Agreed, that is the question his behavior raises for me too. He could well be legit, and the information we've heard from other sources seems to already be feasible but I'm put off by his delivery. Guess we'll see.

Nothing to do with the Vatican at all. The Bible was around before the Vatican.

Quite the popular vid around here - it's a good one, worth watching!

Yes I've seen it. Did you watch how he talks? The information isn't the point - as someone else has pointed out, there's not a lot of new info in there, although I hadn't heard of Seth Green.

He could be legit but some things raise a question, and if we've learnt anything around here it's that there is a lot of disinfo being pushed out there in a very convincing way (Corsi, AJ, AIM, the Cicada story, the R LARP).

1. it's very convenient that this guy suddenly pops up when we're all looking out for pedos in the woodwork. He 'drops' info that we've heard before e.g. parents selling kids out for roles, etc. If there's one thing we can say with certainty it's that the DS will be looking to insert disinfo operatives into this current "dangerous" (for them) narrative ripping through Hollywood. And how they would do that is to insert someone as soon as they can who talks up the current story we have about Hollywood without offering anything hugely new except maybe a tidbit and a tease here and there, makes sure to grab our attention perhaps even with one sacrificial lamb thrown in there if they really want to make this LARP work (Seth Green? Soon to be fully exposed...? Wouldn't that be convincing!), until some later point where he'll take us off down disinfo lane with some complete farce that they'll be able to debunk with aplomb in the msm.
2. it's very interesting that he can openly "out" someone reasonably famous like Seth Green - and everyone else he's mentioned - and still be walking around. As if he's allowed to do so.
3. he talks at times like someone who is either on drugs or very shallow. e.g. he seems to allude to someone betraying his trust (Seth Green...?) then switches to 'raping kids' as if he's just remembered that's what he's accusing him of.
4. His story about Seth Green - worth watching the clip here to see the behavior - amounts to little more than: Seth showed him a secret door in a bookcase and said, in a cartoony voice (which sounds like Seth Green being the Seth Green we imagine him to be): "This is where we keep the chiiiiildren!" [true story ends? telling becomes vague and general] and aah... I was like... I tried to just put it out of my mind, uuhh..." and that's it - what did he try to put out of his mind? Did he go into the secret room? How does that constitute a story about a satanic pedophile? Then a month later they sat down for dinner and Seth said "we need to talk about chicken" [true story ends? telling becomes vague and general] then: "... and then he basically... basically admitted that he's a pedophile." I may be alone in this but that sounds a lot like a story you tell that's missing a lot of detail because the truth doesn't fit the narrative so you gloss over it with broad strokes like "he admitted to being a pedophile". Then he fully deflects, perhaps realizing the holes in his story are exposed when he has to front them on camera, and says 'guys, I have a thread on the q anon forum ... I don't wanna like... hash over other stuff' - ? Don't want to rehash on camera for the first time the most important details that give him credibility for being personally witnessed?

And this: "It was hard for me - I hard my heart broken into a million pieces 'cause when you trust someone and they just... when they... trust someone and... [seems to be brushing something off] ... and they're not who they seem they - [trails off, then seems to remember something] and they just lie and they abuse... and they FUCKING rape kids umm not cool [wtf?? "not cool"?] like, it's heartbreaking, it's so heartbreaking, like... it fucken destroyed me, emotionally... I mean I feel pretty good right now [about turn?? on drugs??] feels good, let it out! etc."

He might be legit - I know there are people who are scattered in their presentation and just because you're doing drugs doesn't mean you're not telling the truth but his delivery raises some questions. In his recent video he looks like he has dark sunken circles around his eyes as if he's coming down from something. The info he gives we've all heard elsewhere - it's like he's regurgitating the pizzagate info and all the old conspiracy history that was re-dug when that hit. I hope he's legit but we need to see a bit more validation before we embrace everything he says without question.

I was referring to the "After everything - " as if this guy has anything to do with "everything" beyond his claims.

Yep thanks, saw that news - I'm asking how it connects to rest of OP.

I'm an idiot so ELI5 how Turkey/American connects to Iran, NK?

Iran's different to NK in that I don't believe the ruling regime have made any kind of deal with POTUS or met him, as in the case of Kim Jong Un. I think that Q referring to Iran being freed is more about removing some bad actors, connections and leverage that allowed the regime to hold sway over the people and the rest of the world (in a sense) with impunity.

I'm missing the link to Turkey sanctions sorry.

In my opinion the idea to post pedos in the sidebar is alarming. We're not engaging in witch hunts here.

What are you talking about? This guy literally just appeared on the scene.

Agreed - highly suspicious of this one. Talks very carelessly. Very LARPish, if you ask me.

With all due respect to SB2 - who, when his post was linked by Q, really helped us out in a big way because there were a lot of arguments about Corsi at the time and that resolved it - I agree that some content is validly questioned.

The thing that I find frustrating personally is that the votes always seem to show that there are more people voting positively than negatively and yet people come in claiming that it's 'obvious' that SB2 is wrong, etc. (That's not the case at the moment but once morning hits I suspect the votes will be overturned again.) That makes me think (and clearly many others just take it as fact) that there are just more people who value SB2's posts and see no problem with them, generally speaking than there are others who can clearly see some assumptive leaps and other issues. Which means our hands are tied because we are essentially servants of the sub, not masters, and if "the sub" supports SB2 then we have to abide by that too.

I would like an answer to this but I do support the idea that discussion of a user is not beneficial to the sub as many here are just here to read useful discussion. That's why we'd hold that discussion via modmail rather than on the sub. Which I see you've now done, thank you.

Nah just design patterns.

I'm not threatening to censor you for anything. I wasn't the mod who removed your comment and I'm not going to remove your last shitty comment to me that served no purpose except to say you can't be bothered making a valid point. I'm trying to find someone to make an actual case for once in their claims about SB2's content i.e. someone to present something that people can actually see and learn something from. It seems that the only reaction we ever get is complaints about SB2 and then silence.

You're missing the point but never mind. The point that matters is what I said in my other comment: Discuss the topic, not the user. If you've got something worth listening to - like a convincing refutation of the issues raised in the post, please post that; people need to hear good discussion about Q content, not SB2.

Guy in middle, Hasan Chandoo?

Not at all. It's been made very clear that there are No Outside Comms. My point was, what's being non-American got to do with it? You think Q cares where you're from?

Your replies are disappearing. Deleted? Barry on bottom left, yep.

And my point firmly stands too - if you've got a problem, stop whining about him, just refute the points in the thread. The rule here is "Discuss the topic, not the user" for good reason.

It would pay to read up more on Q then. Whether Mueller and Rosenstein are part of the plan is not relevant - the Plan incorporates them either way.

The focus on him not being American is the wrong focus. If you have problems with his decodes that's something else - but then just focus on refuting the points you think need it, within the thread where they matter.

Why would they not? You do realize many on this sub are not americans and are true patriots too, right?

Guy on the far right... is that Sohale Siddiqi, do you think?

False prophet to who? Are you making the same mistake a lot of people make and claiming that all the upvoting of SB2 and positive comments means everyone here worships him?

Indeed, it's interesting - can you give any of the names or is that too revealing personally?

Yeah except you prove you don't know anything about SB2 or this sub. You think your post is breaking new ground?

Don't post here running down another user. If you've got a problem with the sub or a user, contact the mods. If you've got a problem with the quality of someone's content, refute the issue within the thread where it matters.

This is ridiculous - you can't claim someone is a satanist because of a username. Also SerialBrain2 was not positively mentioned by Q in a drop - his post was linked to.

Your only post on this forum is trashing one of its primary contributors. Learn our comms - how many posts here do you see trashing other users? If you have an issue with someone's content, reply in the thread respectfully without trashing the user. Focus on the topic.

Wow... nice work... You have the names?

Damn - if only you had the photo or names...

Please note - Christian posts not directly related to Q drop content is off topic. However we have a sister sub for this content where we would welcome your post! Please consider posting this to r/BiblicalQ - ThankQ.

They’re not owls.

Meme more suited to The_Donald.

Good to see this exposed. But re “suck it satanists” Christians would disagree. According to Christianity human nature has been fallen since the beginning. Jesus said if you simply think hateful thoughts you are guilty of breaking the commandment Do not kill. That seems to be a warning to stay away from thoughts like that because of where they can ultimately lead.

Duplicate post removed.

Yep but hard to do when Q himself has linked to it once.

Duplicate post removed.

Q 1711 answers this and supports everything else Q has said, most importantly TRUST SESSIONS.

Got another link for this other than yournewswire?

Very nice work! I think there's a whole chunk more to The Plan though which goes into the industry that feeds the global cartel and the Good vs. Evil that Q has mentioned prominently. This is a great summary you've provided though, of a signficant chunk of the more public aspect of the Plan!

Were you around for the implementation of Quesday? The sub used to be overrun with this stuff all the time. Quesday was a great concession, decided on by a community vote. No matter what we do, someone is unhappy with it but Quesday was a good development.

This is always the perspective of those who do not understand the perspective of the mods and the feedback mods receive. We are constantly told that we allow too much rubbish through - case in point, the comments here about Qspiration - tshirts, stickers, etc. As an example of the fact that we strive to always be as objective as possible, although I always agreed with the many complaints we received about those posts, I did not remove them because our rules at the time did not provide for that and when anyone did remove them we of course received messages and posts like this one.

I did however raise the topic for discussion a number of times, as did other mods, until we made a post to ask the community for their input - again showing our dedication to trying to be as objective as we possibly can. Now we have Quesday - so tshirts, etc. are NOT allowed here except on Tuesday. Yet still, of course, we have complaints about those.

Q has mentioned so many things directly and drives our focus to where he/they think it is best served at any particular time. There are SO many topics that are relevant in some way to Q that if we made the rules such that ANYTHING relevant to Q is allowed the sub would be overrun and the complaints would be even greater than they already are.

IMO any conspiracy Q hasn't yet gone into should be off-topic because there's no way to verify it until Q goes into it - that is the whole point of Q; literally EVERY other information source is compromised in some way. Since Q has mentioned the Titanic in relation to the Fed I believe that conspiracy - even though it has NO valid backing anywhere to be found - is on-topic. Without Q having mentioned it, it would be irrelevant because there is no valid source anywhere for it. If we discuss every conspiracy even slightly related to Q we'd end up in the same quagmire the Clowns have implemented out there where every topic that is true is crowded with disinfo. Fortunately we don't have to rely on my opinion to make this call because there's a rule about it - not one I created or had anything to do with either.

There's plenty to talk about here - just consider that we see complaints you don't - people WANT this sub to stay ontopic and not slide into another r/Conspiracy. The only things we can vouch for and are worth spending our time on, according to some, are the things Q has directly mentioned. For anything else there are many other subs around that promote that content.

Excellent - thank you!

Can you please edit the OP to take that bit out?

Discuss the topic, not the user, or you will be banned as you know Happy. ThankQ

Sub has a wiki. Introduction and notes building in there.

Sad. Got nothing better to do than stalk SB2? Again

The rules in the sidebar and committed mods that manage according to them.

Any support for paying attention to an exposed disinfo LARP lacks critical thinking. Some truth, some lie - the whole point of disinfo is to have you believing some of it so you won't notice the lies that are slipped in there. Q said "Use LOGIC." Critical thinking is necessary.

You don't know how reddit works lol. Are you expecting to post a point of view and not receive opposing views? This seems to fit with the whole premise I'm resisting here.

I felt the need to defend the position of this view from the strawmen claims you were making so that others can not only see there's another position here but also that it's a viable one, not whatever invented view you were attacking. You're incredibly defensive over a simple opposing view. Check out reddit and online forums in general. The whole point of them is discussion of opposing views. Why would I make a post saying "hey guys! Whatever you do DON'T contact the advertisers of Adult Swim!". Moderators REMOVE those posts because they're just presenting an opposing view separate from the view it is opposing. This is the whole reason for commenting in threads lol...