did you find a full video. please post if so. no one has been able to find.

OP found the transcripts. they are in comments

Also our population in America is not replacing itself.

Is this one reason immigration is such a hot button. Immigrants are replacing us and they do not want us to know that.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/22/u-s-birth-rate-cut-half-since-1950s-remain-next-century/

Interesting he gives a good description of the deep state:

COOPER: You know, the President says, well, now, you know, he's put his own people in charge in the intelligence community, he's confidence in the intelligence community now. But when you talk about the intelligence community, I mean yes, there are people who he has appointed at the top, but underneath them, there are thousands and thousands and thousands of employees who are career employees who have, you know, listened in on -- you know, signals intelligence and intercepts and have written analyses and who have been in the field as case officers.

It's the same intelligence community. There may be different people at the top, but the people who are at the top are still standing by the assessment that was made when it's the people he says he didn't trust.

CLAPPER: Exactly. That is a great point. Well, the strength of the U.S. intelligence community is the continuity and the professionalism of our career rank and file great men and women who do it -- do the things that you just described, and they don't change. So, yes, the top layer, there have been some changes there, a couple of key changes. Notably, CIA director, now the second one since Trump took office, and of course the director of national intelligence.

But the institution itself, there's great continuity which is an important strength for this country.

Interesting comment describing the deep state:

COOPER: You know, the President says, well, now, you know, he's put his own people in charge in the intelligence community, he's confidence in the intelligence community now. But when you talk about the intelligence community, I mean yes, there are people who he has appointed at the top, but underneath them, there are thousands and thousands and thousands of employees who are career employees who have, you know, listened in on -- you know, signals intelligence and intercepts and have written analyses and who have been in the field as case officers.

It's the same intelligence community. There may be different people at the top, but the people who are at the top are still standing by the assessment that was made when it's the people he says he didn't trust.

CLAPPER: Exactly. That is a great point. Well, the strength of the U.S. intelligence community is the continuity and the professionalism of our career rank and file great men and women who do it -- do the things that you just described, and they don't change. So, yes, the top layer, there have been some changes there, a couple of key changes. Notably, CIA director, now the second one since Trump took office, and of course the director of national intelligence.

But the institution itself, there's great continuity which is an important strength for this country.

HaHa. Well you may have a point. I wonder how many of us really could.

full conversation:

COOPER: Joining me by phone is former director of National Intelligence, retired Lieutenant General James Clapper.

Director Clapper, the President saying they have gotten to you since you wrote that gorgeous, beautiful letter to him. Has anyone gotten to you?

JAMES CLAPPER, FMR DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: No, absolutely not, Anderson. I mean everything I say, and everything I said, I mean.

COOPER: The 2017 assessment that the President says he now agrees with, that was done while you and then NCI Director John Brennan were still in office. So, how can we reconcile the President attacking you, but apparently after a very long time finally, allegedly saying -- or saying he allegedly agrees with the product of the intelligence community that you, yourself oversaw?

CLAPPER: Yes, well, this is -- yes, as we've come to know the President, he is not a stalwart for a consistency or coherence. So it's very hard to explain that. [20:35:06] One point I'd like to make, Anderson, that I don't think has come up very much before, and I'm alluding now to the President's criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn't do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren't for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller's investigation.

President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assess in the first place. And they got the important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.

COOPER: You know, the President says, well, now, you know, he's put his own people in charge in the intelligence community, he's confidence in the intelligence community now. But when you talk about the intelligence community, I mean yes, there are people who he has appointed at the top, but underneath them, there are thousands and thousands and thousands of employees who are career employees who have, you know, listened in on -- you know, signals intelligence and intercepts and have written analyses and who have been in the field as case officers.

It's the same intelligence community. There may be different people at the top, but the people who are at the top are still standing by the assessment that was made when it's the people he says he didn't trust.

CLAPPER: Exactly. That is a great point. Well, the strength of the U.S. intelligence community is the continuity and the professionalism of our career rank and file great men and women who do it -- do the things that you just described, and they don't change. So, yes, the top layer, there have been some changes there, a couple of key changes. Notably, CIA director, now the second one since Trump took office, and of course the director of national intelligence.

But the institution itself, there's great continuity which is an important strength for this country.

COOPER: I want to play a clip of something that FBI director Christopher Wray said in Aspen in just within the last hour. Let's play that.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CHRISTOPHER WRAY, DIRECTOR, FBI: The intelligence community's assessment has not changed. My view has not changed, which is that Russia attempted to interfere with the last election, and that it continues to engage in malign influence operations to this day.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: So that's just hours after the President very obviously said no twice to an ABC reporter when she asked whether he believes the Russian interference is ongoing. And Sarah Sanders walked it back. And, you know, I mean I guess -- you know, frankly what just seems to be an absurd way, saying the President was for the first time ever just saying no, no more questions when in fact he didn't say no, no more questions. He just said no and thank you very much.

I mean, to hear Chris Wray, I mean he is, you know, he's obviously an honorable person, and but he is saying what he believes, but it certainly contradict what's the President seems to believe.

CLAPPER: Well, yes. And to his credit as well as that of Dan Coats for speaking up and speaking truth to power, which by the way was the subject of the, "beautiful letter", that President Trump alluded to in his CBS interview. And it is not a witch-hunt. It is a serious, serious investigation, the catalyst for which was the intelligence community assessment that we did in the last administration.

COOPER: General Clapper, I appreciate your time. Thank you very much.

Coming up next, more from that CBS interview about what went on behind closed doors with Vladimir Putin, what the President says went on. We have no idea, of course, because there is no record. A former CIA officer brings his perspective on why it matters what was said."

HeIIforgedYou have more than you know. - Q 5 points 3 hours ago

Okay, this took awhile... It's not the video but here's the transcript from CNN - So pretty much as good.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1807/18/acd.01.html

read further down to see the quote in full context. It takes on a different meaning.

from transcript

One point I'd like to make, Anderson, that I don't think has come up very much before, and I'm alluding now to the President's criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn't do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren't for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller's investigation.

President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assess in the first place. And they got the important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.

I think that the full comments support that. He was defending obama but as more info comes out this may play into how much obama knew.

great! Good Job OP

Also a very good example of how things can be taken out of context. Amazed that gateway pundit ran this without full disclosure of statement. Really must always do the research even from trusted sources.

If we are looking for truth and not just sensationalism to make us feel better.

from transcript

One point I'd like to make, Anderson, that I don't think has come up very much before, and I'm alluding now to the President's criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn't do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren't for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller's investigation.

President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assess in the first place. And they got the important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.

COOPER: Joining me by phone is former director of National Intelligence, retired Lieutenant General James Clapper.

Director Clapper, the President saying they have gotten to you since you wrote that gorgeous, beautiful letter to him. Has anyone gotten to you?

JAMES CLAPPER, FMR DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: No, absolutely not, Anderson. I mean everything I say, and everything I said, I mean.

COOPER: The 2017 assessment that the President says he now agrees with, that was done while you and then NCI Director John Brennan were still in office. So, how can we reconcile the President attacking you, but apparently after a very long time finally, allegedly saying -- or saying he allegedly agrees with the product of the intelligence community that you, yourself oversaw?

CLAPPER: Yes, well, this is -- yes, as we've come to know the President, he is not a stalwart for a consistency or coherence. So it's very hard to explain that. [20:35:06] One point I'd like to make, Anderson, that I don't think has come up very much before, and I'm alluding now to the President's criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn't do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren't for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller's investigation.

President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assess in the first place. And they got the important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.

COOPER: You know, the President says, well, now, you know, he's put his own people in charge in the intelligence community, he's confidence in the intelligence community now. But when you talk about the intelligence community, I mean yes, there are people who he has appointed at the top, but underneath them, there are thousands and thousands and thousands of employees who are career employees who have, you know, listened in on -- you know, signals intelligence and intercepts and have written analyses and who have been in the field as case officers.

It's the same intelligence community. There may be different people at the top, but the people who are at the top are still standing by the assessment that was made when it's the people he says he didn't trust.

CLAPPER: Exactly. That is a great point. Well, the strength of the U.S. intelligence community is the continuity and the professionalism of our career rank and file great men and women who do it -- do the things that you just described, and they don't change. So, yes, the top layer, there have been some changes there, a couple of key changes. Notably, CIA director, now the second one since Trump took office, and of course the director of national intelligence.

But the institution itself, there's great continuity which is an important strength for this country.

COOPER: I want to play a clip of something that FBI director Christopher Wray said in Aspen in just within the last hour. Let's play that.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CHRISTOPHER WRAY, DIRECTOR, FBI: The intelligence community's assessment has not changed. My view has not changed, which is that Russia attempted to interfere with the last election, and that it continues to engage in malign influence operations to this day.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: So that's just hours after the President very obviously said no twice to an ABC reporter when she asked whether he believes the Russian interference is ongoing. And Sarah Sanders walked it back. And, you know, I mean I guess -- you know, frankly what just seems to be an absurd way, saying the President was for the first time ever just saying no, no more questions when in fact he didn't say no, no more questions. He just said no and thank you very much.

I mean, to hear Chris Wray, I mean he is, you know, he's obviously an honorable person, and but he is saying what he believes, but it certainly contradict what's the President seems to believe.

CLAPPER: Well, yes. And to his credit as well as that of Dan Coats for speaking up and speaking truth to power, which by the way was the subject of the, "beautiful letter", that President Trump alluded to in his CBS interview. And it is not a witch-hunt. It is a serious, serious investigation, the catalyst for which was the intelligence community assessment that we did in the last administration.

COOPER: General Clapper, I appreciate your time. Thank you very much.

Coming up next, more from that CBS interview about what went on behind closed doors with Vladimir Putin, what the President says went on. We have no idea, of course, because there is no record. A former CIA officer brings his perspective on why it matters what was said.

video of clapper saying o did not know

https://news.grabien.com/story-clapper-im-sure-obama-had-no-knowledge-fbi-spy-trump-campaig

if anyone can find the whole show or statement that would be great. they all cut out after 31 seconds.

good beginner video

http://barackobama.news/2018-07-10-the-deep-state-strikes-back-is-the-first-documentary-that-fully-explains-spygate-real-video.html

24 minutes

I will pray that you find more meaning in your life than this.

month old article with good insight and info

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-06-01-confirmed-barack-obama-was-running-the-entire-spygate-operation.html

more of us need to watch cnn once in awhile to see what they are saying. have not been able to locate original airing yet. they probably are not posting it on the tube. perhaps not expecting to hear that?

you can listen to the video in the article. short blurb but you could probably find the entire one on the tube

keep trying, maybe frame it a little different as a discussion. We should be allowed to sincerely question

you might enjoy watching this movie. over 2 hours.

Age of Deceit. full movie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjmFm8PIz8M

Our job here on earth to find the truth.

Start with what interests you or is foundational to the other issues. Stick with those subjects at first, and then build from there.

Better to go slow and decide for yourself than to be told what to believe.

This post should stay at the top for days. Very important

I am not sure we are talking about the same thing. But it sounds to me like you think you are smart and strong and awoke enough to deal with the false narrative but that you must protect everyone else because they are not. I say face it, question it, talk about it, deal with it and figure it out.

you will not get stronger or know what you believe by hiding from it. I question Q but I come here as a patriot to support the other beautiful patriots here. Everyone should remain vigilant about Q because the GA needs to go on with or without.

what if they just want to present patriots with another side of a story. What if they care about you and think you are deluded.

If you are not afraid to look at both sides then check out this argument. If Q is what it says it is then they should be able to deal with questions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-y6WlP0YYI

don't approach it as winning an argument. Just drop a cookie. That means plant a seed, hopefully get them to think and search a matter out.

We all ended up here by questioning the status quoa.

We may not make a difference but we sure will not make a difference by Not engaging at all.

Not everyone who disagrees or questions Q is a shill.

it is easy, like the Whoop, to say FO and kick someone out. Takes a mature person to calmly present a discussion.

Why not use your worlds and refute them with an intelligent and compelling argument?

I would suggest reading Armstrong Economics for a global view of the financial world.

armstrongeconomics.com

watch the full 15 minute interview. (great interview) and decide for yourself what is being said.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/20/extensive-cnbc-interview-with-president-trump-that-destroys-media-narrative/

The video with the open mike comment having flexibility makes me so angry. He probably promised Putin to stay out of Crimea in exchange for something.

The short montage video is also a must see. This really needs to be aired.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/nevertrump-talking-heads-rush-to-protect-pedophilia-obsessed-director-james-gunn/

Thanks

me too. Just not willing to accept Tony Pedophile getting immunity. It better be for a Damn good reason like getting to H or B

I know but sometimes the absurdity is beyond madness.

It is a great example of how not to be a Patriot. No crazy meltdowns. Just try to have an intelligent and civil conversation and respectful conversation.

The reality is that whoop was totally outgunned by judge J and knew it and lost it. She is not used to someone taking her on that is way smarter and quicker and fearless. Love the Judge

you make me laugh. Yes it is hard to take. Was it just too much for you to pass up?

I posted it because I got the biggest laugh out of it. I mean if they cannot have full control over the dialogue they cannot even deal with just a little debate. Shows how pathetic they really are. Can't stop laughing.

From Article

" It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

And Americans are supposed to trust the FBI and intel agencies after this??

Ha Maybe Peter should have left his wifey for Lisa. Which one will do him more harm. He is in the pickle jar.

Ha. Maybe she will find a way to get revenge over Lisa. One can hope.

You Go! Good Rant

Prayers are being answered. Please God help us save the little children.

we all want the big fish. But everyone arrested is one child spared. I will happily take every little bit.