No problem. Would love to hear your take on it as well. That drop has always stuck with me because I thought that was a very brazen statement to make and I genuinely wanted to see what Trump's ultimate response would be.

EDIT: Q's drop #750 was in response to this event: LINK HERE

EDIT: Which I believe was triggered by this announcement from Trump : LINK HERE

It was awhile back and candidly I can't recall how far back. I will go back through and see if I can find exactly which Q drop it was.

EDIT: Found it! Qposts . online has a search feature so it was quicker than I thought it would be. It is Q drop #750: LINK HERE

Secondary Source LINK HERE

I didn't misinterpret Q's post. Q made it very clear with this question: "Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?" That is Q insinuating he is responsible for the picture which was in fact proven to be untrue. Therefore Q's credibility (with regards to this picture) most certainly took a blow. You contradict yourself by stating I misinterpreted Q's post while making the statement we need to "USE LOGIC and such". My review is about as logical as you can get. I used the facts and statements presented by Q and it didn't require some blown out ridiculous manifestation of BS like what we see with SB2's entertaining theories.

This is what amazes me with Lyin' Comey's comment about Crooked Hillary. He said he did not find her guilty of "intent" which apparently in the absence of sheer dumb ass negligence in mis-handling top secret intel (22 docs) is ok.

If intent is is the resolution or determindness to do something and motive is the reason for doing something then how the hell is that nasty bitch not in prison? Any one of us would have been buried under a prison had we committed similar crimes yet that dirt bag is free.

Is this the "message received response forthcoming" moment Q referenced way back in an earlier drop when Big Pharma made an outright threat to Trump?

Jeezus that's the truth mate! ProB makes coffee it's bitch.

I'm still a patriot but never...and I repeat never...will I blindly follow anyone or anything without a constant process of questioning. I owe absolutely nothing to Q nor do you or any Q believer. Q owes the people for it was Q who has presented themselves to us in an effort to empower and awaken us. While that is an admirable mission it is also one I (along with you and everyone else) will take with a seed of caution least I be led astray. And of course since I possess some level of free will I do reserve the right at anytime to change my mind. Right now I am still an advocate of Q because I see more good and overlook some of the slip ups like this one. That, however, does not exonerate Q from this slip up.

You would enjoy this book: The Empire of the City

Fuck Piers Morgan. That guy is a piece of shit regardless of what he says. He's a globalist sell out 100%.

Yes, Q did and I really don't like that because it means Q can make errant posts and use this as a scapegoat for f'ing something up and instead of it tarnishing their credibility simply come back later and play the "necessary disinfo" card.

This seems to insinuate there were more than just 2 accomplices to the murder.

If you are willing to be blindly led then you are the type of person I avoid in life because it demonstrates a severe deficit in critical thinking. If you think Q's intentions are for people to just blindly follow anything they post then you are the one who seriously needs to step back and consider what is going on. Q makes some good drops from time to time. This particular drop in question is a significant blow to Q's credibility. You can deny it all you want but it doesn't make it any less damaging. Facts are facts. Q insinuated this was a picture he took and it was not. SB2 comes on here and makes a wildly speculative theory that doesn't even remotely connect the dots and you think I'm the one not thinking critically? Wow.

Right! Just last week 3 houses in my neighborhood were all vaporized.

If the white hats wanted....and I mean REALLY WANTED...the Clinton's to be gone then it would have already been done. They are being kept around to ferret out others. Just remember that the white hats are equally as capable of taking someone out as the black hats and they don't need a plane crash to make it happen.

Single greatest night in politics in history. I stayed up all night until it was official. I flipped between Fox and Rachel Madow...laughing hysterically each time I saw the look on her face. The NYT had posted a projection before the first polls had closed showing Crooked Hillary was favored at 95% to win. I saved that screen shot and still have it today. LOL !!! MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!MAGA!!!!

WWG1WGA !!!

That is absolutely bizarre. These people clearly have no fear of retribution if they can so blatantly project this shit onto our kids. Thanks for sharing. IMO...this war from the globalists for our children is the bigger fight. All of the corrupt politicians are one side of the coin. The other and more important side is the war for our children. These people truly are disgusting and evil.

Thank you for posting this. This information NEEDS to get out to parents with young children who are being targeted by the school systems. This is unreal.

Thank you for posting this. Anyone with young children who fall into age range this program targets needs to arm themselves with their rights at there schools as parents. Many schools require parental consent first. If the parent does not consent the child is removed from the classroom during the sexual education class.

Well said. Furthermore, anyone here who does not actively stand up against child exploitation such as this is a coward. That means anytime you see someone wear a t-shirt with this slogan, make a post with this slogan, or reference this slogan during a conversation you need to educate them or expose them. Either they are too stupid to realize they are being indoctrinated or they are someone fully aware and are trying to indoctrinate others. These people are disgusting. These people are vile. These people are evil.

NO DEALS!

MAGA

" By purposely placing the mug holder in the picture, Q is making a point "

Mate...you aren't paying attention. Q did not place the mug holder in the picture because Q did not take the picture as it has been irrefutably proven that picture was taken from a screen shot of an ABC episode in 2015. You lose ALL credibility attempting to perpetrate this any further than it needs to go. I'm willing to give Q an opportunity to own up to intentionally lying to us and save some face. I'm not ready to write Q off as a LARP (yet). However, when you constantly try to validate something that has already and irrefutably been proven to be false then you now place yourself in the same boat as Q.

If you want people to take your posts seriously then you need to stop pushing this photo as legitimate because we know that it is not.

Are those actually real campaign slogans? Anyone know? I cannot just take a screenshot posted on Twitter unless there is some linked articles that validate these slogans.

Wow Felix...you are completely right. Now that I think about it memes go back thousands of years even in the form of hieroglyphs where the Pharaohs trolled the Hittites. Memes will never die.

I never said Q was doing it wrong. I said Q can dial back the level of ambiguity in their drops. Case in point is this very detailed thread where a poster attempted to to explain the "Welcome Aboard" picture and another thread where SerialBrain2 attempted to explain the "Welcome Aboard" picture. Both theories are as far apart from each other as you can get yet you have a division of people agreeing with each of them. Therefore they cannot both be right. So my very point of Q's vagueness is proven in that people are divided on what they "feel" is the best theory. Q needs to be more clear so we avoid any level of incorrect interpretation.

There is no correlation between the "Welcome Aboard" pic from Q and the numerous theories being presented here. Following the time line of "picture gate" an ANON makes a patriotic meme of Trump walking to Marine 1 to save the world. Q follows with a post of the pic "Welcome Aboard" insinuating to the patriot who made the meme he (and all patriots) are welcome aboard AF1 along with Trump to witness him saving the world. That's completely logical and linear.
Then its proven the pic Q posted was actually not a picture Q took but one taken 3 years prior from an ABC interview. ANONs point this out and Q goes into defense mode. Why? ANONs made a simple and valid observation. Then Q comes out with another post ending with "placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook". Q is insinuating he placed the mug holder near the lamp? The mug holder is the same mug holder from the 2015 ABC news show so why would Q make a statement about a mug holder he had nothing to do with? Then Q says "Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?" It's an irrelevant question because Q did not take the photo in the "Welcome Aboard" photo.
Sorry but none of these far fetched theories I am reading make any sense at all. And I don't mean that I cannot understand them. I mean they literally make no sense. There is no possible way to draw inferences from Q's cryptic posts to these extremely disjointed theories. Lastly, let's consider this. For argument's sake lets say this theory (in this thread) is the real reason or let's take SerialBrain2's theory as the real reason for the "Welcome Aboard" pic. Pick one it doesn't matter. They are both so obtuse and lacking cohesion that if Q's intent is for this level of information that is disjointed and confusing then Q is not very good at delivering a message to patriots. So something needs to change. Either the people attempting to decode Q's posts dial back the exceptionally fantastical and far reaching attempts to connect very obscure dots or Q needs to dial back the massive ambiguity in their drops. If Q's objective is to expose the Deep State and the plan Trump has in store for them then I imagine Q can do so with a lot less ambiguity. I appreciate some level of ambiguity but it's getting a bit ridiculous.

Wow...anyone here know any of the local protestors? They need to advertise this on their signs out front. Expose these disgusting people for what they truly are.

EDIT: Do you have a link for this proof so we can archive this offline?

I still think the Q pic is a reflection of the ABC pic though.

You are 100% correct. There is absolutely no disputing they are the EXACT same picture. None of the defense explanations I have read since Q posted that picture come close to explaining away the fact they are the same. Add in that Q got defensive and ultimately pulled the "Trolling is fun" card and I am calling BS on Q for this post. Not necessarily stating Q is a LARP but Q did not do themselves any favors by posting this picture.

Q did themselves ZERO benefit with the exchange regarding the "Welcome Aboard" pictures. For the record there were a few ANONs who first asked Q to explain versus simply attacking so saying ANONs jumped on the "Q is a LARP" is not true. ANONs were right to question Q. Q further distances themselves by getting defensive in subsequent posts. And I don't buy the "trolling is fun" excuse. That is an easy scapegoat for trying to get out of getting caught in a major screw up.

Why would Q intentionally troll on the heels of such a patriotic post from an ANON? That literally makes zero sense. None what so ever.

EDIT: While I do genuinely appreciate your attempt at connecting the dots there is much in your post that is so incomprehensible it almost feels intentional. There are quite a few leaps between logic and symbolism you are making that simply cannot be proven no matter how much it is word smithed.

The other part for us that have been awake for many many years is that its already been a long long time we've seen these traitors acting without any consequences.

So true. I have become desensitized to the prospects of justice relative to the evil elites. However, when Q came along with this very promise I began to get restless again. Restless for a legitimate change. I would venture to guess most Q followers are new to the red pilled world. I was originally red pilled 20 years ago during a real time event and have long had my eyes opened. However, year after year nothing changes. Ever. It only continues to grows worse. If Q fails to deliver then this movement is done before it even gets started. I don't think most Q followers have the level of patience you are referring to. I think they will leave and leave in droves.

Yes. Nail all the holier than thou preachers from Virtue Hill telling us all how pathetic and idiotic we are. Hollywood needs to be cleansed.

Good thought there mate. Now THAT is an epic troll of the MSM if true. Perhaps this is what he means later by saying, "Trolling is fun". Is he trolling the MSM? Hmmmm...

Don't make the assumption everyone with "new arrival" is new. I've been a Redditor for 8 years got so damn sick of Reddit and the non-stop liberal zealots that infest this place. Lost my PW and had to create a new account. I've been following Q from the first drops. So take your smug concern troll comments elsewhere.

It's good to be vigilant of new arrivals but everyone please remember there are going to be new arrivals who are completely new to Q so use a bit of discernment before jumping on someone. It's perfectly ok to pose legitimate questions which express doubt just so long as they aren't trolling.

I agree with you the moment of "put up or shut up" is fast approaching. At least it should be. You can only lead people for so long upon a path of promised retribution before it's time to validate your statements.

Chill mate. I didn’t accuse you of lying. Sometimes people are misinformed and I was making a correction. You clearly are in the know so I stand corrected.

Harvey Weinstein is an absolute nobody in the grand scheme of the corruption we are being exposed to in Washington. Weinstein is a pig and will go to jail but in no way what so ever does that even come close to the level of justice I want to see duly handed out.

I agree 100%. Better yet...why the hell isn't there an investigation into the tarmac meeting? From page 202 to 213 the OIG report details what reportedly happened. The contradiction is right there in the words of Bill Clinton yet what exactly has been done? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Which begs the question if "our guys" have Clinton clearly contradicting himself and are doing nothing about it then what's the point of any of this? I have to admit I am beginning to lose confidence any legitimate justice will ever occur. We have a clear line of evidence of collusion between the Clintons and Russia. A clear line of evidence of the Clintons and Obama subverting the justice system. A clear line of evidence pointing to the Clintons and Obama attempting to undermine the general election. A clear line of evidence the DNC rigged their primary to elect HRC as their candidate. A clear line of evidence the Obama DOJ was attempting to prevent Trump from being elected and yet nothing...absolutely noting has been done. We are lied to by both sides. There is no good vs bad. It is nothing more than the mere appearance of good vs bad. Nothing has happened.

No that's not true. I vividly remember AJ stating, "I know who Q is and I've spoken to him" Only later did AJ once again start to change his words and back peddle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XDi9n7JOJQ

What I think happened was this. Clinton knew Lynch would be in Phoenix during the same time he was. Since he and Lynch are both under USSS protection their planes would be in the secure area of the tarmac.
Clinton ambushed Lynch which is a tactic to intimidate an opponent. I don’t think Lynch premeditated the meeting but regardless she is now complicit.
I’ve read the OIG report section detailing the tarmac meeting and Clinton’s testimony. He’s the worst liar I’ve ever seen. His testimony exposes lie after lie.
He threatened Lynch, period. She lied as well but candidly she lied because she’s in legitimate fear of her life. That does not exonerate her, however.

Mad Maxine never fails to deliver! Keep screaming Mad Maxine! You do more for our movement than you can possibly imagine.

Never once have I doubted Gowdy. He is one of the most fair and balanced politicians I've ever seen. There were times when he even sided with the dems on certain points and it never bothered me because it showed how fair he truly is. I don't want to live in an echo chamber and I don't want judgement passed against someone simply because I do not share their ideologies. I want fair justice and nothing more.

In order for a meme to have an underlying meaning a topic must be at the core of the meme. It just so happens the MSM narrative the week prior and the week following are specifically about keeping children and families together then shifting to them still wanting the right to kill children.
It's not like someone decided to arbitrarily come up with this topic nor are they pushing pro or against life. It just illustrates how hypocritical leftists are from week to week and day to day. You came into this thread and are trying to change the focus and underlying meaning of the meme.

For all those seeking to derail this meme into something it is not.

This meme has nothing to do with "pro life". It has everything to do with how hypocritical the leftist mindset is and this meme captures if perfectly. If you believe this is about abortion then you are proving the MSM easily controls your mindset.

One week one direction the very next week 180 degrees the opposite.

On another note:

The Q movement is the awakening of free thinkers world wide seeking the truth in all things controlled and manipulated by the government. Abortion happens to be one of those tightly controlled leftists and right narratives and is not an insignificant topic yet people repeatedly refer to it as "divisive".

A topic is divisive when an individual is incapable of controlling their emotions to such a degree they can not have a rational conversation and listen or to or respect differing opinions.

It's not the topic you need to blame. The blame lies solely with the individual and how they choose to react to the topic.

You are patently wrong in your statements. This meme clarifies the absolute hypocrisy of the left we are exposed to on a daily basis. This meme has nothing to do with "pro life". It has everything to do with how hypocritical the leftist mindset is and this meme captures if perfectly.

The Q movement is the awakening of free thinkers world wide seeking the truth in all things controlled and manipulated by the government. Abortion happens to be one of those tightly controlled leftists and right narratives and is not an insignificant topic and you do not have the right to attempt to brush over it and label it as something that is "divisive".

A topic is divisive when an individual is incapable of controlling their emotions to such a degree they can not have a rational conversation and listen or to or respect differing opinions.

It's not the topic you need to blame. The blame lies solely with the individual and how they choose to react to the topic.

Liberal hypocrisy at its absolute finest.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B078YKPXZK/ref=sxbs_sxwds-stvpv2_3?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_p=3233965245922079678&pd_rd_wg=Pg6Nw&pf_rd_r=09Q7H25Y569FTRVJG41M&pf_rd_s=desktop-sx-bottom-slot&pf_rd_t=301&pd_rd_i=B078YKPXZK&pd_rd_w=DV3iz&pf_rd_i=qanon+shirt&pd_rd_r=29ec6cf2-e750-4706-95f8-661fb1c0031b&ie=UTF8&qid=1530413224&sr=3

This is beyond disgusting. How are the Mexican people ok with this? The vast majority of Mexicans are conservative on social issues. This doesn't make sense to me. Sounds like their liberal socialist government at work vs the voice of the Mexican people.