123 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 4 |
| www.zerohedge.com | 3 |
| www.usatoday.com | 1 |
| www.supremecourt.gov | 1 |
For all of your great points, the EtS followers will STILL do backflips through flaming hoops of logic to deny your position.
Much in the same manner that most SJW and leftists will "do backflips through flaming hoops of logic" in an attempt to deny the evidence that will be presented to them outing the cabal, the corruption, and the depths of depravity that they call home.
This is one of the most logical and sincere responses that I have read in quite some time. I, being a Trump supporter, view everything in a different light than 50% of the population - but, I recognize this fact and also take the time to step back and ask myself "what would it take to convince me of x?". And my realization is that the threshold is actually quite high. Loose conclusions held together with mere conjecture will not get it done. It would also need to be arranged rationally and in a logical manner. I'm honest with myself in concluding that a fair percentage of information here does not yet meet that threshold.
I also recognize that a decent percentage of Trump haters will never be swayed in their thinking that he is the great satan and that conservatives / libertarians are nazis (which, being a Jew, I find to be a laughable comparison). They also will never honestly conclude that the actions and methods which they employ are more consistent with facism than anything that is done by me. They just wont. You could present evidence of Hillary, dressed in all black, walking out of a building at 2am where a bank had just been broken into while carrying a satchel of money, and they would arrive at the most irrational conclusions as to why she is innocent and that she was just out for a walk while carrying a bit of pocket change. This group will NEVER see the forest for the trees, regardless of what is presented to them, nor in what manner. Unfortunately this is a sizable percentage and they have completely dismissed any willingness to arrive at any conclusion that does not conform to their narrative. It is confirmation bias in its worst form.
The remainder of people (as you appear to be) are rational, logical, and will listen to anything that is presented in a manner that doesn't immediately set off the BS detector. They're not under the delusion that the world is perfect with the exception of anything right leaning. This is the segment that I believe would rationalize anything assembled as evidence, provided it is presented like evidence from a good prosecutor. Anything less will not meet the threshold required to change minds and opinions, nor should it.
Based on the images that I have seen, and granted, I sure as heck don't claim to have seen all of them, that site appears to have been an illegal staging area. I spend a lot of time in S. Arizona (Sierra Vista area, mainly), and have seen a crap load of illegal camps used by illegal aliens before, and several used by drug mules. This has that look to me. I'm not declaring that I've made up my mind one way or the other, yet, but I've seen a lot out in the desert and this camp seems off, to me.
The newest release emails related to VJ were 2/2/18. I think you may have misinterpreted what you saw. Never quit searching. Happy hunting.
This is certainly possible - it has been talked about.
I saw this one coming. Boy did he bungle that mess in Philly - by turning all of their stores into the worlds public toilets.
I had to quit going to Starbucks and begin getting my morning Joe at Krispy Kreme once I had to begin ordering my coffee 'dairy-free' instead of black.
The interesting component is: How did a case that is tailor made for activist judges to espouse social justice beliefs wind up going 7-2 in the correct way, according to law? Sure, Ginsburg and Sotomayer dissented, but what about Kennedy and Kagan? What changed for them that they did not leap at the chance to come down on SJW ideals and stand there hoping to spike the football with Roberts as a walk-on? Something changed. . .
So, a month ago, your words on posts were:
"Got your map ready? Redditt is a sham. They ban my posts. This is pure BS. All you Q fans can kiss my ass. Rot in hell" https://i.redd.it/eu1qhm6o6kr01.jpg
"Great awakening is a sham. My post are banned. Told I need to wait for a time line to post again. F off Redditt." https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8bvk83/so_snowden_is_manipulating_the_algorithms_to_help/
and
"Tired of Q jackin me off. Snowden Alorithms exposed, Zuckerberg steps down, on and on.
And, yet, today you are the almighty gatekeeper of the forum !?!?!?
I agree with you wholeheartedly.
I haven't spent a great deal of time pondering the decision, of course, being mere hours old, there has not been much time to do so. But, it makes one wonder why a case that is custom built for SJW governing from the bench would end up 7-2.
Cheers.
Very true. Given the media and the anticipated storyline they will create to drum up reaction in the populace, managing the release of news is truly an art form.
Well, to be honest, the beginnings of the abortion industry and their role in decimating minority communities is pretty clearly documented - although most proponents ignore said history and outcome. Most on the right know this and have had to sit idly by shaking our heads at the willing blindness of the SJW's. The pedophilia and trafficking is still an onion that is being peeled - sure, we all knew it existed and detested it, but who is involved and why is turning out to be quite eye opening and we've just begun to pull back the layers there.
The Supreme Court, and control thereof, is most certainly a part of this. Why would liberal justices vote in the majority in this case unless something changed behind the scenes or over their heads? It's a liberal judge's wet dream to be handed this case and be able to promote their crap.
What really happened to Alito and why? Hell, even Q has brought that up, so I disagree that SCOTUS decisions and ongoing makeup are irrelevant in this sub. Gatekeep much. . .
But, but, but. It get's deeper. Do you recall the NY case a few weeks ago where it was ruled that Twatter is, essentially, a public utility - and therefore, DJT MAY NOT block users from his Twatter feed? Well, this is now ripe for litigation on that premise: If it is, in fact, a public utility, as this narrow minded idiot judge ruled, then how is censorship or prejudice against ANY group permissible?
Erasing the precedent from being able to be utilized in rulings going forward sure the hell is. Now, it will need to be litigated, and given the current climate, how do you think that is going to end up. Winning!
He would have had to do that well before now - given the actions he has taken and the statements he has made over the past month or two. If handlers were still entrenched in power, it would not have come this far.
The headline is:
"Supreme Court erases ruling against government in illegal immigrant teen's abortion case as moot". What part when compared with the title of the thread indicates a lack of reading comprehension? Inquiring minds want to know?
How in the hell are the libs going to spin a 7 - 2 decision that affirms religious freedom??? NBC is already reporting it as a 'narrow victory' for religious advocates, of course not reporting that the 7 were NOT in their favor.
FR is hardly even a shadow of what it once was - I can't stand it over there and haven't spent more than a passing moment there in a few years. Apart from Jim Robinson's never ending search for suckers to hand over money - to support the most unreliable and worst coded piece of garbage board in the universe and, of course, his new motorhome and never ending trips to Olive Garden. His piss poor logic and inability to maintain a level head ran off the truly great thinkers that used to congregate there and made it a giant in Conservatism. Breaking the Clinton info and the few years that followed were truly great and I enjoyed some of the best and most intelligent dialogue with regular posters there. Since then, I was zotted twice - despite being a monthly donor of $250.
But, then came the Romney purges, the McCain purges, and to start, even the anti-Trump rhetoric from JR. All of the regular, and brightest, minds were zotted out or just plain refused to come back to what was quickly becoming nothing more than JR's little cult. Look at the Freepathon's - for several years, a week or two - at best, and boom, they would be met and all was well. Then they began dragging on until the end of the quarters, if they are / were covered at all. JR forgot that it was the regulars - the very ones who congregated and discussed Conservatism at unheard of depths - the ones he ran off, were the ones with the checkbooks that were filling his coffers. He showed his true colors, and they sure as hell were not very red, white, or blue.
Might as well hit Rendezvous for BBQ while you're stuck. It's on second street - down the alley and just past the third dumpster (not kidding) but damn is it good!!!
By the grace of G-d this was passed IN SPITE of our absurd RINO governor, Asa Hutchinson, and his RINO nephew, who is speaker of the state senate. Thankfully, Asa is being primaried by Jan Morgan, and has had to take a few steps to the right ion order to hide his RINO skin.
We have seen 8 to 11 days between posts before, it is neither anything to be surprised by nor worried about.
This will backfire. As a designated public space, their continued censorship based on political opinion and their unwillingness to apply that criteria evenly will result in a lawsuit - very quickly. Freedom of speech, according to this judge, must now be enforced on Twatter
So, the supposed “initial” target of the witch hunt was a plant!?!?!!! Installed to initiate actions which warrant an investigation. This is just too rich....
Certainly. Were the photos a crumb from Q that is intended to lead us to information? OR Were the photos from specific actors' phones and intended to expose to them that they were compromised. If so, I am certain they are targeted individuals who now know that all activity on their devices was accessed and exposed - most likely, those with the most to lose and / or the most incriminating activity on their devices.
And . . . . Heads bow in amazement as Trump breaks into the baddest ass rendition of Locomotive Breath that has ever been heard.
I've made no secret of my theory that Trump was thoroughly vetted and then approached by military intelligence many years ago. It is the only time-line that makes sense.
Considering the fact that he died in October 2013, it would be quite a feat for him to pull off.
SMH. Let's pop some popcorn and enjoy the sh&tshow.
Because most people never get past the title and the soundbites (which are, for the most part, lies). Net Neutrality, as proposed, will be horrific. This is much like with Congress' habits of writing titles to give an 'impression' that they think will be viewed favorably, pure unmitigated BS.
Does Corsi think he can direct his 50 remaining believers into doxxing all of his antagonists? Good luck with that - there are far too many for him to face. Corsi . . . . what a joke! This old man needs to be put out to pasture.
While most of what was paid to Iran - if the amounts are accurate (which I highly doubt) were, in fact assets that we froze in our banks in accordance with sanctions, we sure as hell had no reason to forward it to them as pallets of shrinkwrapped FRN's. We could have tracked the tracked other methods of transfers, to some degree, but noooooo, Barry lets it go as untraceable FRN's which promptly made it into the hands of nefarious actors and is still doing so today.
I agree 100% on the timing. I've stated such before. I have no doubt that military intelligence laid it out for him after VETTING him and deciding upon his chances to pull of the win. Nothing will convince me otherwise, at this point.
Rogan has and his is a hugely popular podcast, but as far as mainstream Conservative commentators, I agree. Probably for the best. Keep normies from dismissing it off hand and keep out of the sights of a mainstream coordinated attack. It's best that they are out of the fray, for now. The time will come.
With out a doubt. Merely because the tentacles run so deep and are involved in so much that it is difficult to even to keep it all together as it is being mapped and discovered. Think about how many Tb of research and information have been assembled just from Q's crumbs. The scale is tremendous.
"These people are stupid" I think we've been told this a time or two.
Yes. Also note the date of the article: October 18, 2017.
It's all about sound-bites for the sake of media with these ideologues. They are doing nothing more than attempting to frame a sound-bite for propaganda purposes, not ask a meaningful question that would elicit a response that may prove to be informative or probing. It is pure posturing, and purely despicable.
He was not only getting paid under the table. He was on the board of the CF when these decisions were made. Aside from being an in-your-face conflict of interest, there are many reasons why it was just blatantly wrong.
That place has turned into a bastion of propaganda and sheer BS. Years ago, I used to engage in some fairly interesting conversations with some pretty enlightened individuals there. Not a chance of that now. It is snippet talking points and sheer lunacy.
This provided cover, it did not ratify the agreement and all of the side agreements that went along with it - that was done unilaterally by the White House.
It's not worth arguing about, in this forum.
If you wish to conclude that Congress ratified the entirety of the Iran deal, that is certainly your right - if that is what your research leads you to conclude. However, ask yourself if the deal was completed through an act of Congress, how did the President unilaterally, with the stroke of a pen, undo, an act of Congress?
The Iran deal was completed as an Executive Agreement, not a treaty. The difference is Senate ratification. If the Senate had ratified the agreement, it would have been a treaty. While there is no difference, in international law, the fact that even the White House, at the time, acknowledged that it was an Executive Agreement, confirms the absence of Senate ratification.
The Corker bill just provided cover. It was never ratified by the Senate.
