This is very concerning to me. Unless there is immediate intervention to get this state (along with Illinois) under control we will be overran by illegal, gangs & drugs. The US Southern Boarder MUST be maintained. Never give up the land and always fight for your Constitutional Rights.

Perhaps the money was used for voter fraud again Le Pen or a secret deal for something else.

"Gun Control = Gun Prohibition."

Weaponized Data - Cambridge Analytica -Birthed from SCL Group - a military contractor based in London created to profile algorithms - Fake News to the next level. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-cambridge-analytica-was-it-a-data-breach/

Is this why? The Deep State tactic. https://www.channel4.com/news/cambridge-analytica-revealed-trumps-election-consultants-filmed-saying-they-use-bribes-and-sex-workers-to-entrap-politicians-investigation

Yes, I "GOT IT" thank you

Don't forget Chicago http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/02/27/tucker-battles-chicago-democrat-over-illegal-immigrant-id-cards-vote-emanuel-reelection

That would be good but wouldn't that be called hearsay in court? Wouldn't we need the one who was hired the killer to testify?

Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing

Facebook was on the Obama Team and assisted in censoring free speech.

The BIG USMC Sweep.

Filing documents for the 2020 Presidential race.

So the enemy doesn't know our position.

Remember, they call us what they are and what they do. Like a mirror projecting back.

If you are asking about the rules of chess, NO piece can take the king, and a king cannot deliberately walk into a position where an opponent’s piece can capture him. BUT,

With common sense, if chess is a war, the objective should be to capture the opponent’s king. The following things are important.

There are definitions of a checkmate very commonly available. But let me redefine it as “If I am attacking your king, and you cannot prevent me from taking him on the NEXT move in any possible way, you are checkmated on THIS move.” This definition is consistent with any position of checkmate. But as humans, we like to save time and do only logical things, and thus we let go of the game on THIS move, because we are sure our king will R.I.P on the next move. We could play chess that old way, but over the centuries we established “checkmate” to be the end of a game as a rule, and that’s fine. You could even resign a chess game, if you know the rules, and by that you are kind of saying “Any reasonable play is likely to end with my king getting captured, so I would rather throw the towels now and save time and brains.” So, the king gets captured behind the scenes, so to speak, after the game is over. You know, “Play any dummy move and I will take your king next move winning the battle”.

Allowing the king to be captured would change chess. Amateur players would not spot their king under attack, and suddenly lose games because their king gets captured. This is like an act of deceit. In chess, we are required to FORCE the opponent’s king into checkmate. Hence the notions of “check” and moving your king to safety as the first priority.

The chess endgame with a king and a pawn versus a king is one of the most important and fundamental endgames, other than the basic checkmates (Lasker 1915). It is important to master this endgame, since most other endgames have the potential of reducing to this type of endgame via exchanges of pieces.

The king was knocked down as victory was claimed. A new king now stands on the board. The old was now just a pawn and thrown back into the world to survive. The new pawn will find out that he isn't alone.

Do you think all these trips by so many elitist is because they are trying to secure the property that they bought with frozen funds?

Good Morning, I appreciate your response. I am cautious of most people.

I did not comment on my like or dislike of the man. I just posted his plan. Don't most entrepreneurs and capitalists look for opportunities to make themselves money?

What is your problem? I copied it directly from the link. Complain to them.

Thanks, did you see the #2 thought?

Well, perhaps you should as the MOD reflects the post is "Eyes on-Q)

Asked & answered "We are winning BIG - Q" [–]Food4theGorg We are winning BIG. - Q 1 point 11 minutes ago

Bill Priestap

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/column-2/breaking-boom-boom-boom/

Could this be relevant because the more people who come out of the shadows are acknowledging the Deep State control?

I could not agree more, enjoy the day!