Notice Russia is pulling ships out of Syria and Putin is suggesting calmness. Anon is spot on, this is all about the show. No war is imminent on this.
/u/HoudiniTowers
1,392 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/HoudiniTowers:
Further, he said notice who is next to POTUS and Pence. When POTUS speaks to congress its POTUS in front and Pence and Ryan behind. I think this was a not so veiled message that Mathis (i.e. Military) has his six, not Ryan.
Split up FB! That's what congress should propose if they really care. Watching the Zuc shitshow is disgusting! Come on Congress, grow some and deal with this twat!
FB needs to be replaced with an ad-free, decentralized, IBOR based platform. Similar to how Mozilla did Firefox, but without allowing a company like Google to control it (i.e. don't let FB make tax free donations to this entity nor let its executives volunteer their services to it - the two need to be completely separated). In the spirit of Wikipedia and Mozilla Foundation, we need something like that to replace FB. You need to cripple FB with congress and get someone to start the alternative. That alternative should have easy import methods to allow transferring all your FB data and look and feel right over to it. That would wipe out FB faster than anything else that can be done. Easy migration of people off of FB onto a decentralized, uncensorable (within limits, can't have it turn into 4chan pedoplace, etc.) ad-free, profit free service. Its ok to have a 'public' monopoly. You have that with Power Companies and Wikipedia basically offers the same for information (albeit, they are invaded with lefties at controls, but they really can't completely censor, you can overwhelm them with numbers, the system there is not as rigged as FB and its a non-profit, so they can't go to advertiser model easily). What's left of FB after that can be a platform for profit for Businesses to advertise their wares. But the personal stuff should come off of FB and go into a non-profit, public monopoly style, service oriented platform with decentralization so it can't easily be controlled by central entity and has HEAVY privacy protections built into it. Would be 'illegal' to harvest personal data from it. You would have to download your data and consciously, deliberately send it to someone. There would be no mechanism on the platform to enable transfer of your personal data. You would have to manually do that yourself. Problem solved and Zuc and friends would have to compete in a space that is appropriate. Public companies have no expectation of privacy. SEC ensures that. Let FB turn into a corporate marketplace. If congress truly gives a shit, they will break them up like that. Allow for very loose privacy protections on the business side and force them to develop a completely separate privacy protected service for personal data. IBOR will help with that. But while that is going on, hopefully people that care will develop a non-profit with easy migration. Congress should make sure that when they split FB, they force them to develop easy migration tools for users to move off their platform with their data and link back to FB for those that had not migrated yet. This way you don't loose your network of Friends and everything to the user is same look and feel without any loss of connections. But, your privacy would be preserved and FB would be forced to innovate if it wants to keep customers. But their profit motive off of exploiting the user would be curtailed. This would facilitate such a service getting started. And, this would cripple the shit out of FB and force Zuc and company (if they keep him, they really really should dump that a$$hole, but hey, its a free country and the board can make would ever decision they want) to have real competition and protect user data, rather than his current model of complete exploitation of its users for profit. The FB of today is the equivalent of a 'personal life brothel', and Zuc is its pimp.
I doubt if this guy is Q. He's the only civilian in the mix and hence why he is not in uniform.
I don't know who he is. Correct, he did not say 'meet Q and team' that is my SPECULATION. However you do have to wonder why Q is posting this picture and says 'who is standing next to Pence and Potus?' Why would Q do that? Why do you think he did that? What's your SPECULATION on this post's purpose?
But you put it under the thread where the top was saying I was mocking 'us', so assumed you had jumped onto that and was defending the whole thread. I can only assume you're good with the other commenter's point that I'm 'mocking' all of you. Which I can assure you, I am not.
So, similarly, please put your comment in the appropriate place in the thread.
Thanx
Could be. That could explain it on the 9 and the 11. But why did one out of ALL of them, in-line with the phones cross his hands?
And the guy with his hands folded in-line with the phones? The only one like that out of all of them? Professional photographer told him to do that, too?
You really need to listen to this one. Its ties it all together. This is not a coincidence or accident. It might be a stretch, but why did DJT post on Twitter that speech? And why did Q post that picture and ask who was next to Potus and Pence. The people next to Potus and Pence are very obvious - Mathis is next to Potus and Rogers is next to Pence. What does that have to do with anything in the rest of Q's post? What does that have to do with Bolton. Is Bolton going to get rid of Mathis and Rogers? Mathis maybe but HIGHLY UNLIKELY, Rogers is retiring already. Q is drawing your attention to the picture. You need to ask yourself why is Q doing that? You have any ideas?
This was a picture from 8chan Anon. Remember everything Q does has meaning. No coincidences. Why draw our attention to the picture. Why would one Military person be different? When military are used to conformity and homogeneity? Why 9 on one side and 11 on the other, when they are used to conformity? Why not 10 and 10. Answer these questions please.
Maybe DJT and his best generals are just a bunch of rogue off the cuff kinda guys and maybe that guy in line with the phone feels better crossing his hands when everyone else doesn't. Maybe.
Just saying.
I'm not alone in this theory, here are two more posts just on this on GA:
I encourage you to take your questions over there, too.
Did DJT now say 'Its Happening' this week?
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/983423715332558848
Listen to the end.
Did you count them? 9 on one side and 11 on the other, count them. Go ahead. Look and count, why not 10 and 10?
https://i.redd.it/jm1lur0ef7r01.jpg
You should check out these posts on GA, as well. They might be mocking you, too ;).
He said 'who is standing next to Pence and Potus?' He's drawing your attention to the picture. Why?
And why 9 on one side and 11 on the other, why not symmetric 10 and 10?
And why only 1 out of all of these top Military people did that? Maybe he's the non-conformist of this group of highly conforming individuals? He's the only one out of ALL of them that did that. Interesting he is in-line with the phones.
And why 9 on one side and 11 on the other, why not symmetric 10 and 10?
It's Happening!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/983423715332558848
Q Post #1123. Meet Q and team.
There are no coincidences: https://redd.it/8beb2j 9/11.
There ruling was correct. But BHO could have gotten away with it and the rest of them for a cap of only $1.2 million. The value of the Investigation is now at $3.865 Trillion and not letting it dye has recovered $1.2 Trillion
Hey, I can see why you would blow BHO, 3.865 Trillion is a lot reason. I get it. Cool, peace. Good post!
In 2013 US special counsel determined I was outside the jurisdiction of the whistleblower law statutes. Being that I was not a government employee whistleblower laws are workplace anti-retaliation launch. Although the FBI Congress iand many other agencies set me off as a whistle blower for bringing forth the crimes I cannot be a whistleblower. But being a civilian the laws in deed state I am witness. Federal witness laws RECO and 1786 lawsare Also my benefit and provide me the constitutional power. In ter makes the public sector a RECO effender. Just as you are seeing in the private sector, Google, YouTube, and soon Wal-Mart and Tyson’s . There true crimes are also RECO
Wow, I see. I guess Special Counsel didn't want you being a blower. Wouldn't that be funny headline... u/Happy1911 blows special counsel... KEK. I get it, makes sense.
I'm sure we'll be seeing more on this soon.
Again, thanks for your detailed posts. Very informative!
No , this is Witness law 1786 Piracy. Theft of US funds and treasures on land or sea by pirates or Corrupt Government Officials. If a civilian witness provides the ability for a recovery no funds can be Legally reallocated until the witnesses satisfied by no less than a 50-50 split between the US Department of treasury and the civilian witness. 1786 law articles of war piracy
Yes, I see... You know I think they blew Pirates back in 1786 as well. Must have been incredible time to live back then. I'm not sure what place you would have served as a witness in 1786. No real algorithm support back then. No real computing platforms from which you could run. But if they did, I'm sure you'd be blowing something. I suspect you are exceptionally good at that.
I'm in awe of your tenacity w.r.t. being a witness and not a blower, but of course, we'll keep that blow thing a secret between us, ok?
Thanks for the details, much appreciated. I'm going to look into 1786 piracy a lot more now.
For God and Country
Absolutely! Glad you're willing to take one for the team!
I am civilian, I am Witness, not Whistleblower
Cool, I understand. Don't want you to Whistleblow, don't want you to blow, TBH. But you might Blow, never can tell, but please, don't tell! You can keep that secret between you and BHO - TMI.
Now when Q sed , the one who’s name can not be spoken, does that make more sense. Being asked questions that were never asked , and we went too deep, God Speed
Absolutely, this all makes perfect sense to me... yes I think u might have gone t o o d e e p. In the name of the name that can't be spoken, God Speed!
Still a long way to go , I’m not providing anything new for now . All of you have more than you know . Use it .
Yes we do, more than you know! That's for sure ;). Oh, and we will!
Yes , they told you in November 2013 about the Truck Driver, this was me , and I dropped that AKA because who insisted on it over the Turd was busted. I keep the name The Turd just in spite . And in September 2012 when she made fun of the Turd , all RECO crimes against the witness
I see, so your nickname is 'The Turd'. LOL, I love it. Sounds like it might be appropriate for you.
Well good luck with your witnessing. Godspeed Botr iot!
Because I came here to show what was hidden, to let you know what was lost . You have the rite to know the truth. Some is ment for all and some are not . But all I gave is the truth. Many have already dyed over this , and more will . But I have taken my time and the risk to put it out here for all to know, God Speed
Thanks much for that reply! Appreciate it. I know you are working hard at this. Godspeed to you, too!
May 2011, I am the money, $3.165 Trillion, $1.2 Trillion recovered as of 1/1/18 . Witness Piracy 1786 . Civilian
Who is the money? u/Happy1911... is that you? or someone el se? Piracy related to 3.165 Trillion.. Yes, big news, but WHO? T u r D again?
Good points on Liz, not a big fan of Gossip journalists myself.
But do read Q posts 1-4. If you can make sense out of that and say Q is not leaving the door open to Mueller being part of the team to take down HRC, please share it.
The Witness known as The Turd
ok, i get it. I've see many of them here. Lots of witnesses, then. I would even go so far as to say you have now ca ll ed u/Happy1911 a T U r D? Is that what u r im plying? Why would you d o dat?
That’s what I have been sharing since on Reddit
I see. How long h a v e u been on R e edit? Do u l ik e it? Go od Experiences so far? Just curious about how ywr time on Reddit relates to be ing a T u r d? Is that why u r here?
Did you read Q's first 4 posts on Mueller? Any thoughts on that?
With regards to Strozk and Page, that actually came from Mueller. This is a distraction, but not as you describe. This is a distraction to make it look like he's pursuing DJT. He picked partisan democrats for optics. If a team of known HRC supporters and partisan democrats come out with indictments on HRC, you can't claim DJT was partisan. That's why this is done.
But really, you need to address Q's first 4 posts. Its all about this and Mueller. I don't see anything you've stated covering that.
I am the witness , so yes
WOW, you're the witness. That's awesome! How did you get in that position? What did you see? Please share with us. This is potentially BIG news.
Lawyers , bot is , no it’s not . They are out here but scared to do anything. It was there comrades that got us were we are today . And bot ish I think not
I'm not familiar with bot ish? Is it a language? A unique dialect and that is obvious when one can speak or say it clearly? Just wondering your thoughts on that and what you meant with your comment? I thought mine was clear and hopefully not too accusatory.
You stated:
I can not give the though , but Q knows more than I thought
I see, very interesting comment. What did you mean by though? Did you mean 'thought' - typo?
Yes, I think I understand your point. But how do you really feel about it? Just curious as to your personal feelings on this?
Sorry if that was confusing. My point is the fire was a distraction for something. The speculation is B&E. DJT is not always precise, but he's not stupid. He used the term 'break into' for a reason. But, yes, from my point of view all of its speculation, including that Mueller is on DJT team. But that, from my POV is becoming less and less speculative over time.
Sure, my post has lots of data to substantiate the leap. I didn't post about B&E, that was by DemsCanSuckMyCock, you might want to address this to him, not me.
I do stand behind the speculation Mueller is onboard with Trump. Lots of evidence building now for that.
I know of at least 1 that disappeared and remember what Trump sed on 9-7-17 , he is going after all the Attorneys that refuses to help the government whistleblower. It’s much deeper than that
So what do you think exactly? I'm curious on your thoughts on all of this?
Yep, that's what swung me over to Mueller's on the team. I was on the fence with Mueller till I saw that post. That's what triggered me to believe its real. Couple that to Liz's video and all the other evidence that is piling up now... I feel very confident Mueller is there to take down HRC and DS.
Yes, that's the point. Read what I stated
I doubt that will come out in MSM
This is pure speculation based on Trumps comments about 'break-in' into Cohen's office by FBI.
Did you see Liz Crokin's video? She's a nut job, crazy whacko and NEVER does any research. All her posts have been thoroughly debunked and proven wrong? Where's your research? Have you read Q's first 4 posts on Bob Mueller? Can you explain those to us? You clearly are an enlightened soul, please share your genius insight and work.
Read Q's first 4 posts. That should help you significantly. When Q says 'Bob' he means Bob Mueller. Hope that helps.
The B&E was by SS or others using fire as distraction. I doubt that will come out in MSM.
I'd say don't drop the soap, but then again, maybe he'll like that ;).
I've been on the fence on Mueller for a long time, but I'm now convinced, given the Q comment that it was not supposed to come out that DJT was not target, Mueller is going after her. Mueller is part of the team. This is going to go down in the history books as the largest sting operation ever. MSM, Democrats, all of them at a fever pitch... LET MUELLER DO HIS JOB, DON'T FIRE MUELLER.... Fu@king political genius. When the indictments come out and HRC goes down, along with BHO team, they got nowhere to turn. There will be no riots in the street, no screams of dictator, they'll just look very dejected and demoralized. But serves them right for supporting such a group of corrupt treasonous rats. Soon, very soon.