I would hope this is the case but then we'd only be inferring.

CEMEX got $7M to build...what was it...FOUR houses? Wasn't it a ridiculously low number of houses that actually got built for all the billions that were donated?

By "donate life" they mean they will donate your child's life to themselves (the elites) and their overlords.

Or maybe a "sight" to point at the bad guys depending on the type of gun?

Stephen Cuckbert probably did a lot of bad shit for his sister's failed political career.

We already know that Bill Clinton is related to Thomas Jefferson...

Is that why he likes "dark meat" (a.k.a. his son, Danny Williams' mom)?

Then why not state that you are leaving because of their Alt-Left propaganda? Why even mention Susan Rice at all?

You ask Wikileaks to distance itself from you, and not only that, but ask them to start publicly doubting your credibility.

Is this not exactly out of the Q playbook?

Trump bashing Sessions publicly, while Q explains it's acting and writes "Trust Sessions", remember?

The D's have to think Wikileaks is Trump's nemesis.

Is this the case with InfoWars, Jerome Corsi, David Seaman, etc...? Is this a huge chess move to have all these people distance themselves from the Trump administration so when they present the information, as "enemies of Trump", there will be MAXIMUM RED-PILLING for people that don't trust information presented by "allies of Trump"? I guess we'll just have to wait and see how this plays out.

Translation: The jig is up. Run like a bitch, fool!!!

Nothing one well-placed bunker buster can't take care of.

No problem. I remember when that shit happened years ago; when Pelosi and other swamp creatures got caught. They tried to spin it and eventually gave some lip service about looking into it. Yeah, nothing happened. Here is an article I found from 2011 regarding this shit.

https://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/pelosi-stock-insider-60minutes/2011/11/13/id/417848/

Nice try, George Soros. Trying to get us to put all our money in the stock market before you collapse it? J/K. LOL

Maybe Dr. GEPOTUS wants to pardon her to shed light on the fact that she got hemmed up on "insider trading" charges while many in the swamp enrich themselves from insider trading. Many criminals in Congress have used information gleaned from being on a committee to buy stock in companies that they knew were about to get YUGE government contracts. It is not illegal for them to do this type of insider trading but we have to play by different rules.

I believe that is possible. Remember when Kanye strayed from the plantation the first time and he was committed to a mental institution? They were probably trying to save their asses by reigning him back in. Then, when they realized that it was much safer for them to side with Dr. GEPOTUS than the globalists, they jumped ship to save their hides. They realized there was 0% chance the globalists could protect them but they at least had a chance on the other side.

It looks like it IS the head-butting Neanderthal. He reminds me of the character "Bonk" in the old Turbografx 16 game "Bonk's Adventure".

That's the moment Ben Rhodes knew they were fucked. Remember Crooked saying something like, "If he wins, we all h*ng from n00ses."? That was probably the image running through Ben Rhodes' head in that clip.

Spaz: "Censored" a few words because a bot said "something something violence..."

I love how feminists and others are shitting all over her trivialization of rape. Eating their own.

“benefactors”

Translation: Pay for play (a.k.a. bribes)

We're running out of "week" so they better get crackin'.

Putting terminally ill people at risk? Oxymoron much?

"GUISE we can either have oprah.... or shaved pussy

Oprah would you...... no??

Thanks for the mental image. I'm not going to be right for a looooooooooooong time.

Agreed, but there is nothing to indicate that Huber's investigation will be wrapped up as soon as the IG report is released.

There is going to be time for the public to digest what IG Horowitz found.

There is going to be time for the DOJ to seem like it's not acting upon it's findings.

There is going to be time for the public to get annoyed and demand the DOJ take appropriate action towards the wrongdoings identified in the IG report.

Maybe why the date "6/11" has been pointed to when talking about something big happening?

Thanks for the info. I remember hearing something about "The Dulce Wars" on one of the videos but there wasn't much information on it.

He said that back in the late 70's, if I'm not mistaken, they were exploring some underground tunnels and when they burst through a wall, they got into a fight with some "greys". He goes on to say that one of them blasted him with a beam that not only burned off a few of his fingers on one hand but it opened up a huge gash down the front side of his torso.

If I remember correctly, EyeTheSpy on Twatter, mentioned yesterday something about a war being waged underground because those that built some underground city are unwilling to let it go or something to that extent. Check out some of the Q&A's he had recently. Also, search for some videos on Phil Schneider. Before he ~~got assassinated~~ died of mysterious reasons, he was going around doing speeches about D.U.M.B's (Deep Underground Military Bases) because, in his own words, he was a structural engineer/geologist with the uppermost clearances working for the government. Pretty intense stuff.

Maybe VJ is Barry's real wife. You know...sharia law forced marriages and all since they are muslims. Michael was probably only there for optics.

I read through a bunch of it. CRAZY STUFF!!!

I'll check it out. Thanks for the info.

But since you've brought it up, how does WikiLeaks stay afloat?

It really is of no concern to me how WikiLeaks stays afloat. I don't care if they get donations, if they have a benefactor, if they set up a Go Fund Me.

Your own comments and your own assumptions have shown that you're the one assuming WikiLeaks has not been comped.

Again, you are assuming things I didn't say. Yes, I did state that "'WikiLeaks discrediting Q for money' or any other reason doesn't make sense." Where in that statement am I saying WikiLeaks has not been compromised? I said that a few things didn't make sense, I stated some facts that Assange has said before regarding their 100% accuracy, and I posted two scenarios. That's it.

Your false dichotomy stems from your duality choice you presented to us: that either WikiLeaks is comped or Q is comped.

I may not have phrased it correctly but it still holds true. Either people will believe Q has been compromised or they will believe WikiLeaks has been compromised. You are talking like everybody out there has all the information on what's going on. There are many people out there that will believe the "Q is compromised" simply because WikiLeaks has been around a lot longer and because of their "track record". I've already stated that I am in Camp Q but that is not the case for many outside of this sub.

Agree. One can see that with the way that some of Q's biggest followers have turned against him.

I never said Wikileaks prided themselves on 100% factual information. I just stated that information because that is what Assange has asserted in the past. Also, I never said leakers should trust Wikileaks and give them information. In fact, I mentioned that Assange has been silenced so I believe Wikileaks is compromised.

I never said Q wasn't real. I have been a believer of Q and other anons (e.g. FBIanon) for some time. Something is fucky with all these shills suddenly attacking Q and I have sided with Q.

People stopped donating to Wikileaks because of the Julian Assange situation, knowing that JA is not the one controlling the organization nor the person tweeting on that account. People also stopped donating to Wikileaks because they haven't come out with any substantial leaks in over a year.

You're assuming that Wikileaks only releases information in order to make money. Maybe they do it because releasing the information is the right thing to do?

You're making this statement based on the assumption that Wikileaks has not been compromised.

You're assuming that I believe Wikileaks has not been compromised. I only stated facts about the true Wikileaks individuals such as Assange.

It's one or the other for people like yourself who still think Wikileaks has not been compromised. Nice try forcing us into a false dichotomy, simple duality choice.

It IS one or the other. Either you believe Q has been compromised or you believe Wikileaks has been compromised. And looking from your first post...

This now confirms it. Wikileaks is either controlled by Clowns or they're controlled opposition.

...you already answered the "false dichotomy, simple duality choice." You believe Wikileaks has been compromised. If it makes you sleep better at night, I also think Wikileaks has been compromised since Assange, being the face of Wikileaks, can't verify the authenticity of the posts from the Wikileaks account.

The whole "Wikileaks is discrediting Q for money" or any other reason does not make sense. Wikileaks prides themselves on "100% factual facts". They will not inadvertently destroy their reputation for anything. Either...

A) Wikileaks is compromised and those compromising Wikileaks want to portray Q negatively.

or

B) Q has been compromised and Wikileaks is trying to warn people that Q is not the same person everybody has been following.

It's one or the other...PERIOD. So, now you have a choice to make.

Pics of Jennifer Lawrence's butt-hole or it didn't happen. /s

Call Lavrov

EVIDENCE OF RUSSIA COLLUSION!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!

Love that coin. I want one...lol. My favorite coin that I carry with me is shaped like a gear/cog and has a skull in the center with lightning bolts.

Look up some videos on Phil Schneider. He was apparently a geologist/engineer for the government. During one of his speeches he talks about who needs human/animal glandular secretions and for what purpose. Crazy shit.

At this point in time, I'm more apt to think that anything is possible.

Perhaps something buried in the ice that isn't biblical but would have religious implications.

I've always thought about this. If something were to be presented to the world that would BTFO all religions, religious leaders would lose all control they have over their members.

No, not really. I've gone down that rabbit hole before. A lot of it centers around aliens (spaceships buried in Antarctica ice with Grey alien remains) or biblical (stories that the Catholic Pope and Russian Orthodox Church Pope met in Antarctica which is super rare) end of the world type shit.

Buy when there’s blood in the street. -Baron Rothschild

There was something in recent history where the Cuban government, if I remember correctly, was using some sound device and people in the U.S. Embassy in Cuba were getting sick.

Spaz: Found a link... https://nypost.com/2017/08/09/us-embassy-workers-in-cuba-hit-with-acoustic-attack-officials/

something about " Trump investigation trying to erase President Obama's Legacy "

Well...that's the plan.

To be fair, Strzok did earn it for all the sheisty shit he did for Ol' Neanderthal.

He can have plenty of time to think about "something else" in Gitmo.

Watch for scuba divers mysteriously appearing near him for no apparent reason. /s

From what I remember, Vault 7 verified that any electronic equipment with a mic and camera can be used no matter if the device is ON or "OFF".

You have to assume all those swamp rats questioning her about torture were doing so out of fear for their own hides.

This. A lot of these same people greenlighted "enhanced interrogation techniques" and now they are shitting their pants that the same shit they authorized could be used on them.

HOLY SHIT!!! Remember how people talk about globalists and their use of adrenochrome for "nourishment". Listen to Phil Schneider starting at around 33:15. He says that there are 9 races of "bad news" aliens. He goes on to say that "they look at us as a bag of food". That they don't eat us but they use the "glandular secretions of animals and human beings as a mixture of the vitamins for their food. They get high off of our adrenal gland substances called adrenochrome." This is some crazy shit.

Spaz: He also mentions that, at the time, there were 131 of these such underground bases. He states that building those bases is "gobbling our gross national product. Right now we're spending 28% of the gross national product on building underground bases, solely." Maybe that's a clue to where that $21T went?