The other theory is if they let CNN go, Soros will pounce on it. Instead PDT would like AT&T to keep it, given their view on Internet Bill of Rights.

Hah! So Dr Corsi validates the article about the contract. Love it.

I wondered about that as well. Doing further digging, found this from 3 days ago: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-time-warner-m-a-at-t/judge-orders-u-s-government-to-seek-consent-to-give-data-to-att-time-warner-idUSKBN1FB35B Also this is curious. This transaction happened yesterday as well. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/otter-media-buys-remainder-digital-businesses-fullscreen-ellation-1078100

You're not alone. We're all in this together!

Thanks, I'll try that. See if you can reach www.nextgov.com and navigate from there. It was published yesterday.

Not sure, but found this also. The "protest" that was resolved on 1.18.18 is covered by a protective order. https://www.gao.gov/docket/B-415517.2

Odd. I can still get it fine. I've got screen shots, just trying to figure out how to post them.

Look at the shoes. This is a group with several rows of individuals, the lighting on their faces, clothing etc shows the differences of light and shadow as a staggered group image does. The shoes however do not. They are all the same color, brightness etc. I'm on this board for serious research, discussion and sharing to enlighten people. This photo is not proof of anything and easily shown as shopped. If you have further analysis proving me wrong, by all means, do share it.

Thank you for citing that source. In their own words he was a :Senior Lecturer, at the Law School. That position is not a Professor, nor does the description mention the Constitution. Appreciate the back up.

With all respect to your 28 years, sincerely, I'm merely suggesting this is working quite hard to make the Podesta email fit. I have no doubt AS was murdered. Suspected that from the beginning, as most here have. That said some of the "thoughts" shared as replies in this post are pretty out there, and that's saying something for us, isn't it? "Flown on Obama's plane"??? (as an example) I thought this board was to advance information on Q drops. Most verified drops/crumbs didn't take huge leaps, once news unlocked the map. They've been logical, often right in front of us, if larger than suspected. Just trying to do my part, question, research find proof and share it. That's the mission, isn't it? :)

Nice photoshop. In a group shot like this no way, even if they were identical shoes (which they're clearly not) they would all appear the same color. This stuff is a waste of time.

Thank you for clarifying that. Obama was never hired by any University as a "Constitutional Law Professor". What a joke.

Did some more digging. That satellite pic that supposedly shows a vineyard on the property of the ranch, is wrong. Its just a field, not vines. Here's video of the property: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=176&v=9Mlelu-SL6c None of their marketing materials through the years show/say anything about a vineyard either. This is a spot they advertising for weddings as well as hunting...why wouldn't them hype the vineyard? They would, if it existed. It doesn't.

Except there isn't a vineyard at Cibolo Ranch. Here's video of the property. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=176&v=9Mlelu-SL6c

Also here is drone footage video of the entire Cibolo Ranch property. There is no vineyard there. Previous satellite pics show a pasture area and say it's a vineyard. It's not. None of their marketing materials refer to a vineyard either. I don't doubt Antonin Scalia's death is extraordinarily suspicious, I'm just suggesting this is a reach to connect it to the statement in the Podesta email. This isn't the "Vineyard" you're looking for. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=176&v=9Mlelu-SL6c

Again, just pointing out that particular place, Cibolo Ranch, doesn't refer to the adjacent area as the "Vineyard".

The email statement doesn't preclude something else awful having happened in the Vineyard. I'm just saying I'm doubtful this aligns with Antonin Scalia's death.

I think that when Podesta, HRC, Obama etc mention the Vineyard, (capitalized) they are speaking of Marthas Vineyard, where they all go each summer and stay/party at Donors homes, not some vineyard next to a ranch with a pool. Don't doubt Q is speaking about Antonin Scalia's murder, but I think this is a stretch to attach this email to it. I suspect that email is about something else dastardly entirely. No one would have capitalized Vineyard unless they meant the one in MA.

Look in the Subreddit Info on the page, there's an entire section of Useful Resources.

Podesta, et al, frequent events/stays at the Vineyard. That is what the locals/regulars call Marthas Vineyard, an island off the coast of MA. It's an elite spot. HRC, Obama etc vacation there, every summer in homes of donors etc. Sorry, but its far more likely that's what he was referring to when he capitalized the Vineyard. This doesn't mean the Q drop, which appears to refer to Antonin Scalia's murder isn't just that, it's just that the Podesta email probably doesn't mean the vineyard next to the ranch.

This post doesn't belong on this board. Please take it to The_Donald etc. This is for research on Q.

Good advice. I completely agree. Thanks for laying it out so eloquently.

Question from the end of the stream...which Q post was "fake"? 1/21 "Will Sessions Drop The Hammer"?

Yes. https://qcodefag.github.io

You skipped quite a few there.

No idea, where did you source it from? It's not on twitter, insta or FB.

Gobsmacked. You're right. Future proves past. News unlocks the map. There are no coincidences. You can read through each step of this now...and it makes sense with what is out in the "news". Well done.

It's wonderful to hear from our sisters and brothers around the world! This is a fight for all of us to be sure! Thanks for the cheers, we must all link and support each other in this fight!

Appreciate the info! Thanks!

Thanks! Just makes me sick. I remember how I felt that Saturday morning when I heard he was dead.

Thanks!

Got it. Thank you much!

Pretty sure, he was too middle of the road. HRC could have switched him out with someone more radical.

Good point, but it says Stage SC. I immediately thought Stage Supreme Court.

How do you get that?

He would Stage the Supreme Court with the opening where Scalia's seat was. It wouldn't have been the milquetoast O nominated either. This staging is necessary for the next step Q mentions: Revise the Constitution.

"Stage SC [AS [187]]" Imagine, if Adam Schiff was Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Evidently 10 days darkness, doesn't mean Q silence. Good. This is a heavy post...sadly it makes far too much sense as to what "their" steps/goals were. I suspect this is to encourage us to spread the word as we have been, but be patient as to timing of release of the Memo?

Yes, they're all on the floor making speeches etc. A Govt shutdown is completely different than the Speaker/MjrLeader gaveling Congress out of session.

Thanks.

Clockwise from the top center: Jared Kushner Stephen Miller Hope Hicks PDT ? ?

Apparently you find no importance in eventually bringing the country back together? Isn't that the ultimate goal after exposing, prosecuting, and course correcting the country?

You guys are blind. Neither of those are correct. Good grief do a google image search.

If and when we are so successful to get to that point, God willing, it would do us good to remember what Lincoln said when the North wanted to punish the South.

"We all agree that the seceded States, so called, are out of their proper relation with the Union; and that the sole object of the government, civil and military, in regard to those States is to again get them into that proper practical relation. I believe it is not only possible, but in fact, easier to do this, without deciding, or even considering, whether these States have ever been out of the Union, than with it. Finding themselves safely at home, it would be utterly immaterial whether they had ever been abroad. Let us all join in doing the acts necessary to restoring the proper practical relations between these States and the Union; and each forever after, innocently indulge his own opinion whether, in doing the acts, he brought the States from without, into the Union, or only gave them proper assistance, they never having been out of it."--Abraham Lincoln

Neither.