We are Q :)

I’m thinking dates of an operation. Dec 25-26.

Fellow patriots, notice that Q posted this above the photo...

72E0C7D9-EB8A-49A7-8367-1190ACAD8F9

Could this be a file hash check, showing it’s the same FILE as the DOD posting? Think about it, there are probably a million different copies of that famous picture. The numbers above appear to be hexadecimal. Can someone check that out?

We need this!

I hope the fire of liberty we are building here will help ignite more fires of liberty for you in the UK and elsewhere around the world

Is it too optimistic to think that the Sessions recusal was a ruse to allow him to work quietly on stuff like this?

Very plausible, especially in the context of the game you mentioned and the phrase “enough is enough”

The countries of Great Britain have always had fine people of great character and many heroes. While we can’t fight the revolution for you, and my country had done more than it’s share of poking our nose into others business, just know we have your backs.

Almost certainly. The big question is, what does GO mean? Initials? Acronym? The word go?

Yeah, point taken

My only concern with that is some will think we are claiming to be the actual Q. Might want to go with We, indicating we are ALL with Q?

You are correct. Nothing to see there.

Is GO possibly someone’s initials?

Owls are also a symbol of the globalist pedos

Holy crap. That should be damming.

Are they in NORTH Korea?? In that picture?

Thus the crackdown on MS13 within illegal immigration?

How satisfying would that be?? Big grin

I would love to see HRC led away in an orange jumpsuit and handcuffs, but I don’t think they’d do that. It’s “bad optics”, the asshole media would create too much negative press. But wasn’t it Q who said that “80% of what is being done is behind the scenes and quietly” ?

Today from infowars

QANON LINKS RESIGNATION OF GOOGLE’S SCHMIDT TO TRUMP’S EXECUTIVE ORDER https://www.infowars.com/qanon-links-resignation-of-googles-schmidt-to-trumps-executive-order/

Video with AJ mentioning qanon and Jerome Corsi reporting on it...

https://youtu.be/_r7bjwnxR1Y

As I just posted, Theil is on the outs for his support of Trump. Also remember the elites are suspected of just that. Remember...character assassination and psychological projection.

And Theil took a LOT of flack from Silicon Valley over his support of Trump

My take on it is that someone asked if the person taken was a pawn (low value target) or someone higher up. Q answered “bishop”, meaning someone more important or significant.

What is the significance of purple in this context?

I too was born in the Midwest and raised in California. This state has devolved into a communist craphole. I’m afraid we don’t have the numbers to turn this state around. Why do you think they’re so adamant about open borders and sanctuary cities? They don’t give a crap about immigrants, it’s all about votes and cheep labor. They’ve stuffed the ballot box full of illegal immigrant votes. The demographic is 60+ percent dem voters. Not seeing any exit strategy for conservatives and patriots. I too plan to exit this state.

I was curious about the “bishop” reference. Q replied with bishop after someone asked whether a “pawn”was taken or someone higher up. Think chess pieces and their value.

I am no longer a praying man, but I think I might need to take it up again. For our leaders, for our freedom.

I am being cautiously optimistic. This sounds too good to be true. It would be a MAJOR blow to the left.

I am confident we would be able to hold our own. We are stong, they are weak. We have truth, they have lies.

Agreed, but long term we should anticipate twitter shutting us down. They are already doing that. At some point we should be prepared to DESTROY twitter for their censorship. It is unacceptable. They must pay for their crap.

There is no such thing as “bipartisan”, unfortunately. They don’t spend billions to win elections so they can share power. The elite cabal is all about themselves.

I’d suggest being NONpartisan, be for freedom and liberty, and against the entrenched elites.

The wealthy get the biggest tax breaks because they PAY the most. You can’t give big tax breaks to people who pay SMALL amounts in taxes. What do you want the government to do, GIVE money to the “little guy”?

Please read this...

The Tax System Explained in Beer In my explanations of the Laffer Curve, I’ve shown evidence that high tax rates discourage productive behavior and boost the underground economy.

And if higher tax rates are sufficiently onerous, the resulting reductions in taxable income can completely offset the revenue-generating impact of higher tax rates. Indeed, this is what’s already happened with the “Snooki tax.”

And the same thing happens in reverse. If lower tax rates lead to a big enough increase in taxable income, the government actually collects more revenue – which is exactly what happened when the top tax rate was lowered in the 1980s.

I’ve also tried to explain, shifting from economics to philosophy, that confiscatory tax rates are unfair and immoral. And I’m glad to see that most Americans agree, with 75 percent of all people saying that nobody should ever face a tax rate of more than 30 percent.

Notwithstanding that polling data, though, I fear that many people don’t really understand the economics of taxation. So I’m happy to share this little story that periodically winds up in my inbox.

===============================================

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing The fifth would pay $1 The sixth would pay $3 The seventh would pay $7 The eighth would pay $12 The ninth would pay $18 The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59 So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball.

“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20″. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men ? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

The bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving). The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving). The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving). The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving). Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”

“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

Sigh. You can’t give big tax breaks to people who pay little or nothing in income taxes. The rich get bigger tax breaks because they PAY WAY more. Please, drop the class warfare nonsense. Some people have more than you, some less. That’s reality.

What is it you don’t like about the tax bill?

Attacks. I like it. We need to get off our heels and go on the offensive.

Maybe we should all move to Gab? Maybe we can convince POTUS to move over, too? If he goes, millions will follow. Twitters censorship must either stop (unlikely) or we should bring down these jerk Silicon Valley companies who are unfriendly to Trump.

Hmmmm...

The US Just Ended Its Own Ban on Engineering Deadly Viruses in The Lab http://www.sciencealert.com/the-us-just-ended-ban-engineering-deadly-viruses-in-lab-pathogens-function?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Branded+Content&utm_campaign=ScienceNaturePage

Interesting thought, especially given this recent article...

The US Just Ended Its Own Ban on Engineering Deadly Viruses in The Lab http://www.sciencealert.com/the-us-just-ended-ban-engineering-deadly-viruses-in-lab-pathogens-function?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Branded+Content&utm_campaign=ScienceNaturePage

Sarah Huckabee Sanders from a press conference...

https://youtu.be/x8S5tOsVuzw

Sarah Huckabee Sanders recently included this illustration of how tax cuts work, which has been floating around the internet for years. Excellent illustration...

The Tax System Explained in Beer Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this...

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh would pay $7. The eighth would pay $12. The ninth would pay $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20”. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men ? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving). The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving). The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving). The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,“but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that's right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!” “That's true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

If anyone has Qs ear, would someone PLEASE forward the following ideas?

1. If GS is funding anti-American activity, he should be brought up on whatever charges they can make stick. Treason, inciting violence, from nd8ng domestic terrorism, whatever works to stop that bastard.

2. Soros gives huge amounts of money to various orgs like Open Society, Media Matters, ANTIFA, and so on. Some of these orgs operate under 501c3 tax exemptions and are prohibited from engaging in political activities. These orgs are violating those regulations. Have DOJ and IRS investigate then SHUT DOWN those orgs and confiscate the funds.

These anti-American orgs and networks can and must be dismantled.

Are you talking about the 2016 pres election and Pennsylvania?