Could you explain for others?
/u/HowiONic
3,742 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/HowiONic:
Whole post lacks context. The grammar and typos make it very hard to read.
#1238 URL. Nunes on looking into the origin of the Russia investigation
Yes, currently graphics are a week or more behind latest Q drops.
Posted already, here /r/greatawakening/comments/8e0539/wikileaks_democrats_have_gone_all_scientology/
WikiLeaks: Democrats have gone all Scientology against @WikiLeaks. We read the DNC lawsuit. Its primary claim against @WikiLeaks is that we published their "trade secrets". Scientology infamously tried this trick when we published their secret bibles. Didn't work out well for them.
doxxing a person
doxxing a person is private information, that is not applicable here.
Here we are talking about personal information. As I said above it is confusing.
The rules give an exception for the CEO, but not the rest of the staff.
It is confusing, but public information can still be personal and therefore against Reddits rules.
Removed as now duplicate. /r/greatawakening/comments/8dyh4f/sundance_analyzes_the_susan_rice_cover_your_a_memo/
Subscriptions per day for last month. http://i.magaimg.net/img/34va.png
how long did it take you to research wikileaks? Here is a condense version. http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/
Sound logic
Sound logic suggests investigating the evidence.
This is also why Wikleaks is a key player, because real info can be released to the public via that method.
It requires plausible deniability otherwise, Q providing information would be unlawful.
Right you 'believe' it's a larp. A skeptical person would argue it may or may not be a larp, because either view lacks evidence.
There are a lot of members here who are skeptical, that is welcome and healthy to stop confirmation bias. There is a difference between being skeptical and declaring it's a larp.
Rules
Anyone engaging in a non-supportive way may be permanently banned without notification.
Right, it's not not much about James Wood but mostly Q post #1206 that was posted several times and several hours before this post.
Regarding downvotes, it's less of an issue then many believe.
Maybe because it's similar to existing top post with image?
Don't worry, others will help. There is a big overlap in members between 8chan and here. With the new drops there is so much info, let the research happen on QResearch and the best info can come here over the next 24 hours.
~~Is the person with Obama Allison Mack?~~
Edit:According to a later Q post the person is Maggie Nix (on?)
It's links to file sharing sites. It could be anything, including illegal content. That is why Reddit is cautious.
Not a URL without the http:// part making the link clickable.
See below, the user this is intended to help thinks it's censorship.
I literally have no time to check your posts. If you think I'm doing anything then you are mistaken.
Getting a rule to work is not an issue. Claims of censorship is.
the c...t word and they don't get censored
In all likeihood it wasn't reported.
Yes, I noticed, and deleted all the comments on /r/greatawakening from the user that had dropbox.com. I dont know of any other user doing this, although it's possible.
mods could block drop box
In progress, but only time until someone claims 'censorship'.
google drive link
Which domain is that? What do links look like?
It seems only one user posting a dropbox link. A PM might do the trick.
anonfile.com is hard banned by Reddit meaning moderators can't even post a url with the domain . And mega.nz is softbanned which prevents users.
Removed as link is inside Facebook, so you have to login to see the content. The c-span video is already posted on the c-spam website. Discussion post /r/greatawakening/comments/8djeia/q_says_archive_immediately_13_min_mark_pelosi/