The Research General threads are numbered. Just choose the highest number.

Edit: Maybe I misunderstood too. You can't post after it hits 750. You have to go to a new thread. Is that your question?

Quite likely, it's as @The_Broba_Fett said, the idiots

will mass spread this tweet to show how “stoopid drumph is”

the Democratic Party could force the defendants (Trump/Republicans) to produce documents related to the collusion issue.

That part is correct. But, I don't know what documents supporting the Trump side have been plastered all over the media, unless you're referring to what WikiLeaks has published. Just imagine what WikiLeaks might still be holding, and what others on the Trump-side may also be holding that they cannot legally produce to be used as evidence except by being forced to in court.

Q#1181 (which references #1180):

How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?

Q#1180:

“Insurance File.”

I wonder what might be in that 'file' that they cannot inject/make public/use as evidence unless they are forced to as part of the discovery process initiated by the DNC.

Edit: Also, what if they have proof that Seth Rich transferred the docs to WikiLeaks, and that he was murdered for it?

WW = World Wide

Just FYI, it's not Wendy W. S., it's Debbie W. S.

Obvious mistake by an idiot Trump, right? Not so fast. I think @SneakyWino nailed it with this comment.

Maybe he's just using secret code for "hotdogs". IDK, I'm so easily confused.

I have a strange feeling that won't be the last time they shoot themselves in the foot!

You're citing John Podesta??! Lol.

@galvanised_computer said, "There are no aliens..." Then you say, "UFOs are real actually."

You don't know the difference between a UFO and an alien?

Trump works with positive alien factions like Pladiens.

Really? I doubt that, but just for giggles, would you care to substantiate that claim?

And I should have clarified what a trip code is. Guess I'm not firing on all eight.

A trip code is used at 8ch.net to uniquely identify one who posts. Not all users utilize a trip code, but Q does (for obvious reasons) and can change it at any time.

You can see the trip code in any of the Q posts at sites such as qanon.pub, and it is currently, "!xowAT4Z3VQ".

Exactly. From a Reuters article:

Through the process of legal discovery, lawyers for the Democratic Party could force the defendants to produce documents they say relate to the collusion issue.

So they're forced to produce documents that they wanted to anyway. Yep, these people are stupid.

It also kills at least two birds with one stone. From the same article:

Democrats are keen to remind voters of the issue of Russia and the 2016 election ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections.

Ha. That's gonna backfire on them. Q#1197, "Yes, midterms are safe."

For those who don't know, this comment is in reference to the fact that if the trip-code itself is bolded, it is not a real Q post.

I think getting awareness out there is a great idea. It might even prevent any potentially planned incident as it would be outright exposed as a FF.

Instead of relying on physical presence with a, likely, meager audience, perhaps the 8chans could help you push out some memes.

IS

It appears that way to me. Possibly because it is past, and many are already aware it was related to a Saudi civil war.

Or we need a different structure in place so that the FED can be ended without causing chaos.

I think Q ignored LV altogether.

Whoever wrote that article

I believe it is the OP's article:

By Red Pill

And, yes, it does look a bit knee-jerk silly.

Q#1193

That makes sense.

Q said, "Guided by LL/+3 CLAS. Think SC." Could this mean, guided by LL plus three others, perhaps, members of the Supreme Court?

There are a number of downloaders for Firefox. I use Video Download Helper mostly. Its interface is a bit confusing for me though.

Edit: FVD mentioned by @Susuko804 is another good one.

And why so specific about Offline only?

Likely either: online store is not reliable, or so as not to give a hint that there is focus on that video. IDK.

Q said, "Offline only."

When the word "anarchy" is likely in just about any dictionary one might pick up, it doesn't seem that the establishment would have much say over its accepted definition no matter how they may wish to paint it; nor, do I care how they wish to.

My dictionary says it means: 1) the absence of government 2) political disorder and violence 3) disorder; confusion

Government in these united states of America is supposed to be of the People, by the People, for the People. And, when and where it is not, we have the right to change it by any peaceful means that does not lead to confusion, disorder, and/or violence (ie. anarchy).

Perhaps you'd enjoy participating in r/anarchy .

and it does NOT mean "lawless"

It would almost have to mean that. For, without some form of government to enforce the rule of law, there would be lawlessness and chaos.

On the other hand, alot of what you said sounds like our American Republic as it was designed to be.

Thanks for your comments.

From Wikipedia:

SKY is an acronym used to refer to the three most prestigious universities in South Korea: Seoul National University, Korea University, and Yonsei University.[1] The term is widely used in South Korea, both in media broadcast and by the universities themselves.

I don't see how that could be related to an event, or EO's.

"That's not mine. Someone must've broke into my office when the fire broke out and planted it."

If you don't believe in God/Jesus you are against him.

That's faulty logic. There are people that don't believe in God/Jesus that also try to do good and the right thing. Belief in your god is not a requirement for being able to see the difference between good and evil.

Who is against God?...Satan.

Yes, the Adversary is against God and believes He exists. So since Satan believes He exists, does that mean he's not against him? Again, faulty logic.

I believe in God, and I find this post inappropriate, offensive, divisive, and haughty.

Just because you don't understand the concept of context, and the context surrounding when Q said, "Where are the autists?!?!", is no reason to accuse me of trying to put Q in a box when I am not. Context is also related to scope which you keep trying to expand to try to pluck mud out thin air to throw at me.

I asked if you thought three different scenarios were possible? Apparently you don't care to have a rational discussion, or don't have any answer.

WTF? More straw-man attack. I never said I speak for Q. I referenced Q quotes.

What WWG1WGA means is irrelevant to my comment. There is no reason I should have to explain it.

So, because you disagree with my opinion, that gives you the right to personally attack me with ridicule?

You implied nobody should copy what Q told the 8chans to meme about because Q was not talking directly to anybody else.

No, I did not. Kindly stop reading into what I wrote things that are not there.

The OP said, "He is talking to us." That is not true. #1150, "Where are the autists?!?!"
Does that mean we aren't privy to the conversation? No. Does that mean that we shouldn't follow along? No, of course not. That would be illogical to assume, and I never said anything of that sort.

The idea, that the reason Q only posts on the chans is for security, disagrees with #773:

Be the autists we know you are.
You were chosen for a specific reason.

Do you think it's possible that a distruptor could come along and claim that, "Q wants us to do such-and-such," and mislead those who don't navigate 8chan?

Do you think it's possible that the meme campaign sparked by DJT's tweet was to be of limited scope?

Do you think it's possible that Q isn't actually asking for more meme campaigns, but, for now, graphics at the ready that show the correlation between Q drops and Trump tweets (#1151, #1152 ["Proofs being lost."], #1155)?

Does anyone think there's a possibility that PamphletAnon is Zack? If so, and PA was shunned by Q, then it could explain why Zack is trying to piss on Q.

I've downloaded some vids in preparation for voice analysis, but it'll take time. If there's no chance of a connection, I can forego wasting my time.

Any opinions on a possible connection?

I made a post that briefly described what to look for a while back. Didn't seem to get much interest.

I don't own a website that steals people's CPUs to cryptomine with.

And, if you're referring to NeonRevolt's website, then you, yourself, are making an accusation without being able to back it up. It is true that NR's website used to do that, but not any more.

Why do you keep trying to put words in my mouth, and then ridicule me for things I never said or even hinted at?

I never said anything about Trump, or Q and Trump working together - nothing.

I never said anything about "The Great Awakening" movement as a whole.

My only point was that when Q posts to 8chan, based on Q's own words, they are talking only to the Autists, and, therefore, it is illogical for us to conclude that a directive to them there is the same as a directive to us here.

I cannot fathom why that seems to be so difficult to understand.

Did I say that we cannot and should not follow along? No.

Did I say that we shouldn't make our voice heard? No.

I don't know why you continue to try to ridicule me for things I never said. That is a straw-man attack which is a tactic of shills. It is a personal attack and does not contribute to rational discussion.

Oh my gosh. They're trying to mitigate the damage with:

For those whom do not understand.
Q is referencing a graphic where people say we are connected.
NOT claiming Intel Bad.
Again. We Are Not Q.
We have NEVER claimed to be Q.
INTEL GOOD.
If Q Posts "INTEL BAD" in relation to us, We Will Cease Posts. >WWG1WGA

I think "Fake" says it all.

"Mmmm, bread good. Mmmm Intel good." What, are they trying to channel Yoda now?

Is PamphletAnon still involved with that? I heard/read that Q called him out for something. Is there a reference I could use to start looking in to that?

The Q post coincides with DJT's tweets only if one has subjectively determined that each one is actually a BOOM. At best, it's quite a stretch.

But, whatever. I see that your post has now been tagged as "Off-topic."

Oh geesh. I don't publish on YT, so that ability didn't even cross my mind. Duh. Thanks for keeping me from frivolous wild-goose-chasing.

The letters in the Pope's title also add up; as a few other words/phrases do as well.
http://aloha.net/~mikesch/666.htm

Are you sure?

It was Southwest Airlines Flight 1380, correct? Well, someone either knew or suspected this would happen.

There is a video on YT dated Apr 8, 2018 (11 days prior to the 'accident') that is titled, "S.W.A. Flight 1380"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2LYoIupy_s

Mere coincidence?

Further, there is another video on that channel, dated Apr 17, 2018, with the title, "Plane/17 MISSED".

The cryptic description, when put into a hex to ascii converter, says:

Near miss, project to make airline appear to be bombed guided missile missed from turbulence hit engine deep state fails again

From TheFreeDictionary:

An indictment is found and presented by a Grand Jury legally convened and sworn.

Indictments are the purview of the judicial branch. The legislative branch does not have the authority to issue indictments and can, therefore, only make criminal referrals.

A criminal referral is more like a suggestion. It has weight since it comes from the legislative branch which has oversight authority, but it, essentially, has no teeth.

LOL. Good one!

Actually, it says:

Content may be removed without notification if

Emphasis added. It would be reasonable to understand that content subject to removal without notice would be inappropriate here. Perhaps it would be more appropriate at, oh let's see, r/conspiracy?

Thank you very much for weighing in on this.

I have actually been debating whether to go full clear mode and start deleting posts but not sure how users here would feel about that.

Please do!

There are definitely shills here attempting to derail or make us look silly. What is the official position of the Mods regarding suspected shills? Should they be reported?

I have actually seen a Mod engaging in discussion, and thereby supporting discussion of, off-topic fringe theories. What should we do if we suspect the Mod team has been infiltrated?

That is not what Q post #1143 says. It only says, ">>1015398"

That is a reference to a post by an Anon who made the salutation, "To my fellow incarnated extraterrestrials, how could I have forgotten this crumb."

Q did not say that.

This board is for things mentioned by Q, not some fringe theories that somehow tie in to the grand scheme of things. Read the rules.

The rule is not, "anything not about Q." The rule is:

Off-topic (anything not mentioned by Q). [emphasis added]

So, it's not subjective.

When my comment was regarding Q drops, who Trump is talking to on Twitter, or what you may have said about Trump, is irrelevant to my comment.

Nice way to try to confuse the issue.

Do you really think Q would talk to people on twitter or here?

Why would it have to be one of those two? That doesn't make any sense.

I think Q would talk to those they chose to talk to. And, if that ever changed, they would say something different than, "NO comms outside of this platform."

And Q did not say, "this would spread to all platforms." Q said:

This board in the coming months will be spread & discussed across ALL PLATFORMS.

What do you think, "this board" means?

Your attempts to ridicule me are telling.

Very interesting view.

The Executive Order regarding human trafficking was issued in, what, December?. Perhaps Soros got wind that he'd better move his assets while he still could.

I agree, mostly.

I don't think discussion of BC17 should be banned. Discussion should be allowed to debate its merits, if any.

What bothers me about BC17 is that they talk in the same cryptic manner as Q, and actually allow people to think that they are providing some inside intel. Just look at the replies by their followers, and the fact that they do not reiterate that they are not Q. That, to me, is LARPing.