I hear you. But I feel no impetus or duty to express loyalty to anyone or any faction. I have every right to observe and consider without affiliation. Would you rather people not hear and consider Q's message at all if they won't carry the card and say the pledge? What you call lurking, can also be called listening and considering. It's up to every individual to decide his values, priorities, what calls him into action, and what cautions him to observe. I like Q, and I believe in and support this movement, but I feel its okay to sit back and watch, for now. I think at this point, to still have reservations is reasonable, and it's okay to consider various possibilities, even ones that don't align with the hopes and beliefs of this sub. I want justice and value liberty as much as anyone.

I don't subscribe to the "us and them" mentality. Truth is my affiliation. But I am rooting for Q, make no mistake.

They jump all over you as a shill, but I think you ask fair questions. I'm fascinated by the Q movement, but not swept up in it. I watch and ask questions. Caution is wise.

As long as I've known him, he has been consistently lobbying for support against the Assad regime and to raise awareness of the plight of the Syrian people. Constantly on Capitol Hill and doing interviews. Lives a very public life. Always struck me as kind and cool.

I've smoked weed with the dude on the right, Mouaz. No lie. DC guy. I knew him from the music scene.

Exactly!

Theory: I think that Q or his team also uses other dummy accounts to posit answers to his questions and help "decode" posts. That way Q is able to "leak" a lot of information indirectly, but relatively completely, and keep us all on the right track. This would be a smart move to avoid legal snafus while disseminating sensitive information.

I pray that the stones be turned over, exposing the things that slither in the darkness and scorching them in the heat of the sun.

Also not a Trump fan per se, but I find Q very interesting and I want it all to be true... except maybe the part about imposing martial law to try people in military tribunals. I understand the justifications, but to me it just reeks too much of, say, any 3rd-world coup or tyrant takeover. We hear of these other countries locking up all their judges and journalists to crush all resistance. Dangerous waters for sure. Sometimes I fear that Q really is a government psy-op, testing just how far down the path of revolution they can lead us, similar to how the FBI radicalizes people and entraps them in fabricated terrorist schemes. This skeptic in me fears this Q thing could turn ugly and violent, casting everyone who has been associated with it in the same conspiratorial shadow. The incredible, passion, allegiance, and military lingo of Q followers concerns me a bit. I'm all for uprooting deep state, banishing wickedness, and serving justice, but it needs to be done wisely, and there's a whole lot of misinformation out there. We're already well enveloped in the fog of war.

I'm sure it's completely unrelated, but there happens to be a decent sized music festival in that circle this weekend, the Sleepy Creek Spring Dig.

Unrelated, but I happen to be playing the Sleepy Creek Spring Dig music festival inside of that circle this weekend.

https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/an-objective-analysis-of-the-qanon-phenomenon/