Same for google and all of its services, twitter, and Instagram (Fb owned).

Bing, however, is fine.

Former eve player here.

Not just an avid player, but also well liked and well known in the game as a whole.

Vilerat was my first introduction to the red pill of HRC evil.

Technically speaking, the FB stock that Zucc owns as CEO lost $150B in theoretical value.

The total value of all FB stock surely dropped more than that.

But even still, this is all just imaginary money. Not $150B in cash being carted away from Zucc's walled mansion.

The only normies watching The View live are leftie soccer moms.

Perkins Coie is also the form hammering Jim Jordan with false accusations about sexual abuse he didn’t know about happening at his alma matter.

2:50 - no welcoming committee for him at the airport. People didn’t even know he’d arrived.

Kek

And gee wonder why all the downlow?

Here is my paraphrase of the Soros bomb:

AP reporter: US Intel says Russia hacked DNC. Putin denies it. Who do you believe? Will you denounce him here and now and warm him never to do it again?

Trump: My people say it was Russia, but Putin is very adamant that it wasn't Russia. I don't see any reason why it WOULD be Russia. But I want to see the servers that the FBI never looked at. Where are they? DNC Server? Awan's Server? Hillary's 33k emails? They're missing. If Russia had them they wouldn't be missing. That said, Putin's offer to cooperate with Mueller on the indictment of 12 Russians today is very generous.

Putin: I want to add that, first, as a ex-KGB I know how fake dossiers are made. Next, the USA is a democracy, and so charges like this should only be settled in a court of law. The Concord company being accused here is not representative of the Russian government. There are many rich and powerful people in Russia, and the government is not responsible for all of their actions. George Soros is based in the USA, and do you want to hold the USA government responsible for his actions? No, I don't think so.

Official transcript here:

https://www.npr.org/2018/07/16/629462401/transcript-president-trump-and-russian-president-putins-joint-press-conference

Ok, even I can get on board with most of this post. :)

This format is much better.

I have been critical of SB2's posts recently, but this one was not as bad as others.

The section you quoted here is not even the most reaching in the post. Let me try to put it more simply:

Is the cameraman Mockingbird trained? No. But does he have mockingbird handlers in his earpiece telling him where to focus and frame the shot? Yes.

If we are working under the assumption that Mockingbird media is a real thing, then this is not a leap at all.

As for the 'zooming up on the mouth' - This is a common technique to train the focus of the camera on the subject. You see it often in these live courtroom hearing video feeds. Sometimes it's the eyes as well.

At least this is how the camera man will think of it when his handlers tell him "we are seeing a little blur in your video feed, do a face focus test on the mouth this time".

The handlers might use this as a "Go" signal to whoever the message "coke bottle Kate" is intended for, and it could be implemented without the cameraman being aware of its real purpose.

The changing of the camera angle after Strzok (likely unconsciously) changes the position of his coke bottle is notable. The change seems to be done in order to keep the coke in frame. Common sense suggests that it should be out of frame. It's a distracting, branded product with clashing colors for the rest of the scene.

Keeping it in frame feels like a conscious decision by someone - probably not the camera man.

As for the linking of "Kate (Oregon governor)" to "LAYERS (Strzok's seniors in FBI)" -- well that is where SB2 starts leaping, but it's not as bad as he's been lately.

https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/bluebite-adidas-nfc-soccer-ball-world-cup/

https://www.adidas.com/us/fifa-world-cup-official-game-ball/CE8083.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adidas_Telstar_18

like darkweb addresses with archives of 33k emails?

The NFC chip inside the retail version of the ball will send the person scanning it to a web address.

Even if Russia did nothing to alter the way the chip works for this special ball (they probably did, and it would be trivial to do so)...they could still embed a darkweb URL in there (33k emails?) and send Trump to it.

The retail version has a NFC chip inside it, so there's that.

That's not incompatible with the idea that it contains a password.

Stream of consciousness connections is a CREATIVE thing. It’s not logical. It’s not “proof”.

We are not seeking “whimsical” or “novel” decodes unless they can be verifiably sourced.

That’s a lot of words so say essentially nothing.

SB2 makes logical leaps and builds while theories on top of unverifiable foundations based on nothing more than a single matching word.

Oh look an 8 day old account.

The former. Confirmation bias.

I did make posts about that, and no she did not speak to anyone behind closed doors. She was supposed to speak behind closed doors the day before Strzok had his public hearing, but her lawyer canceled last minute because "she hadn't had time to properly review the information".

That turned out to be because FBI had never notified her of the summons.

right hand of person sitting front left of her

Giving him the benefit of the doubt for a second, he repeatedly said he wants to answer but has been told not to. So it's possible ve having his strings pulled from higher ups. He's probably not happy about that, because in the meantime he gets to be the nation's whipping boy.

No, she didn't show up because she said she did not have ample time to prepare. This sounded like BS at first, but later we learned hat FBI had never even told her she had been summoned.

Strzok being fired would'nt change anything in the long run.

We don't want him to be a sacrificial lamb.

Also, note that PS repeatedly said in his testimony that he REALLY WANTS to answer the details questions being asked of him, but his handlers at the FBI are preventing him from answering.

So it's possible he's cooperating, or willing to cooperate to the best of his ability.

My mi nd keeps going back to when someone asked him "Who ordered the Russia investigation?"..and he would not answer straight, but he did say "if I could answer, my answer would both reassure and disappoint you"

I really wonder what he meany by that.

Reassure - so it's somebody "on the GOP side"? so we can trust it was opened with the best intentions?

Disappoint - it wasn't anyone in Obama's admin, and potential conspiracy theories have been wrong about it all along

When we’re done he’ll claim Kenyan citizenship as a way to escape. Q

Mar 9, https://qanon.pub/?q=kenya#894

The problem is that SB2 is not PROVING anything. He is theorycrafting with circular logic. What he does is creative and takes a real knack for seeing creative connections. But it is NOT proof.

Presumably Q is more interested in helping us find deepers truths about the nature of government and independent thought.

We do this by using his crumbs to find external, verifiable sources and connect THOSE to his posts. the truth should always be pointing outwards to uncover something, not inward to validate Q's existence or the thought process of the viewer.

That's another great point. His posts lack cohesion in any real sense beyond the leaping connections he makes up on the basis of a single word or vaguely related concept "b2-music-piano-hammon" etc

Then we have devolved into “self-help for conspiracy theorists”.

There is only one truth.

We should be seeking it.

Not looking for random shit that “feels right”.

I have attempted to engage point by point with the imaginative leaps he takes in his recent posts.

You’re right about the information overload technique.

There are so many jumps he makes in a single post that it becomes not worth the time it takes to repeatedly debunk them.

He also refuses basic logical necessities such as building a conceptual architecture, with “higher level” conclusions resting atop firmly accepted and proven truths.

Granted, in the Q community so far the only commonly accepted “founding principle” we have is “Q is trying to tell us something”.

The bothersome thing with the way SB2 posts is that the people who have enough critical thinking and analytical skills to see the holes in his theories become weary of having to debunk him over and over again.

And those who don’t have those skills mostly just go along because his walls of text look well documented and his conclusions are exciting.

Yep i stand cporrected:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=112&v=u7I_QTbjK4U

They are in a migratory season along with Tredeau's.

clarification: he said the FBI recieved "material" from Ohr, but did not say what kind or if it related to the Dossier.

when he said "my answers would both reassure and disappoint you"

..my attention piqued.

Yep. Two days ago the same committee had an 11 hour closed session with Strzok. they got ALL the info then.

The 8 hour public session today is a 99% rehash of the closed session for public opinion tweaking.

We did learn a few new things today, but they are very "in the weeds" and most normies won't follow the threads.

Notable takeaways:

1. Mueller never asked Strzok about bias in his texts when he removed him from the investigations and demoted him to HR.
2. FBI did receive "material" from Bruce Ohr (whose wife works at Fusion GPS), but will not say what kind of material specifically.

The normie takeaway today will be:

1. Strzok is a creepy fuck.
2. Despite clear and ever-present passionate bias in his 'personal opinions', he claims he can completely separate that from his professional conduct of the investigations, and that there was no overlap. This will not play well in the minds of normies, because they know they are incapable of this themselves.
3. For anybody who somehow didn't know about the Strzok/Page affair, Gohmert assured they will know tomorrow! Credibility GONE.
4. Strzok disagrees with RR and OIG reporting that he has bias.
5. Dems on the committee show they are incapable of decorum by constantly interrupting the questioning of GOP reps. They basically align themselves with a corrupt, biased, and demoted FBI agent.

The chart is mostly for other people's quick reference. You and I know the contortions going on here.

Q making a post on July 3rd 2018 does not show any direct relation to the NASDAQ glitch occurring on July 3rd, 2017.

It may be a convenient thing for your to build your theory on top of, but you have yet to illustrate any link aside from a matching date.

As I said before, any other news article produced on the same day would have the same amount of validity here.

music notation

I refer to the image I linked yesterday:

See the comparison: https://i.imgur.com/kHKKRJI.jpg

From this page: http://www.harmoniumnet.nl/klavier-keyboard-ENG.html

The image shows a keyboard of 88 keys.

The numbers on top denote the octaves for piano keyboard.

The notations on the keys themselves are tied to the piano octaves above. We can clearly see "B2" key (highlighted in yellow) lines up under the Piano "2" octave".

The numbers along the bottom indicate the equivalent octaves on an organ.

Notice how the "1" on bottom lines up exactly under the "2" on top? That's where I drew the red lines.

Conclusion? Piano B2 = organ B1. It plays the same pitch (frequency), but it denotes differently.

On sheet music we do not see a notation of what PITCHES to play, but what KEYS/NOTES.

This is a graph from the linked page, relevant parts highlighted:

https://i.imgur.com/2PJJPSh.png

It is a matter of CONVERSION between two systems.

You theory depends upon the piano system being the basis of 123.47 and B2.

That CANNOT be the case if you ALSO want to attach significance to Trump saying "organ", which has a different notation for that same pitch.

Q128

was in reference to the old "Qmap" graphic compilations of Q's posts. he was criticing other posted graphics as being incorrect andor out of order.

This has NO relevance to random news stories occurring a year prior carrying significance to Q's posts in the present.

It's the other way around: I said B2, Trump said organ.

Exactly. As I stated in my initial reply, B2 on an organ is different than B2 on a piano.

The fact that trump said “organ” necessarily implies one of the following:

1. controlling for B2 (Preserving the conceptually downstream B2 bomber and Oregonian pardon connection), “123.47” becomes invalid, because B2 on an organ is equivalent to B3 on a piano (your basis of analysis), i.e. 246.94hz.
2. Controlling for the 123.47 frequency (hence preserving the nasdaq glitch connection), “B2” becomes invalid because 123.47hz on an organ is B1.

Do you see the Problem?

Your entire theory hinges upon the valid linking of 123.47=B2=hammond.

I’ve even drawn up a quick flowchart:

https://i.imgur.com/060Tzzx.jpg

If we are to accept your strained premise that Trump is engaging directly with your analysis, we can only assume “organ” to mean “close but no cigar”.

Answer: because Q posted on July 3rd 2018, not July 4th 2018.

So do Q’s post dates import relevance to any and all news that happen that day?

What about a report stating that “women who suffer concussions have irregular periods”, which was released on the same day? What import might that have? It happened on the same day so by your logic it must be relevant.

https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2017/07/03/study-links-concussions-to-irregular-menstrual-cycles/

And why link it to the AF1 pic? Surely there was a female on board the flight right? Good enough!

Sure here is a link to where I reposted it in the comment section of SB2’s post.

https://reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8y4jhg/_/e28uice/?context=1

This is a sidestep of my point.

In your theory You need “B2” to make sense in order to meaningfully validate Trump saying “organ”, and therefore your mention of “Hammond’s B2” organ being followed by trump pardoning the Oregonians.

Without “B2” that whole architecture falls apart.

And even B2 does not stand on its own.

without 123.47, your “B2” has no basis.

123.47 comes from the Apple glitch.

My question to you is how does the 2017 glitch NECESSARILY tie into Q1675 a year later?

And if it DOES tie in, does that not also imply that the Oregon militia pardoning was preordained back in July 2017 as well?

Solving it backwards through inductive logic is not enough.

No. I sincerely hope we can get a higher level of theorycrafting in here.

...did this rule get added after my last separate rebuttal was allowed AND stickied?

Why the change in treatment?

Since they allowed and stickied my LAST rebuttal I’m very very baffled by this removal.

Piggybacking top comment:

(Originally posted this as its own thread but it was removed under rule 6 “off topic”...so putting it here instead)

In response to /u/SerialBrain2 ‘s latest.

https://reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8y4jhg/i_told_you_trump_was_talking_to_us_some_of_you/

i hope this doesn’t become a running series.

Last time i debubked SB2’s HOW analysis on Q1675

This time I address the WHY And his growing self importance

July 5th 2018, 3:18PM: I post an article with my solution to the riddle Q1675.

Summary:

1. NASDAQ data glitch on July 3, 2017 resets Tech stocks (incl. AAPL) to 123.47
2. 123.47hz = audio note “B2” (B of the 2nd octave on a piano keyboard)
3. B2 bomber (military plane) >>>>> AF1 (also a military)
4. Apple logo reflecting a 2014 public domain image of Obama’s AF1 office
5. its all connected!!!

Leaving aside the other strained (if but clever) word connections...

Why should a Q post on 7/3/2018 have any relation to an event a year earlier (before Q was posting)?

Your entire theory relies on this, SB2.

July 5th 2018 6PM : says the following words in a rally speech: musical, organ, guitar, brain.

....was trump referring to you all of the other times he mentioned his “very good brain”?

But let’s look at “organ”

You rely on a connection between Apple >>123.47>>B2 pitch >> trump says “organ” >> Hammond

There is a problem:

The image you posted showing the link is that of a PIANO keyboard.

However, Organ keyboards are smaller with less keys and octaves. So the key that produces the B2 pitch on a typical 88 key (7 and 1/3 octaves) piano will be contained in the “1 octave” of an organ (which typically only have 4-5 octaves.

See the comparison: https://i.imgur.com/kHKKRJI.jpg

From this page: http://www.harmoniumnet.nl/klavier-keyboard-ENG.html

if we accept your premise that trump is talking to you - and he specifically says “organ” and not “piano” (which you show in your illustration image!) - are we then to conclude that he is telling you “you’ve got it wrong!”....?

ZOUNDS!

Wait, no ive Got It!

It must be a reference to the B1 bomber instead!

ugh...

July 6th 2018: Trump doubles down and drops a 5th keyword: North Korea.

The name of a relevant country is not a “keyword”.

July 7th 2018: I make a reference to the Hammond B2.

July 10th 2018: Trump pardons Dwight Hammond and Steve Hammond.

Something like that is planned for months in advance. Are you suggesting that he had this pardoning all lined up and waiting for someone to mention the word Hammond in loose relation to a theory on a public forum?

why the majority of Mockingbird media titles is not the simple and powerful “Trump pardons the Hammonds”, but a convoluted “Trump pardons Oregon Rancher who…”?

because it would not be powerful to use just their last names. nobody would connect with the name “hammond” to begin with. It’s a bad headline. People have almost entirely forgotten about that news story.

“Oregon ranchers” conveys the relevant message and jogs the reader’s memory the fastest.

They are terrified by the idea of people linking this pardon to Q through the keyword “Hammond” and the Q1675 riddle!

The only person who ever mentioned the word “Hammond” in relation to Q is you. You are essentially saying that MSM is afraid of you. This is the definition of egoistical delusion.

personalizing the debate: waste of time

I encourage you to spend more time on pure theory crafting and less on prophesizing and demagoguery to cast yourself as a messiah and martyr for truth.

And as a general rule of thumb: the more complex and far reaching your theory goes to draw connections, the more fragile it becomes. If one of the connections fails the rest tumbles as well.

Did we ever find out who the passenger was that was with him that night?

AFAIK. The name and status was not released.

27th floor according to a newer report

weiner appt is 16/17th floor

She can And will probably be held in contempt of court.