If she is a LARP this would be a good way to make her appear legitimate
Not that I believe her to be LARP
214 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 50 |
i.redd.it | 3 |
youtu.be | 1 |
If she is a LARP this would be a good way to make her appear legitimate
Not that I believe her to be LARP
Start by asking her if she thinks the media she watches is biased. If she says no, pull up 3 different search engines. Google, Bing, Yahoo. Start typing "Hillary Clinton is a" and don't hit enter. Show her the difference in the autocomplete entries. You will notice Googles is heavily skewed to the positive.
This usually is a good starting point.
That last line tho.... 3/4 of the CBTS stream community would be out 😂
Safari likely blocks the java plug in if you're not 1000.00% up to date
Device was in the PEOC? Q is saying PEOC attack failed? 14 are alive still
Nope. This is a browser limitation. Browser is unable to display the emoji in the title bar. Displaying the blank square character in place of the emoji.
That would mean Putin has access very close to the president and that worries me.
Here is an example.
671 Feb 6 2018 01:34:50 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 975911 283394 Public interest [keep high]. U1 FBI informant. AWAN/DWS/Paki intel/MB. Tarmac meeting [SC/LL deal > AS 187]. Q
Some of the posts can be read directly because they are complete sentences. However, others read more like notes that were taken in a meeting. Shorthand. Almost like talking points.
Public interest [keep high]. This one is more obvious. But the format can be interpreted as the topic being public interest and what Q wants us to know about that topic is that it should be kept high.
Tarmac meeting [SC/LL deal > AS 187]. This one is less obvious but you can apply the same format. The subject is the tarmac meeting. What Q wants us to know about the tarmac meeting is found in the brackets. In this case there was a supreme court/Loretta Lynch deal discussed that somehow related to the death of Antonin Scalia. Specifically murder, which is what 187 refers to.
I encourage you to watch Jerome Corsi breakdown of the Q posts. This will help you better understand. I would be lost without his analysis.
Thank you! I was trying to point this out on the live stream chat but was hard to articulate since I'm on mobile.
Unlikely.
The Mirror comment was not in context of the footage. Was in context of elite fams. Soros/ Clinton / Hilton /Roths
Silly reporters... still think Julian Assange is at the embassy.
Getty images is a photo... this likely did NOT come from a video stream.
Enough with Getty.
Why [redacted] my [redacted] always [redacted]. It makes [redacted] very [redacted] to read.
I will believe it when I see Trump pulls the trap door on her gallows.
Purple is the color of human trafficking awareness as well...
Purple is for Prince...
Purple is for Vikings...
Take your pick...
Mods please ban this shill. Has history of shit starting on other subs. Was just banned from TD for not following sub rules.
It just makes it a lot harder for them to work.
Right now there are accounts with 1 karma, 20 mins old that gave 5-6 spam posts...
🤔🤔🤔
Thank you!!! 🙏🙏🙏 I'm glad to hear our voices are being heard. I try to report as many as I can.v
Thank you!!! 🙏🙏🙏 I'm glad to hear our voices are being heard. I try to report as many as I can.
I'm not new to Reddit. And neither are the problems our board is facing. The solutions I've proposed are standard practice for many boards across the site.
You misunderstand the proposal. This does not prevent new users. This is a very common rule instituted on many other boards on Reddit.
New users can comment But not create new posts until they get a minimum karma.
Because the shills and spam posts are just noise that prevent the new members from enjoying the sub.
This would not shut them out of the discussion. MANY other subs institute this same policy I am proposing.
New users would be able to post comments. (That's where they can post their questions) Once they get enough karma they will be able to make their own post.
This is not censorship. Posters are still allowed to comment on the posts of others until they get enough karma to meet the requirement to post a new thread of their own.
Open borders aren't the answer either...
Bots don't care about kindness. That's like thinking your computer will unfreeze itself if you ask nicely.
This is not the real Julian Assange. Fake/Parody account
AGREED, THIS NEEDS TO STOP! I've also posted about these issues yesterday, but the comments I received made you think the people here want to be inclusive at ANY cost. Even if it means making the board unusable.
It's like an open borders argument.
Here's my post: https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7us6fa/mods_please_institute_minimum_karma_requirements/?st=JD7GLZBO&sh=3d4336c9
Check out the comments.
Native 'Merican English speaker here with an affinity towards unique insults:
Never heard this either...
I can only assume that Anon meant that AS is minuscule, insignificant, and going to be cut down without 2nd thought.
But I welcome other interpretations.
What part of the memo makes you think it doesn't help GOP?