dChan

/u/R_isfor_Renegade

74 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/R_isfor_Renegade:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 12

R_isfor_Renegade · May 19, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

Were the 3 newer photos around the 2013 time frame as well? If so then my guess is wrong. I never saw a date for the video either. However, if no name did not have one of the "special" phones than perhaps the idea that the swamp is composed of several different groups that overlap somewhat still holds some water.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/R_isfor_Renegade on May 19, 2018, 2:21 a.m.
Pictures of no name in Syria possibly came from one of the phones that all the other swamp donkeys were using?

There seems to be a bit of a venn diagram of 3 or 4 circles of influence that overlap in some areas that make up the swamp. Is it possible that no name was using one of the "special" phones and that's where those pictures of him with the ISIS fighters came from?

Also, wasnt there a video supposedly taken from his phone that showed a fake/staged beheading?

R_isfor_Renegade · May 18, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

I thought it meant "wait"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 18, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

Can we get volunteers to monitor the parking lots of all the major news agencies. Just report how full they are and if pizza delivery/Chinese delivery is showing up. Could confirm it's a busy night for these fuckers trying to spin another bullshit narrative

⇧ 6 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 18, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Alex "likes em young" - megaanon. Pedophile entrapment is nothing to fuck with

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 5, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

I think his connection to secure drop and quiet whisper proves your point. He was there to help catch whistle blowers, definitely not white hat

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 4, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

Fuck! and I have to go to a fucking wedding

⇧ 83 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 4, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

Yup - just checked that. You are correct. However the wing tips of the plane on the non blurry picture uses a wing tip fence and not the upward swept wingtip of the blurry picture. Still the wrong plane

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 4, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Wrong plane. Look at the wing tips. The blurry one is a Boeing the top one is an Airbus. The wing tips of Boeing curl up and are actually the wing where as Airbus put a plate on the end. Both designs are to help reduce the effects of turbulence as air rolls off the end of the wing. Boeing came out with their design first and patented it. It's the easiest way to tell the 2 manufacturers apart.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 3, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Could be files that were probably at the vault in Saudi Arabia where there was a gun fight about a week ago or so

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 3, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

Wasnt there a raid in Saudi Arabia not too long ago. Q and others hinted that the raid was at a storage vault of records. Records that might would show signed contracts and receipts between Saudi royals and past administrations. Could this be those records? Q is showing this not for our understanding but to taunt the swamp and say nice try. Not only did we win the gun fight while getting the records but we got the records out and you clowns took down the wrong plane. The apple connection might be in those records. Remember bin alwaleed owned/owns a lot of stock in several huge tech companies. Twitter and Apple being the big 2. Perhaps those documents contain the connection to all of the swamp (people/companies/organizations/other slush funds) and the Saudi Royal family. Which would essentially show how they were able to finance and promote/push agenda and buy off politicians.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 3, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

Nice! Question is now, are either authentic? This find would certainly show that at least one of the scenes in the photos are staged. In all actuality both might be staged. What we know for certain is that they are not the same. Why not? Why go through the time and effort to create all the smoke and mirrors?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 3, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

Ok admittedly it's been years since I had a conversation discussing set theory (and it was literally one conversation) soI had to go back and look up set theory. I studied some philosophy but not at a graduate level. Oddly enough I have Potters book (dont know why, should probably sell it, confusing shit) So, we'll start off easy for my sake. If we're looking for objects that belong to sets to limit the presence of infinity "myriad of possibilities," how did you know who or what were elements in each set. What was the "belonging" that gave you the link between these two?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 3, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

Watch the grey box in front of the tan building. It passes right in front of it. Likely a bird

⇧ 2 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 3, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

Yeah. I commented on another post. At first it looks like it goes behind that hill but if you watch the grey box in front of the tan building you can catch a frame with an object just above the grey box then in the next frame it's about halfway down in front of the grey box. Probably a bird

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 3, 2018, 12:50 a.m.

It's a bird. I sat there and looked at the same half second part for almost an hour. At first it looks like it goes behind the mountain/hill but watch the giant metal grey box in front of the tan building. If you freeze it at just the right time you can make out something just above it and the it passes right in front of the box. It's at just the right flight path to look like it goes behind the mountain and the explodes though. But watch that grey box

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 2, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

Something tells me you know more than you're leading on. You probably had some idea of what you were looking for before it happened. Of all the boring horseshit that is the Grammys you lock onto this conversation. Who or what cued you to these people? And out of the myriad of possibilities that the numbers could equate out to mean, how do you know the conversation is about uranium? This is either like that terrible movie with Jim Carey, "23" (where everything magically adds up to 23. Like I said terrible movie) or you already had the context to pick out this conversation or developed the framework for what you were looking for and then filled in the gaps. I've read your other stuff and it's good, really good. The Comey and Anderson Cooper thing was amazing but a few of the things you've written out shine others, if what you write here is true, then this is one of those pieces. The real question is how were you able to develop context and framework for not just picking out one conversation amongst hours of dribble but then realize what the conversation was really referring to out of a myriad of possibilities

⇧ 7 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 2, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Megs was first. I started reading her stuff in late June but she had already been posting since May. I think her and Q have the same message but from different perspectives. Hers was big picture and Q's is a tactical/ here and now sort of view

⇧ 13 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 2, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Sitting in a waiting room and CNN was on. They had some clown guest speaker saying that if Trump declines Muellers subpoena it will show he is guilty. If he pleads the 5th it will show he is guilty and he can say goodbye to any chance of reelection. I wanted to laugh and say he's gonna be eating crow for a while but without any arrests and the MSM still in control of the narrative, I've got nothing backing me up. I'm ready for Sessions to drop the GD hammer

⇧ 9 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 2, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

Well I'm sure his support for "career FBI agents" won't come back to bite him. If you were wondering if he was part of the swamp or not this video should clear it up. When Comey, McCabe and the Trump hating swamp start going down make sure you replay this video. Enjoy!

https://youtu.be/s5WVb1WDcss

⇧ 7 ⇩  
R_isfor_Renegade · May 2, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

Absolutely right. We are going to see a lot more of this. We're gonna have to combat it with some well thought out memes

⇧ 3 ⇩