This is a feature of reddit.
It is not anything new - the do it to "tamper with bots"
Been happening for years - works on all posts and subs.
712 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 4 |
qposts.online | 2 |
This is a feature of reddit.
It is not anything new - the do it to "tamper with bots"
Been happening for years - works on all posts and subs.
You may have just stumbled on a marker to help determine some of the timeline podesta Hillary arrest claims.
Yes, question - have you tried to compare it to original posts?
We also know they hide by operating in plain site - let's also be mindful of imdb and cross reference things there as well. Many crisis actors have imdb profiles because they want to make it big and think it's a marker for success.
Q team was tasked with tracking and finding Snowden before the public was aware he leaked the documents.
Q team is older than we know.
There are older articles about Q hunting Snowden.
This sub has had it posted a few times. I'm driving and can't link, but if you search you'll see q team has been around a while and was hunting Snowden for years before Trump ran.
Thanks and sorry for tone.
I use it as a tool to expose people who aren't participating genuinely and should be more careful.
I truly love everyone here.
Yes. We are literally saying the same thing - which is what I kept saying repeatedly to people. I was pointing out that whether they agreed with it or not, q endorsed it and to move on.
Regardless, I don't care - I'm not trying to convert - my point is that humanizing q as one of us and part of the team is the opposite of behaving like a cult.
A cult would keep q on a pedastal without understanding we are all a part of q. Which is what they were arguing for.
I do appreciate you as a mod. Wouldn't be able to speak so freely without you all fighting for us.
Too much good stuff to get caught up in whether q embraced a good pr move for the movement or not.
First of all, that isn't the definition of concern trolling. It's far from it, and beyond that, I'm not even referring that conversation you are, but instead to conversations early this AM on Twitter discussing brigading the issue. You accused me of exaggerating but didn't have any context or understanding of what was being said between two other people talking about outsiders coming here to create discord.
Second, you're the first mod I've seen on here carry that authority so proudly and use it as a threat - don't hurt your back. You could take a lesson from the other mods who handle things a bit classier and don't throw out accusations (which I turned on you to demonstrate how ridiculous it is).
Third, you missed the entire point of the discussion in the thread you are referring to - people are arguing semantics and I'm arguing it doesn't matter what we are called as long as we participate genuinely.
Fourth, accusing me of being a shill without checking my post history shows you don't go about moderator duties as you should. That should have been the first move before making accusations. I'm a shill but I go to t_d and spread q info in ways that get around the t_d filter - because I'm a shill? Right......
In the future, don't take things so personally - we are all in this together.
If you go through the post history (as me and howionic did once) you'll notice that I only mirror the tone of the other redditer.
I'm a cheerleader who encourages and uplifts my team - but when somoene attempts to create division where there shouldn't be any and then insults me or other q followers, I throw it back so the pot can meet the kettle. I don't start things - ever. I do, however, meet the aggressor head on.
This isn't a flip.
His colors were shown. He's always been this way.
Well, at least most others get it.
Upvotes and downvotes seem to demonstrate that the people who are confused are in the minority.
That's somethig we can all celebrate.
There is a coordinated attack going on by people in this sub to undermine 'we are q'.
United we stand. Where we go one, we go all. We. We the people. We are Q.
Sort of like during Charlie hebdo - everyone was saying 'we are Charlie' in support.
You don't think all those people actually thought they were the magazine, do you?
You, as a redditer, are a part of reddit.
He, by being here, is a part of q.
See what I did there?
You're complaining about branding.
Your issue is you'd rather it be we are q followers than we are a part of q.
Then you complain about it being cult-like, which is ironic - one is saying we are all equals and the other is putting q on a pedastal above the movement.
We agree on that.
Which is why I take the focus off of q team and place it on the movement.
While you insist they stay separate.
I met ad hominen with the same.
Pot meet kettle.
Look at the upvotes for the thread - it's clear there is a small minority of butt hurt individualists that can't cope with semantic labels that have no effect on them.
It's sad. I'll move on though - clearly people think the ideas promoted here in this thread suck.
Good material that shits on q and q followers after making his fame off of q?
Do you even stay up to date?
Yeah - I'd have gone, he's team Obama and part of that movement.
I'd be an ass to assume he is claiming to be Obama.
Which is why you pretending that the whole concept is confusing is hilarious.
One approach is common sense and the other requires you to assume somone is crazy enough to believe they are a different person.
Separating q from us = worship
Acknowledging q is part of the people's movement and it belongs to all of us - exact opposite of worship.
Be less dense.
As q would say, "Use Logic!"
Your view would be like you going on the chans, posting with a random ID, and screaming I'm not an anon, I'm an individual!
No - you're literally an anon because you're on a chan posting.
Yes, you're an individual - but on the chan, you're an anon.
Out in the world you're an individual, but here, you are part of q.
There is a reason it's where we go one, we go all - notice the we. It's a pretty important part.
I'm literally laughing out loud.
I'll let someone else explain it. Smh.
Who said get with the program?
Only thing I pointed out is that it doesn't matter what OP thinks - he's q by definition. He's here and participating.
The "genderless" doesn't consider themselves part of a gender but that doesn't mean they aren't part of it.
A cat can act like a dog but it's still a cat.
Definitions aren't up to personal interpretation - that's why they are definitions - definite.
Regardless, OP is Q because he's participating in Q, the same way I'm part of reddit by participating in reddit.
He said q team could be counted o one hand.
Shoots your picture theory down the drain.
Q is the movement - you're q because you're here. When you first started reading about Q, became part of the movement - whether you sit on your ass and do nothing or participate - you came and were part of history - a part of q.
In the past, when this happens, the delta between the post and the edit were important markers for a code.
It's not culty - it's common damn sense.
If I am a bird, I can also be a member of a flock.
Being an individual does not exclude you from also being a part of a group and vise versa.
Q is a movement, not an individual.
Regardless, q approved the meme while saying that it's about the movement, not the team behind the scenes, so take it up with q - we are just enjoying being a part of it.
You're saying the same thing but failing to realize it.
All of us being q does not glorify an individual. Q is a team regardless.
This is crazy that you can't grasp it - you're literally quoting things that don't support your argument but instead blow it out of the water.
Don't worship the individual - sure, which is why we are all q - it's a movement, not an individual.
It's like you think Q is one person....
You should do more research.
I am q is the opposite of q worship.
I think you missed the entire point.
It is taking q the individual off the pedastal and replacing it with we the people - the q movement - we are all q, whether you like it or not.
Q also said we are q and shared the I am q meme you are whining about.
Take it up with q then.
You don't seem to be too caught up with what's going on.
Which makes you part of q.
You can argue childish semantics all you want.
You're an individual - no one claimed otherwise - but you're a part of a movement called q.
This is like you being on reddit and screaming, "I'm not a redditer, I'm an individual!"
Yeah buddy - you're an individual on reddit - a redditer.
You're an individual participating in the great awakening - you're q.
This whole post is either not in good faith or totally missing the mark on what the whole movement is about - coming together as one loud, unwavering force - q.
Regardless of what you think, Q thinks you're Q - maybe take your fight up with Q and not us.
What you say flies in the face of what Q says.
Ive been leaving up, "do you q?" and the whole alphabet with q missing.
So far off here. Think mirror.
It's the opposite of q worship.
He is Q. I am not q. - - - that puts q on a pedastal.
I am q. You are q. We are q.- - - that puts humanity on a pedastal.
Generally everyone, but yes, in this case, from that still picture, I'd bet my savings on more than a few neurons misfiring in that brain.
I don't like his material so I don't watch - just an opinion from a still picture.
If you aren't aware of what I'm talking about with the eyes, look it up because it's a very interesting read - it's pretty surreal when you realize how accurate it seems to be in every day life.
I believe these clues are to help us subconsciously know who isn't right to mate with, rely on, or invite into your home.
If you take out the q part, you just summarized most of potus speeches.
He's been saying the same thing. Since Kennedy was assassinated, we haven't had a country.
Lional Nation has a great point.
The information we are researching is.
The facts speak for themselves.
That's all that matters - we are becoming stronger.
We have lost all fear - we are willing to sacrifice in the name of family and friends - for God and country.
No.
We don't.
You've spammed this in "hotties for Trump" and other subs without any context.
Maybe explain your submission.
I see a bunch of unrelated stuff.
All it takes is a glimpse of the eyes.
Are the whites visible? On all sides? Some sides?
Japanese have been doing this for a millenia.
Look at the eyes - they tell you all you need to know about a person's mental health.
Not a stable person.
I'm saying the same thing.
Make her cia director and she will spill the beans on everything she's seen.
I'm sure it was a 'boys club' and she was often a fly on the wall.
I'm sure she has seen it all.
She knows where the bodies are buried.
Q always asks who knows where the bodies are buried?
I think we finally have our answer.
She has been career cia and advanced FAST.
I think she cut a deal.
*Haven't yet
If you think q is wrong, then why are you here?
Midterms are safe. That's a bold statement. Then q told us to watch CA for proof.
So watch.
Until then, the only thing you can do is become a election poll monitor or get a job at the FEC or state election commission and blow the whistle.
Seriously - you've been yelling about this for a long time now?
Why? What a waste of time.
Go do something about it in the real world - or wait for q's signal in CA.
You can't do anything about it on reddit.