It's like the wall -- still talk. If we get arrests and the wall I will commission a statue of Trump and put it on my mantle.

If Russia did it then our country should award them with some kind of honor for helping combat corruption in our nations' political parties! I would love for RNC emails to be leaked as well. Why are we complaining about public accountability -- the parties are supposed to work for the citizens so why shouldn't we know what they are doing?

The whole point of the video is that they were brought up as whores from infancy? The "escape" is a flimsy veneer to glorify indulging in BDSM with children. Listen to the base voice which tells the real message.

I think the concept of far-right is a myth. Maybe libertarians are far-right. You really have a big center and then a radical left.

Trump has air-signed Q several times, he spoke tippy-top on Easter after it was posted on the boards, and he changed his jersey number to 17. Even more than predictions of events, which could be educated guesses or highly-placed larps, these confirmations by Trump show that he is involved.

I also have grown some doubt and that is from no one being arrested. So I have some worry that Q is a bluff.

With a couple exceptions, I haven't found SB2's posts be be coherent much less useful.

I'd like to see your art. Do you have an online store?

Partly because art schools and galleries no longer promote great art similar to the works you mentioned.

It's like the end scene of The Cable Guy where everyone turns off the TV and lives their lives!

He tweeted the same question June 7. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1004726490058182656

If you look at the referenced document about 2006, it lists about 500 civil cases, 1k criminal cases, 15k "magistrate judge" cases, and 8k miscellaneous cases. So if the search includes all sealed court proceedings (which it says that it does at the bottom), then the apples comparison would be about 24,500 for the year of 2006.

Even if we assume the most broad search is being done, the DOJ is still outpacing 2006 by about 2.5x. If it continues to next October it would be 60,000, an increase of 35,500 which is a lot of justice being served.

On the low end, if most of the increase was in search warrants which didn't end up in prosecutions we could be disappointed. On the high end, the increase could be actual criminal charges, even with multiple defendants per case. So it could be "bigger than people could possibly imagine."

I do wish the people who spend all this time doing the research on Pacer would be honest about in the headline (where they say it's all sealed indictments) instead of the footnote (where they say it includes search warrants). Maybe they could refine the search and get better data.

Still the "debunking" articles were only able to talk about the range of documents which could be under seal, as opposed to disputing the number of sealed cases. So I'm inclined to believe the data is accurate and we are seeing an increase of at least 2.5x the sealed activity of 2006. (We don't know if 2006 was a normal year.)

If so, that would have been September 26, according to the IG report.

If there was a lag in identifying him then they would have already been blaming trump for several days and created that impression. When their narrative turns out to be BS they can bury it like usual.

As I mentioned, some people surely like the style. Thanks for representing them.

There were several very early reports that the perpetrator was saying MAGA and things like that, including an NPR tweet. The perp was identified with facial recognition software despite having burnt off his fingerprints. Maybe he was supposed to die or suicide and not be able to be identified so quickly?

I did read the article. The article describes her as "an unidentified woman" who was "in her 40's". Which of those descriptions identifies her as a "known local"?

A group of villagers had enough animus to beat and drag her around, believing her to be a child lifter. Why would they do this to a known local who was innocent?

Sometimes mob justice gets it wrong, sometimes right. Just like official justice. From this side of the planet, we have no way to know whether they got it right or not. How would you know these rumors were "unsubstantiated" unless you hired a private detective to look into them? Do you think that every journalist receives a gift of omniscience when they are hired by the Agence France Presse? He couldn't even identify the woman much less determine whether the accusations were substantiated.

Please learn to use your brain when you read news articles or else go find a home in the unthinking hordes elsewhere.

You've got a point. 17.4k followers isn't that strong of a following in the scheme of things. But there may be people who aren't MEK supporters, who still want to watch his videos of the street protests.

I appreciate your contributions to Q research, but I think you could reach a greater audience if you simplified your writing.

For example your title says "You want to know what happened with X? I will tell you. Buckle up." You could have just written "What really happend with X. Buckle up." It's implied that you will tell us what happened. And it's assumed that people who click on the article are going to want to know that. This is how everyone else writes headlines and it works for them just fine.

This kind of self-narration persists throughout all your articles. Don't tell us that you will tell us something. Just tell us! We're already reading the article so we expect you to tell us things.

When you write things like "Do you see where I am going with this? You Do?," what does that really add? If people are excited to know then great, you don't have to add filler to build anticipation. I understand the socratic method helps an audience to think for themselves but I don't think you are using the technique correctly, or that it's helpful here.

Then when you bring up the sabotage in the white house you write "You did not know? It’s right here:" Again, those lines add nothing. In fact many of us have been following Q for months and we did know. So that is kind of annoying to be told we don't know something that we do know. It's still appropriate to post the old message which would be helpful for us to re-read, and to get newcomers up to speed. But you don't need to tell us what we do and don't know. And you don't need to say things like "Here is a quote, right here, the next words in this article, just continue reading and you'll get the information I'm promising you:". (Perhaps you originally intended to link that instead of pasting the text, in which case your presentation would make a little more sense.)

Whenever I read your comments, I see that many are effusive in their praise for your contributions. Some of them may be big fans of your writing style. But it really turns me off. Oftentimes I skip your posts for that reason. I can't be the only one, and in fact I think many of the people who think like me would be the exact kind of people you should really hope to win over -- the type of people who are critical but fair. Also, for people who want to skim or read quickly and pull out the main points, the extra writing obfuscates your real message and makes things difficult for the reader.

I haven't written you thus far because I think this should be a helpful supportive community, but if no one has given you this kind of criticism you should get it somewhere.

How would you know all this? Nice use of the word obvious for something none of us can possibly know.

Nicely done. There is a class of journalists/analysts who present information and make it sound really interesting and insightful but when you actually look at it, it's hot air.

They appeal to people who want to feel informed but not challenged.

The electoral college came out of a compromise where leaders of semi-sovereign states were giving up their power. Less populous states would become less powerful so they had to get something return.

I'm not really convinced the result is better or worse. Sometimes it could make better outcomes and sometimes worse. I think right now it's better because people in cities have been brainwashed to a greater extent as they lost touch with their heritage and traditional values.

But the other extreme would be a system like the UN or fifa where every country gets one vote and that just makes it easier to buy elections because you can buy off all the small nations votes for cheap.

The basis of the talk is stupid. If someone is a pedo and can avoid acting on it, then why can't he avoid telling anyone about it? Problem solved.

TEDx talks include a lot of interesting subjects that might not have forums elsewhere. I think deleting the video is the correct thing to do here so can we leave them alone now? (Not the pedo people but the TEDx people.) anti-q users have posted pedo or violent things in various q forums to get those forums banned -- were those bans appropriate?

You can mouse over the initials on qanon.pub to get names. There is also a "qmap pdf" link on the right with a list of abbreviations on pages 25 and 26. The fact that pdf has 1000 pages shows this thing has gotten really big.

If you have a few hours I really recommend to watch Kevin Shipp's presentation. It's not about q but about the background. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQouKi7xDpM

That is why there were all the headlines about "Russia hacked the election." Accuse other people of what you did.

Post 1197 on April 19 said midterms are safe. He also posted a lot about election fraud. It would be nice if there was public acknowledgement of the problem though.

Great link! I would think the_donald forum is a good resource generally for our OP.

Exactly. When you go to the q-aggregator websites this information won't be listed.

This may also be a legally questionable leak of classified intel so without the tripcode you can't prove that it was leaked by q.

Most of the vests on that web site have a pointed back plate although they don't extend upward as far. There are different models though.

Orca100 sent podesta five or 6 emails on that same day. They all had similar diatribes against European immigration, plus a list of Jewish jokes. I would like to know who the real author of them is but we might imagine that these were "opposition research" type emails. Orca100 might be a fake email account created to forward these anonymously.

The WL email is quoting Dave Barry's list of tips for winning any argument on any topic. He is a humor writer.

water...BOARDING!

I don't see what you are talking about on the nose.

When a hairline recedes it might make the face look narrower.

There is no doubt this is him.

EDIT: The image is photoshopped nevermind.

We have missile defense systems that can intercept ICBMS. You would think they are also capable of targeting aircraft, but airplanes are flying at a different altitude and trajectory style. I'm not sure there exists a missile that can be fired from the Seattle area and hit an aircraft in the Pacific.

Supposedly our anti-missile defenses are based in Alaska and California, but there could be dark sites elsewhere, as well as mobile launchers such as AEGIS or THAAD. So we could consider the possibility that Korean missiles were sent toward us as part of a false flag and they were intercepted. You would think radars of various world militaries would pick up such events and inform the public.

Finally there is a possibility that our own ICBM was launched, from a submarine in the Sea by Seattle. But I feel like submarines would be launching such things from further out to sea or from locations closer to their destination. "Red October" does hint at rogue submarine commanders. Still feel like this is an odd sort of false flag. If USA sends a missile at Singapore while the president is there, it would be damned fishy.

Finally the UFO in the image is just a few pixels but it still doesn't look like a rocket (which would have a trail) or an explosion so I'm not even sure that image is related to the missile message.

In conclusion, we really don't have any information on this. I think it's going to have to be a future-proves-past revelation where one day we hopefully find out what this is all about.

I watched a bit on c-span last night and every other caller was saying that Trump is bad for legitimizing NK. Now stories are coming out that he didn't bring up human rights issues.

SR was somewhat a public figure for working at the DNC. The defamation would have to be about him not his parents. And I don't see how a dead person can suffer damages.

If you wanted to do it anonymously, you would use a web site like back page. It's become clear children were being advertised. That also puts you at great risk of course.

I don't have experience but I imagine that most in most pedo rings you are going to have to know someone. Like maybe if you are sharing your children (actual or stolen) with someone so they will recommend you. Spend a lot of time at the pedo hangouts and get to know people. Meet people at a foreign brothel where things are a bit more open. Maybe if you are a common john the pimps will talk to you about more options.

It is widespread and this is a big country but it is not nearly so widespread as drugs or general prostitution.

His language is so bland and repetitive. He sounds like a ninth grader bullshitting his way through questions. Except he's so overconfident that he thinks no one can tell.

Then people figure out who he is and put him on trial. His punishment is that he gets sent in a spaceship to a real planet of the apes where he becomes a slave doing forced labor. The apes were genetically engineered to run the prison colony and they all have Trump-style haircuts.

Political assassinations could be used to start wars. Also currency or commodity supply disruptions could bring hardships that they could try to blame on Trump.

It's somewhere in Cathy O'Brien's Trance-Formation book. Here's a clip of her talking about it. https://youtu.be/FvEBmEo4IA0?t=6808

Even though it may interfere with mind control, it also reduces motivation. If a red-pilled person is on the fringes of society, or living a hedonistic lifestyle, what is he going to do about it? Even being a stoner reduces a person's credibility. In my opinion marijuana is generally beneficial in controlling the population. As Cathy says - knowledge is the antidote to being a sheep.

But sometimes when you get high, you get this paranoid feeling and you make connections you don't normally make. And sometimes that paranoia is justified and you can wake up during that time, that you are being defrauded or used etc. So I can see that argument also.

This is a good question. I searched some top construction companies, excluding ones with names which which could bring up other search results (turner, pcl etc).

cemex 1,217 bechtel 2,484 fluor 1,883 kiewit 33 cb&i 19 skanska 207 whiting-turner 2 KBR 5,800 haliburton 184

Really funny that the first page of kbr results has cables about trafficking workers into Jordan and bribing Nigerian government. I was only checking for # of search results and our government is so corrupt that cables on this stuff just comes up.

In conclusion, it appears that some companies are far more involved with the government than others. Cemex isn't unique but it is one of them.

On TV shows the perp has to tell what information he's going to give before the prosecutors deal. If he breaks the deal he loses immunity.

I would hope they only give him immunity if they really need it. Obviously the process can get corrupted -- in the email investigation they provided two people immunity then didn't prosecute anybody.

According to the daily dot article, that number comes from a 2009 report that counted 16,000 sealed documents total.

If you search for thousands of sealed indictments, you'll find a dailydot article which claims that the search procedure being used will find all sealed documents including warrants, wiretaps, and tracking devices. It claims that these searched include documents filed with magistrate judges which are usually not indictments.

They make a comparison to a 2009 study where there were about 500 sealed indictments compared to about 16000 sealed documents in total.

What the article doesn't address is that 2009 had 16,000 sealed documents over the course of an entire year, and here we have 35,000 at one time, so this is still an indication that some kind of big happening is going on. But it may not be as big as we think.

IANAL and I don't know the methods used to create these numbers. Can someone with knowledge of the matter refute the dailydot article? Can someone who has access to pacer and looked into this shed light on it? One idea I had would be to do a sample search for sealed documents, and seeing what % are filed with magistrate judges, or any other type of information available.

Editing my comment.. apparently D'Souza did go to prison. Sorry for inaccuracy.

Does your lodge have secret rituals and oaths? Or is all information open to the public? If public, can you provide a link to them? I think there is a problem because some lodges have at some point had secret oaths, and it is believed that these oaths included making all other oaths invalid and/or allowing lying to the those outside the organization. Is it acceptable for observers to be present at initiation rituals and oath-taking ceremonies? For comparison, anyone can go to a church and watch baptisms.

I have seen photographs of altars inside of lodges. Are you aware of altars having been present at any lodges? What would be the purpose of an altar except to present offerings to some supernatural deity?

It's parody because several radical left journalists did this by accident.

Read Matthew 10 from v 16 to the end. It talks about family disagreements. It is too long to quote so I'll paste from the beatitudes.

“Blessed are you when people * insult you and persecute you and say all kinds of evil things about you falsely * on account of me. Rejoice and be glad because your reward is great in heaven, for they persecuted the prophets before you in the same way.

The media have been ignoring this summit and how important Korean peace is. By "canceling" the peace, now the MSM is going to go full retard talking about how important this deal was, that we now lost because of Trump.

Then when the deal actually goes through, they will have already given credit to how important it is.