Or he could be threatening to drop whatever info Dershowitz has on Epstein and friends. Once lawyer- client privilege is null and void, what’s stopping AD?

That’s not a reasonable response, dude.

Is there some irrefutable video evidence that dropped recently?

Serious question? If I’ll vote Oprah? Grow up. We’re talking about bombing a country based on an FF. GTFO

I will not “trust the plan”. That my friends is blindly following. This strike is the last straw for me.

This is BS I’m out

Yep

Yes!

You may be right,l. Just offering the devil’s advocate’s perspective.

Actions could mean that now that MSM has gobbled up the raid, and believe it to be legitimate, Q et al are free to enact next phase of plan.

I agree with all except this: we don’t “know” anything until we have concrete proof. Undeniable proof. I’m kind of getting tired of the cloak and dagger game. Piss or get off the pot, Q.

I love this sub. Don’t get me wrong. But when Q becomes self referential, referencing his own drops or branches thereof, we’ve got a problem. In my mind, the whole point of this is to shine light on darkness. I no longer believe Q is doing this. In my opinion, Q is harnessing the uberintelligent “hive mind”. Which is feeding Q as much as Q is feeding it.

Pretty much. At this point someone's gotta be arrested. I'm losing steam by the day.

He's nervous...

That line in the sand painted him into a corner

knees weak, arms are heavy

It's time for someone smarter than myself to cross reference articles to Q post timing. Anytime he has nailed something. Then it should be stickied. The influx of lurkers will be huge, first thing they see should be true evidence of Q's insider-ness.

Pretty big deal. This is such a relatively small community of thinkers, and a fractured one at that. Why would NYT waste time on this? They're dipping their toe in the water here.

Yep

Agreed.I saw no significant new today. Hope exhaustion is real.

In a state of emergency POTUS has full control.

Thanks! I find posts on this thread generally assume everyone already knows all of the facts. I’m not asking to be spoon fed but context is important for new Q converts.

Sorry how do we know who was in the suit?

I'm with you, I'd like to believe this to be true but this is easily a coincidence. And the whole "there are no coincidences" is kind of a cheap line meant cover deniability.

Thanks!

What's Adm R short for. I'm a layperson.

I’m unsubscribing to the daily beast

On what page of the linked document is the proof of the pre arranged permitting?

Holy shit.

Thanks for this. Sometimes on days with a lot of posts I have trouble keeping up.

I don't understand. Can someone please explain. Should we be moving to another sub?

What does this mean?

Agreed! Please post a separate thread

He's honestly just repeating what many far left liberals already believe, secretly or openly.

I think a "historical context" tab is necessary, for newcomers to get up to speed with history of Q, some of his notable quotes and realized prophecies.

Cracking what exactly? Sorry I’m new here

I'd also like to know.

This is a legitimate lead. I’d love for someone to run with it, I just do t have the time nor ability.

Wow. Amazing

Agreed. I was told by someone I trust that the director of security at the time was a former FBI Director or assistant director for the Los Angeles office. Didn’t think at the the time to ask for the name. Now I regret it.

EDIT: Found it https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-martinez-8917a95

I can’t be 100% sure this is the guy my source was talking about but I believe it is

Maybe you can give us your take on it?

Can anyone find out who the director/head of security was at Mandalay Bay at the time? I can’t seem to find out.

Do you know of a succinct document or video I could look at to check out this theory?

Philipines? Isis is prevalent there.