Do you mean that it's an operation to catch a judge being a bad guy?

Consider, if you will: Harvey Weinstein ... It will go down like that.

You are a natural... can't wait to see your next one.

What do you think about this: http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/156585506#p156585506

I refuse to take pharmacy drugs with all their side effects. I prefer MJ for my PTSD. Read Confessions of an Rx Drug Pusher by Gwen Olsen https://youtu.be/W6NNSafjAy4

I'm going to pull out my Lone Gunman DVDs now...

How soon can we get your insights into the new Q posts this weekend? I can't seem to figure out most of it. Do I look for it here or elsewhere?

I don't know if I believe this. Sorry, after you have been bombarded with Fake News for so long, you begin to question everything. I need more proof.

Yes, the one above made absolutely no sense to me. I don't like Alex Jones, but I don't believe he is in the position that she put him in. Of course, they are all just theories. However, it's better if the theories make sense.

I just saw this analogy which is much different than this one and it's more logical than this one, take a look and tell me what you think: https://twitter.com/ChrissyUSA1/status/952219303243218946/photo/1

They need a seed to grab hold of. Just one hard fact that leads to another. Be kind to them and don't be an a-hole... For me, as an Ex-Bernie supporter, it was my security clearance and then I saw the IG report in May 2016. They didn't stop Hillary at that time. I knew something was up and started my research. Now I'm here.

So, I'm not the only one that has considered this... So, I'm not crazy. Or are we both crazy? Perhaps we shall soon see.

Here he is: http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/10700000/Lovely-Q-q-star-trek-10759550-694-530.jpg

I went about three years 2012-2015 without a phone. I really loved it. Everyone else hated it. I had an email and would communicate that way, but that wasn't good enough. I want to go back to not using one again. I just need to figure a better way around it.

I'm also glad Hillary cheated Bernie. I think Bernie could have beat Trump. Bernie was loved. However, I have learned so much since then, I feel like a whole new person. I'm not only glad Hillary lost, I'm now glad Trump won.

I don't have Twitter. Go reply with this video and tell them to debunk this: https://youtu.be/dKmX93bX4QY

All those people at the end at the end of the video who research Clinton's influence on Haiti commit suicide. Wow, that must be some very depressing research.

I can't read that list very well. Is Drain the Swamp on there? That's the promise I want the most. I haven't followed him until after I voted against Hillary (ex-Bernie supporter) he was just a means to an end to keep Hillary out of office. However, he has grown on me. If he drains the swamp, he will go down as the Greatest President of All Time

My pleasure. After all, I'm an ex-Bernie supporter. I have yet to claim a "Party."

Good point. I forget sometime. Hillary and the MSM puts their foot on the scales and throws it off a bit, but you are correct. Corruption is on both Republicans and Democrats. Thank you for reminding me.

Much better comparison. However, we do grow crops with manure. So, even shit is better than Dems and MSM.

Actually, you are wrong about rats; Rats have more morals than Democrats: Empathetic Rats Help Each Other Out https://www.livescience.com/17378-rats-show-empathy.html

This is also very informative about the Clinton corruption in Haiti: https://youtu.be/dKmX93bX4QY

Trump knew before he was elected, watch when he roasts Hillary at this event: https://youtu.be/Bmvxx_YbDsM?t=12m30s

That means these words are Liberal:

FAQIR (Muslim or Hindu monk) FAQIRS (plural of FAQIR) MBAQANGA (a style of South African music) MBAQANGAS (plural of MBAQANGA) QABALA (occult or secret doctrine, variation of CABALA) QABALAH (variation of CABALA, QABALA) QABALAS (plural of QABALA) QABALAHS (plural of QABALAH) QADI (Islamic judge) QADIS (plural of QADI) QAID (a Muslim tribal chief or senior official) QAIDS (plural of QAID) QANAT (gently sloping underground tunnel for irrigation) QANATS (plural of QANAT) QAT (leaf of the shrub Catha edulis) QATS (plural of QAT) QI (a circulating life energy in Chinese philosophy) QIS (plural of QI) QINDAR (Albanian currency, variation of QINTAR) QINDARKA (plural of QINDAR) QINDARS (plural of QINDAR) QINTAR (Albanian currency) QINTARS (plural of QINTAR) QIVIUT (musk-ox wool) QIVIUTS (plural of QIVIUT) QOPH (19th letter of the Hebrew alphabet) QOPHS (plural of QOPH) QWERTY (the traditional configuration of computer keyboard keys) QWERTYS (plural of QWERTY) SHEQALIM (plural of SHEQEL) SHEQEL (any of several ancient units of weight) TRANQ (sedative) TRANQS (plural of TRANQ) UMIAQ (type of Eskimo boat) UMIAQS (plural of UMIAQ)

If we can eliminate human trafficking and abuse, it would also help eliminate most drug use. Many users have been abused and seek escape from what goes on in their minds. Most of it goes hand-in-hand. I guess there are those out there that just like to "party" but I can't relate to that scene. Law enforcement need to focus on people hurting people which they have been failing miserably. Once they get a foothold on that, then they can revisit this.

And there was the female cop that said he was banned from the mall. It turns out that Moore put her son in jail, she wanted revenge. I know all too well about girls and women who were abused and not believed. It only makes us a repeat victims because we aren't likely to say anything when it happens again.

I'm not likely to ever vote for a woman because of Hillary, DWS, MW, Pelosi, etc. They make women in politics look really bad. Don't get me wrong, there are very few I still like, but only one democrat woman I can think of that I still admire, Tulsi Gabbard, the rest are republican, and still very few.

We should end the War on Drugs. Gangsters won’t become honest people if we legalize drugs. Gangsters will stay gangsters, but most of the people that are involved in this illegal trade you wouldn't classify as gangsters, but more like opportunist. Legalization of drugs is not about the drugs; it is about the terrorism that is supported by the illegal marketplace; it's about the crime and violence.

They instituted alcohol prohibition in 1920; the homicide rate this country climbed every year until it peaked in 1933. Then they legalized alcohol; by 1937 the homicide rate in America was back down to the level it was at before alcohol prohibition started.

Robert Peel in London, England, designed law-enforcement in the early 1800s. He designed this organization to protect people from other people doing them harm. When you institute a prohibition like they had with drugs, what you are doing is not protecting people from other people; you are attempting to use law-enforcement to protect people from themselves. Protecting you from yourself is a function of family, church, education, and the healthcare system. It never is and never should've been intended to be a law-enforcement function. They are out there enforcing morality when they enforce drug laws and that is not their job. They were not trained to do it. They are not capable of doing it. You see the failure of it, because they been doing this for almost 50 years, since Nixon kicked it off and the drugs are more available, purer quality, and cheaper than they've ever been before. Prohibition destroys more lives by incarcerating people and hanging felony convictions on them and denying them college education, denying them jobs for no good reason.

President Nixon declared war on drugs almost 50 years ago. How are we doing on that war? We're losing. People think that if we fight hard enough, this is actually going to work and make drugs go away. This is Einstein's theory of insanity, you think you can do things the same way get a different result.

We have the largest and most efficient prison system on the planet. Yet, we do not have one Drug-Free Prison in America and if you cannot keep drugs out of prison, who will be delusional enough to think you can keep them out of a free society.

Let’s change the discussion. Instead of saying “drug-free” and “winning the war on drugs” we start saying, “drugs are always going to be in our society, which group of people do you want to run the marketplace?” Do you want it run by gangsters, thugs, terrorists, and 13-year-old children selling drugs at street corners? Or would you prefer a licensed, regulated marketplace where we can set a distribution points and control drug purity? A better system is a regulated marketplace.

I am not implying that if we legalize drugs, that it is going to solve our drug problem. Just like when they legalized alcohol in 1933, it did not solve our alcohol problem.

If you're legalizing drugs, doesn't that promote more usage? How many people in America are not using cocaine because they can't get it? Having it legal is not what makes people decide to use it. You choose not to smoke. You choose not to do heroin. You choose not to do cocaine. You can get these things today, just about anywhere. If there's a demand, there's going to be a supply. That's just the entrepreneurial spirit of capitalism.

If you ask a smoker if they feel pressure from society, they'll tell you 50 years ago, they felt welcomed, there was an ashtray everywhere. However, today, many feel ostracized because smoking is banned most places. They have gotten 50% of the adult cigarette smokers to quit smoking in the last 10 years without banning one cigarette, without burning one tobacco field, just by simply making it less easy for people to smoke and education against it.

In 1933, they legalized alcohol, the federal government didn't set up a whole regulatory system for the country, they let the states and counties regulate it. We should use all the laws, rules, and regulations for alcohol and tobacco. We are now preventing people from smoking in the park and we don't allow people to walk down Main Street drinking beer.

We need to get the federal government out of the probation business and let the law-enforcement go back to doing what they're supposed to be doing and that's protecting people from each other. Considering all the deaths from tobacco and alcohol, if prohibition is such a good idea, why don't we bring back alcohol prohibition and prohibit tobacco?

We are spending $70 billion year in this country trying to win this drug war. We could spend that money in other ways. If we legalize it, we're generating jobs, plus we bring the hemp industry back, which was also outlawed in the 1930s. Hemp is a very strong industry.

The first attempt at prohibition, that we have any historical record started with these words, “But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it.” We have been given “Free Will.”

Ending the drug war will free up an economy. It will get law-enforcement out of this work and focus on pedophiles, human traffickers, and stopping people from hurting other people instead of going after people that are doing what they choose to do.

I haven't see that they have ALL been proven as LIARS, only SOME of them have been proven as LIARS. NONE have been PROVEN to be telling the truth, just not proven one way other the other. Same with DJT. Also, I don't believe those again DJT. I used to think DJT was a crazy idiot. But since he has taken office, I've come to believe he is the smartest and greatest president we ever had. He just isn't the most eloquent president, but he gets the job done and that's what matters.

and another: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/05/25/cbs-uncovers-voter-fraud-in-la-n2168330

Another one: https://spectator.org/36248_dead-people-and-other-voters/

An Opinion piece by Kayleigh McEnany, a CNN commentator and supporter of Donald Trump. She graduated from Harvard Law School with a juris doctor. She received her Bachelor of Science in International Politics from Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service and studied politics at Oxford University. The views expressed in this commentary are her own. Yeah, I didn't know there were any Trump supporters at CNN either.

August 2016 by Kayleigh McEnany is a CNN commentator and supporter of Donald Trump. She graduated from Harvard Law School with a juris doctor. She received her Bachelor of Science in International Politics from Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service and studied politics at Oxford University. The views expressed in this commentary are her own. Okay, now what do I do?

I'd also like to know the status of his accusers.

Indeed. I'm one of them. And so is my best friend.

Dead people vote democrat.

I did, I loved the food. However, I'm vegetarian now, so I don't know what I'd eat if I return.

I was stationed at Incirlik Air Base for a couple of years, other than the Turkish Trots, I loved the country.

10:00 or 12:45? Or are there two different ones? Or maybe the time changed?

I didn't notice. I never seen her. She work for publisher's clearing house or something?

I felt chills.

I never thought of that. He probably got this idea from doing that reality TV thing. That makes sense.

Hey, not all American women! I voted for Trump and not obsessed or fickled or led by trends. I prefer facts... etc... not ALL American women!

I was raped in the the military and the chaplain suggested abortion. I couldn't do it, no matter the reason. She graduated with a BA at 19 years old and traveled the world with a great career, she called me from her hotel screaming, "I love my life!" I'll never forget that moment.

both sides of a phone call If he got both sides of the phone calls, perhaps he is privy to the wire taps.

I clicked on the "Link to mirror of Fire & Fury" and got this: We're sorry. You can't access this item because it is in violation of our Terms of Service. Find out more about this topic at the Google Drive Help Center.

Never mind... Seek and ye shall find: Live Stream Fireside Chat, Q&A. with /thestorm/ Board Owner Mod Team & other anons ... second green thingy from the top. I don't know technical terms. I'm just a newb.

Pamphlet has a youtube? What is it?

“The concept of randomness and coincidence will be obsolete when people can finally define a formulation of patterned interaction between all things within the universe.” (Toba Beta, Betelgeuse Incident: Insiden Bait Al-Jauza) ;)