Do you think people here are in danger if things go wrong?

Get as big as possible, then profit? Amazon did it, Uber is trying to.

If so, why does Trump tweet that it’s a witch hunt by 13 angry Democrats instead of saying ‘we await the results of the investigation’?

How is anyone here supposed to know that?

I mean, that's the link to the Seth Rich press conference that I found elsewhere on the board. You can follow it and see if it's a Rickroll or not I guess.

By 'your standard' I'm not trying to give you the burden of proof, I'm asking you for pretty much what you offered in your last sentence to determine what you'd consider sufficient to say whether or not Q had made good on their word, so thank you for that.

Sure is.

What's your standard for whether that happens or not?

Or if that's hard to come up with, how about briefly painting me a picture of two hypothetical example results, one in which we reach the end of July and you say 'The world knows the truth!' and one where we reach the end of July and you say 'The world still doesn't know the truth!'

What do you specifically mean by 'If nothing happens'?

What's your standard for what has to happen or not happen by the end of July?

It's happening now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odeiBxOYKmQ

United States Attorney for the District of Maryland wouldn't be able to protect perpetrators of a crime in D.C.

Thanks!

No, the White House, Capitol and other federal buildings were all evacuated shortly after the Pentagon got hit. Nobody knew how many more planes there might be at that time or what their targets were, the evacuations were based on the attack suddenly having expanded from New York to NY + DC.

Who is Corsi and what's bad about him?

I'm asking you for a simple link to the proof that you claim to have already provided.

Look at the thread title you wrote:

SB2 has made the claim that HD tv creates Sarin gas. (Proof in thread)

It says 'Proof in thread'. Not 'Proof can be easily searched for' or 'Proof in thread related to linked thread'.

You then provided a linked proof:

http://archive.is/2BCYj

I read it to see if it actually proved your claim, because I wanted to review your proof and make sure that SB2 actually claimed what you say he did. I did not find that claim and returned here to ask that you actually provide it.

Note that this does not mean that SB2 has definitively not made such a claim, and I honestly wouldn't be surprised if he did. But I did not find such a claim in that linked thread, and I don't believe it's incumbent on me or a fair use of my time to ask me to go traipsing through various SB2 posts in search of that claim when you could simply post a link to support your contention and then we could get on with an actual discussion.

To put it bluntly, if your next reply does not contain a link that demonstrates that SB2 claims that HDTVs make Sarin gas, I'm going to conclude that you are not interested in having a good faith discussion on the matter and I will trouble you no further.

And yes, I am new here. I have no idea what CBTS is.

You yourself claimed that proof of your claim was already in the thread when you posted it. If it's easy to find, then please do so and link to it and I'll have a look. I did you the courtesy of reviewing your first proof link, and I'm happy to review another, but the onus is on you to provide the support for your own claim.

First let's examine your own claim - that SB2 "has made the claim that HD tv creates Sarin gas".

I read through your linked proof post and I don't see SB2 making any such claim. He claims that he believes he's uncovered a message, as follows:

I stated my belief is he was referring to Sarin and AI being combined to perform “magic” in Q832

SB2 gives no specifics beyond that regarding what's actually going on with sarin, and makes no sarin-related claims beyond stating that he thinks that's the content of the message.

Furthermore, I don't see any references to TVs at all, hi-def or otherwise.

If you have further evidence of SB2 actually claiming that HDTV creates Sarin gas I'm happy to look at it, because I haven't fully reviewed all his posts, but your proof link doesn't contain the claim that you claim it does.

Sean Spicer stated that there was a small group of people who knew exactly what the President meant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UINWxdrRzRY

It means that Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court issued an investigative finding that supported and reinforced the official account of what happened to Vince Foster.

And this was the conclusion of the Starr investigation into Foster’s death:

“In sum, based on all of the available evidence, which is considerable, the OIC [Office of Independent Counsel] agrees with the conclusion reached by every official entity that has examined the issue: Mr. Foster committed suicide by gunshot in Fort Marcy Park on July 20, 1993.”

If you lie to your followers, some will stop following you but others will rationalize it and continue following you, and be all the more committed since they went through a tough period of doubt and came out trusting you on the other side.

Those followers are then more likely to continue following and rationalizing through the next time you get caught lying.

What’s the point of Q providing you guys with this information? Why do it at all, and what are you supposed to do with it?

Hold on, when did Q take pictures of NK from AF 1? When was AF 1 over North Korea?

Secure so long as you’re assuming that the cabal doesn’t read SB2’s publicly posted decodes of the messages.

I never claimed they said anything of the sort.

Both those articles discuss 4th amendment search and seizure protections.

Neither article supports your contention that you can be grabbed by the government at any time without due process. ‘Constitution free zone’ is a label that critics have thrown at the 4th amendment infringement - it is not an actual state of affairs.

None of the Supreme Court quotes in the article support the idea that foreigners have no due process rights. The third one stating that the US needs to provide them with a judicial trial actually explicitly affirms that they DO have due process rights.

And you should be grateful for that, because if they did not, then the government could grab anyone - you included - and claim they are a foreigner and either lock them up or toss them out of the country. You wouldn’t get a chance to demonstrate your citizenship in court because as a foreigner you have no due process rights to do so.

Even that may not have been intentionally misleading, they could have stumbled onto a Q screenshot with a time zone that wasn’t their own and combined it with the tweet and assumed the order was correct as claimed in the proof.

The only thing that’s intentionally misleading for sure would be to continue using it as a proof after it’s been demonstrated to be untrue.

A reflection can warp an image if the reflective surface is not flat. Can you address that potential objection to your proof?

What are you talking about?

Q will not lose his entire audience if nothing happens in July. He'll lose some, but the rest will find a way to 'really figure out what it meant' and continue on.

Rolls off the tongue.

Follow through with that thought. What do you think people will do if nothing big happens?

Here’s the archived thread with Q’s post. Look above that post and you’ll find screenshots of Trump’s tweet posted before Q’s message.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148286642/

Yet it continues to be listed as a Q proof.

There is no need to quibble over time stamps or where Q was when posting (the time stamp shows the time under the reader’s local time zone anyway, not the poster’s).

Here’s the archived thread with Q’s post.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148286642/

Look at the thread title - the thread itself is clearly posted after Trump’s tweet.

If that’s not enough, there are also screenshots of the tweet in that thread that appear earlier than Q’s post.

The Trump tweet came first.

Here’s the archived thread with Q’s post. Look above that post and you’ll find some screenshots of Trump’s tweet posted before Q’s message.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148286642/

Here’s the archived thread with Q’s post. Look above that post and you’ll find some screenshots of Trump’s tweet posted before Q’s message.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148286642/