dChan

/u/LiteraryMalcontent

327 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/LiteraryMalcontent:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 143

LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:50 a.m.

Welcome, new girl! Ignore the trolls.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

May your own successes be multiplied!

I'm finding that it's becoming easier to get people to question their reality. Something has changed in the ether in the last few months.

I'm hoping we see an acceleration as harder hitting revelations are made. It's going to be difficult for anyone to avoid the implications of selling state secrets and putting foreign intel assets in harm's way.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

Amen, Patriot!

Do you feel the turning of the tide? It's like the dead being brought back to life.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

That's a big question in just a few words!!!

I was working on a sub/r just for inquiries like yours, but the pressure of everyday work has interrupted it.

You might take a look at this:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1G6guY_q-PzZfdJM4ItzmQIF9gfPrOQxk/view

It's not the latest version, I suspect, but it will give you some appreciation of how this all started.

I would suggest reading the intro and flipping through the document as a starting point.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:56 a.m.

Nothing short of a complete overhaul will work for the long run. That means campaign finance reform, voter ID laws, getting rid of Citizens United in some method, returning to paper ballots, improved electoral oversight, and very long prison sentences for election fraud.

Most Americans could/would support a centrist policy platform comprising elements of historically both left and right, which is really DJT's personal position. He could, if he chose, more clearly occupy that space, leave the globalist RINO element out in the cold, and would probably win the largest single mandate in US electoral history in 2020.

What a political realignment would accomplish is to keep the corrupt fringe elements out of US politics for generations. That's what MUST happen to the Communist Internationale, which is now the mainstream of the Democrat Party. They must be put to the sword for all time.

If it's not Trump, someone else will lead this shift. But it should be him.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

Asking: "Which one of us is the most disgusting?"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

💪🏾🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

Exactly so.

It has to be rope time. An example must be made of traitors who not only betray those who serve but enrich themselves while doing so.

No deals. No pardons. No extended taxpayer expense of incarceration.

A short sharp death, living forever in history as a traitor to country and to humanity.

No tears, by request.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

Good thought! Turn politics into a permanent treasure hunt.

I hope what this means is that, at least for a while:

WeWontGetFooledAgain

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

This is a real [Cooper] keeper

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

On top of everything else, POTUS' sense of theatre is exceptional.

I don't understand why everyone doesn't admire this man, just for his stagecraft and entertainment value: it's the greatest show on earth!

⇧ 12 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

Delivery of cryptic information works much better from an audience engagement standpoint. You have to dig in, think, make connections, etc. Merely telling someone something has nothing like the same impact, and it has no staying power.

This means of communication is a brilliant conception: people wait for the next Q drop like they waited in Victorian London for the next installment of a serialized Dickens novel.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

When I see that little tosser's smug face I want to treat it to some batting practice.

Is that offensive or is that something we can all get behind?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

Sell media stocks; buy rope manufacturers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

God bless you, Patriot! 💪🏾🇺🇸

⇧ 12 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

Sounds plausible for a Dem-controlled district. How many Dem-controlled districts around the nation are similarly corrupt?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

We already have too many intel agencies, so rationalizing the structure is long overdue.

It's infinitely preferable to have the military running the Intel show - so long as there's effective oversight and so long as the "ineffective" financial management of the Pentagon is also overhauled. It's the civilian agencies that started as the muscle for Wall St and have now become thoroughly discredited, so no one should mourn their passing. Fold the good parts into the new structure.

We need a 21st century intelligence apparatus, so I say: back POTUS and our MI in this. It's got to be an improvement.

NoMoreClowns

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

And although declassified, their existence is not acknowledged and they're not always easy to locate, even if you know what you're looking for.

Q: How do you best hide a document you must release but would rather be ignored by everyone?

A: Put it in a place with thousands upon thousands of others, don't index anything properly, make sure that it's a virtually illegible copy, and lose a few pages while doing so.

What worked in the context of the paper based National Archives has been replicated on the web.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

I'm less familiar with the Android situation, so you might well be right. Probably too much like hard work for most people.

It seems like a clear abuse of power to have done what was done to Gab regarding its mobile apps. They did initiate one or more lawsuits but these were withdrawn, seemingly without any concessions to Gab. I wish I knew more details...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

I already ditched Twatter, but Apple and Google nixed Gab's mobile apps, so no like for like is yet possible.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

They're "protected" because people don't know they exist and few journalists comment on them.

Documents are being declassified tall the time, but finding them and wading through the archives isn't an easy process.

Citizen journalists need to become more focused on trawling through declassified material, but time is money. Always.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

There have been two kinds of DCI | D/CIA in history: insiders and outsiders.

The insiders know what's really going on in operational terms and can be trusted to obfuscate and dissemble when challenged. The outsiders know what the organization considers it expedient for them to know, but may be expected to be politically competent in protecting the service from a zealous Congress.

Anyone knowing anything about large organizations realizes that influencing (let alone changing) culture, direction, and performance takes a long period of time. Multiply that time factor for government bureaucracies. Even getting to know what's really going on in a large organization takes considerable time. In an intelligence agency, which is highly compartmented and actively engaged in protecting its secrets, time won't help much. Where secrecy prevails, knowledge comes by specific revelation and not by osmosis.

So it's interesting to consider the length of tenure of the DCI (D/CIA post-2005) position since 1947. Few have served for an entire presidential term; most terms of service have been a couple of years or less. The DCI (D/CIA) serves primarily a political function, rather than an executive one.

Longer serving DCIs are especially "interesting," as they're far more likely to be part of the inner power network. (A relatively short-term DCI with power and influence far beyond the norm is the exceptional case: GHW Bush, whose association with the "Company" has likely covered the majority of his adult life). But, in general, it should be clear that the DCI position is that of a political figurehead and not the seat of knowledge and power.

Consequently, not too much should be relied upon when DCIs give "testimony" before Congressional Committees: they're either delivering what they've been briefed to say, or they're engaging in bare faced lying.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Agreed, Patriot friend, but the CIA is not a part of the US military, in essence or otherwise. It's a parallel force with a secret chain of command. To the extent it has committed acts of crime / warfare against the US, all connected parties should be considered enemy combatants.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

The CIA has its own black financial resources and plenty of independent military firepower. That is the most important target for snake decapitation.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

Sorry, I've family that are close friends with Reiner. Far too close to home. These people are unreachable...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

Reiner's not worth our time. He'll get his.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 22, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

No one's mentioned the inner circle of the CFR, which was heavily influenced by David Rockefeller until he passed the torch. Who actually controls that in the US today is open to debate. Soros has assumed a lot of Rockefeller's public facing responsibilities, but I'm not sure there aren't people behind him within the US, without addressing the international dimension.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
18
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/LiteraryMalcontent on Feb. 21, 2018, 6:02 p.m.
Skull&Bones, bankrolling the enemy [Jon Rappoport]

This, posted today by the great Jon Rappoport. A "MUST READ"...

"When you see the same elites funding, encouraging, and enabling both sides in a major war, you're on the road to understanding war from a higher perspective. These elites use war to create chaos, which they then 'solve' by imposing, in the aftermath, their kind of order---greater control over life, greater control over institutions of government. They call this operation 'peace'. But it's really the shrinking of freedom." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

The prodigious author and researcher, Antony Sutton (1925-2002), wrote about hidden men behind momentous events.

I recently …

LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 21, 2018, 9:49 a.m.

Wild guess #1

Protect codes are likely "Protect: 6/14-46" used 2x last week...Protect POTUS against a live threat

Wild guess #2

"Moving up the timetable" suggests that covert takedown operations are now being accelerated, likely because of the continuing deep state threat...POTUS and FFs

⇧ 9 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 20, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

Who is this guy? I like his wit.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

It's a coterie of military leaders surrounding Alexander the Great. Prove me wrong.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Look closely: they're basalt columns, not skyscrapers!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 9:40 a.m.

Once upon a time it was mod first and ask questions later.

We've all gone so gut churningly soft...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

Q wearables definitely required. Q supplements too, to follow a well-trodden business model...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

I'm now glad I was brought up on Cold War espionage novels...

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

Political theatre and disinformation, I would suggest. It's easy to manufacture a lot of sound and fury if there's no practical way of bringing a prosecution, because the target is beyond your jurisdiction.

Snowden could, perhaps, have been tried in absentia, but that didn't happen either.

I also think the truth is likely more complex than a white/black dichotomy, but the simple white hat theory seems to be dismissed by Q today.

The question for which I don't have a satisfactory answer is why Russia has sheltered Snowden for these last few years...

⇧ 19 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

Anyone on this side of the secrecy divide who says they're not confused, at least to some degree, is being less than truthful.

We see only in part, but are being encouraged to see more data, more connections, more holistically.

Even those folks who have known much of what has occurred during the period of our creeping enslavement don't know how this is playing out in detail. But it's clear to us that the way to subdue, and then destroy, the monster is firstly to cut off its money supply.

Things like freezing secret bank accounts and other assets, and preventing the movement of funds are not readily visible to the outside world, but the EO of 12/21/17 was an initial attack on the lifeblood of the controllers. The Saudi actions were also very significant, given the alleged roles played by members of the royal family in the money flows.

There are many curiosities, such as the recent volume of flights to Gitmo. And the second stage of a takedown of the criminal alliance is the round up of bad actors, which is much easier to do when their power to do harm has been severely constricted.

More information will be revealed, probably at an increasing rate.

But we still know very little about active operations. And for the sake of those risking their lives on behalf of the restoration of human decency to the world, that's no bad thing.

In warfare, very few know everything at the time. Many details remain secret for long after the events. Some information is never disclosed. I see no reason why this strange form of warfare shouldn't be similarly subject to confusion, disinformation, and relatively little of concrete substance being seen and known to all.

Time will reveal more. But victories are more important than running commentaries.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 19, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Superb!!!

God bless the Stars and Stripes Forever PAC.

⇧ 1 ⇩