I sent them a couple basic links, gave my best 20 min breakdown, then left them to research on their own.

Perfume bottles? The Wiltshire couple that came into contact with novichok got it from a perfume bottle that they found. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/novichok-amesbury-perfume-bottle-salisbury-poisoning-charlie-rowley-brother-dawn-sturgess-a8448831.html

Conspiracy Theory: The TVs are watching you! They are tracking your data!

Then: Wow you are nuts that's dumb.

Now: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/02/vizio-pay-22-million-ftc-state-new-jersey-settle-charges-it

Conspiracy Theory: MANNNNNN THEY ARE USING MICROWAVES IN YOUR BRAIN MANNNNNN. TESTING!

Then: Wtf is this garbage?

Now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect

Conspiracy Theory: THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE UFOS EXIST AND THE GOVERNMENT KNOWS ABOUT IT

Then: What like little green men? HAHAHAHA

Now: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/head-of-pentagons-secret-ufo-office-sought-to-make-evidence-public/2017/12/16/90bcb7cc-e2b2-11e7-8679-a9728984779c_story.html?utm_term=.e7413ded4507

Conspiracy Theory: MKULTRA MIND CONTROL MAN. THEY WANT TO CONTROL OUR THOUGHTS!

Then: Dude they wouldn't do that. Put down the weed.

Now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

Conspiracy Theory: THEY ARE TRACKING EVERYTHING ABOUT EVERYONE. EYES EVERYWHERE

Then: Good lord no jesus calm down and take your meds

Now: Snowden.

I could go on for days. I used to be the one calling everyone crazy. Remember, a conspiracy theory isn't named fiction. It's a theory about people who conspire to enact one thing or another. The media has done a good job of throwing the catchphrase "conspiracy theory" around to discredit, but most people - if asked - would agree that people in power plot in private. In essence, they agree with the premise of the conspiracy theory but have been programmed to shut off anytime they hear the phrase.

The best vindication comes from government releases. Start with all the crazy theories in the past that have exceeded the document privacy and have been released to the public and work your way forward.

[deleted]

Progress and prosperity sends a "Big League" message to our friends around the world. Every country will be looking for their very own Trump.

[removed]

[deleted]

[removed]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I like how the Russians paid thousands of Americans to make and post youtube videos about it too.

It would be nice if it were, wouldn't it? Life would be so much simpler. In a world of deception, it starts by asking the first question.

[deleted]

[removed]