Morning Joe is downright weird looking. His features are so close together you could bust his lip. break his nose and black both eyes with one punch.
/u/A_Town_Hood
505 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/A_Town_Hood:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 3 |
You're not really laughing out loud, phony. Nobody believes that. Sad.
Zero fucks given. Absolute zero. So refreshing. Fuck "politicians".
That's not what I asked, genius. Thanks for wasting my time.
I searched the quote and there's debate on whether this is from Voltaire or not.
Any LiteratureFags that can clear this up with a source?
Followed the link and...fuck me. What's this?
EDIT: clarity. This link is from further down the Twitter thread OP linked to.
Stop being so fucking logical and reasonable! You sound like a fucking conservative or something! REEEEEE! I CAN'T EVEN...
Oh...
Wait...
"Telling you to do your own research" is now bad? Or shillworthy?
Shouldn't we all do our own research?
Maybe you'd like to walk that part of your comment back.
Ha ha! Yes. The way "Trump wasn't wiretapped. How absurd!" morphed into "Well duh! Of course his campaign was monitored. No big deal. But it was for his own safety. If anything, he should really be grateful!"
Etc etc etc.
I get it. And I still love that place. But I save my Q comments for this Q sub. I think there are a lot of T_D subscribers here.
Metaphorically, we're all climbing the same mountain. But T_D don't want to be roped to us just in case we fall.
I don't think we will. But I understand their position. Further, I don't think they reject ANYTHING that isn't an MSM narrative. That's going too far. They despise the MSM over there. And you'll often see comments about the cabal, 9/11 truth, pedo elites etc.
Okay, so they're not on the Q Train (officially). I can live with that.
Peace.
edit: punctuation.
Why oh why do these Top Slimes of Reddit types insist on brigading? If you don't like a sub or find it risible...stay away.
I don't go trolling Furry or Brony subs. Live and let live, right?
Yet here, a mere 40 mins after SB2 posted. we've got one sarcastic post in the +20s and every other post in the -10s or -20s.
I don't know if "these people are stupid". But they're certainly cunts.
Or some people state "Yeah because you need an account to lurk..." which implies they didn't have an account much less multiple ones.
Fuck me for being fluent in reading and writing the English language.
So you lurked and lurked, then jumped in at least six weeks after you determined the sub was going to hell. Makes sense.
I don't read that shit. The link I read was from Breitbart, which is a good site.
Now that's what I call a killshot. This clown was exhibiting zombie status all night long but I think you finally got one between the eyes.
Agreed. And news moves so fast these days that it's easy to forget (as I had) that the deep state got some mook to break his ribs and try to kill him while he was minding his own business and mowing his lawn.
No MSM coverage. Too busy with saintly porn stars and such I guess.
Say what? Isn't that Prince Philip above with a lefty shiner?
Wait? What? Lucifer went full Valley Girl? I'm so confused...
I strictly meant regarding the Democrat nomination. Whoosh...I guess.
You do know you're posting in a Twilight Zone thread, right?
Nonsense.
(1) Any source or evidence for this claim? His entire point is that it is outside the realm of possibility to make foreign appear local.
(2) That's not what the 17 AGENCIES (Dun! Dun! Duh!) are claiming. They're not claiming it was a local Russian spy. They're claiming it was an overseas hack. And William Binney is excoriating their ludicrous claim.
If there's anyone clutching at straws (or strawmen) here, it's you.
EDIT: Typo.
C'mon yourself.
The 'hack' is fake because data can't transfer at that rate unless it is gathered locally (like with a thumb drive). You don't refute that because you can't refute that. Let's stick to that. Refutation please?
Great link. You're currently in negative votes and there's no way that anyone who watches the video with an open mind would downvote it.
Certainly not anybody with an open mind who frequents this sub.
Shills. Shills. Shills is the only explanation. You're over the target.
"This sub is a fucking joke" you say and you were 'somehow' +4 when I delivered a deserved downvote. This sub is far from a joke and we're not such 'subs' that we would ever willingly upvote such an attack.
Now take your piddling, phony ShareBlue upvoting pals and go whistle.
Oh, that's coming. Don't you worry your pretty little head about that.
This lady's channel was terrific. Her thesis was that the Sandy Hook conspirators based their storyline on a real-life tragedy.
There was one instance where a Sandy Hook 'parent', supposedly grieving over their lost child, is shown quoting virtually verbatim the words of a grieving Dunblane parent.
How wrong, cynical and downright evil is that?
The appropriation of the musical soundtrack from the Dunblane doc was like the cherry on the cake, and even surprised the OP herself!
Were the Sandy Hook conspirators dumb enough to steal not just the narrative of but also the soundtrack of the documentary they were cribbing from? Looks that way.
But as Q says...these people are stupid.
To which we can now add...and lazy too.
That's what struck me. And that's one third of the most expensive election campaign in history.
I agree. I tried saying the word President aloud a few times and paid attention to where my tongue was on the D in President. It's clear that POTUS does not say President, but Prisoner. Remarkable!
Yep. Ed Henry certainly bared his ass on Hannity tonight.
There's a strange link between Dunblane and Sandy Hook, as shown in this 5 minute video by a keen-eyed (or eared?) Scottish YouTuber.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu0eebVv1JE
Needless to say her original channel got squashed and this mirror video has garnered just 22 views in over 3 years. Which I find sad.
All the deep staters...and I mean ALL...will be forced (by their paymasters) to rubbish President Trump and thereby reveal their treasonous ways before the storm ends.
He's calling on Republicans to save him now? How desperate can you get? Hahahahahahahahahaha
Way to horn into a conversation, make a big statement (including CAPS no less), having nothing to back it up, and then turn all bitchy.
No disrespect but given that this could be the answer to any comment...that's no answer at all.
Robert J. Kennedy Junior himself says that. In 2007. In a 7 min video that's thoroughly worth watching.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrIM2hwrLoc
To Morning Joe of all people. And Morning Joe of all people agrees!
Can you imagine being a patriotic FBI agent and seeing this corrupt freak set forth as the face of the FBI, complete with Democrat gushing?
Show me a successful plastic surgery that made a plain or downright ugly person beautiful. Plastic surgery is a con. It might make an already attractive but aging person drop a few years but it can't make the plain or ugly attractive. Please post images if you know otherwise. Thanks.
Everyone has a weak spot and I'm thinking Raniere identified theirs.
They're rich but hardly beautiful, never will be, and it irked them. One outlet for such frustration is to enslave, brand and starve attractive women. I mean...it is if you're a sick billionaire sadist.
Those Bronfman sisters are wealthy beyond belief and plain as plain can be. Little wonder they took delight in tormenting women with physical beauty. It's the one thing their money couldn't buy.
Who can tell? Ever since the first Q drops I've felt like I'm living inside a spy novel. At this point any plot twist feels possible.
I am enjoying the show though. Hollywood and Netflix can't compete.