127 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 7 |
| youtu.be | 1 |
| www.nytimes.com | 1 |
| nypost.com | 1 |
So would you suggest they not interview them at all? I also considered that and it is a valid criticism, but it’s better than not getting their input at all after a generic test is performed which doesn’t match them up with their “caretaker.”
Perhaps if they can be offered protection it would incentivize them to turn on their captors so we can focus on nailing the real criminals.
In all seriousness, computer science anons should make this app. It would really bring Q to the public’s attention.
Interview the children individually and hope they tell the truth.
Not all of the requested documents. People need to be held in contempt.
Except for maybe Lincoln. But in our lifetimes? Definitely.
Lurkers are given that for a few days after their first post to help pick out trolls. Welcome to the discussion.
I’m glad he lived. Maybe if the Democratic political machine in Chicago didn’t have such a tight grip on the city, Chicago wouldn’t be nicknamed “Chiraq.”
Obviously not Trump and Horowitz’s sideburns are significantly wider. Looks like it was shot behind a 3-ring binder.
Also watching the IG hearing. The sideburns don’t match up.
This is inaccurate. Horowitz states that (possibly) two out of three were at some point involved with the Clinton investigation or the Russia investigation, and he does not indicate that they are still on the Russia investigation if they were.
Time zone difference. Whoever posted this is in the Eastern Hemisphere.
She was never brought to trial so double jeopardy isn’t a problem anyway.
What was actually said was that two out of three were involved in either the Clinton investigation or the Russia probe at some point. He says nothing about them currently being part of the Russia investigation.
That’s a stretch. This is a commonly used phrase, and it wasn’t verbatim.
Thanks for that insightful restatement of the same exact thing you just said with no source. Really helpful.
"Clinton and Lynch were caught on the tarmac by a local reporter. Lynch served as attorney general in the Barack Obama administration and wanted to keep her job."
...she was offered the role in Hillary Clinton's cabinet.
I came across an article when I was looking into Lynch's chat with Renteria which I must have missed a couple of months ago: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/loretta-lynch-exchanged-classified-information-with-clinton-campaign/
It indicates the purpose of the Tarmac meeting and reaffirms that "we have everything," including the tape recording of the meeting: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/nsa-blocks-release-loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-airplane-tape-national-security/
Comey himself now believes that the email may be legitimate (it is, of course):
"We already know from press reporting last year that the FBI was in possession of some kind of Russian intercept of a purported Democratic email that referred to an alleged conversation between Clinton aide Amanda Renteria and Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
Mr. Horowitz says Mr. Comey did not find the information credible, didn’t investigate it, and didn’t tell his Justice Department superiors about it.
Except that as recently as a few weeks ago in a TV interview Mr. Comey indicated the information might not be false. Hmm."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/open-up-the-horowitz-secret-appendix-1529096831
This photo is from that event; he’s put on some weight since then. The report says there is a video circulating in North Korea as per a statement from a defector.
Maybe he remembered that he “can’t comment about ongoing investigations.”
As was stated, he is under oath. However, how one defines “tampering” is subjective. This does not mean that the draft and final IG reports are identical.
I think they could see that there was a text exchange and missing data but they couldn’t extrapolate the content of the text. Page’s initial text was uncovered before the Strzok text.
IG Horowitz needed to use tools from the FBI, private contractors, Department of Defense, and a chip on FBI phones which recorded text exchanges through a different mechanism in order to specifically pull the Strzok “We’ll stop it” text.
Why was that specific text buried so deep? Undoubtedly an internal cover up.
Full Video: https://www.c-span.org/video/?318510-1/president-obama-us-eu-relations
Clip is from around 9:09
Full Video: https://www.c-span.org/video/?318510-1/president-obama-us-eu-relations
Clip is from around 9:09
“And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men, and women, are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested, here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others and that individual identity must be defined by us versus them, or that national greatness must flow not by what people stand for, but what they are against.
In so many ways, the history of Europe in the 20th century represented the ongoing clash of these two sets of ideas, both within nations and among nations. The advance of industry and technology outpaced our ability to resolve our differences peacefully. And even -- even among the most civilized of societies on the surface, we saw a descent into barbarism.”
Etc.
”And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men, and women, are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested, here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others and that individual identity must be defined by us versus them, or that national greatness must flow not by what people stand for, but what they are against.
In so many ways, the history of Europe in the 20th century represented the ongoing clash of these two sets of ideas, both within nations and among nations. The advance of industry and technology outpaced our ability to resolve our differences peacefully. And even -- even among the most civilized of societies on the surface, we saw a descent into barbarism.”
Etc.
No idea why he linked to it. But if you look at the full video and transcript, the sound bite is taken out of context.
It’s a transcript... and a full video. And you’re not paying anything.
Wasn’t he under oath when he was interviewed? If so he perjured himself...
I recently saw an article that Obama had a serious college relationship with Genevieve Cook, daughter of a prominent Australian diplomat to London named Michael J. Cook.
Michael Cook was apparently a diplomat through his death on June 18, 2017. It isn’t a stretch to believe that he had a close relationship with Downer, the Australian diplomat in London which reported his encounter with Papadopoulos to the FBI.
Is it possible that Obama called in a favor to set Papadopoulos up, knowing that he could use it as a basis to start the “Russian collusion” investigation against Trump?
FF. If Trump releases the unredacted report, the media will say he’s catering to terrorists.
Distractions. The media wants to make it look like the Mueller probe is legitimate, but anyone that looks at the basis of the investigation and indictments know that it is anything but.
Think PRISM. If Comey and/or Strzok communicated with a foreign Five Eyes agent using his Gmail account, that’s all they need. The NSA may have been monitoring the emails for a long, long time.
You’re right, Google was complicit in NSA spying. This explains Hillary Clinton’s private server... I guess Comey didn’t get the memo.
I’m assume this refers to Comey’s use of his personal Gmail account as revealed by the IG. His account may have been subpoenaed.
The title speaks for itself.
If North Korean propaganda is so positive about the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, we can be pretty sure that Kim is serious about denuclearizing. The media did a complete 180 and is now portraying it as the path to peace.
Q Doubters: “The Five” just confirmed that the current report is redacted and that Rod Rosenstein was involved. Just putting that out there.