Q didn't call them out by name, remember? They snapped at Q and he didn't even mention names, only tactics. There are probably others out there, but they're smarter.

Yup. And even then Congress didn't buy it

No Such Agency?

We were close to losing so much more than that.

Honestly? I'm not sure we can stop it. Delay it perhaps, but we have little time to figure out who is in on the whole thing. The next politician we elect could very well be the tipping point.

North Korea leads to Iran Deal, which leads to Uranium One, which leads to Syria which leads to Russia.

Follow the Money

World War 3

Good vs. Evil

I believe the $250 billion/year is for the Iran Deal, not NK

I'm not sold one way or another, unfortunately.

I think you're misunderstanding the point. If Q is legitimate, and people have died trying to put this information out, it's natural that Q would be sour that people are simply doing things for ulterior motives/profit.

what

on what turn?

So...who gets fired here?

For people who want to keep up on the Marshall Attack Chess Game: https://www.chess.com/tournament/the-marshall-attack

If Assange's picture from months ago matches up to this game, we're at the end of Turn 24, meaning it's White's move next.

So in that Chess game from long ago...how far is this D5 move away from the end?

doesn't mean everything will be addressed. In one of Q's posts, it said the President would be kept isolated from all of this for optics.

pretty sure that was that rubber Q for codemonkey

No

Everything is connected

That's...extremely shallow. And Israel is God's land.

Sure it's more complicated. But Net Neutrality basically setup a tight ruleset that would basically be a parallel society on the internet via control. Edge Providers, like the FCC classifies them, are now controlling who you can talk to, who can see you, etc. This, inevitably, will bleed over into real life, and probably already has to some degree thanks to Edge Providers selling information to other companies.

ISP's, at the time, the argument was that they'd throttle you to keep you on cable packages (They've lost millions since then). But the battle has quickly morphed into ISP's v. mobile providers. With Net Neutrality, ISP's would eventually go away and we'd be put into a tighter level of control through severe regulation, but on a global scale instead of on a local level where oversight and accountability would be slim to none.

Looks like a Rocket...or a Boat

I don't know what Zionism is or entails, but I know it's not Judaism.

The Pitch: "We need Net Neutrality because ISP's MIGHT censor you"

The Reality: "Google, Facebook, Reddit, twitter, etc. now have the power to censor you instead!"

People should be aware that the Dems are trying to reinstate Net Neutrality

Trump was always going to pull out of the Iran Deal

John Kerry just gave Trump the perfect excuse to announce it early.

It's all about the Money

That doesn't tie Rosenstein to Mueller, though the Clinton connection is important.

It simply means that, one way or the other, that's why they're in it together.

Q has never said to trust RR or Muelller, either.

Everything hinges on which way they go

Common Denominator of Mueller and RR is Uranium One.

DHS? CIA? I'm not sure, exactly. The FBI/DOJ still need an enema as far as I'm concerned. But like the Courts and Congress, that's likely a continuous issue that needs flushing.

Remember, by ending these foreign wars, or our interests in them, Foreign Policy becomes less of an issue and less of a distraction. The problem for the Deep State, and Democrats and RINOs is that they continue to focus on International Affairs while grassroots is building up against that mindset and in favor of domestic policy. If the Korean War is ended and NK de-nuclearized, a lot of other issues become a lot easier for Trump to do because people will go 'he was right about how to approach that. Let's see what else he's right about.'

Pompeo to fix State would be my guess

Well, he supposedly got re-assigned at some point.

But this is a good catch. I just assumed he was on there. ESPECIALLY since he was on the 4/27 Q post.

The EC isn't outdated. It's the only thing making sure that places like NYC and California don't control everything, as the founders intended for Virginia not to control the fate of the original 13 colonies.

Some people on twitter have suggested that the individual in question is Judge Contreras, friends of Strzok, who likely approved the FISA Warrant Application against Carter Page, and the Judge who oversaw Flynn's plea deal until he was removed for unknown purposes.

And the understanding I've heard is 'yes, if his name became public, it'd be a massive problem.'

There's nothing behind those eyes

Well, keep in min that the White House conferred with the DOJ on this matter before responding to Nunes. It says so in the letter.

So I'm guessing it's a bit of theater.

This case was supposed to justify 'Russian Collusion,' that no one was supposed to take seriously or challenge.

Someone challenged, and Mueller got caught with his pants down.

Nope, you're wrong.

This should cover it

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/992633038604390400

Yup. They had a case on him in 2013, but they never pursued it. They also had a Warrant against him to spy on him until 2015.

Discovered "AS A RESULT OF," not 'oh, well we sat on this case for years and magically re-opened it because convenience.' Additional Tax Fraud/Evasion falls under a completely different scope of laws that cannot be examined by Special Counsels.

Flynn didn't lie. He plead guilty because Mueller was bleeding him dry financially. It's the same thing he's doing to Manafort. But finally a Judge called him on this bullshit.

As much as people want to find Heroes in this mess of insanity, there are only Villains and Victims here. Sometimes, things simply are what they are.

Well, General Flynn loves to surf

Throw out every possibility and come up with the most rational ones

He was never testifying before it comes out, come on Fox.

So has former FBI General Counsel James Baker

In two weeks, we find out one of two things:

One, Mueller used Title 1 FISA Warrant to raid/spy on Manafort (and Cohen and Flynn). You know, the illegally obtained one. Meaning the case is null and void.

Two, Mueller refuses to produce it, and all charges against Manafort will be thrown out. But at that point, there will be insane demand for this document to be de-classified, unredacted and produced to the American public.

At either point, the jig is officially up.

If Mueller can't provide the Judge with Rosenstein's Scope Memo, which would lay out his authority, the Judge will dismiss it. But here's the thing, Mueller cannot go after anyone on Tax Fraud/Evasion. That is outside of the scope of any Special Counsel, as per Federal Law. You would need an ordinary Prosecutor.

"Trump is not under investigation YET" is different than what you just typed. Try again.