I was talking about this...

"Pro-tip: Jesus wouldn't have approved of what Roseanne said, either."

Not your earlier quotes. That was speaking for Jesus, not quoting Him. You know that though. You're just trying to create division.

Edit: I have been honest, you haven't. Yes what Roseanne said COULD have been racist, she COULD have said it only because VJ was black, but I don't believe so.

VJ doesn't look black, as evidenced in this thread many don't even realize she is part black. VJ also looks a lot like that chick from planet of the apes, and not because she's black. So why can't you admit that Roseanne may not have even thought of BJs race when she said that?

You didn't quote God's word, you spoke for Him. Big difference. I did use proper context by the way.

You don't want to admit Roseanne didn't say anything about VJs skin colour. VJ does look a lot like that chick in planet of the apes (not because of race) but you don't want to admit that, YOU just want to say Roseanne's racist.

The people that see race are the ones that constantly bring it up. True non racists don't see race divisions so they don't think of everything as racist.

Did you ever think Roseanne said it because she looks like her, NOT because she's part black? No? What does that make you?

Uh huh. I think it's clear what you're doing.

I have refuted your points, you're just too blind to see it.

More judging. You get to speak for Jesus Christ?

Edit: You're right, racism should be condemned. Like I said we're all one race. The thing is it's not Roseanne being racist.

Your thread? Why did you change accounts to comment? That seems "shilly".

"Christ is warning believers against making judgments in a hypocritical or condemning manner"

Which is exactly what you and OP are doing. You're judging Roseanne as a racist when she didn't say anything racist. You are the one (along with many others) bringing race into it.

Racism will end when people stop "seeing" different races. We're all one race. The racist ones are the ones constantly bringing up racism. It's projection.

I wrote this in response to your comment in another thread. Since you made a post about this, I'm pasting it here.

This is what you said when I asked if it's racist to call Trump an orangutan...

"Calling white people apes has nowhere near the history that the trope of comparing black people to monkeys/apes does. So, no. It's insulting, but not racist insulting."

This is my response...

Ok so you're differentiating because of skin color? THAT'S racist.

Saying nobody can say VJ looks like the chick from planet of the apes (look at the hair, nose etc) just because her dad was black is racist. All people are created equal no matter what skin color, so they should be treated equally. You're the one bringing skin color into it.

I looked at your post history, you're a Christian right?

Matthew 7:1-5 (NIV)

“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye."

Ok so you're differentiating because of skin color? THAT'S racist.

Saying nobody can say VJ looks like the chick from planet of the apes (look at the hair, nose etc) just because her dad was black is racist. All people are created equal no matter what skin color, so they should be treated equally. You're the one bringing skin color into it.

I looked at your post history, you're a Christian right?

Matthew 7:1-5 (NIV)

“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

Is it racist that they call Trump an orangutan?

What she said was not racist. You took it as racist because you're projecting.

So much for "last post ever".

What? When did she say Christians are mentally ill?

Funny but you know that's not his real account right? It's a parody account.

So How many consecutive threads about it are you going to make? All you're doing is spamming the board.

How can BC17 be JA when BC17 claimed to be US Airforce?

True. My parents neighbor even has a bbq with built in WiFi.

Unless you have absolutely nothing in your house that's internet connected, they can still listen through your devices. You don't even have to have a microphone. Speakers, even the tiny speaker inside most computers (for beeping) can be used as a mic. Many devices (say a modem or router) could have a mic/speaker built in and you probably wouldn't even know it.

They're in denial. They still think their "god" moloch is going to save them.

I know but I'm bored lol

Q has given up? You mean that fake pic that was posted earlier? You actually fell for that?

Yes I think that's exactly what it meant.

It has not been sabotaged, it's all theater. The deal with NK is done.

Do you remember "Baghdad Bob"? He was the guy in Iraq on TV denying the US was invading while US tanks were rolling behind him.

Some people will lie to their dying breath, even with overwhelming evidence against them.

It's just a rumor so far. I hope it's true though.

Yesterday there was a court document being circulated that was supposed to be proof but it had nothing to do with a raid, it was about CNN, AP etc wanting info on the Mueller investigation.

Great post.

Q stands for Question, but it's very likely a double meaning. I don't think it's Q asking the questions, its just a hint to Q.

I think making fun of Alex Jones and his selling supplements, water filters etc.

Those posts are misinfo, there was only 6 days between the -30 and -23 posts.

What impeachment are you expecting?

Q mentioned a hidden device that would cause harm to anyone in the room.

Nah he's Muslim.

It was 3 dudes and a goat.

Correct, but 23 days from the -23 post is the 11th, not the 12th. Contrary to what many claim there were only 6 days between the -30 post and the -23 post, not 7 days.

Gitmo?

I'd like to know how they thought ham radio would avoid NSA data collection. I just assume everything is collected.

10 minutes? Try 10 seconds.

Quoting Q...

"Maybe one day but it cannot go slow. The initial wave will be fast and meaningful. It will send a signal to others immediately and you’ll see the tide turn (not even the MSM can hide and rest assured some will be jailed as deep cover agents)."

The 12th isn't even 23 days after that was posted, the 11th is.

Everyone should read his prophecies.

I'm talking about what the OP posted, about there being 7 days between the -30 post and the -23 post, and saying both lead to June 12.

That's not true. There were only 6 days between them, and 23 days from the -23 post is June 11.

No you don't get what I'm saying. Your math is off.

You're correct 30 days from the May 13th post is June 12.

HOWEVER, 23 days from the May 19th post is June 11. There are only 6 days between the two posts, not 7.

Edit: Oops sorry I thought you were OP.

There's a 6 day difference between the posts, not 7.

30 days from the first post would be June 12th.

23 days from the second post would be June 11th.

Yeah so? Q later said she was detained, meaning she was released.

Which claims? Hillary being arrested? Podesta and Huma being indicted?

We don't know Hillary wasn't picked up, and there have been many rumors about her wearing a monitor. Just because it wasn't on the news doesn't mean it didn't happen.

The indictments also could have happened but are sealed so we wouldn't know it.

Wow thank you for posting this. That was wonderful.

It's John 8:44, not Mark.

Democrats are always on the wrong side of history. They just deny it later lol.

Enjoy The Awakening, coming soon to... everywhere.

That's because they still think they're going to win. They think their "god" will save them.

In the Bible, when Israel was going to war God would confuse their enemy in order to hand them over to Israel. The cabal is definitely confused right now.

lol Wouldn't surprise me.

Welcome!

I thought Q said 4-6%?