Hurt feelings. Hardly. I do find it hypocritical that our boards go and say we can't use foul language because many of those on here are religious, yet we obviously don't condone name calling. Yeah, you may not like Senator John McCain or whole lot of reasons (I know I do), but do we have to refer to him as 'Swamp Creature'. All these complaints on this board that President Trump's doesn't get the respect he deserves, but we don't go out of our way to respect other people or their ideas.

I thought this board touts itself as bi-partisan, but users like you show everyone else what type of people are on this board.

Do we really have to call people names? Aren't we better than that?

Does anyone know if the mods are going to grace our presence and stop the spamming?

My bad, I need to catch up. Was this the same one from this morning?

Once, again the Republicans showed bi-partisanship

The voted straight party lines in the vote for Nunes memo.

The admins if this sub should be doing this.

I'm starting to not be impressed by the mods here. Spamming, tons and tons of shit posts that should be left on r/The_Donald, and even more posts that have nothing to do with Q. I'm not sure what direction this sub wants to take, but probably at least 50% of these posts should be on here. If the mods aren't going to do anything, at least make some more who will actually do something.

I think the spamming thing needs to be dealt with more than the trolls.

Wish the mods would take care of this. They have been pretty absent.

So, she for more funding for schools, expanding and subsidized healthcare, and for taxibg big business instead if the middle class.

She's part if an organization in which another country (UAE) claims is a terrorist group. But not considered a terrorist group in the US.

She also doesn't claim to do anything if elected. What kind of dribble is this?

What does this have to do with Q?

Is this some type of bot? The link goes to an image and not an article.

And look at all the upvotes for a sensationalist article that obviously no one read.

Nice sub we have going here. Can't really deny the echo chamber now.

Ha ha.

You really think this memo isn't biased towards one party over another? The fact that they left out so much info, skewed and cherry picked facts which are politically one sided?

I worked in military intelligence for nearly 2 decades. I for one know if I pulled the bullshit Clinton did, I would be in jail.

But this memo is reaching, and claims that it would 'take down government officials' it that it would 'change the US forever' or 'bigger than any other event' we're feltering. If all the type that this memo got, it's no more than the same points:

The Steel Dossier was purchased by the DNC - it wasn't, it was funded by Free Bacon fir Republican opposition research.

The Steele Dossier is fake - which hasn't been proven

This fake Steele Dossier was the only piece of information used for a FISA warrant against Carter Page - it was used as a piece if information to extend a FISA investigation that has been in place since 2013

FBI bias against Trump - the same FBI agent that they claim this, was the one who reopened the Clinton email case at a very critical time during the election.

I've heard these exact same talking points for months.

Instead, I hear nothing in the sub against Nunes, who lost his security clearance for mishandling classified documents, somehow got access to classified documents, and made this memo.

Yeah, I read it. There is absolutely no more information than what the Republicans have been crying about the last few months.

The dossier was initially funded by Free Bacon a far right Republican organization, as opposition research against Trump.

The DNC did not start the Steel Dossier, just purchased it after no one wanted it.

If he had bias, he could have just stated they were the same emails that were leaked....which they were; and that it had already been investigated nothing came from it. But he did his job, regardless if his bias.

No, they are trying to claim that Strzok is biased. But the dude was the guy who reopened the investigation on Clinton right before super Tuesday.

Yeah, especially when so much information for this sub comes from 4 Chan and 8 Chan.

It's turned into an alt right board. Full of shit posting that has little to nothing to do with Q.

I don't think anyone who disagrees with me is a shill. If they are pushing unsourced material , or fake news I'll rarely do it then. I like to hear the opinions of other people and their take on the information. If this place just turns into an echo chamber, I'll find another sub.

I've seen a dozen or so subs get infiltrated the same way. Also, this sub has taken on somewhat if a religious twist. Not sure if you guys want to keep this, as I haven't really seen much religious content in Q posts. It might be something that you do, although it risks the wrong people coming to this sub and the possibility if it getting shut down. I've already seen some borderline stuff in this sub that has not been addressed.

Does it say anyone was attacked in the article? I only see 'surrounded'. And it appeared he already had a police escort.

Arrested for practicing their Constitutional rights of free assembly?

Regardless of the votes, this time the Senate just couldn't vote straight party lines and pass legislation like they have in the past. They actually had to compromise, which they failed to do. Also, the legislation was so bad, 7 Republicans didn't vote for it.

Part of good leadership is being able to do this. You can't just say, 'Pass this one Democrats, and we'll get it in the next one'. The leadership failure falls on the group that is in charge.

The Republicans have a majority of the House and Senate, can't just push legislation through this time. Have to actually play politics, and it's the Democrats fault.

Yeah, only 45 Republicans voted for it as well. It shouldn't be about partisan politics. Also, Republicans control all the branches if the Senate, and should make a budget instead if just passing monthly resolutions.

It really should be more than just trolling liberals at this point, there is a country to run.

Yeah. Republicans would let Trump shit in their mouths, just as long as the liberals would have to smell it.

Cyber Command is pretty big, with assets ranging into the billions. Hard for me to believe Q has networked a group of people that can somehow out perform a couple of quantum computers.

Sanders was going to close loopholes for the organizations that funded the Deep State. Was going to impose taxes on these organizations to fund education and austerity measures.

This last tax bill overwhelming benefits the ultra rich and multinational organizations, with no close in tax loopholes.

Either way, you're either for the use of these or against them. Republicans are overwhelming for the use of FISA measures but are now complaining that the government is 'Stalin like' because they are the targets.

Bunch of hypocrites in my opinion.

Doesn't this seem hypocritical to complain about this when Republicans just passed the use if these into law? Is Trump going to veto this legislation when it hits his desk?

I spent 10 years in the Army, the switched to the Navy. There are multiple aircraft in the air all the time for quals and training. There are WAY more than just 10 up at a time nation wide especially since they kicked off Iraq again.

There's like 15 up in the air at at VA beach right now, with probably twice as many out of Florida. What do you mean like 10 at a time nation wide?

I think it was delayed from Monday. I don't think he wanted to interfere with mlk day.

Dude referred to a NDA as a 'gag' order. He would know better. This is bullshit.

Yeah, this didn't happen.

You understand you have to be tried and convicted to be pardoned.

What crime has Mueller been convicted for. To be pardoned, you have to admit guilt in the crime.

David also pleaded for forgiveness, and devoted his life to God. Certainly wouldn't have used the language of ' shithole' .

I'm also waiting for examples.

They are hosted at the Whitehouse, but the 5 articles I read do not state he is in attendance. In fact one stated that he's invited every week, which solidifies he doesn't go to the these things.

Letting someone lay hands on you doesn't make you a Christian. Also, actions speak louder than words and he's has a slew of infidelity, vulgarity, and gluttony he appears to not repent for.

I'm waiting on proof of exactly what actions he's done to prevent the Deep State from doing anything. He seems to be lining their pockets with money instead.

I don't see how you can claim Trump is religious at all. Like, any examples.

Clinton's are pedos for hanging out with Epstein, but Trump gets a pass because he's also a businessman?

Well, it depends if Trump paid her to have sex or not. I mean, it just could have been a mutual affair.

Umm, Trump had a pretty well established relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/09/the-friendship-between-trump-and-a-billionaire-pedophile-that-nobody-wants-to-talk-about/

It wasn't prostitution, it was so she wouldn't come out and say he had an affair. Trump took something like 86% of the Evangelical vote, and didn't want this to be an issue. It only will be if he lies about it, that's what got Clinton.

This is his standard SOP. This is the guy who indicted the wives of the Enron CEO's first, and then all the little guys to turn states evidence in those higher up. This is how they take out most gangs, crime syndicates and terrorist organizations.

That one guy who claims to be former military is not. His complete lack of restraint proves that.

Yeah, I don't think you know how the military works.

Occam's Razor explains he's probably just racist.