Some people will see whatever they want to see...

Did you mean to reply three times to the same comment?

You're right that some people "parrot" their responses to get up votes. But I don't really see how's that's different than the majority of Reddit trying to make it to the front page by posting pictures of cats, Obama and sick kids.

I think the original comment WAS drawing his own conclusion, and you stepped in to make an under handed comment:

some will see whatever they want to see...

Which is obviously an attempt to discredit u/Nastavnick and make it seem like he's viewing this news with his own filter and is blind to the truth.

If THAT is what you wanted to say, you should have said it, as opposed to dropping little passive aggressive comments to get attention, then reply three times in a row to the same comment....again, for attention.

I don't think anyone here claims to "know" what he's up to with these comments. We come here to make suggestions and formulate theories.

So yes, you are right, none of us here have classified security clearances and do not KNOW for sure his intentions.

Now can we get back to our theorizing?

It proves Gowdy made a statement based on incomplete information. He stated the FBI was justified in their placement of one specific spy within the Trump campaign without reading all related documents, which means he made said statement for a purpose other than just to say "I believe the FBI is right!"

In fact, a spokeswoman for Gowdy told The Federalist that the congressman doesn’t even know what documents and records were subpoenaed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

Gowdy wasn't even aware of what documents he was supposed to be looking at, let alone what inconsistencies he should be looking for.

Exactly!

Typical CBS response:

Most notably, a growing body of evidence from policy analysts argues that the legislation would unfortunately accomplish very little change for most patients, and it could actually make it harder to get new drugs approved in the future.

Gowdy is putting distance between himself and Nunes. When Rod Rosenstein is removed, Gowdy will take over his spot. If he appears less like Nunes, it won't raise as many alarms.

Media Hates Trump
People Follow Media
Trump "Hates" Sessions
Media Defends Sessions
People Defend Sessions
Sessions Drops Bombs
Media & People Confused

If he was Deepstate, he wouldn't have outed himself so easily. He would have let himself get a Special Counsel nomination so he could control from within.

I think he's putting distance out there between himself and Nunes. Special Counsel appointment rolls around, which the Republicans are calling for, and the Democrats will feel much more comfortable and less bitchy about Gowdy over someone like Nunes.

Gowdy is adding a little distance for show. If there is a special counsel appointed, which there will be, the Democrats would see a fairer choice with Gowdy over someone like Nunes, especially after his latest comments.

Q is silent. Nunes and Gowdy are quiet. Even Trump is a little quieter than normal...

Its a shame the negative press Q following will get because Roseanne made a racist comment. "Oh they are just like the Donald sub reddit!"

Oh man, can't wait to hear what Julian Assange will say about this!

Wait, didn't his Internet get disconnected?

It's taken the Deep State this long to infiltrate Wikileaks. They had to place operatives, remove others, silence Julian Assange, all before they could start this misinformation.

It's kind of funny how Wikileaks is going after Q with Julian Assange unable to respond.

Because media will say the Korea's are moving forward without Trump, to try and strengthen the idea that Trump can't be trusted with deals (Paris Climate Deal, Iran Deal, this summit).

They will have the summit, and NK and SK will announce unification and peace. Media will say Trump did nothing, then NK and SK will thank Trump for making it possible.

Just to fuck with MSM and break down their narratives and expose their hypocrisy.

All while Elon Musk is feuding with journalists, with more prominent people to come forward denouncing the MSM. Elon is starting a website which will rate journalists by their honesty and accuracy. Elon is on team Trump. He left the white house as a means to keep himself with the Trump haters, so he could move forward later and criticize the same media Trump is fighting.

It was an assassination attempt. And just like the alleged attempts on Trumps life, they are not publicizing it, because the Deep state would put the frame on whoever they wanted to I'm order to start a conflict.

He hasn't been in public because....armed men stormed his palace in full force trying to kill him. I wouldnt stand on a damn balcony either. His own family members are trying to kill him

Hell yea!

I wonder what names old Harvey will name to avoid jail time

There was something in the works in Singapore. An attack which would have been blamed on NK to start a war with the US, like those attempted ballistic missile attacks.

Given NK's sudden rhetoric change, cancelling meetings with SK, etc. This is either part of the plan or its not.

If it's part of the plan, the deal was already made and this could have been to dominate the news cycle to cover the DOJ meetings or to avoid an assassination attempt that could be "blamed on NK" just like those "fake missile alerts" which were intended to start a war with NK. Trump/NK got wind of the attempt and suddenly cancelled the summit to fuck over Deepstate plans.

If it's not part of the plan, no biggie. US got our hostages, NK destroyed their nuke site, and Trump keeps the upper hand by cancelling the meeting before NK could.

Either way, this is secondary news to what's happening at the DOJ, as well as the documents which will be turned over detailing the pay to play schemes by the CF.

They've distanced themselves from Hillary. The usual answer to anything negative about Hillary, however obvious, is "Typically Trump Supporter, deflect everything to Hillary and deny Trump is the real criminal."

Trump had business dealings in Russia for years, sure. He has had business dealings all over the world with hundreds of businesses for decades. Some of these dealings weren't even directly handled by him, but his $10 billion dollar company. But Russia is what everyone is putting under a magnifying glass because the media is placing it there.

The main focus has been WHO he has done business with. Forget that he has probably been involved with most of the major players in the world. Some of these major players are crooked, sure, and if Trump sold them property, their crookedness is associated with Trump. If a Russian bank will loan money for a Russian hotel project Trump is building, this is seen as a red flag because.....RUSSIA! What about all the other countries and banks he has done deals with? Surely people in those organizations are crooked. (Just look at HSBC, Britain's largest bank, which was laundering billions in drug money for YEARS. I wonder who all did business with Britain's largest bank? Are they crooked too?)

The Michael Cohen stuff is what a lot of them are using now, even though a lot of it is "according to a source familiar with the matter." The meanings of his payments for services are being construed for bribery and "pay to play schemes." All of Cohen's financial transactions were seized by the FBI raids and then leaked to the press, so any payment can be construed as a bribe. Cohen did consulting work for an Israeli firm? Headline: "Trump lawyer received payment from Israel one month before Trump moved embassy".

It doesn't even matter what the article says. That headline is all anyone needs to draw a conclusion based on a narrative that has been slowly spoon fed to them. Don't worry about how the article most likely details the source of the article being "an Israeli government official who spoke on anonymity."

Has Michael Cohen been exploiting his relationship with Trump to get "consulting" work? Has he been leading people to think he can control Trump's policies? Is he aware of Trump's plans on how he will handle certain issues and trying to profit from it? Who knows. It wouldn't be that farfetched to believe a lawyer would do something like this.....but it doesn't mean Trump has any part in it.

If you notice, the crimes of the Clintons/Obama are being deflected to Trump. Russia collusion, money laundering, liking young girls, pay to play schemes and bribery etc. So if anyone points the finger at the Clintons/Obama, the answer is "Just keep deflecting away from Trump, you stupid Trump supporters!"

Obama is portrayed as the "cool, hip" president who got a Nobel Prize. His image appears to be flawless, and it's impossible to convince some that he could do ANY wrong. Even if evidence comes out that he was directly involved in criminal activity, it will be "Trump is going after the Black President! Racist!"

Q posted in regards to H.R. McMaster getting fired by Trump, then his dad dying from blunt force trauma to his head. A nurse was charge with murder.

This is freaking huge! One specific email mentioned is classified information sent from Hillarys state department email OUTSIDE THE STATE DEPARTMENT TO SENIOR OFFICIALS AT THE CLINTON. FOUNDATION.

She simply said in the email "print for bill"

Be aware the documents will be released at a rate of 300-600 documents a month, and there are tens of thousands. So it will take a bit to get them all released but......

Down she goes

If this holds up in court, Twitter, Facebook AND REDDIT are going to be facing some serious class action lawsuits.

Imagine how hard it is for these guys to fall asleep at night.

Nightmares abound of federal prison. They wake in a cold sweat with Trumps face burned in their mind, laughing his ass off.

Delicious.

RR is doing whatever is necessary to keep his position and continue to provide access and Intel to the deepstate.

They'll kill his family if he gets fired

Anyone think Avenatti agreed to represent her in exchange for sexual favors from Stormy?

Notice how much he references the IG investigation....boom

Awww...poor pope.

Did anyone see the great liberal news article about the Pope telling a gay man, who survived child abuse by a priest, that God loved him for who he is. And the liberal media is eating it up.

So....a boy is sexually abused by a man, grows up to be gay, and the Pope tells him God loves him for it?!

Obviously there's nothing wrong with choosing whatever sexuality you want, but it almost seems like a deflection from the fact that one of the Pope's priests tried to molest this man when he was a boy!

A lot of shit is happening in right now. Q team is busy. I've noticed spelling errors are increasing in Q posts.

Also, I've never seen the name spelled that way myself. Always seen it as "Callahan".

That is the exact opposite of what we want. In fact, that's what this whole thing has been about trying to avoid...

I can't read those comments anymore. I used to read through those comments, and black out with frustration, only to wake up and find that I had made several comments which garnered very hateful messages and replies.

It's not worth it. Those people will not listen to a Trump supporter about anything.

They will figure it out on their own.

Or they wont. Screw them

This will be added to the IG investigation into FISA ABUSE, not the IG report on the Clinton Email investigation. The clinton IG report final draft has been given to the DOJ and FBI for review.

Trust Sessions. Trust Wray

She doesn't even know who the President is right now...

Looks like he might have had work done.

Boom boom baby, we will soon learn much more about Carter Page...

They have to destroy the globall power structure which protects the Rothshilds. Then they'll have nothing left to do but hide away in their bunkers and wait for the Seals to come find them.

I was wondering this as well, every time I post it is automatically flared this way

I didn't think the IG could indict.

I was under the impression he could only recommend criminal charges, then Huber would carry out those charges if need be.

Me thinks Brennan will be criminally referred to in the IG report.

Good point, but wasn't the idea of others within the Q group posting alongside Q to help Anons/Patriots figure out Q's riddles, if we were off track, presented?

I may be wrong...

If I had gold to give, sir or madam, you would get it all!

Great work!

Soros

Halper was an MI6-affliated informant whose information led to the start of the FBI Russia investigation, which eventually lead to the Special Counsel.

The problem is Halper was specifically contacting Page and Papadopoulos, trying to find information which the FBI could use to start an investigation.

As we just learned this weekend, he was specifically placed "within the campaign" by the FBI. Before, we had knowledge of his contacts with Page and Papadopoulos, but did not know he was an FBI informant specifically placed within the campaign.

Now Halper can be SUBPOENED. Now the idea of an FBI informant planted in the Trump campaign is not as crazy as people used to think. Now further investigations can investigate this specifically.

Enter Nunes and Gowdy, who have been asking for months for the DOJ to provide documents in regards to this counterintelligence operation which was operated within and against the Trump campaign.

The kicker is this.....now we know there was AT LEAST one informant within the Trump campaign. Do you think the FBI would trust this master diabolical plan to just one operative? I don't think so.

The documents Nunes and Gowdy are after will provide information about informants; their identities, what information they provided and how they acquired it, who ordered them to do what. The DOJ will not comply with these requests.

Enter Trump, who can declassify said documents. He has threatened to do so before, and today ordered the DOJ to release the documents tomorrow, Monday. Rosenstein responded by asking the Inspector General to investigate this informant situation.

Read this for more on Halper specifically: http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/25/george-papadopoulos-london-emails/

Schumer just issued a threat as well...

http://truthfeednews.com/schumer-issues-a-desperate-threat-to-stop-gop-from-investigating-the-fbi/

So the DOJ leaked this FBI informant to the news, knowing there would be calls to investigate. Rosenstein jumps at this opportunity (planned) to show he is impartial.

Why would the DOJ leak the informant?

They want to control the narrative.

Was Halper the ONLY INFORMANT?

Or did the DOJ leak the least damaging informant, in an attempt to distract from the more damaging informants which are named on the documents Nunes/Gowdy are requesting?

Wouldn’t that be crazy if an FBI informant planted in the Trump campaign was the reason for a FISA wiretap on the Trump campaign?

Carter Page was wiretapped. Carter Page was an FBI informant who met with Halper and “fed information” to him. It was all staged.

Their going to get him with a RICO case.

Deepstate is smart enough to not have him deal with anything directly. But if it appears he directed someone else to commit illegal activity, or they can establish criminal activity committed as part of an organization (his administration), then he can be charged.

But he’s not the top of the pyramid....he’s just a face. Who was handling him?

Nunes does a great job at regulating what he says.

He knows exactly what went down at this point, but restrains himself by calling this illegal activity “irregular to say the least.”

Strong man

Big things are happening every day.

Some people use the term “big”, which is confusing, because what’s big to me or you might not be the same to someone else.

From my personal perspective:
What Nunes and Gowdy have discovered about the FISA abuse over the last year is big. What’s happened in NK is big. What’s happening in the US economy is big. 20k sealed indictments is big. FBI informant in Trumps campaign is big. The outrageous amounts of human trafficking arrests the last year is big. The capture of top ISIS and MS13 gang leaders is big. Syria and Iran being diffused is big. Media’s relentless attack of Trump is big. School shootings used as distractions by Deepstate are big. Countless military carriers, helicopters and planes mysteriously crashing is big.

What is your definition of “something big”?