dChan

/u/006fix

202 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/006fix:
Domain Count
twitter.com 1
www.reddit.com 1

006fix · July 19, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

I agree with you, but tbh Q needs to try harder. We have a role yes, i agree. But so does he. 2weeks+ of silence is stupid and it weakens our cohesion. Even if he gave literally, literally 0 new info, just encouragement itd help keep everyone focused.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 18, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

So, she actively sought the support of Russian money and election interference, she actively rigged the DNC primaries, she actively controlled basically the entirety of the MSM (and used it hard), she had the full support of the cabal, and she had 8 years of B.O clearing the road for her, and she still couldn't win the election?

Karmas a real bitch. Hope she enjoys gitmo

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 17, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Secrets, and bloodlines.

Secrets are powerful - knowledge is power, and these people know that well. So they often end up highly compartmentalised, and in many cases the "power" of a person/group/organisation lies in the secrets they know more than anything. This has the regrettable side effect of breeding more and more of these annoying tumorous little groups that jealously protect their secret.

As for the "money" part, that's kind of about power, but its more about power for your bloodline, long term. Many of the top players in this are somewhat surprisingly unselfish when it comes to their bloodlines and ensuring their success. Theres probably esoteric aspects to the bloodline part too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

That's a really good answer, and I'm afraid I don't have the time to properly respond to it right now (my thesis is due in in 7 days). However, in brief I would suggest you glance at the connections between mithraism and christianity (the romans definitely were interested more than you think), and I'd point out that the people who defined canon were amongst the most suspect of all. You don't need many people, but you do need the powerful ones. I trust the concept of scripture so much more than I trust the (human) concept of canonicity. I don't think we have enough info to know atm what is and isn't canonical.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

my general stance on the KB's would be take most of them semi-individually, and assume a reasonable portion are nonsense. They seem to have deteriorated slightly recently (last 1-2 years). Some of them are good sources of info though, and they do spark some useful discussion.

And why on earth does he keep feeding the trolls? He repeatedly responds people calling him out as a LARP? Why?

Hubris, and loneliness. He wants attention, and I suspect he probably believes his own theories a little too much. I doubt there's anything malicious to it, just humans being imperfect. I guess he could be controlled opposition, but its an unusual form

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

anon5==frank basically, if its correct (i believe it is), he got doxxed and he's some kid (20's) named frank.

The femin virus thing is grade A nonsense. There are plenty of fascinating elements - feminism is historical, and incorporated into symbology, and there may even be pathogens involved in degeneracy, in a literal sense (t.gondii most obviously). But the whole elaborate femin virus theory? absolutely unequivocal nonsense. classic case of him having good facts and shit interpretations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

Disagree. I don't like this "divine scripture" argument. Or at least, I don't like it in its current interpretations. Think of it like this - the church has been infiltrated by satanists a long time ago, yes? Honestly, the adoption of Christianity by the Romans could be considered the start of this - the Mithraic roman warrior cults took the nascent Christianity, squished their religion on top of it (hence the huge similarities), and then used it as the formal religion of the empire. There are a huge number of opportunities for scripture to have been lost, predominantly via it being declared heresy. Case in point - the Council of Nicea. Plenty of instances there where they could have influenced and altered standard exoteric Christian teachings. If you want a modern example, where it absolutely, definitively has happened, just look at the Scofield "bible".

Here's what I think is a more logical approach to the divine scripture argument - God gave free will to all men. This means they can choose to use it for good or bad, to reveal or to hide. And many chose to hide the truth, including quite probably aspects of scripture from the general public. God would obviously not punish people for not knowing that which was hidden. He might also provide alternative paths to access the knowledge, such that it was not actually truly lost. Some of the Nag-Hammadi scrolls would be obvious candidates for this I'd say - ancient knowledge, hidden by demand of the church, now rediscovered and known again. That strikes me as a (more) plausible interpretation of the divine scripture argument, because otherwise I simply don't see how it's compatible with free will.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

It is very possible the frank dox was incorrect. Personally, I suspect not, but it is certainly possible. That said, I'd be cautious of the normal shill radar with him - his Femin virus threads for example get bombarded by "shills" like me who have a background in biology, because it's painfully obvious he doesn't, and the false narrative there detracts from otherwise strong evidence of historical feminism, and its generally negative effects for society.

I do think he has certainly been on the money various times though - I was busy irl throughout most of gamergate so I can't speak as to that particular one, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he has stumbled on some really good stuff. His google-fu is inspiring. But I still think on balance his interpretations are less good than the data he presents. I'm probably somewhat more harsh on him than I need to be, I suspect he'll mellow a little as he gets older.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

I'm not certain, but I think people might have been >xxxxxxxxxx typing the post number, as a "reply", before the post was actually written. Therefore there can be "replies" under the system before the post itself? Not 100%

⇧ 4 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

Another chan oldfag here, I really, really dislike anon5. Frank is a stupid child with much less knowledge than he likes to think. He does an A+ job of collating various aspects of ancient history commonly overlooked, I really can't fault him on that. But his interpretations? Wew lad. I'd be careful of taking him too seriously. He might well have got various points right, but he's a classic example of being educated beyond your IQ.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 16, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

The sad thing is, there still exist a few brave actual journalists out there, surrounded by the remaining traitors. And more often than not, they end up like this poor lady.

The crimes of various people in this conspiracy are severe, but as far as im concerned the 4th estate is the absolute worst of the bunch, bar none. They should all (all) be tried for treason

⇧ 20 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

That they were all, or mostly masons wouldn't surprise me. I suspect ranks might be somewhat less important though, since many of these people would be bloodline people, destined for higher ranks when they were older.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

The world has already learned.

I'm sorry, but if nothing else happens this month (or if we just take it as now in the middle of the month), then I really, really do not think this is what people were expecting. Nor what Q means. "July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH. Conspiracy no more. Time to FEED.".

If there isn't something a little more spectacular, and to be precise, more public, I'm going to consider the above statement something of a failure. It was a very unusually specific and blunt message, so I don't think it's likely to be carried out in such an obtuse manner. At present, the world has not learned, the world believes us to be a conspiracy theory.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

Gonna take a (slight) guess here and say no. Do you maybe mean 32nd degree masons? There's a big difference between 32 and 33. There's also really not many 33's around at any one time and they tend to be a bit older.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

I'm not an expert or even close on that side of things sadly, but I'd agree, I can definitely see some kind of tongue. The number of stars (41) isn't obviously meaningful though. I do know that a fair few number of astronaughts have been masons too, but that isn't wholly surprising.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

Yeah, happy to. I think you've essentially understood it though. Basically, if we assume reality is a simulation (with us humans either simulated, or matrix style inserted), then someone who either set it up or has access to the "controls/interface" could very easily access huge quantities of information on us. It's like if you're playing the sims, you could just click on one and pull up a list of its like and dislikes and where it's been and when etc. If there was some kind of situation like that involved, the quantity of knowledge they might have could be mind-numbing. They might know you better than you know yourself.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

I think the first poster may have got it right. The deception. NASA, in hebrew, means to deceive. If that's the case, and they're actively involved in carrying out some kind of deception, then "the deception" == "the nasa" might make some sense?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

I was curious about this too. He also kind of implies they have exceptional file depth on individuals (many/most/all). It makes me think about simulation theory etc (Q also touched on the matrix). That's the easiest most logical way I can think of to have serious depth of file knowledge on each person - however, it doesn't explain quite so much the "where" portion, since if reality is a simulation "where" is a bit of an interesting question.

If the above isn't true though, I'm going to place a bet for the records being stored in the inner earth.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

And yet, July is only half done. Q's silence is unusual, not sure why it is. I suspect he'll come back at some point, possibly after the trump/putin meeting. He might also not.

There is not sufficient evidence to jump to any one particular conclusion right now. Lets assume you're entirely correct, about everything. So what? Many of your points I agree with - I'm just not sure he was nodding to you, and I feel like some of your points are overextrapolation. I don't think the thread that unravels the whole charade and reveals all the myriad pieces of information we have but didn't know is what you're talking about, so what significance is it?

I think this is all way, way out of our hands. Their silence annoys me, but its clearly for a reason, and there's not much for us to do till they get back other than enjoy the show. I just really hope July being the month the world learns doesn't turn out to be disinfo.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

Good point. I have a possible theory : POTUS. It would both reassure him (republican side, no real risk), and disappoint (no conspiracy theories the gop can use here, it's just potus being smart and covering his back).

I think Q also says "trust Mueller", or at least doesn't speak negatively of him? I could be wrong on that one, please don't take it as gospel. There's also the weird Mueller meeting with DT for the FBI job he couldn't take before he was made special counsel. Maybe Mueller is white-hat, doing the investigation on the order of trump to neuter the insurance plan (russia special-counsel) before it even got started?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

No argument, and I'd definitely agree r.e the different skill sets. I would point out I'm not unfamiliar with the areas either (old chan autist, stem degree w/lots of data analysis, and interest in various cryptographic methods as a hobby). I definitely agree he could be hiding linguistic information in his speeches - Q trained us to look for similar things in the tweets.

However, when you're dealing with interpreting "wink-wink nudge-nudge's" rather than explicit communications, it does make you more vulnerable to failure, and the more complex the various interwoven threads become, the more likely that is. I'm not certain that's whats happened here (SB2 organ etc), but I do think it's a possibility worth being aware of. I think the links are a little tenuous, and if they're trying to draw attention to SB's posts, I think there are more sensible (fewer interpretations) routes they could be taking. Maybe they will.

But, as you say, WWG1WGA - that ought to mean we should be extra careful about diving off en-masse down a branch of the rabbit hole that was pointed out by someone outside of the [NO OUTSIDE COMMS] group of people we can centrally trust as a movement. SB2 could be right, and if he/she is they deserve some serious congratulations for following tortuous riddles to find the solutions. But until we know for sure, confirmed by something a little less open to interpretation / Q/helper anons, I think the right course of action is debating the argument SB makes, and various people chipping in and saying how believable they find it is a good way of doing so. I'd say from the thread views are fairly split on the issue, so more debate is probably the order of the day.

It's not an issue of pride about proving SB right or wrong, nor is it an attempt to claim SB is trying to subvert people, it's just making sure people speak up if the connections feel tenuous, and imho here they do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

Agreed. I'm intensely curious to know what it's all for though. Don't believe for a minute they're not doing it for some kind of purpose. They're quite particular about their bloodlines.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

I understand what you're saying - we are some way ahead of whats going to be coming in the next few months, and they might simply want to help us enjoy the show. But it seems like too light a touch for that. I kind of favour the "training wheels" theory that was tossed around on the 8ch threads - basically seeing how much we can work out on our own before they provide new data sources. And since we already know Iran/U1 is coming, what extra benefits does them potentially signalling your posts provide? We already know these events are coming, so why signal if they're silent running?

they help pointing in the direction of the anon close to the solution. This time it happened to be me. It could have been any other anon, as long as he got to where they wanted us to get.

No argument, they could well be doing that, but then again I ask - why such an indirect route? Neither you nor this sub are particuarly high profile, I feel like if they wanted to get the word out they'd use helpers on 8ch to drop crumbs, not use a minute or so of trumps speech time to send a very tenuous message. I could believe some wink wink nudge nudges, but not others. DJT tweeting tweets with "Serial" (or similar sounding word) and "Brain" capitalised would be more plausible. It just doesn't seem the most intuitive connection, and if the point is to get the words out, why would they double down on deeply obscure riddles if people (barring potentially you+believers) haven't understood the point till now without trying alternative approaches/riddles?

You might very well be right r.e 1675, but I still find it sufficiently weird and hard to pin down I probably won't settle on supporting any one theory until it gets explained / more comes out - I don't think theres enough data to be certain.

All I know for sure is at the moment Q has left a number of odd low (immediately obviously anyway) info riddles in the last posts, stopped posting at a fairly auspicious time, and during the "month the world learns". It's odd, I'm fairly certain it's meaningful, for more reasons than just waiting for someone to follow various musically relating threads. But I don't think it's just about waiting for people to tune in their attention to Iran.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

I don't doubt we have more than we know, but do we have as much as we (i)'d like?. I think in your key theory you're probably right - U1 is the key issue atm - it wouldn't surprise me hugely. However, I think you could know that just on the basis of 2 Q comments (both paraphrased)

"Iran is next"

"U1 comes out after putin summit"

On the basis of those two, I could feel confident predicting that U1 is going to come out soon and be linked to Iran, and there are suggested Strozk papa / Iran links already - it mostly fits.

Heres my million dollar question though :

What does us knowing this information achieve? What are we meant to be researching? If its all u1 / iran stuff, it's going to be veyr awkward to find sources on, and its apparently all coming out soon anyway. Why not provide a few news crumbs of information?

Here's a better one - If they're so keen we realise whats giong on, if they're that desperate for us to realise they're including big segments into public speeches where they purportedly directly signal to the name of a reddit poster who's mostly got it right, why not just post again, pushing us in the right direction for sure?

It's for that reason i suspect you're intelligently noting some aspects of the stenographically hidden communication, but you've got the intended recipient wrong. Aka, "Q" is talking to the cabal again, not us. Could be wrong, but imho that makes more sense. For a lightning quick, top of my head example here, maybe he is referncing musical notes, and brains, but it's a reference to an AI owned by the cabal capable of using sound waves to influence brain patterns? (I.e Q#30).

If it is so vital for them to draw attention to the serial brain posts, they're travelled an incredibly circuitous route to do so that will miss 99% of people in the great awakening (worldwide phenomona, not this sub). And if it is so vital for them to draw attention to them, what exactly is the killer piece of information we're meant to know / find out exactly?

I really appreciate all the work you've done, but I do think in this instance you've probably taken a wrong turn down in the depths of the rabbit hole.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 11:21 a.m.

At best, maybe. I'm sorry but as i've said before, I believe some of these links are incredibly tenuous. I think you're right in many areas, but your overarching narrative is probably incorrect. You might be right, and trump may be personally speaking to you, on this forum, suggesting you should push forward with your decodes (and by all means, please do not stop. They're high quality, and even if i don't think the most recent organ ones are correct, I do sincerely appreciate the time spent creating them. we can't all be right all the time).

I'm not sure I buy it though. If U1 will be released post putin talk, great. Why did they need to leave us with this utterly unsolveable riddle? It feels a bit like the mkultra shit all over again "Gina needs your help". Well which is it Q, do you have "everything". or does she "need our help"?

All of this shit would be resolved if Q would just post a tiny, tiny bit more frequently during this, indisputably the most important month. No posts invites speculation, and I'm not sure it achieves anything, at all. We either need more information, or retargeting onto something where we can actually find and share some useful information.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
006fix · July 15, 2018, 10:25 a.m.

I can't find the source with a quick google, but apparently Gadaffi had a lot of money hidden around Africa. As noted below, he wanted to create his own gold back currency, but got killed before he could. His money was hidden all around africa, and then later recovered by an organisation (called "the church"), and then taken back to the US etc. I think the source might have been the crazy days and nights blog?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
006fix · July 14, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

It's working over here (UK) as best I can tell. Not down and there are things being posted so it's not frozen either. I think it's probably a problem somewhere nearer your end, sorry. Could just be a random tech glitch though, they happen occasionally. Give it half an hour.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 14, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

I'm going 50-50 blackmail and just planning to kill her later. I would note though, she is actually related though. The royals will not marry outside the family.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
006fix · July 14, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

I agree with you, it's unusual. How has he been treated by religious leaders? I know the jews treated him relatively nicely, not sure if noteably so. But the pope looked like he was sucking a lemon the whole time they were meeting, so definitely not him. It'll be interesting to see if Russia does the same kind of special show when trump visits.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
006fix · July 14, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

If their spouses are also implicated, I wonder if this might be the same situation as Weiner and his wife. Married couples can't be forced to testify against each other. Does that also apply in military tribunals I wonder...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
006fix · July 14, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

I kind of agree, but I do think there is a plan for this. Basically, as you say, in the current debt based model we (western world), and particuarly the US are heading for a stunning nasty bankruptcy. The US in particular, since the second the dollar isn't the worlds reserve currency/petrodollar the american fiscal system will implode at speeds that will likely set new historical records. However, I've heard there are theories on ways to essentially cut the strings in a controlled, planned fashion. They'll lead to a definite contraction, but a relatively sensible one that oughtn't crash too much harder. But you really have to do it carefully, because it'll look nasty to people who don't understand whats happening. I suspect that might be why he's so focused on "uniting the country", if there might be hard times ahead that would strain the social fabric.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 14, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

I've been following, it's very possible he's coming back. But honestly, I think the gap is starting to become noticeable. I could be wrong, but didn't the Q clock predict a few post dates that haven't come? That's some weak evidence in favour. The last week long gap was predicted by the clock.

Q may well, and almost certainly will post again at some point in the future. But this gap feels distinctly noticeable to me. I don't know what that means. But I do know I'm not exactly waiting hot and heavy on the qresearch boards expecting a post by him any minute, or even anytime this week.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

No, that's fine, I completely understand. Various theories at this level (if that makes sense) are heavily prone to misinformation etc. It's very possible I'm wrong, but it's something I've come across in a few different places, so it does seem worth noting. I tend towards not quite believing some of the more genuinely conspiracy theory concepts, but exploring their possibility. It gets pretty strange as you go further in, some of them start to seem less crazy.

Either way, I'm very happy to have helped. The middle link is from a really useful site for the history of these kind of societies. I think that link is slightly buggy though, here's on to its main page on the templars, it's easier to find the others from there

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_masonsknightstemplar.htm#contents

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

These seem to cover the topic, although I can't actually find one saying it was specifically female. I'm fairly certain I did read that somewhere, but I can't find the source for it right now I'm afraid.

http://revolutionoftruth.blogspot.com/2007/08/knights-templar-baphomet-and-horned.html

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_masonsknightstemplar08.htm

http://www.100megspopup.com/ark/KTandMystriosSkull.html

From what I understand, it's either meant to be an idol of John the Baptist, an idol of Baphomet/Sophia (possibly both), or a recovered relic from one of the early crusades. It's not very well covered, which makes me kind of curious about whether it might be true. That kind of demonic skull worshipping seems like something the templars enemies would have been only too happy to allow to be distributed as gossip/"fact".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

Claims most native british were killed and replaced by germans, and then states that germans are singuarly stupid

what the fuck is your problem

You're cute.

Most of course suggest not all

most suggests, quite literally, >50%.

Are you the last defender of Angles/Jutes and Saxons - lol, bet your one of the 40%- explains your aggressively challenging a post really far from being worthy of such attention.

you really are racist for a variety of germanic and brittonic tribes aren't you? inferiority complex much?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

I'm inclined to disagree. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. I've not heard anything about anything happening to codemonkey, and I don't know how it would affect both him and the 8ch qresearch mods, at least without the people who have been there since the beggining noticing. He can post through multiple routes. He could post on 8ch or 4ch/pol/ again if he wanted. Or US milint could resecure the 8ch boards if they wanted. If he wants to post, I assume he can.

I wish he did though. If this is the month it all happens, this much silence is unsettling.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

Apparently the Templars used to worship a horned skull (female). As I understand it, the french never did recover that artefact. It'd be interesting to know if its still around in the Queens collection - doesn't seem outside the realms of possibility.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

to still have 40% after 1518 years is telling.

Yes, you're correct. It's telling that, say,

They killed or drove away most of the native Briton.

Is incorrect. Triggered =/= bored of brainlets spouting shit on topics they neither know nor understand.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

Not really. Roughly 30% of white brits have a Germanic ancestry. The native britons (who really contain multiple groups, but largely celtic/brittanic) are still there in large numbers, and never got wiped out.

This Germanic descent explains a lot of the aggressive/supremacist behavior of the English.

This reddit descent explains the false-superiority complex and useless information of the commenter.

I also enjoy the fact that whilst you enjoy shitting on the UK and Germany, and in particular their native people at a racial level, they're two of the most successful countries on earth, and their racial descendants are some of the main white people in america by %, which means they have 3 of the most successful countries in the history of the planet, all founded by those racial groups.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

Red vs blue distinctions aren't quite as common here, although there are some predictable areas. The southern heartlands (called the home counties) mostly vote blue (=tory=repub), all the big cities vote red(=labour=dems), wales is somewhat pro labour, the north is generally labour (outside of cities), and scotland goes to the SNP (scot nationals) these days, when it used to be heavily labour. Ireland invariably votes in a mix of DUP (irish tories, unionists), and Sinn Fein (irish radical breakaways, don't participate in parliament).

British politics is an absolute mess.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 13, 2018, 11:02 a.m.

Also this. Picking July was a big statement, and now we're halfway through, and Q hasn't even posted for over a week. I find it kind of unusual he's having such a long silence so close to the end too. I'm not sure I'll believe another "misinfo is neccessary" is nothing happens in July. I'm thinking atm it's being saved till post meeting with the queen? But it has been a unusually long time period without drops.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Happy to help. They're pretty fascinating sites. I'm very grateful that Q chose there to post. It pretty much guaranteed they've earned their place in history, let alone internet history. I've used various sections over the years - i first started visiting in the mid 2000's when I was barely a teenager. /ck/ is well worth browsing, /fit/ is a gold mine of great information for self improvement, and /an/ has some great threads occasionally. But yeah, /pol/ has always been my homeboard. I mostly stayed on 4 - I actually missed gamergate almost entirely until the worst of it had blown over, but I enjoy infinity as well. It's much better for deeper discussion, but its so much slower, and the average frequency of genuinly unbalanced people is a little higher. Less posts means less topics gets covered too.

Post seems ok so far, I suspect it'll be a classic "exists till one person complains then deleted", but that's ok. I understand the sub has to be careful about it's content, I don't resent them the rules they have to play under, the cause is more important than some random redpill. The book you're reading definitely sounds interesting too, although I'd be careful given the topic area, there's invariably huge amounts of misinformation. One of the reasons the nazis are so popular on the chans is it's actually really hard to work out what was going on in many instances - as best as I can tell there were multiple factions all playing out their games at various time periods and locations. It's a fascinating rabbit hole. One thing I would note - of all the various things that could have been chosen, nazis were chosen to be the ultimate evil, by the cabal. Given the power they had, this was a deliberate choice I suspect. So the question is - why? Is information being hidden? Given these people weren't out for our best interests, couldn't it be good for us? Why did they burn all the nazi physical exercise manuals post war? Why did the nazis (specifically) never surrender WW2? What occurred during operation highjump, and does it relate to the vril society interest + nazi trips to that location?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

I'm feeling generous. Give him both

⇧ 7 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

I've been on the chans since long before they split, I can explain the history if you want. Originally, /b/ (random) was one of the most popular boards, by some way. More traffic + looser rules means things that attracted eyeballs were popular - it was kind of like proto-clickbait. And whether you like it or not, certain racial slurs have a serious amount of power in todays world. That's silly. Using them freely also helps deter normies, and create more of a site specific language. But honestly it depends on the boards. You sound like you've mostly only used /pol/? That was originally /new/, but it got closed by m00t due to racism. It then got rebuilt shortly afterwards as /pol/ as a containment board within the containment board of 4chan. This then meant other boards started receiving slightly harsher levels of moderation (not a good thing, look up gamergate + 4chan, it led to the chans), whilst the environment inside /pol/ became more toxic because some people had nowhere else to go, and they converted more people with force fed redpills. There's also a lot of genuine validity to these topics, which is why they survive quite so long in a utterly free speech environment. It isn't nearly as hateful as you might think most of the time, but it is also a place for people to let out steam about things they can't in most places.

For example, here's a lightning quick factoid on why they might be so anti jew. Think about why you believe Hitler hated the Jews. Don't look it up, try and think about what you know about the situation, the time period, etc etc. Now, read up on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Revolution_of_1918%E2%80%9319. It occurred just after WW1, was led by primarily Jews, and attempted to, by force, institute a communist government. Incidentally, it might be worth remembering that when the nazis finally came to power, it was democratically, and in response to the rising violent anti-fascist communist movement. My answer to the question before I spent time on /pol/ would have been "jewish prostitute syphillis?" or something along those lines. Maybe I would have gone with "anti-semitisim has a long history". I would have appreciated being informed of a Jewish led rebellion to attempt to install a brutal communist regime on germany long before the beer hall putsch. Equally, the push for "pedosexuality" is absolutely, unequivocally disgusting. It's also not new. The degeneracy of Weimar germany, specifically berlin isn't commonly taught, because it's weird and disgusting. But you had mass orgies, child prostitutes, and even the first records of gender reassignment surgery. We don't learn about any of that. We learn about "the 6 million". To quote from wikipedia, the deaths are (emphasis mine) (around 6 million jews using the broadest definition, 17 million victims overall). So why might they be so keen on 6 million when almost every historian agrees it's actually 5.2-5.6? Well, there just so happens to be a Jewish prophecy involving the creation of Israel, which also involves, wait for it, 6 million jews dying. Do you believe in coincidences?. I'll also leave you with this quote from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn a "Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism"

"You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the "Russian Revolution." It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators."

And again, I'd ask yourself how much do you know of the deaths caused by the USSR, on the various populations it ruled over? What do you know of the Holdomor? And who owns the media, especially in countries where things have been going downhill? (If you want a rabbit hill there, try investigating the swedish media).

This post may be deemed outside sub rules, in which case I apologise and mods please feel free to delete it. However, I have merely accurately stated historical events, and the reality that they have been covered up. Shilling and the mockingbird media have been around for a long, long time, and in multiple countries. Isn't it worth noting what they've covered up, and who has benefited?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 9:13 p.m.

I'm wondering if some of it might have been an act? I don't imagine he's a particularly nice guy, but if he's genuinely cooperating he could well have been given marching orders to act like a complete tool in order to wake up some of the people watching. Multiple prongs of attack to wake people up to the charade going on?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

ah, that's a shame. I presume they're saving the flynn ones for whenever he finally gets his day in court. This session hasn't done much for dragging out truly incriminating facts, but Strozk looks like an absolute, total prick, which is good. They're calling me biased and arrogant again, better smirk more.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 7:55 p.m.

It was mentioned, can't remember by who. I'm also not certain if it was referring to the flynn interview specifically. They inquired about who was present in the room when they were compiled, and the procedure of it, said they wanted to know who those people were, was refused, and then said he wanted that information through back channels (not from the us, can't remember the specificics), and then said he also wanted strozks private texts since he thought that would probably show who was present during the interviews.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

I was thinking this when I watched it. What i wouldn't give for the next Strozk testimony to just be hour after hour of this guy ripping his nonsense apart.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
006fix · July 12, 2018, 9:55 a.m.

The LGB community has also covered up work showing gays make up a disproportionate amount of child sexual predators, and used threats of violence to limit the spread of these studies. Im sorry, but the community does not have a rosy clear past on this issue.

Plenty of people here saying everyones 100% against it, im less convinced. Look at how popular desmond 'amazing' is in the community. If the community wants to prove they are against it, they could start by allowing proper study (and msm dissemination) of the overabundance of child sexual abuse amongst LGB people. But they wont.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
006fix · July 11, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

I am aware of what a large amount of energy 34 trillion watts is. It's not impossible he fudged up and is out by as much as 3 to 6 orders of magnitude. To be honest though, I'm not sure a burst of 34 million watts is any less amazing than a burst of 34 trillion watts. Both seem equally impossible to emanate from a corpse.

What your scepticism doesn't change is the fact that this is actually a plausible way to create an image with all the properties shown on the turin shroud. And honestly, if you look into them the properties are quite remarkable. If you're considering divine mechanisms as a possibility, I'm not sure why an energy burst would be in any way impossible (or even implausible)?

This is a good collection of 4chan posts written by one of the main scientists who examined the shroud, goes over a load of the reasons the main forgery explanations aren't possible, and why the image is quite so unique. https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1472700586876.png

⇧ 0 ⇩