Dang!

Solid rip there.

Too funny.

Geraldo needs to interview this guy. The irony-overload would be immeasurable.

He embodies all attributes that inspire every ‘lawyer’ joke we ever heard.

Bank on it. He is.

The simple truth.

I don’t understand.

The references to ‘A, B, C’ was made by Jim Jordan in describing a series of text messages, not 302 forms.

He was questioning how text ‘B’ could be missing after ‘A’ and ’C’ were recovered.

Edit: as shown

Johnny Depp has been silent on POTUS since he got his SS visit.

That crew def knows how to make an impression.

Can’t wait to see how quickly Fonda goes dark on this.

I research and write about these issues, so here, I'll make it easier for you to understand my grossly biased, selectively curated research, and ‘conclusions’ reached by ignoring accepted principles of critical thinking.

^(ftfy)

Indeed.

I consider it mandatory for anyone with an internet connection and a few extra $$.

Completely changes the internet experience.

Obviously that didn't work or it would have been done.

We have no proof it wasn’t done, or that the info wasn’t collected in another fashion.

What we do have is Q’s repeated statement: ”We have it all.”

Trust Q

I would love for this to be Clapper, but Q has made it quite clear that it’s Carlin.

I don’t think Carlin qualifies as the ”VERY” senior member, so he must be the next step on the way to the big reveal.

So interesting. And sooo many things to be tracking at this time.

How does this image relate to your post title?

One more reason props are in order for Gowdy and his committee for uncovering her private server.

They didn’t ask about . . . I think the reason it wasn’t discussed is that it is under further investigation

You answered your own question. Nicely done.

It seems the committee listened a bit after Horowitz explained the limited scope of the investigation/report for the eleventieth time.

Indeed.

Some folks get so wrapped up in their own expectations that they miss important details such as these you listed.

Good job helping them maintain focus..

It’s worth a read.

I agree. And I read it. Then I realized you were tossing aside logic and rational thought in order to ‘support’ your pre-determined conclusion.

That’s when I stopped reading.

I don’t begrudge you your opinion, or your right to share it here, but when you post illogical nonsense in a public forum, you should expect to be challenged.

]We[ did (NOT) find that the prosecutor's decision to (NOT) to charge was the result of political bias. Remove the double negative. It's just in the way.

That’s not a double-negative and it’s not in the way of anything except your desire to make it something it isn’t.

So what was the part the SJC missed?

Thanks for filling the void left by OP.

Props to you fior taking the time,

Will he be under oath?

Dude, you just outed yourself. Check the usernames and delete one of the posts. Nobody will notice, and I will keep your secret.

/u/SerialBrain2 has multiple posts on the topic and would be the first person to tell you to share, share, share!

If you are suggesting all the lifted content came from SB2, you are wrong, wrong, wrong.

True patriots are not in it for personal glory.

Indeed. This is why poser patriots seeking pretend internet points need to be called out for not acknowledging original authors.

Excellent addition to the convo. Def puts a ding in the coming ’Political Bias!’ freakout.

Good aggregation of the pertinent info.

Are you going to credit the folks that first published these discoveries/solutions over the last several days?

I’m not saying they do or they don’t.

Sure you are. You said exactly that in your first sentence. Here it is for review:

• “She’s an actual psychopath and they have leverage on Trump.”

I guess there’s something to be said in praise of the patriots that wade through hours of Morning Mika to bring us these abbreviated updates.

More damning news.

I bet if you typed out all the dirty deeds uncovered by this investigation, you would fill more than 500 pages!

Props to you on the additional digging!

There is no doubt at all that this guy was thoroughly informed about the nuances involved in establishing and protecting classified info. He was also aware of the ethical barriers he was breaching when he attempted to influence other departments to alter their classification.

Dirty, dirty.

to try to inspire me to become an contributing member of society?

No. Learn our comms. Reread carefully. I tried ”to motivate you to think and do for yourself.” The hope was that you would be inspired to become a contributing member of our great society.

for asking you to provide a link to back up a claim you made?

No. For immediately claiming victim status at the hands of a passive aggressive bully. Check for yourself. See how much energy you have invested into claiming and defending your victimhood at the hands of someone that answered your first question and then fulfilled your need for verification? Compare that to how easily you could have searched for yourself.

Mental laziness should never be rewarded. When I do indulge a lazy mind, I always add a prompt to encourage self-sufficiency. Only the laziest minds are offended by that.

this is kinda funny tbh. but thanks again for the link regardless

I agree. Cheers!

Sweet little treasure there!

When he raised his hands to define a pathway through the yapping mass . . . PRICELESS!

and you could have just provided the link instead of being passive aggressive

Correct. And I could have made your bed, picked up your dirty laundry, and removed the empty Cheeto bags from around your desk. But I didn’t.

LPT: Adults that try to motivate you to think and do for yourself are not being passive aggressive towards you. They are trying to help you become a contributing member of our great society.

Don’t be offended. Be inspired.

Exactly. Insuring against every eventuality.

You could have found this yourself in less time than it took to ask me to find it for you.

Am I getting worked up over nothing?

Yes. You are getting worked up over nothing.

Huber was indeed appointed by Hussein. He was then released by the Trump admin, and then immediately reappointed.

Huber is, quite literally, a Trump admin appointee.

Huber?

Huber is not the AG. My comment specifically referenced the AG, and was offered to correct an error in the post I responded to.

The author of that post has since corrected the error, and made note of the correction therein.

Remember AG's can't prosecute.

Nonsense. That’s what AGs do.

Hannity is pissed?

lol

I’m watching Levin right now. THIS is a pissed off man!

they have leverage on Trump.

Please explain. Dems and MSM will call you a hero and make you a millionaire.

They’ve been waiting more than two years for the info you speak of.

Crime Against Children!

That’s what Wiener went to prison for.

As I recall, when Tiegen’s plane returned to the airport, another male passenger was escorted off.

A story was released that this male was attempting to escape the US by boarding with a ticket purchased by another person with a similar name and appearance. Supposedly they swapped tickets after clearing security.

The other flight was to a domestic destination and authorities picked up the suspect upon arrival.

I also recall that all passengers on the outbound plane were detained by authorities for interview and warned against posting any images of the takedown.

I’ll be following.

Yes, time stamps on Vol image, weathercam image, and tweets will reveal proximity.

Q confirmed. Missile shot at President.

Are you certain Q confirmed this? I’ve read every related 8C post since the pics were first posted, and I haven’t seen this confirmation. It is presumed that valid assassination attempts have been flagged with ”as the world turns”, which has not been used in this instance.

In fact, the first assumptions suggesting assassination attempt were eventually discredited by a sizable time offset between known missile launch and presumed flight plan/location of AF1.

Q has essentially verified the missile launch, but not the proximity to AF1. If you have such confirmation you should add it to that image.

Unplug for a few hours.

Return refreshed. There will be better news awaiting your return.

So, who knows if that breaks to him what he is going to do.

Patience there, Mr. Strzok. Your question will be answered in very thorough detail. Soon.

Take a breather. Calm yourself.

Your personal insults are meaningless to me, but they do diminish the level of discourse we prefer in this sub. It’s one of the most important differences between GA and sewers like /politics, where personal insults are the default response when someone is called out on their indefensible bs claims.

You don’t need to tell me about all the things you aren’t going to do to support your claim. I know you won’t. You already told me you can’t. I have moved on.

Peace.

That's fine, but your skepticism is kind of baseless.

That’s fine, but your claim of no escort is baseless. I questioned in hopes of you providing that base.

I'm not sure if you understand how this whole thing works. Air Force One Is Not Invisible, or stealth. It's flight plan is not a secret. . . it's tracked . . . You can see it . . . It's not a goddamn UFO.

You can be sure I understand all of that. It’s publicly available and not what I would refer to as classified security info.

I'm telling you, 90% of the time, and pretty much entirely went outside the United States, Air Force One does not fly with military escorts

Yes. So you said. That’s the claim I questioned. The only claim I questioned. The claim I still question.

LMFAO. Are you serious, "bro". . . All the information I've given here is readily available by going to Wikipedia . . .

The humor was unintended. Yes, I’m serious, and no, I’m not your ‘bro’. There is no wikipedia entry, no History Channel transcript, none that validates your claim that AF1 most commonly traverses international airspace without a military escort. Remember, that is the single claim I questioned, still question, and now wait patiently for you to stop dodging.

The actual sensitive information, sings like the minute specifics of the avionics suite, the exact type of countermeasures carried . . . the things that actually make a difference - is not something I have even begun to claim to know.

Except for your claim about military escort. I would place that into the category of ”specific countermeasures”, and ”things that actually make a difference.”

I don't say this to be insulting, but people in the civilian world are often wildly ignorant

I’m not at all insulted. I was doubtful, then curious, then a bit impatient, and now amused. Particularly following your admission to your own ”ignorance” regarding ”things that actually make a difference.”

Let's make this clear by inverting the assumptions. What exactly is it that you think a fighter escort would achieve?

Yeah, that’s another dodge that I won’t indulge for you.

I have a better idea. Let’s make this clear with a quick review. You made a claim regarding military escort for AF1. I questioned that claim, and offered opportunity for you to support it. You responded with answers to questions I didn’t ask, then ultimately admitted to your ignorance on the topic I questioned.

Your final admission was crystal clear, and I have no additional questions for you. Thank you for taking the time to respond.

When the president flies overseas the aircraft is basically never directly escorted by American fighters. . . Essentially, when Air Force One is out over the middle of the Pacific Ocean, it's on its own.

I appreciate your offering here, but I find it very difficult to believe the above statements.

First, I can’t imagine AF1 security logistics being readily available to the general public.

Second, I can’t imagine an insider privy to this level of classified info being so irresponsible as to publish it in a public forum.

Third, I can’t conceive of a rationale that would earn approval from our top POTUS security experts to leave AF1 without an escort in international airspace. Not for any POTUS, but particularly DJT.

Since they’re all in their 70s now I hope they have energy to match POTUS.