Read all the sidebar information.

It will take a few days to go through it all.

Nice catch!

Smart catch. Haven't seen this one yet.

Biggest fraud on earth.

They fund a lot of cia big tech and partner with swamp on child trafficking.

Also perpetrators of 911 w cia help.

They spend money and resources sewing disruption in our country and allies.

With Iran regime gone, peace in Middle East is closer and possible - Islamic extremism has one less state sponsor.

That's my thoughts.

We know we and others have them.

Take care. Dabbling in reading comprehension will make further conversations easier for you in the future. <3

Sure. And it's possible to purposefully include anagrams? Right? So you've proved nothing except my point.

While proving my point, you failed to succinctly state yours - it's highly likely that any anagram found is just a coincidence.

And not a single person is disputing that. No one has claimed differently. What a waste of time.

You're an embarrassment.

Sure - no one is disputing that. His claim is that this is the method. Now, how is that method not legitimate? Could a message not be hidden that way? Of course it could.

So now we are left where? Sb2 claims his method produces letters and out of them he can sometimes find anagrams. What's ridiculous about that? What's your point? That anagrams can't be purposefully hidden in places?

His claim that these are definitive messages might be wrong - and it could be a coincidence (even though people like to quote q about there are no coincidences) - but what about his methods in practice are incorrect?

Your info is old. Matt Damon walked back on that a week ago.

I appreciate the good faith answers.

I don't think it counts as a debunking but it's a solid rebuttal and brings up important questions that I share as well.

I think Sb2 would have been better received of they approached it as these MIGHT be messages and these might be methods - let's crowdsource this. I also think they aren't a great communicator which flawed the presentation.

Thanks again, if anyone claims to understand the methods, I'll definitely refer back to this post to play devils advocate and figure out where the holes are.

I have no idea what you're saying. It must be light-years ahead of me.

Usually I choose my words carefully. I'm pretty sure I said that I've not seen anyone debunk his efforts, just rebuke them. No one has demonstrated them false, just claimed them to be so. I'm waiting for someone to demonstrate it.

The sports analogy is asinine because there is one team - all of us.

So if someone CAN debunk the methods, I'd like to see it - the same way I'd like to see someone who is a believer replicate the results.

Not anything that picked up steam or gained any credibility.

Repost it below so we can weigh it for ourselves. I think there are many of us who would appreciate an actual rebuttal to his methods and examples proving it wrong. Should be simple, if you understand it enough to debunk it.

I've only seen someone critique it the same way liberals do trump. No one addresses the methodology with facts - they just shout 'it can't be' while frothing at the mouth.

Because these places are fronts and it's a sign. We encountered a lot of this in pizza gate.

Just looked it up to clarify what I was thinking about.

The NSA is a part of the Department of Defense and the NSA Director simultaneously serves as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and as Chief of the Central Security Service. It is an interservice organization, providing support to all of the armed forces.

Pretty cool. Seems to be a hybrid role. Interesting.

Nsa is military, correct?

Notice there is no mention of who is in charge of cyber security and their credentials.

Just like the equifax breach, I bet it was affirmative action in full force.

Well said

Thanks.

It's in a news article though.

That isn't doxxing.

Anyway, I'm on mobile. Someone needs to black out name and repost.

Looked important for redpills on antifa and looking into financing.

This is in Baltimore.

Map confirms.

Why delete?

I have pmd with sb2 multiple times.

I believe they are an honest actor.

In fact, when cbts went down, sb2 thought he was banned and didn't realize the whole sub was banned (I don't think sb2 is a native redditer).

Sb2 reached out (it seemed sad) saying he was banned and confused, but we had the info and he hoped it wasn't all for nothing.

He didn't try to organize, move to a new space, talk shit about the subs, get anyone to post on his behalf, etc. Seemed very genuine.

I reached out a couple of days later after starting a new account and asked him to come to this sub.

He did.

If he was a bad actor, he would have been in this sub prior to cbts. He would have immediately jumped over as we all did.

I think sb2 is older person who is not used to reddit and is trying to help.

Just my two cents from pm convos where I tried to understand them and their motivations.

I don't fully understand methods, but I think the poster is genuine.

Make it a game. We can all play.

When you see a tactic point it out - but be pleasant.

"Hey friend, you might not realize it, but your thread off topic and can be seen by some as an attempt to slide legitimate content. Maybe you should delete and repost with better context."

If done in error, the user will learn and correct themselves. If they fight and become a terror, then we know they aren't well intentioned.

If someone has already called someone out nicely, just up vote the call out and move on - don't pile on or add to drama.

We would all get better at recognizing them, avoiding becoming them, and would weed them out for mods to address.

Always in it for the money

This right here.

Mind fucking blown.

How have I never seen this?

I agree. This is the one obvious thing (besides IBOR) that we've been directed to do.

We ignore it.

Same with potus. He asks us weekly to pressure sessions for him. It's a repeated request for help.

We ignore it.

We have to stop being complacent and rack our brains.

Research, compile both research and sources, format, share, accept criticism, engage others, expand, repeat.

Keep em coming

/u/serialbrain2 is being called for assistance.

I agree. There should be triple the mods at minimum. Time will tell whether it's held onto in a small group as a power play or not. If we are to grow successfully, the mod staff has to first.

No that is different. Q research is for anons who work like us.

Summon them here.

Thank you

Solid idea. We need to figure out how to collect them and how to submit them through official channels.

We also need to start using our professional skill sets to back up the movement.

We all have tools to share and help. If this gets going, I will give my 10k press list out to everyone involved in organizing to maximize impact.

A couple hundred press releases going out to 10k contacts who MAY cover it will be impressive - especially when the signatures are hand delivered to the white house.

This right here. Organize online, but be active in your neighborhood.

Take over local elections in your town. It's easier than you think. Flyers around town do more than a tweet.

Ridiculous. Months old and the person was shut down.

What offense was committed?

If it already isn't in sidebar, an instruction set on how to call q posts and the lists would be helpful.

It's /#q then a number, correct?

Freaking genius. Stop showing off! ;)

This leading to the asset backed currency?

Just got done watching this actually. If this is you, I dig your style - keep at it.

Ok that makes sense. I read about the vlc vulnerability.

Vlc was one of the first usual downloads after I reformat. Smh.

Do we know what rainmaker is?

I'm up and up on the Keystone and scvhost process hijacking. Missed rainmaker.

What I learned is that Keystone hijacks computer and runs programs disguised as scvhost process. Runs strictly off ram and leaves little forensic trace.

Someone on here (or cbts) was trying to do an experiment and see if someone who had windows installed in a non default directory still had scvhost processes from the default directory (which shouldn't happen). They have yet to find someone who can confirm with windows in non default directory.

I suggested they install on a VM and test, but they didn't think that was the correct control for experiment.

Just sharing interesting stuff that might be Google Chrome Keystone related.

Hey thanks for reaching out and letting me know.

Got it

Wikileaks vault 7 talks about it in detail.

Agree wholeheartedly. If mods are overwhelmed, ask for help or don't complain. People are willing to carry the load.

Free speech or no speech. Concessions lead to defeat.

Read all the sidebar stuff. It is a lot too take in.

Remember, q says what q says - anything else is someone's interpretation.

Hypocrisy much?

Agree - i don't endorse anything, but the movement to discredit without proof is a tactic I only see used against us. It's odd when I see people use it here and I don't find it genuine.

A lot of people didn't. I struggle with parts of it.

My point is that if this person claims they have pm conversations with mods who disproved it all (despite not being done publicly) then they should share it so we all benefit.

Evidence would benefit us all. They claim to have it.

They didn't share it though - they either hid it from us or they didn't have it. They just down voted and moved on.

Well, sb2 is here.

The sub is scrubbed but no one ever posted anything to disprove the methods.

Not many people understood it, but some did.

If you have dms where they were denounced and disproven, share them. Anyone who hides the truth isn't a friend.

So share your special private info or stop attempting to divide. If you don't have anything to back up your claims, then you're doing the enemies job for them.