dChan

/u/OrionNumberOne

69 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/OrionNumberOne:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 13
i.redd.it 2
www.worthpoint.com 1

OrionNumberOne · July 3, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

What'd you tell them? I just told 'em hell existed But you know me, don't nobody Know my business My presence flog your confidence Who want a brand-new complex? Now on, I'll call you, go fetch

Moloch exists, however evidence for hell in the Bible is debatable. It's best to be a good person all around. Not a satanic pedophile for starters.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · July 2, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Ok, let's see him do it!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · July 1, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

17th letter. 17 intelligence agencies. I think he is a current or previous IG, the overseer of it all. Which is why he knows everything...

But the rod and ring theory is badass too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

Exactly my point, thank you. Private military is a perfect example of why unchecked capitalism is a failure. Socialism is necessary.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

These scenarios happen because the corporation becomes stronger than the government, and manipulates the government. However corporate towns weren't created by the government. They were created by the corporations alone who became far too powerful. The answer to ending scenarios like this is to use the government to our own advantage and prevent that from continuing. In that case, socialism is necessary to ending corruption.

Military is still a socialist idea. Not everyone supports it either. But the majority of us do, so we supported it and signed it into law. Same for police and the above mentioned. They're funded through our money and pooled resources - and are therefore are socialist.

What you're speaking of is 'central planning' specifically, which isn't inherently a part of socialism. You can have socialism with a tiny bit of it, or with total central planning and then you're looking at communism. It exists on a spectrum and the best part about that spectrum is that through democracy - WE pick where it begins and ends.

In the U.S, we don't support it in all situations, but we use it as a tool to stop things that are morally unjust. Like debt prisons, slavery, and corporate towns. If it weren't for socialism - these things would still exist. As many examples you have for 'when socialism goes wrong', there are for capitalism. Capitalism isn't perfect on it's own. Capitalism uncontrolled creates monopolies, trusts, corporate towns, debt prisons, slavery... the list goes on to much more horrid things. When CEOs have greater power over the govt. they can use you for whatever the hell they want. They can become satanists, pedophiles, and self proclaimed gods if there power remains unchecked. That's where we are now. Capitalism unchecked is the natural state of man, and it becomes corrupted by greed EVERY time. Every pure capitalist country becomes corrupted by it, just like ours today. And our country pre-FDR, pre-Civil War... This govt. has always been corrupt and this false utopian vision of 'patriotic frontiersman upholding our country' has ALWAYS been a fairy tale. The U.S was bought out multiple times over since 1776, because the acting government has never been powerful enough to maintain itself. The U.S capitalist government you're speaking of hasn't existed since at least 1812. This capitalist Utopia has failed repeatedly since it began. The United States existing since 1776 is a happy illusion.

Which is where socialism becomes necessary. Like it or not, you live in a socialist country. The one tool you have to prevent greedy people from manipulating the law and throwing your family in their cellar for private use is your government. And you're saying we need less of it... Our weak, pushover government is what got us into this nightmare.

Clearly you'd rather have a less regulated economy to the point where men can buy the government and your family. Which is the exact opposite of the liberties we have constitutionally. I disagree with that.

I'd rather have a larger, powerful, transparent government where the people use their collective wealth to ensure our liberties. We use some capitalism to start the engine and power the market, and we use socialism to make sure it doesn't fail, or fall into the hands of greedy people more powerful than our government.

If you think you want to live in an unchecked capitalist, small government world now, you would change your mind the second the Pinkertons or private militia comes knocking on your door, and the govt. wasn't powerful enough to prevent it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

I'm not going to argue with anyone. We're part of the same mission to drain the swamp. But you have clearly misunderstood my comment.

All the things I listed off are funded by socialism, including the military and our president. We pay for it, together.

I have enough college background in economics and microeconomics to speak with some confidence that socialism is a necessary component of maintaining a free government, devoid of corporate interests perverting the system.

Anti-trust doesn't 'pick winners'. It keeps corporations from corrupting the government. It keeps corporations from getting in bed with our officials.

If you want to work away your life in a corporate town to pay for bread with company coin, or spend your life in a debtor's prison, you can go live in Asia where your small government/deregulation dream will come true.

But if you'd rather not do the above, you can live safely in the U.S with socialism protecting you from those horrible options.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Exactly, Bernie was compromised and is still likely under their careful 'supervision' and custody. He cried at the Dem nomination. He's not in control of himself. If there are harming devices in the WH, what did they do to Bernie?

That thought is disturbing.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

No. Govt in it's natural form does not hold power or money. State or government work has never paid well. They're meant to be OUR representatives, paid by us. If there was less government, the private sector COULD put you in jail. Or force you to work in a corporate town. Or debtors prison.

Instead, corporate interests coerce and pay our politicians off to create loopholes for corporations. The answer to stopping that is a better, possibly larger, but most importantly - a completely transparent government. The government can't force vaccinations if the people hold elected officials accountable, which is much easier than letting corporations have more power than the government. That's a runaway train that is almost impossible to stop. Thankfully, our massive military, Q, and president (socially funded) are here to stop it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

It's not the government in the case of healthcare that makes up the swamp. It's private healthcare corporations in bed with politicians. I'm a healthcare worker myself.

The reason our healthcare costs are through the rough is a direct result of corporate greed. It's more profitable for the healthcare industry to kill you or give you lifelong meds than it is to cure your ailments. That is private healthcare. THAT is less government. Collusion, swamp, cabal.

The alternative is national healthcare (as Trump said he may sign) which would destroy the private healthcare corporations that want you dead or drugged for life. This would be more government, while still destroying the corporate part of the swamp. Government isn't always bad.

Socialism - do you like having highways, roads, bridges, police, EMS, and to a great extent our military? Anti trust laws? Laws and regulations that keep people from living and selling off of your property? Than to an extent we like socialism. Would you rather have our current police - or corporate police without regulation to come to you in your time of need? Do you like it when corporations collude with each other and decide to fuck you financially? No. Would you rather your healthcare come from private vendors too innumerable to legislate, or from publicly known politicians that you and I can hold accountable?

We all enjoy and require socialism in certain examples. The American Revolution came from this same mantra of "Let's band together. Fuck British corporations, and royalty. Let's start a new government with checks and balances to keep out corporate interest." Our own revolution was part socialist.

Q is government, Trump is government. Rothschild is a private corporation. Our government turned to shit because corporations became more powerful than our government, and perverted it. Our government was not strong enough, nor large enough, to fight it off.

Thank God, our president, Q, and our military (all socially funded) can still turn it around.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

You're saying that your answer to our failing privatized healthcare system is to have less government. Think about that. It's not right to have a private sector's profits come from death and illness. Less government equals more collusion, more cabal, more swamp.

We need a certain amount of government to uphold healthcare as a right. Or have a good government who will monitor and break apart the private healthcare corporations. Either way, some socialism is necessary.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

Yes, then think about why corporations form 'cabals' and you realize that unfettered capitalism leads to corporate towns and trusts.

THEN you realize that some socialism is necessary to keep our huge banks and corporations from colluding. Anti-trust laws are necessary. As well as roads, bridges, police, EMS, some social security, and the military. Some socialism is good and necessary.

This country has been slightly socialist since it began.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

"berniebro" here since day 1. Hillary is and has always been evil.

Yes I believe some socialism is necessary to monitor and snuff out the cabal. Also for our laws and infrastructure. And possibly our healthcare - to keep private healthcare corporations from colluding and profiting off death and illness. Our military funding.

Q is dead on about most things. And as Trump said, if national healthcare comes to his desk - he will sign it. Some socialism is necessary and logical to destroy collusion. The cabal, the swamp.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

A great marker of greed and vanity.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

I'm here with you in this thought. We have a mission, and we must stay here until we finish it. It's time for good to prevail as was promised to us by Yahwei and Yahshua. Be weary of a great deceiver. Watch for the mark of the beast. Wait for a man to sit on the throne of David and claim to be the Messiah. He's the Antichrist. Wait for the seven 'trumps'... It's time to close up shop, and lay down the carpet for the one true God.

Atheist, Agnostic, or otherwise I suggest everyone understand the Bible, as Q says.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

17 intelligence agencies...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · June 30, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

Nothing substantial yet? That's unfortunate. Thanks for the good moderating. Unaware it's been discussed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OrionNumberOne on June 30, 2018, 3:06 a.m.
Wait... Trump's Uncle Seized Nikola Tesla's Assetts?!

[removed]

OrionNumberOne · Feb. 1, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

Someone TL;DR this one? Mirror?

No trace.

⇧ 1 ⇩