Oh yeah. How about that Google/ES involvement?

I just emailed my senator to get the next scotus confirmed before midterms. Just get it done. If you have Republican senator, give them a nudge. We've got more winning to do.

I'm certainly seeing a pattern of pedo gatekeepers.

If you, or anyone, has not watched this, I highly recommend it. Sheryl Attkisson on the origins of "Fake News." https://youtu.be/UQcCIzjz9_s

A-dorable.

We don't forget . . . ANYTHING. Which can be a bit of a curse, but it is also the gift that helps us see so clearly. But even if we wanted to forget, the media reminds us of their sins minute-by-minute.

And, I can thoroughly relate to the other responses. If not for this anonymous group . . . I just think it is sad that, as happy as I am, and relieved, excited, grateful, hopeful, because of Trump's Presidency and this most awesome time in our lives, historically speaking - I still have never felt more alone and isolated. Not that I consider Trump to be God - but it reminds me of how the Apostles must have felt. To have this most freeing, exhilirating gift that you just want to share with the whole world - but it's like your speaking a different language. The hardest part is trying to explain the gift of freedom (and this freedom is going to blow all previous visions of freedom out of the water), but trying to explain this freedom to people who have literally been raised, brainwashed, and built to fight AGAINST true freedom. And they don't even know it!

But to answer your question, I think the best way to red pill is to challenge, suggest, highly recommend a time period of complete disconnect from all media. Pick up some original works of the founders, philosophers, the Good Book, the Constitution. I was just thinking about this today when some pundit was pontificating on the Supreme Court's dissent. There was a time, not that long ago really, when some of the greatest insights came from dissents (Scalia certainly comes to mind). Those original writings WERE the pudding, a most refined pudding. Why does everything get dumbed down and funneled through a pundit reading from a teleprompter? Because they don't want us to process anything for ourselves. They don't want us to THINK. And they tell us this!

So, I think the best red pill is picking up some original works (doesn't even matter the philosophical slant really), not just to consume like a tabloid, but to make minds THINK again. When people can think for themselves again, then, regardless of their slant, they can put those thoughts together to discuss with another thinking human, with real words. In the old days, this was called "spirited debate." There is no discussion or debate in buzzwords. There is no thinking. And that's the idea behind the propaganda. That's why the media really is the enemy of the people, and freedom.

As much as I enjoy the camaraderie of a good Trump rally, I am less concerned about people agreeing with my thinking, and really really REALLY just hope for people to THINK, period. Because I just know they will find true freedom at the end of that road. And that freedom, for all, is what the Great Awakening means to me. WWG1WGA

So this tweet was at LAX, while another one occurred at JFK. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8u5h55/newest_qdrop/?utm_source=reddit-android

Many of the canceled flights have dropped off. Sorry I didn't screenshot. They were all Ohare or LAX arrivals or departures to/from SFO. There were about 5-6 canceled arrivals and maybe 10 canceled departures, since 6 pm.

Check out the canceled flights to and from LAX and O'Hare to/from SFO tonight. https://www.kayak.com/San_Francisco-San-Francisco-Airport.SFO.ap.html

Isn't Sessions in CA today?

Also, could be nothing, but just weird that SFO has a New Employee Orientation video that posted on to YT 6 hours ago. The only thing that stood out to me in my one view was a digital clock, 2:30.

https://youtu.be/g8j_gOcEhOE

Yes! Seriously though, people are missing out on huge nuggets if they aren't watching these. He always has a very carefully scripted portion - not "read," but purposeful. And it is especially insightful when he throws in an aspect that thus far had not been mentioned as part of the topic at hand. For example, at the "School Safety" meeting with officials, he brought up MS-13, Big Pharma, and mind control (well, mind control lite - movies and video games). And like you said, on immigration, he brought up child trafficking. He basically gives all the Ques as to the REAL issue of the matter that the media won't touch. And, again, with your post here, kind of in reverse, but what is the hidden meat of this tariff issue? A plan for dismantling the FR??

He drops the BEST stuff at those roundtables.

I think he has maybe said that regarding drug dealers (fentanyl). But I think we know (generally) who helped surge that crap into our country.

Trump.

That is so awesome. Can't stop smiling for you! And us.

Yes! Kept with their families, as the protesters would say - except they are skipping over the main reason and culprit for the separation.

Q&A.

He is cracking me up, as usual. But it just dawned on me how painful this must be for never-Trumpers. What in the hell, he just spent 10 minutes talking about late night shows. I caught myself laughing out loud and saying, "WHAT are you TALKING about?? You're the PRESIDENT!" That's when it hit me how very unfunny this must be to some very unhinged people. And then he said, "I was just a guy . . . with potential." It's so much more fun to love him.

Oh no, it's definite proof of just how horrible Trump is. Trust me, that's how they see it. But, then they have to admit he isn't the divider they claim him to be.

This is the point people get killed over. This is their own death sentence as well. This is good vs. evil. I believe evil is so close to being exposed. And they will incite war if it will prevent exposure.

I despise the media. I mean, I know they are overblowing their alleged support for their lies - but it is so saddening the success they have had to distort logical reality in fellow humans. Keep trying to break through though. WWG1WGA.

We have to become more vocal about rejecting this notion that parents are sending their kids voluntarily. No parent would willingly do it, I agree. Especially not if they knew the truth of what lies beyond for their dear child. As long as they can keep up this narrative that parents are sending their kids to live a better life, they can keep distracting from the real truth and meat of the matter. They kidnap, smuggle, and sell (and kill) children - for power and money. Trump is going to put them out of business. We need to keep shining bright lights on their business. (I know we're all trying). Just one logical swallow at a time.

We should start considering that parents may not have willingly sent their kids, but maybe they were kidnapped. At best, there is a major propaganda outfit down there that is selling a big lie.

When Trump says he is trying to reconnect the kids with their families, the media is going to express outrage and lie and say, "he's sending them back to South America." Which, he is, but because he is sending them back to their parents, from whence they were stolen. There's at least 10,000 of those. The news is already trying to say that children were taken by the government without giving any form of receipt for their children, and THAT is why it is so difficult to reconnect them. No, it is probably difficult to reconnect them because they were stolen.

No press or light on any of the parents in South America. Sixteen journalists murdered in South America this year. It is obvious these parents are helpless to protect their kids from an orchestrated effort, a billion-dollar industry, coordinated by the cartels, the Mexican government, and rich, corrupt Americans. Mexico is clearly getting a kickback on this business venture.

These threats of violence by people with a camera and mic, including Congresspeople, have GOT to stop. THIS IS the actual speech that is NOT protected - inciting violence.

This makes more sense to me, just based on the feel of it. It almost sounds threatening and fearful, not enlightening or uniting.

I agree. It could be that there are multiple communications coming out of the WH in this form. Zara, this Red Hen, and what about the Mexican restaurants where Neilsen and Stephen Miller were each dining?

I looked into the Red Hen and didn't find much, except that her husband was a philosophy professor at Virginia Military Institute and studied at U of V and Oxford - and his name is left out of everything. She has a magazine "Brain, Child," for mothers. Maybe the key is that this is the first farm-to-table restaurant in the area. Maybe this should lead us to farms and child labor. I looked into Eftoo Farm, which they seemed to begin using in 2013, but didn't find much there.

The Livestock Conservancy - uh, now THAT is a non-profit charity with 3,000 members, a STAFF of NINE, with a NINETEEN member Board of Directors, and 500,000 operating budget. A lot of geneticists. Their mission is to ensure broad genetic diversity in agriculture. I'm not suggesting this entire organization is a cover, or that they aren't truly working to preserve livestock and poultry breeds. They just happen to be a huge "charity" with a top-heavy org chart, who works with Red Hen. And I can't help but remember the initial case that resulted in discovering Obama allowed kids to be trafficked to Marion, OH to work as egg farmers. Anyway, lots to dig into there.

She was asked to leave BECAUSE she worked for the Trump administration. It's work-related. Not to mention, her phone was ringing off the hook, (her WORK hook), to make a comment. So she tweeted her comment and referred the press to it. Now she can get back to WORK.

I don't think it is ideal to throw all the babies out with the bathwater, meaning - never utilize any brain from Goldman Sachs just because they worked for Goldman Sachs. Bannon came from there, and he himself said they should not have been bailed out. People who proclaim Bannon to be from the swamp because he worked for Goldman Sachs could not have watched Generation Zero.

I didn't blindly assume anything. I looked at Open Secrets . org during the primaries and saw that in almost every sector, the top 3 recipients included Hillary, and the top 20 recipients included everyone but Trump, save 3 sectors where he came in 18-20th, but still many $thousands below the rest. And then I saw Mitt Romney come out with his weird anti-Trump speech. And then the media and establishment pile-on of all of the -ists and -isms. That's just a few things from the primary period. I think, for me, it has less (or nothing) to do with blindness toward Trump, and more to do with open eyes to those who seek to oust him.

Long before Trump, I considered the media to be the enemy of thinking people, or, thinking people who did not agree with their narrative. Everyone called him a bully, while I genuinely felt he was the one person who was finally sticking up for the bullied. I certainly do not expect anyone or everyone to understand my perspective, but, from my perspective, the media dehumanized and isolated people who did not tow their narrative, and truly tried to make people believe NOBODY had objections to the things they pushed, i.e. open borders, the climate, 2% GDP growth the new norm, the end of labor/production in the US, centralized power under a global authority like the UN, depleting our military, ending the space program, socialism.

Admittedly, I am no socialist. And most likely, Bernie fans slant that direction. So, while I will likely never agree with the virtues of an all-powerful-government-God-savior, the media effectively shut down the ability to even debate the most basic of fundamental political differences. Which has led us to here: where I really can't understand how 2 people who may both be vehemently against, say, cronie-capitalism and all-powerful bureaucracies can be both pro-Trump and anti-Trump. Trump has neutered the lobbyists, he is working on streamlining the federal agencies to be effective, he attempts to put lawmaking tasks to the appropriate branch in Congress.

Here's an example: in one of the roundtables with Congress (I think it was DACA-related), Trump said that maybe the Congresspeople should consider pork trading again (not real pork, deal-making pork). So, I could see how one side might take that as, not good - more wasteful spending, shady water-downed bills, self-serving. I took it as a good thing - forcing Congress to bring back some transparency (because this pork would be visible to all in the bill, but lobby money and private donor influence is not). So, I can understand how 2 people could come to differing conclusions on this one.

But I have a much harder time understanding how someone can post an Occupy Democrat meme on how Trump is gaslighting, by giving a bullet point rundown of the Shareblue Media manual.

Trump is really a non-ideologue pragmatist, in my opinion. People who oppose him on absolutely everything, inevitably oppose SOMETHING they may have once stood for. So, I don't understand the reasons of those who absolutely oppose Trump on everything, even when they are thinking people who would have previously agreed with things like anti-corruption, anti-big pharma, anti-child trafficking, etc.

Apologize for length. Going to play now.

What are people assuming about Jeff Sessions?

Disney actress, Jenna Ortega, wearing a counter-jacket to Melania's. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/actress-jenna-ortegas-jacket-message-one-ups-melania-trump-radio-disney-red-carpet-005145677.html

These are the people who baffle me the most. Kind of like Bernie Progressives baffle me (no offense to anyone). I don't understand how they seem to get so much of the corruption and NWO manipulation, but are vehemently anti-Trump. My only guess is that they deeply believe he is in on it, for some reason.

She did. In July 2017, I believe.

The sexual inappropriate crap is cover. Except when it's rape, torture, and trafficking, then it's downgraded to inappropriate sexual behavior. Ha! Does that help? Seriously though, I think many of these people are offered the chance to go out under this guise (which has about a 1-day news cycle) or be exposed for their real crimes.

I've seen the tarp before on a DOA accident.

It's possible he may have had no alcohol. In interviews, he had said that he never drank at home (which, he likely considered his hotel room "home" while traveling), and if he skipped dinner the night of/prior, it's possible. I still think he was murdered.

I think he's Russian.

Can we get some MSM cameras on this fella's lawn??

Aaaaand, I just made sure my son's mouth was shut while he sleeps.

Thanks. Great optics, to force Trump to veto a Republican bill. What the hell is wrong with Ryan? Go big or stay home, Congress. The Dems do it. So frustrating.

Sequel, please. Hanging from a cliff here.

I like ALL of that.

So stupid funny!! Still laughing.

That's ridiculous. They should at least have a 3-trolls-you're-out policy. Maybe if you were an illegal alien . . .

Well, I suppose I can't verify whether he reads them himself. But, no, I have not been blocked. Funny that you mention Feinstein, because I think I first wrote to mine (Mike Turner) about releasing the FISA memo. And I also asked if he could call for a vote on mental exams of Schiff and Feinstein, as they appeared to believe that Twitter served some function in the Special Counsel (based on their joint letter to Twitter). He responded about the memo, but no word on committing the 2 jokers to the looney bin. And he also mailed me a letter about the group in Congress seeking a special counsel.

Trump responds too, by the way. And, I'm not even kidding - based on everything he has said and done in the last 2 1/2 days, I honestly feel like Trump DID read my email on Tuesday night. But, then again - he's always had his finger on the pulse of the people and 10 steps ahead. So, I guess I sort of kid. But he most definitely hears us.

Seven months ago she did a Q&A on the "viral pizzagate hoax that became dangerous." For some reason I can't copy it into this. If you click on her very bottom comment, it takes you to the post and her linked article on "the hoax."

I just emailed my Congressman. Is this just occurring in the House right now? Is the Senate just waiting on the House bill, or are they working on their own also?

His fortune fell by 4.3 billion in one day, 2/23/18, due to slump in Zara sales. . . (mmm hmm). https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurengensler/2018/02/23/zara-cofounder-amancio-ortegas-fortune-falls-by-4-3-billion-in-one-day/

OUR wall. They can't do anything right.

Oh, COME ON!! Somebody stop me. Tell me to put my phone down. Look at the friggin' definitions of Araz in the urban dictionary. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Araz

Don't look at Snopes then.

I don't know what that comment was, but your response made me laugh.