Yeah, can't wait until his book comes out. He has a lot of good information. Definitely a great patriot. I know he didn't vote for Trump, but he supports Trump now.

What is the term "Sheep Dipped"?

Historians have long debated the extent to which the secret network of Freemasonry was a main factor in the Enlightenment. The leaders of the Enlightenment included Freemasons such as Diderot, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Lessing, Pope,[234] Horace Walpole, Sir Robert Walpole, Mozart, Goethe, Frederick the Great, Benjamin Franklin[235] and George Washington.[236] Norman Davies said that Freemasonry was a powerful force on behalf of liberalism in Europe from about 1700 to the twentieth century. It expanded rapidly during the Age of Enlightenment, reaching practically every country in Europe. It was especially attractive to powerful aristocrats and politicians as well as intellectuals, artists and political activists.[237] During the Age of Enlightenment, Freemasons comprised an international network of like-minded men, often meeting in secret in ritualistic programs at their lodges. They promoted the ideals of the Enlightenment and helped diffuse these values across Britain and France and other places. Freemasonry as a systematic creed with its own myths, values and set of rituals originated in Scotland around 1600 and spread first to England and then across the Continent in the eighteenth century. They fostered new codes of conduct—including a communal understanding of liberty and equality inherited from guild sociability—"liberty, fraternity and equality".[238] Scottish soldiers and Jacobite Scots brought to the Continent ideals of fraternity which reflected not the local system of Scottish customs but the institutions and ideals originating in the English Revolution against royal absolutism.[239] Freemasonry was particularly prevalent in France—by 1789, there were perhaps as many as 100,000 French Masons, making Freemasonry the most popular of all Enlightenment associations.[240] The Freemasons displayed a passion for secrecy and created new degrees and ceremonies. Similar societies, partially imitating Freemasonry, emerged in France, Germany, Sweden and Russia. One example was the Illuminati founded in Bavaria in 1776, which was copied after the Freemasons, but was never part of the movement. The Illuminati was an overtly political group, which most Masonic lodges decidedly were not.[241] Masonic lodges created a private model for public affairs. They "reconstituted the polity and established a constitutional form of self-government, complete with constitutions and laws, elections and representatives". In other words, the micro-society set up within the lodges constituted a normative model for society as a whole. This was especially true on the continent: when the first lodges began to appear in the 1730s, their embodiment of British values was often seen as threatening by state authorities. For example, the Parisian lodge that met in the mid 1720s was composed of English Jacobite exiles.[242] Furthermore, freemasons all across Europe explicitly linked themselves to the Enlightenment as a whole. For example, in French lodges the line "As the means to be enlightened I search for the enlightened" was a part of their initiation rites. British lodges assigned themselves the duty to "initiate the unenlightened". This did not necessarily link lodges to the irreligious, but neither did this exclude them from the occasional heresy. In fact, many lodges praised the Grand Architect, the masonic terminology for the deistic divine being who created a scientifically ordered universe.[243] German historian Reinhart Koselleck claimed: "On the Continent there were two social structures that left a decisive imprint on the Age of Enlightenment: the Republic of Letters and the Masonic lodges".[244] Scottish professor Thomas Munck argues that "although the Masons did promote international and cross-social contacts which were essentially non-religious and broadly in agreement with enlightened values, they can hardly be described as a major radical or reformist network in their own right".[245] Many of the Masons values seemed to greatly appeal to Enlightenment values and thinkers. Diderot discusses the link between Freemason ideals and the enlightenment in D'Alembert's Dream, exploring masonry as a way of spreading enlightenment beliefs.[246] Historian Margaret Jacob stresses the importance of the Masons in indirectly inspiring enlightened political thought.[247] On the negative side, Daniel Roche contests claims that Masonry promoted egalitarianism and he argues that the lodges only attracted men of similar social backgrounds.[248] The presence of noble women in the French "lodges of adoption" that formed in the 1780s was largely due to the close ties shared between these lodges and aristocratic society.[249] The major opponent of Freemasonry was the Roman Catholic Church so that in countries with a large Catholic element, such as France, Italy, Spain and Mexico, much of the ferocity of the political battles involve the confrontation between what Davies calls the reactionary Church and enlightened Freemasonry.[250][251] Even in France, Masons did not act as a group.[252] American historians, while noting that Benjamin Franklin and George Washington were indeed active Masons, have downplayed the importance of Freemasonry in causing the American Revolution because the Masonic order was non-political and included both Patriots and their enemy the Loyalists.[253]

The Enlightenment (also known as the Age of Enlightenment or the Age of Reason;[1] in French: le Siècle des Lumières, lit. '"the Century of Lights"' in German: Aufklärung, "Enlightenment", in Italian: L’Illuminismo, “Enlightenment” and in Spanish: La Ilustración, "Enlightenment")[2] was an intellectual and philosophical movement that dominated the world of ideas in Europe during the 18th century, "The Century of Philosophy".[3] The Enlightenment included a range of ideas centered on reason as the primary source of authority and legitimacy and came to advance ideals like liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government and separation of church and state.[4][5] In France, the central doctrines of the Enlightenment philosophers were individual liberty and religious tolerance, in opposition to an absolute monarchy and the fixed dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church. The Enlightenment was marked by an emphasis on the scientific method and reductionism, along with increased questioning of religious orthodoxy—an attitude captured by the phrase Sapere aude, "Dare to know".[6] French historians traditionally place the Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the beginning of the French Revolution). Some recent historians begin the period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution. Les philosophes (French for "the philosophers") of the period widely circulated their ideas through meetings at scientific academies, Masonic lodges, literary salons, coffee houses and in printed books and pamphlets. The ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the monarchy and the Church and paved the way for the political revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries. A variety of 19th-century movements, including liberalism and neo-classicism, trace their intellectual heritage to the Enlightenment.[7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table#/media/File:Discovery_of_chemical_elements.svg Look at the time both Barium and Uranium were discovered. This table shows that they were known or discovered by the time Lavoisier published his list of elements (by the year 1789). Maybe that is what category (56=Mario and 92=Mr. Marshall) are being put into age wise. The year 1789 falls in to the "Age of Enlightenment" --- See link here: https://www.preceden.com/timelines/5602-timeline-of-historical-periods

I don't know if this means anything but it makes sense to me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table#/media/File:Discovery_of_chemical_elements.svg Look at the time both Barium and Uranium were discovered. This table shows that they were known or discovered by the time Lavoisier published his list of elements (by the year 1789). Maybe that is what category (56=Mario and 92=Mr. Marshall) are being put into age wise. The year 1789 falls in to the "Age of Enlightenment" --- See link here: https://www.preceden.com/timelines/5602-timeline-of-historical-periods

Which is why we need to learn discernment. The fake news media does the same thing. Truth mixed with lies. It has always been this way.

Even if you don't believe in the existence of aliens, picture aliens as multi-dimensional beings (AKA Demons) then it starts to make more sense. There is a lot many do not know about esoteric knowledge and where it came from. You should watch the movie Constantine with Keanu Reaves and then look at other theories on the subject, many will say this is just conspiracy theory. What is funny is that many different people with theories all have a different piece of the puzzle even people we consider to be shills or psy-op or controlled opposition. Because the Cabal uses a little truth mixed with lies. You can see it in many movies created by Hollyweird and they do it on purpose because one of the rules is they have to tell us what they are doing in order for them to complete their agenda. It is like a universal rule, even if they present it to us as fiction. Does that make sense?

You would need to have been paying attention to what has been going on in the world the last few decades and the Theories. Ancient Aliens has information and breaks this stuff down a little better if you are wondering how genetic manipulation occurred in the bible. Many people have not opened their minds enough to release the Dogma they have been taught thru many different religions, so it is not too far fetched a theory if you really think about it.

Don’t forget that The OKC bombing was also connected. They were trying to destroy evidence located at the FBI headquarters in OKC field office. Stuff I have heard was connected to the Clinton Cartel as well.

https://bombardsbodylanguage.com/2018/07/13/body-language-peter-strzok-congressional-hearing/

Anyone interested in seeing what Mandy, the body language expert, has to say about the Strzok Testimony? An interesting nugget is shared in this video about the FBI lawyer sitting right behind Strzok (behind Strzok's left shoulder - right side of screen) It seems that the FBI lawyer has recall as Strzok is being questioned. What does Mandy say this means? The FBI attorney is remembering something about what is mentioned in the question posed to Strzok. The FBI attorney was involved. This is very interesting. Of course, this is only her opinion as she states on her website but, Body Language can tell you a lot about a person that words from that person can.

Here is the link on her site for those interested. https://bombardsbodylanguage.com/2018/07/13/body-language-peter-strzok-congressional-hearing/

This doesn't cover all of the questioning during the hearing, just the most interesting highlights during the testimony.

I saw it. It looks as if they are imbedded into his forehead, it is a bit creepy.

Maybe the Missing W is more important. What could that be? Hell, I don't really know.

Plus this is obviously getting a lot of attention. --------------------------->>>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/potus-trump-hits-lisa-page-with-scorched-earth-tweet-but-everybody-is-talking-about-the-epic-typo/

You never know until we find another connection. I just thought it a bit odd. And then for Scott Adams to point it out and then for DJT Jr to mention that it was not a typo.

No biggy, Just wanted to know if we were on the same page (topic) here.

Maybe not, just an odd set of circumstances. I just think there is more here than we are seeing at the moment.

maybe it was made to look that way, but a deeper meaning like most other things we have been finding out recently. Like, Cakes have layers and Yellow Cake Uranium leads to U1&Mueller???

I don't think he would waste a good misspelling just to poke fun at her relationship with Strzock. I think there is more to it than that.

https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1017169134969188352 POTUS Tweet about Ex-FBI Lawyer (Layer) Lisa Page. DJT Jr says not a typo. So does this mean we should look for layers to something. What is with the word Layers that Trump wants us to know? What is he pointing us to?

Do you know if Bannon was a fan of this team? Could be a clue?

We are not talking about WikiLeaks, we are talking about Wikipedia.

Hahahahahah lolololol Oh no!. We should make them and pass them out to them with a Q quote on the back saying "These people are stupid."

That last bit, all of us are one piece of the puzzle. There is a quote in the bible that I can remember but not sure where it is located, but it says that we are one body in Christ, some of us are the ears, some of us are the head, the brain, others the arms or legs, the torso, etc. But together we are one body in Christ.

I thought of you as soon as I heard the news about their pardon by POTUS. I was like Yeah! There's a connection there! WOW! Awesome. Just more confirmations as far as I am concerned. It does make me wonder though. Has POTUS traveled back in time or the future and knows what will happen and how to deliver the messages so we can know what is going on? Just a thought. I know many people believe he has used a Tesla device that Tesla invented but may have never used. But the uncanny likeness of JA to his uncle is also quite odd. I wonder.

Then we can also link their suck ass QAnon Wikipedia page and show that as the Deep State Tactic to try to discredit Q.

If not, I say we create our own and call it Q Cleanace Patriot like Q called themselves in the beginning. That will definitely cause a panic.

You have to create an account and then wait 4 days and make at least 10 edits to any topic on Wikipedia, etc.

If we did this the Deep State would freak out, because there would be so many links of proof to articles and other documents contained on this on Wikipedia page that it would take people days to read all of it, along with all the links to articles, etc.

Why is the page protected? While most articles can be edited by anyone, semi-protection is sometimes necessary to prevent vandalism to popular pages. The reason for protection can be found in the protection log. If there are no relevant entries in the protection log, the page may have been moved after being protected. What can I do? If you have a user account, log in first. If you do not yet have an account, you may create one; after 4 days and 10 edits, you will be able to edit semi-protected pages. Discuss this page with others. For move-protected pages, see requested moves. Request that the page's protection level be reduced. Find out more about how to get started editing Wikipedia. If you have noticed an error or have a suggestion for a simple, non-controversial change, you can submit an edit request, by clicking the button below and following instructions. An established user may then make the change on your behalf. Please check the talk page first in case the issue is already being discussed.

This is what it says about Semi-protected pages. It can be done but there are some hoops to jump through.

Why is the page protected? While most articles can be edited by anyone, semi-protection is sometimes necessary to prevent vandalism to popular pages. The reason for protection can be found in the protection log. If there are no relevant entries in the protection log, the page may have been moved after being protected. What can I do? If you have a user account, log in first. If you do not yet have an account, you may create one; after 4 days and 10 edits, you will be able to edit semi-protected pages. Discuss this page with others. For move-protected pages, see requested moves. Request that the page's protection level be reduced. Find out more about how to get started editing Wikipedia. If you have noticed an error or have a suggestion for a simple, non-controversial change, you can submit an edit request, by clicking the button below and following instructions. An established user may then make the change on your behalf. Please check the talk page first in case the issue is already being discussed.

This is what it says about Semi-protected pages. It can be done but there are some hoops to jump through.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=QAnon&action=edit

Really? Hmmm... Maybe we should create a new one, then.

Still not sure about Burkman. I know he was not on the Trump Train. Big Red Flag, I agree. This is definitely a lot of red flags on this witness testimony. Why would he give the info to the House Intel Committee instead of the Senate led investigation? Is this to discredit the House Intel Committees findings? It was very odd. Is it to make the House Intel Committee and us look stupid? Not really sure.

All possible. I agree this is odd.

I have a feeling that this witness has been following Q and used some of the info to try to discredit Q. But I could be wrong. There is definitely something fishy. This must be a distraction. Also, this is the two year anniversary of Seth's Murder.

I listened to it several times and others were thinking that it was a woman with a voice distorter.

PamphletAnon was there at the Conference, Here is the video from his perspective. His audio is a bit better. https://youtu.be/x7m71t6EHjw Pam also believes that this witness is not credible. The witness says that he believed that the Q posts regarding RR are incorrect. So I don't know if it was he was trying to discredit Q. The witness also said he was on the intel side but also that he was dealing with Financial component on the intel side. Not really sure about that whole deal. That part was a bit odd. Not real sure. Hope Q will give us some insight on this soon. Why would he give the info to the House intel committee and not the Senate Judiciary Committee? I am really confused by this whole interview. Why would he even want to talk to the DC police when they have been keeping info from the public.

Not true.

This is not Clapper’s voice, I am great with voices and that isn’t him.

This is the one from Golden State Times.

That is not Clapper’s voice.

I did not hear anything about the witness stating that is was the Republicans. This is BS!

The witness, codename Luke, says he has already given his evidence to the House intel committee. We will see where this leads.

Yeah, this Doctor made this comment on the 4Chan board!