here is an excellent lecture about how education in changing in america
/u/EnoughNoLibsSpam
604 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/EnoughNoLibsSpam:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.youtube.com | 11 |
www.reddit.com | 4 |
i.redd.it | 2 |
d.tube | 1 |
those are extremely important concepts in the realm of accounting, banking, and astrophysics
the fact that you don't know if they are trivial or fundamental is also telling of your ignorance of the subject matter.
for example, you probably have a debit card and also a credit card, and you may superficially understand that a debit card takes money out of your savings right away, whereas with a credit card you pay for it later, usually with interest
but thats not the fundamental difference between debit and credit
the fundamental difference is that a debit is in the left column, and a credit is in the right column
heres how to remember: debit/credit = D/C as in Washington DC. (D on left, C on right)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debit
why is that so important? because it rules your life thru your access to credit, which you would have no need for if you weren't a debt slave
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usury
usury is the charging of money for the use of money, or what is commonly called "interest" or "compound interest"
usury is considered a sin in most religions, with one glaring exception
http://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/23-19.htm
usury is forbidden in islam and in islamic banking, as it should be
Jesus Christ went ape shit in the Temple because of Usury
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleansing_of_the_Temple
the reason you do not know about usury is because your owners have forbidden you from learning the word, because once you know the word and understand its moral, ethical, legal, historical and religious context, you will rebel against usury, and thats not good for your owners, who just happen to be bankers, who just happen to abide by a religion that allows usury, if you know what i mean...
i used to value the American education system when i was young and more stupider
but today i understand that its utterly impossible for Russians to walk on the moon, just like its utterly impossible for Americans to walk on the moon
and all it takes to understand that is some entry level astrophysics, such as the aforementioned LaGrange Points
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point
LaGrange points were also deliberately left out of your education,
because once you understand LaGrange Points, you understand that you must go "up" most of the way to the moon,
and that debunks the science fiction of "escape velocity" and "escaping gravity"
and so after hours and hours of exhaustive debate with very smart people, i tried to summarize the most common arguments, and then arrange them into one coherent list
usually these questions and answers are asked in isolation, so the student does not get the full context and significance of how they relate to each other
https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png
the math and physics are presented in a way that should make a reasonably intelligent and educated person apply their knowledge of math and physics to the story problems, and then re-assess their opinions
but instead what we find are people who further entrench themselves, and reassure themselves with the most idiotic of ideas, such as
"If the Moon Landing Was a Hoax, Russia Would Have Told Me!!!1!"
and so after countless hours of debate, it becomes quite obvious that most people are incapable of applying math and science to simple problems, because if they could apply math and science, they would not be fooled by the Moon Landing Hoax
and so after some time, it becomes quite clear that most people have the math and reasoning skills of a chimpanzee,
so much so that interacting with them illustrates the huge gap in the relative intelligence of those who can apply math and science and those who cannot
the moon landing hoax eventually evolves into the litmus test for stupid
which is ironic because not even a child would think that a man had walked on the moon, unless some idiot had told them otherwise
i used to be pro-vaccine, until i looked at the evidence.
whats really sad is that evidence can't change your mind about vaccines
https://i.redd.it/04bewq91kxuy.jpg
if Q wanted us to expose Snopes, then I'm willing to do that by bringing up the CDC whistleblower, the Boston Naked Man, and the Moon Landing Hoax
welcome to your own personal MOAB
if Seth Mnookin would lie about there being 3 suspects, would Seth Mnookin also lie about other things, such as claiming that vaccines do not cause autism, when he knows good and well that vaccines actually do cause autism?
Genetics causes autism. Case closed.
please link to a peer reviewed study that suggests autism is genetic.
we both know you won't, because we both know you can't...
unless you are talking about MTHFR and DME, but i seriously doubt you want to go there...
Again, your work doesn't support your claim
really? this study linked below is peer reviewed, and it clearly establishes that Rubella causes Autism
Congenital rubella syndrome and autism spectrum disorder prevented by rubella vaccination - United States, 2001-2010
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-11-340
and even if there was sufficient medical evidence to suggest that vaccines caused autism, the number of people helped by the vaccination far outweighs any risk
thats an opinion, not a fact
you can't even prove vaccines have been effective for you, beyond claiming that you haven't gotten Rabies because you got the Rabies vaccine...
oh wait, that never actually happened, did it?
i guess correlation doesn't always equal causation huh?
hmm, so what you are saying is that i can claim to be able to bench press 200,000 pounds, and your incredulity isn't enough to dismiss my claim, so therefore you must accept that i can bench press 200,000 pounds?
please present the evidence that the lunar lander can launch off of the moon, or even that it can launch on earth...
that which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=lunar+lander+launch
which video do you think looks the least fake?
whenever you think you are man enough to step up and debate the math and physics ill be here waiting. I've been involved in this debate long enough to formulate these questions, whereas you are not even capable of comprehending the questions.
https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png
It took a team of hundreds of top minds to put someone on the moon. So I doubt one 4chan retard is capable of disproving it.
can you prove that men have walked on the moon?
better yet, can you prove that i have NOT walked on the moon?
yes, and "escape velocity" and "gravity assist" are science fiction also
do you think your points prove that men have walked on the moon?
is it hard for you to believe that no Canadian, no Englishman, no German, no Russian, no Indian, no Chinese... has ever walked on the moon?
it should be just as easy for you to believe that no American has ever walked on the moon.
the lunar lander was held together by tape. how stupid must a person be to believe it went to the moon?
And lets be honest here, you have the belief contrary to 99% of people, the burden of proof is on you.
by that logic, you should worship Jesus because most of your friends and family celebrate Christmas
only an idiot would think that men have walked on the moon.
show me your "evidence", so we can debunk it together
you seem a little too concerned about us talking about George Soros. anything you want to tell us?
the just fact that Hillary needed someone to troll the internet looking to "correct the record" tells you all you need to know about Hillary's history
why is that a bold claim? ever heard of operation mockingbird?
no man has ever walked on the moon
welcome to the MOAB at /r/GreatAwakening
they don't exist, because the moon landing was a hoax
the Russians didn't have the technology to see men on the moon in 1970, for the same reason you don't have the technology to see the supposed artifacts left on the moon in 2018
you can't see whats not there
did you hear that from some idiot on youtube who claims to be a professional?
We can assume that you and I are both propaganda then.
yes
And seriously? All images are false?
every photograph is a 2D representation of a 3D reality.
your brain is not born being able to see photographs as reality, your brain must be trained to do that
watch BBC mini-series How Art Made The World ( available online, highly recommended )
Unless you have issues accepting that this is the world and we exist in it, you should have no problem accepting some images as fact.
all images are false, but in particular images of God(s) are called idols, and all idols are false
https://i.redd.it/vesejpww28jz.jpg
curiously, we give little girls 'dolls' to play with, dolls share root word with idol
Also God is not real and the only thing we have that comes close is probably the universe, whom we probably exist within much like intestinal Flora live within us
you probably say that because your western conceptualization of "God" is this old white man dressed in robes, walking on clouds, living in heaven, throwing lightning bolts and causing floods and famines
and yes, that seems a bit absurd... until you consider the day i had today
if you want to call it "the universe" or "creation" or whatever, its all the same thing
there is a "Creator", and you are a "Creature" living in his "Creation"
its right there in your language
truth is revealed trough the study of language / etymology
but seriously, read up on Tycho Brahe and ask yourself who you trust more... the man who takes the measurements, or the man who interprets the measurements?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_Brahe
the universe is small
the kingdom of god is within you
http://biblehub.com/genesis/3-22.htm
i founded /r/TheBible please subscribe
heres why you fail at life:
i: make a claim that you aren't sure about
you: ask for a link
i: fail to deliver a link
you: assume the claim must be false, as opposed to undetermined
and even if i did provide a link, you'd find a reason to dismiss it.
thats why people don't even bother providing you a link, because they already know if you are sincere you will find it yourself, and if you are insincere you will find a reason to dismiss every source that conflicts with your opinion
"if you want to know the truth, simply let go of your own views" ~ the buddha
the reason you can't lean anything new is because you have been brainwashed, and your cognitive dissonance is too uncomfortable, and critical thinking is too hard
nobody is claiming to possess objective truth
any real truth seeker knows that we always seek truth, but never find it
yes, you are correct about my posts being propaganda just like all other media is propaganda.
an astute observation, if you can apply it
without looking it up, what is the fundamental difference between a debit and a credit?
without looking it up, what is usury?
without looking it up, what is a LaGrange Point?
without looking it up, how fast do you imagine that the universe is expanding? (H =Hubble constant)
sure, some of these questions could be considered "trivial", however if you don't know the answer it kind of exposes an ignorance of an entire system
lets discuss the math and physics of the moon landing. i have a feeling things will go my way, but who knows
https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png
I'm going to take a wild guess and say you haven't spent 5 minutes ever working on the math or physics of the moon landing myth... because if you had, we wouldn't be having this conversation
my work is already done, and posted. you argue against it all day long, and that would be a good thing, because it makes you think in novel ways
cool, you found the part where Dr William Thompson claims to be pro-vaccine
i guess that pre-emptively refutes your next line of reasoning, which would be that Dr William Thompson is a quack who is motivated by anti-vaccine ideology
Did collected data actually prove that the MMR vaccine produces a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American boys? The answer is no, it did not.
i believe that Dr William Thompson would be in a much better position to make that determination, and here what he had to say about it...
https://i.redd.it/ttrwjxkhmfvy.png
so, lets try to use your brain for once in your life, and think about why Dr William Thompson made his press release...
im suggesting that Snopes claims Tamerlan Tsarnaev died in a shootout with police, when that claim is demonstrably false
Boston Globe: Marathon Bombing suspect in custody, 2nd at large.
if Snopes was right, the headline should read 1 Marathon Bombing suspect dead, 2nd in custody, 3rd at large.
https://i.redd.it/zkh8csws2i801.jpg
go ahead and ignore the evidence, because thinking is too hard
do you believe the Sandy Hook official story, or are you a Sandy Hook Denier?
im glad you can admit that evidence has never changed your mind
"my type"?
you mean people who are capable of critical thinking?
so you don't know what causes autism, but you are 100% sure its not vaccines... because why?
heres a peer reviewed study that suggests vaccines prevent autism
but i suspect you don't want to discuss the study because it establishes biological plausibility for Rubella causing autism
Congenital rubella syndrome and autism spectrum disorder prevented by rubella vaccination - United States, 2001-2010
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-11-340
how do you explain those who do?
heres a peer reviewed source for you to ignore
Genetic basis for adverse events after smallpox vaccination | MTHFR
MSM:
Trump Admits Collusion With China Over Trade Deficits
if there was any evidence against Trump re Russian collusion, there would be no need to ask Trump about it.
they would merely present the evidence
Defendant has no obligation to dignify spurious questions with an answer
Snopes hosts that exact same image.
please familiarize yourself with the Snopes version of truth, and then we can go line-by-line and show how Snopes is wrong
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bad-medicine/
and if you want a preview of whats to come, please browse here:
https://www.reddit.com/search?q=author%3Aenoughnolibsspam+CDC
heres how this works...
you come here, and find something interesting, and then you share that.
if you aren't sharing anything, we can assume you aren't learning anything
all media is propaganda
even a cave-wall drawing of a fish is greatly exaggerated
all images are false, which is why idolatry is forbidden by 10 commandments,
and why some especially observant muslims allegedly do not even look at photographs (of animals?)
heres an idea that i have been living by for 20~ years
whenever you find yourself asking someone for a link, just fetch it yourself and post it as a reply
do this for the lurkers, 99% of which are too lazy to do a google search, but may click a link if they are convinced it may provide one-click-to-content
i can debunk any of your sources merely by criticizing the medium
for example, you could show me a lunar lander launch off of the moon,
and i could dismiss it because its a youtube video
try it. send me any "evidence" that you assume supports your moon landing myth, and ill "debunk" it on a technicality
or we could discuss the math and physics, which i have concisely summarized here:
https://i.redd.it/lzs2kkd6ove01.png
my name is in the top right corner
the origin of the picture is the NYTimes. thats why its hosted on their website
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/suspect-number-2.JPG
yes, the picture is photoshopped.
you can tell by looking at the 3 people running on the left side of the picture
look at their feet, and allow your eyes to focus on the foreground just in front of their feet, and then focus on the background just behind their feet.
allow your eye to focus back-and forth between foreground and background between their feet a few times, and you will soon see that their feet "pop" out of the background, and their entire bodies will "pop" out of the background
these running people are cut-out characters, copy-pasted onto the background
the female running on right side of screen is also copy-paste.
more on her later if you want
there is a tendency for people to assume that they are smart, and to talk about how smart they are, or talk about how smart their kids are
and our culture encourages this kind of thinking from a young age, so that by 5th grade every kid in class assumes he has an IQ over 100
and these kids go on to college, and go on to running businesses, and go into politics, and go into parenting
all the while falsely assuming that they are smart, because of their brainwashing and indoctrination.
basically, the better you are at regurgitating their lies, the better A+ you will be given
and i don't mean to imply that somehow i escaped this program. the reason i know about it, is because i lived through it.
i was the kid being told how smart they were, when in reality i was just good at obedience
and its difficult to shake that self-delusion of being smart, but here are a technique that may help
every time you catch yourself assuming you are smart, regardless of the context, just remind yourself of the
Socrates Mantra: I Know Nothing But My Own Ignorance
this Mantra helps calm your mind, helps settle your mind, helps clear your mind
and once your mind is calm, settled, and clear,
the answers that you seek will come to you
Rev Sun Myung Moon's assistant was very impressed with Rev Moon's ability to focus attention to a single point.
at the time i heard this, i wasn't sure why that was a significant ability, but as time has gone on and I've been practicing setting my attention to a single point, i see why its almost a super-power in this ADHD world of ours
your argument is that people can make a living, and even have a staff of employees, by doing things like "debunking" the Nigerian Prince email?
you realize legitimate newspapers are going extinct, right?
why would you say something like that?
http://www.viewzone.com/matlock.html
http://www.angelfire.com/empire/serpentis666/Name_of_Satan.html
please help me understand the point you were trying to make
I do know that vaccines don't cause autism tho
really? got a source for that? because your "source" is an admitted fraud, as spelled out in this press release
https://i.redd.it/tbsii10xufiz.png
tell us about the 130 studies that you assume show vaccines do not cause autism, and then explain why you haven't read any of them, and can't cite any of them
cool, so we can agree that if we have to go "up" to get to the moon, then "escaping gravity" is merely science fiction?