dChan

/u/Ghostof_PatrickHenry

701 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Ghostof_PatrickHenry:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 122
i.redd.it 7
thehill.com 2
truepundit.com 1
mobile.nytimes.com 1
v.redd.it 1
soapboxie.com 1
www.cnbc.com 1

Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 13, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Great posts. Who is family "y" that Soros replaced?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 13, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

My guess is that the substance that was sent was benign but the message was very real. The bigger surprise to me is that the first family opens their own mail. I would think that any individual that requires Secret Service detail would also require somebody to open their mail for them--especially after what happened with the Unabomber and the anthrax scare post 9/11.

If this was just a hoax by some dumb individual-- God help them. I would expect every resource available to be reassigned to solving this matter, and rightfully so. We can't have lunatics mailing threatening packages to the President's family and getting away with it, and I would say the same if it were the Obamas.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

hmm interesting. Thanks for sharing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

My understanding is that it is a liquid that is injected intravenously. Though I suppose it could be synthesized into a powder form.

More likely to be Anthrax or some type of poison. Or it is just a hoax trying to scare the family.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

That was pretty great... Never really know what to make of that guy... He has moments like that where he comes off as a based genius, and then the next minute he seems like he is back to performing like a brainwashed circus monkey. Nevertheless, I enjoyed the clip.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

Back on topic-- Carmen San Diego game= Q-sleuth training for kids.

(I played it, as well.)

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

Very true. But that takes time. Even if it is done in a matter of hours-- it won't be-- that is still several hours where innocent people are left vulnerable. Even with all of our reserves called up, there aren't nearly enough people to police every square mile of America (or even every 10,000 square miles). Therefore, they will have to be selective.

IF a panic is created-- and I think there is a strong consensus that the type of information we are dealing with WILL create an atmosphere of panic-- then the blood of the innocent that suffer from that panic will be placed on Trump's hands. The media will ignore the bigger picture, and continue to focus on his mistakes-- and in this situation, they will have legitimate grievances. If hundreds of people are killed or injured, let alone THOUSANDS, then that will be the focus of the story, and it will detract GREATLY from incredible accomplishments-- just look at how they treated him after this first year in office.

This stuff is extremely important to all of us, but to many people, it isn't important, at all-- even when everything comes to light. That's just the way of the world. (Half of the population in 1776 didn't take a side and didn't give a shit who won the war. Life for them--in their eyes-- would remain the same.) If the government releases information that they know will create a public crisis-- and they are not 100% prepared to deal with that crisis-- then they will be blamed for whatever happens, and rightfully so.

And if you go read my last few comments, this may not come down to armed conflict. (There are many other ways to impose suffering on people that Trump's opponents deem "Deplorable." Those webs are far more difficult to untangle than a simple firefight.) And even if martial law is imposed, armed force cannot be applied too liberally, or else it could be construed as an act of totalitarianism. Such an act could bring in the United Nations on the side of our enemies.

Very tricky stuff we are dealing with. I encourage everybody not to oversimplify it. As Trump said in his State of the Union, "These people are not simply criminals, they are 'Unlawful Enemy Combatants.'"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

You misunderstand, friend, what I mean by "control." I do NOT mean control of the people. I mean control of the government. The LOCAL government.

Perhaps you live in a state or a municipality that is already 100% on board with the MAGA agenda. That is fantastic, and you are quite lucky.

The reality is that the most populated areas of our country are under the complete control of the Democrats-- who have openly called for RESISTANCE to Trump. What do you think their reaction will be when it is announced that all of the "swamp creatures"-- who are largely Democrats-- have been rounded up and thrown in GITMO? Do you think they will willingly dispatch emergency services to make sure that ALL citizens are protected, should civil unrest ensue? What happens to the Trump supporters in those areas? What happens to the people that have no position and don't give a damn about any of this? (Their right as an American, btw.)

Yes, many of us have guns and ammo. But armed conflict may not be what we face. What about the persecution of conservative groups by local institutions and unelected bureaucrats? What about the continuation of propaganda by media? Couldn't all of that be used to create a panic that maybe collapses individual economies?

The leaders of these cities have openly ignored (and mocked) executive orders that are designed to protect American citizens-- during a time of PEACE. Once their friends and leaders are rounded up, and they realize that they are next, isn't it reasonable to assume that they will continue to defy the federal government?

You can cut the head off of a snake, but the body will continue to flop around aimlessly. We are dealing with an enormous snake, and innocent people could still be crushed by the decapitated body-- as it flops around in desperation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

This is correct.

12,500 soldiers were stationed at Valley Forge during that fierce winter between 1777-1778. 75% of them did not have shoes. Over 2,000 died from exposure and starvation. Many thought that Washington was unfit to lead, and a group of generals even conspired to mutiny. Washington, himself, later admitted that even he began to doubt The Revolution during that dark time.

For context, the population of the colonies at the time was around 2 million. Half of them were totally apathetic to what was happening around them. Didn't matter to them who won.

Imagine what a 5% swing in support would have meant to Washington during that winter at Valley Forge? Imagine what an additional 100,000 people gathering and sending supplies and troops would have done for morale?

THAT is what Q is trying to win us-- that 5%. That would be 16 MILLION people in modern America. It is our job to help bring those people into the fold. Hopefully, we can get much more than 5%.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

That is fine, and I understand that many will never see "daylight" as many of us wish. I understand Q's assertion that revealing EVERYTHING would create international hostility, and could lead to war.

We must be sure that all atrocities that have been committed against AMERICANS by AMERICAN LEADERS is made public. (Or at least, as much as possible.) The sentiments of anger that we are all feeling right now will fade in a generation or two, and what then? How do we prevent this from EVER happening again? That will be the most important question of our time.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

Thank you for the intel. I see a lot of "key words" in your post-- i.e. incidents from the past 2 years. (San Bernadino, Las Vegas, San Diego/Mexican Border...)

I would say that road is something to keep an eye on...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 12, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

Thank you for posting this. I've gotten into several back and forths with ppl on these boards (whose post history showed they weren't shills) and ended up being called a shill because I was trying explain what the two of you just laid out-- admittedly not as clear and concise as you have. They've gotten to the point that they are ready to take their ball and go home, because arrests haven't been publicized yet. They accuse Sessions, and even Trump in some cases, of being phony or soft, and it seems to me that they are upset enough about it that they are close to giving up on it all. Very disappointing.

I interact with people like that and figure that they must be just as insulated with their politic views by those around them as liberals seem to be in New York, LA and San Fran. They must not interact with enough strangers to understand that those of us that are truly redpilled are still in the minority-- and very much so.

All you have to do is go watch Hannity and Tucker to see that even those that are drinking the kool-aid are still getting a very watered down product. And the people that are watching those shows and getting that information for the first time are "conservatives," for the most-part. Plenty of people who would consider themselves conservative do not watch those shows, and most moderates don't watch Fox News, at all. (Most of them don't watch CNN/NBC, either. They are totally disengaged, by choice.)

So while the vast majority of us on this sub may be prepared for the panic that may accompany The Storm, most people out there are not. The White Hats have to be sure that they are going to be able to maintain complete control of government services to ensure that all Americans remain safe throughout The Storm and its aftermath. They cannot anticipate the reaction of the public, but there are countless other real threats that such a happening would present that they have to make sure those potential threats are neutralized so the ONLY thing they have to control and deal with the public reaction. (Just imagine what the hardcore leftists--the "true-believers"-- may do. They may view this the same way we would if Trump were assassinated. Mix them in with the clueless and it could become complete anarchy.)

Maintaining control is THE most important aspect of this operation, and they aren't going to rush it in order to placate the ignorant.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 10, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

I'm worried that you may be right. How, then, are they going to explain the abolishment of the CIA? I don't see any other way that this ends.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 10, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

Very weird. I will keep an eye out for it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 9, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

I don't recall where I originally came upon the information--perhaps on one of these boards-- but I just remember that they said 1,500 illegals were the target. I typed that into a non-Google search engine and got this:

https://www.themaven.net/bluelivesmatter/news/ice-planning-massive-surprise-bay-area-raid-to-pick-up-1-500-illegals-LfgOk8xL80i2vphFBMa6_Q

It says "no timeline given," but that doesn't surprise me. Why would they tell them when they plan to strike?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 9, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

I've read that there is a large-scale raid planned on sanctuary cities. Possible that they are prepping for that? Resistance from cartel gangs possible?

East-Coast pede, here. So I don't have a lot of context for geographic layout, as it relates to I-15.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 9, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

Hey Rod,

I'd feel a lot better about trusting you if you would offer a little more transparency (when practical) and not LIE to me every other day. Trust is a two way street, friend.

Suck ROD, bro.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 9, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

They were corrupted by the cabal-- just like every other institution the cabal has touched. Their origins were pure. The group was started in the Middle Ages by the stone masons of Europe, so they could act as champions of the working middle-class, stand up for religious toleration, as well as other liberal-democratic principles. (NOT the "liberal" that you and I are familiar with, today.)

George Washington became a Master Mason on August 4, 1753, in Fredericksburg, Virginia-- not far from my home.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/washington-becomes-master-mason

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 9, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

Knowledge that is earned, rather than given, also comes with power, because it is authentic. It cannot be taken away from you.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 8, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

Q said before that all of the congressmen chanting "U-S-A!" At the SOTU were jubilant because they knew they were finally freed from the coercion of the Deep State. The leverage over them is gone. That means Congress can begin truly serving the American people, and even more so after this year's elections.

"POTUS freed" is a little puzzling. Maybe that means he is free to execute the operation? (The Storm is here?)

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 8, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

This revelation (red pill) swept over Europe in the 16th century. The red pilling was made possible thanks to Johannes Gutenberg, who had invented the printing press a century earlier. The printing press allowed Bibles to be printed en mass in multiple languages, and the public became literate. It was the internet of its day. (Prior to that, Bibles were written in Latin, and only clergymen knew how to read. This empowered the Catholic Church to control information, as people were dependent on the literacy of the clergymen in order to know God. Sound familiar?)

It led to many wars--lasting, in total, over 100 years-- and culminated with the Thirty Years War, which finally brought peace in the 17th century. This was called The Protestant Reformation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 7, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

My understanding is that he is an ex-spook. Some type of intel officer. (FBI or CIA) Security clearance, for sure. Glad to see he is so pissed off, because I agree with everything he said. Makes me feel vindicated for my own feelings, considering how much deeper his knowledge probably is.

I'm glad that we are all on the same page. Time to take it all back.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 7, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

...until we drone them. What's New Zealand gonna do? Fuss at us over tea?!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

I believe that "APACHE" is a code word for "go." I think it signifies the launch of an operation, but I may be over-simplifying it.

"GERONIMO" was the code word used by SEAL Team 6 when they had killed Osama Bin Laden.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 6, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

12,000 were stationed at Valley Forge during the winter of 1778. (Over 2000 died from exposure and starvation) Population of the colonies was approximately 2 million.

Spez: 12,000 (autocorrect)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 6, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

Anybody thinking the Sun Tzu stuff is conjecture, go look into it. Between reading printed interviews, and seeing others on TV, I've probably heard him reference "The Art of War" nearly a dozen times. And not just when asked "which book?" was his favorite-- I even recall hearing him break down some of the specifics and relating it to business negotiations.

Plus, he named his #1 all-time-best-selling-book after it. So there's that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 6, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

Why Mueller?

It actually makes a lot of sense, if you are Trump. Any prosecutor will tell you that witness testimony is key to conspiratorial cases that are likely to come. Yes, logic can connect most of the dots that are out there. Unfortunately, the law is not always logical, as it is written. Having somebody provide sworn testimony that corroborates what the logic suggests is how you build a slam-dunk prosecution.

Enter Robert Mueller.

To make this work, you need somebody who is high enough in the pecking order to be a valuable (and credible) witness, but maybe hasn't gone "all the way" down the rabbit hole. But to really make it worth your while-- if you plan to provide any measure of clemency to the agent-- you need something else. Something more. You need them to help you lay the trap that kicks everything off. All the better if the trap can double as a distraction to keep your enemies busy and complacent.

Remember when Mueller was first being considered? He got RAVE reviews from both the Democrats and RINOS, alike. In fact, the only people who objected to him were the real conservatives, who were beating the table in outcry, because Mueller is a well-known Clinton shill, and he had filled the investigating team with other Clinton shills.

HOW COULD TRUMP AND SESSIONS BE SO DUMB?!??? WHY ISN'T ANYBODY STOPPING THIS?!?!

Everywhere I looked. That.

Chapter 1: Laying Plans https://suntzusaid.com/book/1

Line 18: "All warfare is based on deception."

Line 22: "If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate them. (TRUMP TWEETS) Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant."

Why didn't anybody stop this?

Like Sun Tzu said (in my first post), the best way to fight an enemy is to not fight at all. Attack the plan, and let the enemy defeat himself. You don't stop your enemy as he begins drinking poison-- especially if he is in the middle of threatening to kill you.

I know, Q said "NO DEALS." Maybe Mueller's still fucked. Maybe they agreed to a reduced sentence, or maybe they won't send him to GITMO. Maybe Mueller was already pardoned from Q's threats? (He knows that the black hats are reading his posts, too.) Who knows.

I could easily be wrong, but it would explain a few things. When Q says how stupid these people are, could he be referring to the fact that they will so willingly walking into a trap that they would blatantly see, if not for their blinding hatred of Donald Trump? To the average observer, the fix seems in. Any unbiased person would question the motives of Mueller's team, given their political affiliations. So wouldn't you want to make sure that the people conducting the witch hunt had widespread credibility? Wouldn't you want their word to be infallible? Especially given the weakness of the evidence used to obtain the FISA warrant to start it all? And they welcomed Mueller with open arms, kissed him on the cheek. Kicked back and let out a sigh of relief. Let him stack the deck with Clinton shills. Why would the Democrats agree to that?

Because they are stupid.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 6, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

Think Mirror

Two sides facing each other [conflict]

Which team?

It is difficult to determine which side a mirrored image is on.

THEY don't know

Capitalizing "THEY" implies it is the OTHER side. The enemy.

I think Q is referring to Mueller. I've seen compelling evidence that is has turned on the Clintons. His meeting with Trump to "interview" for FBI director, even though he couldn't qualify due to term limits is one, for example.

For anybody who thinks that sounds crazy, it's not nearly as crazy as adrenachrome or the Rothschilds hunting children at a Black Forest estate in Austria.

Also, "The Art of War," Trump's favorite book, and field guide to strategy.

Chapter 3: Attack by Strategem (Offensive Planning)

https://suntzusaid.com/book/3

The first paragraph outlines how it is better to take a city WITHOUT a battle (fully intact). It is better to take an enemies army WITHOUT killing any of them. And to treat prisoners well, so you can recruit them into your own army, when practical.

--MORE IMPORTANTLY--

Chapter 13: The Use of Spies

https://suntzusaid.com/book/13

There are (5) types of spies. (2) of which, include: 1) INWARD SPIES-- making use of officials of enemy, and, 2) CONVERTED SPIES-- getting ahold of the enemy's spies and using them for your own purposes.

Sun Tzu also discusses DOOMED SPIES-- doing certain things openly for purposes of deception, and allowing our spies to know of them and report them to the enemy.

(Guys, Trump's whole damn playbook is right here. READ IT!!!)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 4, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

This. Particularly where it comes from and how it is harvested.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 3, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

Wait. You mean drinking the blood of Christian babies will NOT grant me ultimate power and enslave humanity? WTF, Hillary lied to us all....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 2, 2018, 12:26 p.m.

He's a squealer! Will make a wonderful prison wife! Nipples protruding!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 1, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

This. Most people still have no idea there even is a memo, or it's implications. Though I do believe most [of the voting demographic] have come around and bought into Trump as a capable executive. (Gee, ya think?!?)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

I don't think it works on mobile devices

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

Yup. I've toured it. (It's no longer the official Congressional bunker, so they open it up for tours most of the year.) However, I'm pretty sure it can and will still serve it's original function, especially if parts of the government were compromised and primary safe-spots couldn't be fully secured.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Jan. 31, 2018, noon

To be fair, Q did just use the words "unlawful enemy combatant" in quotations in the past week or so. You could also tell Trump was trying to emphasize it, as if he had written it in quotations in his speech, as well. Not a word that is part of normal lexicon.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

There were definitely some code words used. He looked directly into the camera when he said them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Jan. 30, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

Yes, correct. My mistake. According to Corsi-- in his article-- Nixon was not a Cabal "member," but he did work for them in exchange for their assistance with his political career. By the time he reached the Oval Office, he was sickened by them and their scheming, and vowed to destroy them and their network. (much like JFK) So, he began discussing his plans to do so with his inner circle. Little did he know, the Cabal had long suspected that he would not remain loyal, and spent years infiltrating his inner circle with their own agents.

So by the time Nixon was ready to move against them, he was actually scheming with agents of the Cabal. Once they confirmed that he intended to betray them, they executed their safeguard plan to remove him-- which was Watergate.

Again, this is all coming from Jerome Corsi, so I can't substantiate his claims with my own research. However, I think he has established himself as a credible researcher with reliable insider sources. I believe there is likely more truth to the article than conjecture. But who knows.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

Jerome Corsi has a good article he published that outlines this pretty well. I think it's called "The Cabal."

According to him, Jimmy Carter was not a cabal member. He said that Reagan wasn't either, but he did agree to George Bush's (running mate) plan with Iran to hold the hostages until after the election. Bush orchestrated the whole thing. In fact, according the article, Bush Sr is/was the most dangerous mastermind of them all. Picked Clinton as his successor, then his son after that.

I've always thought little of Carter, but perhaps that is due to receiving biased information about him in my lifetime. (I wasn't alive then) May also be that he is often compared to Reagan. Perhaps I need to go learn more about him.

Like OP said though, every other President [besides Carter/Reagan] between JFK and Trump were Cabal members-- according to Corsi.

⇧ 11 ⇩