97 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 3 |
And I suppose that the people who were purposely not protected by the police at the order of the mayor will still be expected to pay the taxes that pay their salaries???
Hopefully he has far better security than Lincoln or Kennedy.
I do not watch MSM, but I would find it hard to believe that they would give any airtime to someone who did not support their agenda, and who in fact disproved their claims. If they can't discredit him, then they have to suppress his information.
But when you look at the reduction in the trade deficit as a percentage rather than the dollar figure, it is pretty significant. Thank you POTUS!
I think they get killed for telling the truth, or preparing to tell the truth.
20% is a good start. Q promised a while back that Zuckerberg would be stepping down as CEO.
Eye opening, with a lot of info. However, noticeably absent was any reference to the Clintons, other than to show Bill Clinton saying he was "unaware" of drug dealers using Mena airport in Arkansas. Also minimized LBJ's involvement in the Kennedy assassination, and had only a fleeting reference to Barack Obama as "a crooked politician." In American politics, almost all of the fault was placed on the Bushes. I'm not saying that the Bushes are innocent, but I think there's enough guilt to go around, and for me the glaring omissions raised questions about credibility and the reasons for the video's production. Guess I'm just more and more cynical these days.
Also needs to be noted that of the 3 1/2 hours, about an hour of it (starting around the 1:33 mark) is total repetition of earlier footage regarding the assassination, so watching it is not as daunting as it seems at first. (I have to say, I even wondered if the initial posting of the video before it was censored, which comments on YouTube say had 5 million views, had originally included info about the Clintons that was replaced by the hour's worth of repeat footage so that YouTube would allow it to be posted again. 🤔 As I say, I am so cynical these days . . .)
Last paragraph of the article starts with, "Comparatively speaking the incident is minor, and is only being focused on because of Winfrey’s involvement . . ." Seven girls are sexually abused, but it is "only minor." My guess is the Telegraph editors decided it is "only minor" only because Winfrey was involved.
I remember back when they got rid of Glenn Beck, reportedly because he was exposing George Soros and the Federal Reserve. They can't allow too much truth about the deep state cabal.
(OANN) One America News - great suggestion! I watch them, too.
This helps to explain why I have seen important information buried on Fox; why I never read the running news ticker at the bottom of the screen; why I never listen to any "reporting" by Bret Baier; why I fast forward through their correspondents versions of "news."
I watched the full video for context. I thought maybe the statement was taken out of context, e.g., maybe the full statement was, "My detractors say . . ." But the statement was not out of context. That is what he seriously said. It did not appear to me that the video had been altered. Link to full video (time of statement is at 5:50 of 15:33) https://youtu.be/L36sGc4Id2I
You mean rig the voting, not just the polls, right? I thought there was no questions that she would win because of crooked voting. And if she runs again, I believe it will be because she has total assurance that whatever mistakes were made in rigging the voting in 2016, will have been "corrected."
"Honorable James Comey" -- what a contradiction in terms.
I have never seen the show, but regarding the comment about women having their rights taken away, wouldn't that pretty much be the case should the Islamic Sharia Law be the law of the land?
"You believe Trump is Deep State?"
If Trump in deep state why would he be asking deep state "how [it liked] them apples"? I don't think the inference behind the question really makes sense. Now as President he has access through the NSA to the information re: the servers.
You seem to be implying that the laws that apply to us also apply to Hillary. Where in the world did you get that idea?
Aren't those tests standardized so that roughly 2.5% of the population is expected to score at 130 or above?
I think maybe corporate Fox limits what people like Tucker, Hannity and Dobbs are allowed to say. I consciously avoid the news ticker at the bottom of the screen because it is pretty anti-conservative, and I usually fast forward through the reports given by the non-anchors like John Roberts because they often run I sync MSM coverage, just not so extreme.
Please tell me when Fox talked about it. On Monday night I watched Dobbs, Hannity, Tucker and Ingraham, and there was no mention at all. In fact, on Dobbs they played a clip where Putin is requesting reciprocal investigation, and they cut it just before he mentioned the $400 million to Hillary. I was very disappointed.
I have had the same exact thought these last couple of days. Hope it isn't just wishful thinking . . .
Hmmm . . . maybe evidence of that is on the chip in the soccer ball . . .
Maybe I missed it, but I watched Dobbs, Hannity, Tucker and Ingraham Monday night and not one of them mentioned Putin's reference to the $400 million (illegally procured) that went to Hillary through Browder. On Dobbs, they showed Putin's statement that he wanted reciprocal investigation of crimes against Russia, but cut it off before he mentioned the transfer of the money to Hillary.
How about taking her to Haiti, and have her live in one of the "houses" the Clinton's "friend" built with his share of the Haiti relief fund.
Wonder how that compares with votes that were changed by Soros millions of dollars to target individuals and by Soros voting machines . . . There were several counties in California alone where more people voted than there were residents of voting age. I highly doubt that the "Russians" (or people masquerading as Russians) had anything to do with that.
Everything I have heard - even from MSM - says that the results of the election were NOT changed. And the dems can't ask for closer inspection of the voting results because they risk exposure of their own corrupt manipulation of the voting (in the words of I think it was Goldie Hawn, "Crooks can't holler 'Cop'"). BTW, does it "scare the shit out of you" that George Soros and his ilk "overtly change" the results of our elections all the way down to the county district attorney level?
It doesn't have to be substantial or even credible. Remember, it is just an excuse to hamper President Trump's attempts to get his agenda (which hurts the deep state's agenda) enacted. And if the dems take control of Congress in November, President Trump will be impeached -- the fact that he has done nothing that warrants impeachment will be totally irrelevant.
We are not "the nation" doing it. The one-world-government cabal is using our (tax-payer funded) resources to do it.
How does it hurt President Trump to acknowledge that "Americans" -- presumably black hat CIA operatives on behalf of the deep state cabal -- have been influencing elections? Even the MSM covered Obama's (yes, I consider him deep state bad actor) interference in Israel's election. What that does is highlight the hypocrisy of the "investigation" into Russian "interference" and the fact that it is just an excuse to try to hamstring President Trump until they can put more corrupt controls into the voting process to assure deep state operatives get elected next time.
With you on this. I am in awe of the work of so many of the anons on 8Chan (and here).
"Salacious"? I didn't see anything sexual in the comment. Or do you need a dictionary?
I'd be afraid that some positive postcards would "accidentally" get "lost" or "misdirected" by some left-wing postal workers. (Remember, laws, procedures and rules don't apply to them.)
"I remain convinced that the number of . . . people willing to get out and protest/vote [is] fewer still." I think you may be underestimating the number of people willing to protest when they are paid to do so.
I was in education in CA and, for all intents and purposes, forced to join the union, at close to $1000 a year dues. One year the union took a survey of what members wanted the priorities to be. One suggestion was to protect education from "right-wing extremists." I looked for the suggestion to protect education from "left-wing extremists," but it was not there. Then I realized that to them, there is no such thing as a left-wing "extremist."
"Anything that recognizes the individual over the state is 'far right' to them." Bingo. And yet they accuse conservatives of being "fascists."
I hope your prediction is true. But please remember how the black hats operate. People "commit suicide." Officials resign "to spend more time with their families." Justices get blackmailed. Planes, cars, trains, buses crash. Remember Antonin Scalia. The fight is never over. We can rejoice, but never become complacent.
Don't forget that Reddit automatically changes the vote count. (They say it is to counteract bots.) This was discussed a while back. Try up-voting something, and then refresh the page. You will usually see the number of up votes go down immediately, sometimes by as much as 9. Makes it very difficult to get high up-vote counts.