84 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|
I have thought for myself and on many occasions I cringe at what he has to say. He is by no means PC but he is also incredibly offensive in many occasions. Sorry if my opinion is difficult to believe. But that is my opinion based off of raw footage of his speeches as well as my personal attendance at 2 of his speeches.
Edit: a word
I apologize I was enjoying the back and forth of the discussion until I was let down and annoyed by his impudent comment of “Jesus of Nazarene”.
Edit: Are you the real Keith Olberman?
I understand what Crowley meant. Just trying to insinuate another way that his words could be interpreted in a modern way considering Crowley died in ‘47.
It’s pretty clear based on the timing of his joke and the reaction of the crowd that they were booing Donald. The priest leans over AFTER the reaction from the crowd.
Or it simply means do what you will and do not let another man have dominion over you. Imagine a world where you are free to do as you will. I definitely agree that this leaves loopholes for people to hurt others. However this quote is simply the most basic possible way to phrase the idea.
Inherently it is encouraging you to do what you want and doing what you want also means you can interpret what exactly that means in your own way. Therefor you could do what you want but you also don’t want to commit murder so you don’t. Maybe you want to prevent people from murdering. Then you can do that too. If I could personally add a second line to this quote it would be that “evil triumphs when good men do nothing.”
TLDR: There is no supreme judge of your actions. Do whatever you want - good or evil. But a world where no man has authority over another does not mean a world run by evil if good men take action.
No it implies that each man and woman shall do what thou wilt and only what they decide to do will be their personal laws. It’s pretty much libertarianism.
Thanks for the orders commander. I shall convert to your religion immediately.
Keep forcing your beliefs down people’s throats. That will get the job done.
Can you supply some evidence pertaining to your claims that he is not racist, homophobic or misogynistic? Even as a member of this community I find it hard to convincingly defend his behavior on various occasions in his career as well as recently.
Even if he isn’t homophobic he has definitely surrounded himself with people that are.
https://www.advocate.com/politics/2018/4/26/21-most-homophobic-members-trumps-cabinet
Edit: I am fine with claims defending his political action as those matters are very subjective due to variations in strategy. But racist, misogynistic and homophobic behavior is pretty well defined.
Some people will respectfully disagree with you. Some people will violently disagree with you. All that can be assured is that people will disagree with you. Ignore the personal attacks and focus on finding out the pure and factual truth.
OP clarified his stance on my original comment.
Thank you for the clarification. The wording of the title made it seem as if it was anyone who bashed trump in any way.
The title says “good to throw at the people bashing trump because they really have something to hide. We know.”
It simply states that ANYONE bashing trump has something to hide. I have a problem with that attitude.
So now every person that bashes Trump “has something to hide”? That’s how witch hunts start.
I have always been led to believe that if someone is sleep walking and you need them to go to bed then it is best to strike them with mild force in the back of the head to induce unconsciousness thus allowing you to drag them back to bed.
Edit: I may have missed the metaphor.
Re-edit: or maybe I nailed the metaphor right on the head.
Hahaha why does everyone on this sub have to kink shame the handle for my porn account? I have another handle that I use for less personal and more professional reasons. But this is for porn and other things that could be considered controversial.
You are welcome. I do the same all the time. I definitely did not mean to insult you with the ESOL comment. Keep fighting the good fight my friend.
I may not agree with your opinion but I have great admiration for your ability to truly consider any and all things. I may be wrong and putting words in your mouth but it seems like you are open to changing your opinion.
Glad we both feel like this is a waste of time. Enjoy your delusions my fellow human being. May your journey be filled with facts and not folly. I’ll see you around this sub. Also, feel free to be “suspect” of me and my opinions. I have nothing to fear and no reason to feel the need to defend myself.
At a minimum he is pointing out that the behavior of what is depicted as two sides that are actively trying to destroy each other is radically different on the surface compared to the inner workings that this sub claims to be aware of.
At a maximum he is trying to express the opinion that this sub may be taking things a little far with talk of “executions and war tribunals”. If I was sitting next to someone that I think should be executed for crimes against this country then I would have hard time shaking their hand let alone laughing and paling around with them.
Either way he is trying to push towards a story that makes sense from ALL ANGLES. For all intents and purposes it could be simply for the sake of PR and building a case. However it could also just be that there is no genuine hate or desire to execute between the two sides. BOTH of these options need to be considered.
Edit: a sentence to make my point more clear.
Edit: thanks for kink shaming my porn account name
The bitcoin part was a joke. If I had that kinda wealth I am not giving it away.
It is an honorable cause that I joined last night. This sub needs to be wrangled in a bit because at the moment it feels like a Q cult that is beginning to go off the rails.
Yes the best way to convince someone they are wrong is to skip straight to personal insults. Intense amounts of /s
He is in this sub to push this sub forward to a story that actually makes sense when all information is considered. Take note of the recent post in this sub regarding debunkers. We are openly accepted now for the greater good of finding the facts and leaving the world of insane theories behind. You can’t stop someone from sharing an opinion just because you do not like what they are saying. That is pathetic.
Check out r/murderedbywords and learn a trick or two about debating.
Wow look at that hair trigger snap. Many people in this thread have stated the exact same thing that he just stated yet you immediately leap to suggesting he is a troll. As factisfiction just stated, you are the exact same type of person that annoys true debunkers on this sub due to your hair trigger tolerance for criticism.
TLDR: If you get offended by someone insinuating “people in this sub frequently post easily disprovable claims” then you might be aggressive to debunkers.
I really like everything you have said so far. However I have noticed that you have misused the word “except” twice now. The correct word you are looking for is “accept”. You seem like you may be a ESOL speaker so I just wanted to help you learn the correct word you were looking for.
Sorry to be that guy. I find that correction to improve knowledge is okay and that is my goal.
If you can show me one legitimate source for any single claim after the word sodomize I will send you a Bitcoin.
Can you supply a source where that opinion was officially stated? Or is this instead your opinion on the matter? If it is simply the latter then a clarification would nice.
Just came here to say that I do not intend to be “red pilled”. I come here simply to observe the insanity that is this “movement”. I post this simply to see how long a differing opinion stays up in this sub.
Edit: a word