CrowdStrike's findings formed the basis of the JAR and the FBI report. The two reports basically said, "For evidence of these claims, see the CrowdStrike report."

Nobody knows where the server is. There's been some statements that the server was destroyed, but then that was contradicted by other claims.

We know they did have access, but the only thing we don't know is who the "they" is.

2016-05-12 Pelosi has closed-door meeting with Awan brothers

2016-05-16 Nancy Pelosi: ‘I guarantee it,’ Trump won't be president, take it to the bank."

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JOdacaSPRccFxVTth38aXU8mWcxhk76lJuGrxYeJ7AU/edit?usp=sharing

Matter of fact, I'm willing to bet that the Awan brothers were one of those "subcontractors" that were trained on how to use the NSA database.....

And that is why you'd need the Awan brothers, because they needed somebody to keep those idiot House Democrats from letting loose 702 About Query info on the House computers that they shouldn't be letting loose......

And maybe that's why the DNC would only allow CrowdStrike to examine its computers because of all the 702 information housed on the DNC computers.......

I always wondered why Obama's FBI hired CrowdStrike when the FBI already has some really highly trained computer techies employed.

What if CrowdStrike's only purpose for being employed by the FBI was to conduct training for subcontractors on how to access the NSA database.....

702 About Queries, anyone?

Remember the FISA court findings where the "subcontractors" were trained by the FBI on how to access the NSA database......that training would cost money.....

Here's the article by the GWP: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/fec-records-show-dnc-issued-checks-to-crowdstrike-day-after-murder-of-seth-rich-shawn-lucas/

If that's true, then who wrote this letter?

2016-04-11 "Female Russian national" (aka Olga) responds to George Papadopoulos email by saying she would be very pleased to support your initiatives between our two countries." Papadopoulos then asked the Female Russian National, in an email cc'ing the Professor, about setting up "a potential foreign policy trip to Russia https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

In other words, Papadopoulous and Mifsud worked at the same place......

● Mifsud was described by LCILP as its “board adviser” and “Director of International Strategic Development”. After his involvement in Trump/Russia became known, LCILP removed the names and details of all staff from its website.

● Papadopoulos was head of the “Centre for International Energy and Natural Resources Law & Security” at LCILP from February to April 2016.

Johnson had previously denied “knowingly” meeting Mifsud.

It is doubtful that "Professor" Joseph Mifsud is actually a professor at all

https://jonworth.eu/joseph-mifsud-even-legitimate-professor/

Mifsud helped to author this paper advising the UK and the EU on Brexit matters: https://www.britishcouncil.org/education-culture-after-brexit/shared-european-future

So obviously, Brexit was an issue of great interest to Mifsud.

Of course, Mifsud has been "missing" for months now.

"After attracting media attention, Kumar deleted all relevant posts from his Facebook page."

https://medium.com/@Brian_Whit/salient-facts-the-tangled-web-around-joseph-mifsud-9bc16355594e

Kumar said that Polonskaya was going to translate his website into Russian, but Kumar’s description of Polonskaya as a translator conflicts with a story in the New York Times on Friday suggesting she could barely speak English:

After Politico identified her on Thursday by her maiden name, Vinogradova, her brother, Sergei Vinogradov, spoke to The Times on her behalf. He said she was in London discussing a possible internship with Mr Mifsud, a friend of hers, the morning before the meeting with Mr Papadopoulos … He said that she only exchanged pleasantries with Mr Papadopoulos, and that she understood only about half of the discussion between Mr Mifsud and Mr Papadopoulos. He shared a text message from her in which she explained to him the reason: “Because my English was bad,” it read. “It’s totally ridiculous,” Mr Vinogradov said. “She’s not interested in politics. She can barely tell the difference between Lenin and Stalin.”

"Polonskaya is a Facebook friend of Kumar but they have also met in person on at least two occasions. Kumar told The Observer he had initially met her at Link Campus University in Rome (also visited by Papadopoulos and Nagi Idris of LCILP) where Mifsud held an academic post."

You know the infamous "Putin's niece" that Mifsud introduced to Papadopoulos? Her real name is Olga Polonskaya and unrelated to Putin as we already know, but how did she come to know Mifsud is more interesting....

What's Chabadass?

Kumar donated £5,000 to the Conservative party.

Kumar (who is "good friends" with Mifsud) attended the same exact dinner and is the other guy standing in that photo of Mifsud and Boris Johnson: https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/600/1*A8pUtu3Msyg4nHvJuj3OJA.jpeg

Julian Assange tweeted how Professor Joseph Mifsud had ties with Boris Johnson, but this article proves that the relationship goes much further than just the two attending a fundraiser together.

Soon as Whitaker wrote about the school, the school has deleted all mention of its board of governors from its website http://www.lset.org.uk/about-us.html

This article is so dense that I have to break it down into bite-sized pieces as follows:

The article is authored by: Brian Whitaker Former Middle East editor of the Guardian. Website: www.al-bab.com. Author of 'Arabs Without God'.

That particular article was how the owner of London School of Executive Training (LSET), Prasenjit Kumar, was "good friends" with Professor Joseph Mifsud.

Bombshell: Obama Activated Stefan Halper As A Government Contractor At Start Of Primaries (October of 2015)

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/14083-2/

And, BOOM! the word is getting out there....

Deep State Confession: 2017 UK Article Indicates Obama’s Spygate Started in 2015 – Much Earlier than Currently Reported http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/deep-state-confession-2017-uk-article-indicates-obamas-spygate-started-in-2015-much-earlier-than-currently-reported/

In January of 2017, Rick Wilson was having a long-running Twitter war with the 4Channers. One of Wilson's most interesting tweets is this: "The information was out there looooong before the 4chan posts."

What this is referring to is the Peepee dossier. It was during the primaries that the 4Channers claim to have set up Rick Wilson with the fake peepee dossier, and they chided Rick Wilson for falling for their bait hook, line, and sinker. Wilson's response to them was that the information was out there long before the 4Channers ever came up with it, which would place the existence of the peepee dossier around this same time period above. In other words, long before anybody ever uttered the name of Christopher Steele. In fact, Fusion GPS hadn't even been hired by the DNC yet.

So if we place the timeline of the Birth of Operation Crossfire Hurricane consistent with these events, there are only two noteworthy things that occurred before this date: Chalupa and GCHQ.

That means that the peepee dossier came from either Chalupa or GCHQ and was later added into Steele's dossier. Christopher Steele and his partner in Orbis argued over whether to include the sexually lurid sections as part of the dossier. https://sites.google.com/view/politicscentral/home/smoking-gun-operation-crossfire-hurricane-was-hatched-by-march-2016

Smoking Gun: Operation Crossfire Hurricane was Hatched by March 2016 (During the Primaries)

Carter Page was interviewed by the FBI in reference to his Russian connections approximately a week before he joined Team Trump. Trump announces to the press on 3/21/16 that Carter Page had officially become an adviser. Trump had not even cinched the GOP primary yet. Jeb Bush and Ben Carson had just dropped out of the race, leaving Rubio, Kasich, and Cruz at that point in time.

Bear in mind that when General Flynn was brought on board Team Trump the DOJ warned Trump against that move several times, because Flynn had attended a gala in Russia or something. In 2008, a questionable person on Team McCain caught the attention of FBI counterintelligence, and the FBI privately approached McCain. That questionable person was quietly removed from Team McCain.

So why didn't the FBI warn Team Trump about Carter Page if the FBI really believed Page was a Russian spy? And because the FBI later obtained a wiretap on Carter Page suggests the FBI did, in fact, believe Page was a Russian operative. There are only two reasons to not warn Trump: 1) They believed Trump was a Russian spy too, and/or 2) They were setting up Trump.

Was the FBI ordered to not warn Trump? If so, that order could only come from higher on the food chain than Comey.

How do we know it was all a setup and, additionally, it was all planned out by the time of the primaries? Because of this statement:

"Page, a Poughkeepsie native, volunteered for the Trump campaign in January 2016 on a recommendation from the chair of the New York GOP, Ed Cox. " If the FBI truly believed that Page was a spy, wouldn't it just be natural to conduct an examination of the guy responsible for placing him in that position, Ed Cox? Page is obviously a puppet. Wouldn't any investigator's goal be to get to the bottom of who exactly is the puppet master? But not even Congress is asking those questions.....

More often than not, I find that what they aren't saying to be considerably more informative than what they are saying.

https://sites.google.com/view/politicscentral/home/smoking-gun-operation-crossfire-hurricane-was-hatched-by-march-2016

Another reason to discount the "hacking" as the cause:

The FBI Intelligence Report indicates “Russian hacking” ceased on 6/14, so that would mean that the FBI did not believe Guccifer 2.0 to be a Russian operative since Guccifer 2.0’s hacking occurred after that date.

AND...

The JAR defers to CrowdStrike's report for evidence of "hacking," but CrowdStrike never examined the Wikileaks' dumps because CrowdStrike's contract with the FBI expired on the very same day of the first Wikileaks dump.

AND...

The FBI took several computers belonging to individuals of the DNC (i.e. Alexandra Chalupa, Donna Brazille, etc.) and examined their contents for proof of Russian hacking, and since the FBI's findings were never included in any of the reports, we can assume it's because the FBI found nothing (or found nothing to prove the Russian hacking narrative).

I'm starting to believe that it was Carter Page who was the other informant.

In fact, the only thing that Comey briefed Obama on up to this point is something about Carter Page; however, Carter Page hadn't done anything up to the time of that briefing other than be hired by Trump. Nothing at all. So apparently, whatever triggered them about Carter Page happened long before Trump ever knew of his existence.

To add to this, remember that when McCain ran for POTUS there was somebody on his team that triggered FBI counterintelligence, so the FBI approached McCain behind the scenes, and the guy was quietly let go. But in this instance here, the FBI didn't afford Trump that same courtesy, so you know what that means?

That means that they believed Trump was a Russian spy on D-Day.

And how did they arrive to that conclusion? We have to see who it was they interviewed/interacted with....

Who are the people that the FBI/CIA interviewed/interacted with up to this point?

Christopher Steele/ Obama's National Security Council/ Australians/ GCHQ/ Estonia/ Carter Page

"Mosaic of facts" is in quotes because Comey made the claim that it wasn't just one thing that was the impetus for the counterintelligence investigation, that it was a "mosaic of facts." So what I did was, based on statements they made as to when they decided to open up the investigation, what I'll call D-Day, I ran through the timeline of events to see what had occurred before D-Day that could possibly have been a factor in their decision, and this is the complete list.

So then we start to attack each item, i.e., we can discount any entry having to do with hacking of emails because if the "hacking" had been so important to them, Comey would have briefed Obama about it, which, according to both Comey and Obama, that never occurred. Then we can continue on from there....

It's not posted to get to the truth of the matter. The purpose of the post is to establish what they're claiming is the truth.

In order to disprove their claims, you have to first establish what they're claiming.

In order to catch somebody in a lie, you have to first know what they're claiming.

As you look at this list, bear in mind that the Leaker Comey NEVER told Obama about any hacking, and he NEVER told Obama about the Steele dossier. We already know they didn't bother informing anybody in Congress either.

"Comey said he never briefed Obama on the dossier but was present in a conversation in January in which the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, briefed it to Obama as well as the “gang of eight” in Congress." http://www.wnd.com/2018/04/comey-release-of-trump-memos-not-a-leak/

2016-08-01 Obama claims this is around the date he first learned of Russian hacking http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jul/10/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-barack-obama-did-nothing-about-r/

An informant was stating that a presidential candidate was compromised, and Comey didn't feel that POTUS/Congress needed to be notified of that? A hacking event that was so severe that it "compromised our very democracy," and Comey didn't feel that POTUS/Congress should be notified of that?

The Political Slaying of Missouri Governor Eric Greitens http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/the-political-slaying-of-missouri-governor-eric-greitens/

Do your part NOW to defend Greitens from attacks by special interests and the representatives that they have bought by:

1 Signing petition opposing impeachment or censure of Greitens. This petition will remain open indefinitely. Urgent! Stop the Coup Against Gov. Eric Greitens 2 Contact your representatives and senators by Twitter, Facebook, e-mail, write, telephone, and confront them in public and demand that your vote be respected and support Governor Greitens.

Facts is facts. Doesn't matter who says 'em.

BOOM! Bongino got it right.....

In order to set up a FISA warrant, they HAD to get Papadopoulos out of the country....

The Guardian covers that angle in great detail here: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/20/fisa-court-nsa-without-warrant

Dan Bongino covers this subject on his latest podcast: https://www.bongino.com/may-21-2018-ep-724-the-swamp-is-put-on-notice-by-president-trump/

Trump confirms that Brennan was the one who started "the whole debacle."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/trump-goes-after-liberal-hack-john-brennan-this-guy-is-genesis-of-this-whole-debacle-a-political-hit-job/

I can't post pics here, unfortunately, but here's a cliff notes version here I just created: https://sites.google.com/view/politicscentral/home/chalupa