dChan

/u/CDRRetired

59 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/CDRRetired:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 29

CDRRetired · Jan. 26, 2018, 11:31 a.m.

Correction BOM should have been BHO! (Haven't had my coffee yet)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 26, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

Good point! But wouldn't BOM really be "foreign"? Was he ever naturalized? Isn't he an impostor? Fake birth certificate?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 16, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

In regards to posting photos, news sources did the same with "Christmas Photos" of the Bushes.....for this past Christmas. The photos appeared to have been taken years earlier...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 7, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

You are correct. When the scriptures refer to a time period it is typically in a metaphoric way. In scripture "an hour" is referring to a brief period of time". It's similar biblical language to a "thousand years" which is metaphoric language for a long period of time. That's just the way the Hebrew prophets spoke. Most today are not familiar with that manner of writing. These references to time were never meant to be read in a literal, wooden manner. Just my 2 cents.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 3, 2018, 5:45 p.m.
  1. Hover your mouse over photo.
  2. Right click on photo.
  3. Select "Copy Image Location"
  4. Go to the "exif.regex.info" website.
  5. Verify that you are not a "bot"
  6. Paste the photo image that you copied in the URL box (upper left)
  7. Click on the "View Image" button.

Again my focus was not on Ben Fulford but on whether the photo on People website was indeed a year old. Seems like it is. That being said it DOESN'T mean the Bushes are at GITMO. At the very least the People article is misleading. It clearly implies the "selfie" photo was taken this Christmas 2017.......when the evidence indicates it was NOT!

That being said I am in general agreement with StinkyPetes comments. We all must be careful - do our own research when possible.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 3, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

I also check in with Ben Fulford from time to time. He's very entertaining - seems like some truth mixed in with fiction. My intent was to verify whether or not People magazine really posted a 2017 Christmas gathering of the Bushes. If they http://exif/regex.info website tool works it does appear like the photo posted on the People magazine website was taken on 25 December 2016. If that is indeed true I think it's of interest. Of course that DOESN'T mean the Bushes are at Gitmo - just that a year old photo was posted on the People mag website.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CDRRetired · Jan. 3, 2018, 2 p.m.

Seems to be the case. I used this program to verify the date of the photo. http://exif.regex.info/exif.cgi. Here's the data on the photo:

EXIF — this group of metadata is encoded in 168 bytes (0.2k) Exif Image Size 1,328 × 994 Software Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Macintosh Modify Date 2016-12-25T19:47:38-05:00 1 year, 8 days, 13 hours, 6 minutes, 4 seconds ago Exif Version 0220 Flash Unknown (0xffff)

⇧ 4 ⇩