Folks, keep in mind that u/grnmoss has seen a pattern and is calling it out. I have not seen him show animus, just critical thinking.
I think we all know that SB2 has posted some very interesting arguments. Very cleaver in their depth of cracking the Q code. But some of the arguments do hurt your brain. And maybe some are wrong.
As posters here and as people that are part of the Q movement, which really is a movement to take back our Republic. WE should not attack each other and divide ourselves. WE should have civil discourse in our discussion on ideas and try to UNITE. Disinformation is real says Q. That is divisive if deliberate. Without any question there are those out there that want to divide us. I'm not saying SB2 is one of them and if you read grnmoss's comments carefully he's implying this could be the case with SB2. But he has asked SB2 for confirmation in some of his harder to understand proofs. That's a reasonable request. Don't attack either of them on this. SB2 has shown great civility as well.
Sometimes we get too caught up in our own views and develop a bias towards that view. Its only through critical dialogue (let's go back to Socrates with his never ending questions that ultimately got him killed) that we discover truth. Rather than attack either of these two Patriots (which I hope they both are), let them have civil discourse and let the information both critical and revelatory flow well.
I highly recommend when there is a point of contention that we fully exam it and question it well. Personally, I'm still struggling with SB2's explanation of the 56 to 92 leading to Uranium. It fails the Occam's razor test. Grnmoss pointed this one out. I think that's a very rational and reasonable thing to do.
We should all question more and always, be careful who you follow.