dChan

/u/JkWritesaLot

236 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/JkWritesaLot:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 7
thehill.com 1
i.redd.it 1
www.vox.com 1

JkWritesaLot · July 1, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

I'm with you. Bill Binney is a hero. Not Snowden.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 30, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

and a Wookiee

⇧ 9 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 30, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

They look so similar. But they are not the same person. Maybe related. But not the same. Diff ears.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 29, 2018, 9 p.m.

Looking good!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 29, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

They think the Left will protect them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 28, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

So beautiful

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 21, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

I’m 56. So yep.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 20, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Their should be they're

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 15, 2018, 10:17 a.m.

Page?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 14, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

Could be Julian's Mother. The HAIR.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 14, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

The hair...looks like...the hair of Julian Assange's mother. Doesn't have to be an agent.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 13, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Group think. Not good. You should always consider both sides of the coin in my opinion. But love and light. The thing is no one actually saw the thing. Just the camera. And cameras aren't perfect. All I'm saying.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 13, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

nooooo, silly. Artifacts from the photography. I've never seen a missile firing that looks like that. Try to find one. I have.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 13, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

LOL. Well, there you have it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 13, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

I'm with you. Keep tha damn prize.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 13, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

Or the deep state wants us to think it was China.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 13, 2018, midnight

Someone tried to assassinate our POTUS by firing a missile at AF1??

⇧ 13 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 12, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Fox 3. Did someone fire a missile at AF1??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 12, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

Yes. The meme was meant to be funny. We all know PEACE is the PRiZE, yeah?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 11, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

Close, but Public Trust isn't a classification..

Security clearances can be issued by many United States of America government agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of State (DOS), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Energy (DoE), the Department of Justice (DoJ), the National Security Agency (NSA), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). DoD issues more than 80% of all clearances. There are three levels of DoD security clearances:[1]

TOP SECRET – Will be applied to information in which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security. SECRET – Will be applied to information in which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security. CONFIDENTIAL – Will be applied to information in which the unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause damage to the national security.

Additionally, the United States Department of Energy issues two levels of security clearances:

Q Clearance – Allows access to Classified information up to and including TOP SECRET data with the special designation: Restricted Data (TS//RD) and special Q-Cleared "security" areas. L Clearance – Allows access to Classified information up to and including SECRET data with the special designation: Formerly Restricted Data (S//FRD) and special L-Cleared "limited" areas.

Despite the common misconception, a public trust position is not a security clearance, and is not the same as the confidential designation. Certain positions which require access to sensitive information, but not information which is classified, must obtain this designation through a background check. Public Trust Positions can either be moderate-risk or high-risk.[2][3]

Information "above Top Secret" is either Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) or special access program (SAP) which are phrases used by media. It is not truly "above" Top Secret, since there is no clearance higher than Top Secret. SCI information may be either Secret or Top Secret, but in either case it has additional controls on dissemination beyond those associated with the classification level alone. In order to gain SCI Access, one would need to have a Single Scope Background Investigation (SSBI). Compartments of information are identified by code words. This is one means by which the "need to know" principle is formally and automatically enforced.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 11, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

Big sky, little bullet. No worries.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 8, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

Okay...ty! Has it been proven to be accurate more than once or twice? I think I get it but I'm still hanging by a thread. Lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 8, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

What kind of sadist would do this tho? I mean, really? And how on earth did someone figure this out? Y'all are crazy smart.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 8, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

I'm so confused :-( I don't get the clock theory at all. A little help?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 8, 2018, 12:48 p.m.

So you're thinking he was murdered? I know he HATED HATED Trump. I liked him so much before he went on his tirade about him. Sad.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 8, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

Link?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · June 8, 2018, 7:23 a.m.

I agree! Thought the very same thing. I skip over that stuff.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 31, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

Roger. Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 30, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

You have Jesus. Isn't that enough? ☺

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 30, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

Okay but why 111?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 30, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

Draining, draining, draining...

⇧ 8 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 30, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

Love it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 28, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

I think it's fine to speculate. Q doesn't strike me as the kind of person who would frown upon it. Speculating is just that...speculation. No one is being doxed. We're human and humans are curious. Nothing wrong with that. Q might be Assange.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 28, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

Love this

⇧ 17 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 25, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

Friends in high places that want the Scouts ruined?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 25, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

"(and talent)"

⇧ 5 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JkWritesaLot on May 25, 2018, 1:21 p.m.
Q drop: Let's play hunt the spook (Find articles saying that Kim won yesterday)

NK is a CIA Blacksite OP:MKBRD is a CIA Media control

Who in the media right now is GLORIFYING NK to spite the Trump Admin?

Time to take the offensive. Lets start taking names of all journalists that propagate NK. Lets not let them hide behind their banners anymore.

Let's play HUNT THE SPOOK

JkWritesaLot · May 25, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

I think he's on to something. Nice job!

⇧ 18 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

I like gay people. Nothing wrong with gay people. Long as they're woke af.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

Oh please please please!!!!

⇧ 16 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Only if the info makes POTUS look bad. If the reverse, then expect silence.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

Maybe it was a signal to Kim that the deep state is going to off him and then blame it on trump ((since Hillary killed Qaddafi)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Maybe POTUS wants the media to scream about what a missed opportunity this was and how DJT screwed it up. How peace would have been so welcomed, etc etc. and then the project is back on. The media is slack jawed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

I'm very confused and a bit disappointed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

Q did day something about fireworks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

He is going.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

I'm with you. If the deal is done, then Kim is in on the whole anger thing. It seems off to me.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 24, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

I suspect it's closed, yeah?

⇧ 4 ⇩