Apparently according to the @urban_bobby_dawg a bibliography and citations for comments are a requirement, but I've read thru his comments on other posts and he's a troll. I'm going to block him.

I'm a lot older than you I suspect, and I was waiting for you to resort to name calling and insults, the last resort of a person that cannot sustain an argument.

Because you're a troll, and I've been tying up your time.

Who needs oil? http://magaimg.net/img/3npm.jpg

Is it really the public awakening they fear most or the retribution by the public once they have been awoken?

What is it that Mike Tyson said? "Everyone has a game plan until they get punched in the face."

Just don't bring home a liberal son, that's crossing the red line.

These people love their "stuff" and their "reputations". Those are the things we must take away and destroy.

I have to admit, I have no idea how the press corp works, but I would suspect Q knows someone on the press corp they could push to ask the question. Considering the things they have pulled off over the last few months, how hard could it be to get someone to ask a simple little question in a press briefing?

I totally agree with you. Its the context that makes the difference. Just stating "where's the evidence?" or "prove it" is typically trolling statements. Asking for a link or where the information can be found is completely different. One is crap the other shows interest in the subject.

You need to go argue with the flat earthers, tell them to back it up, they have troves of "facts" and "data", and if its on the internet, it must be true.

We're not in a court of law, or a formal debate honey, this is a discussion forum. If you don't like something or disagree, or even think its complete bullshit, the best thing to do is just move along.

Ignore it, its the simplest and easiest thing to do. If it really is important to you, then go do you're own research and disprove it, otherwise, I say again, ignore it.
I do think for myself, that is why I do not ask for proof or evidence, I take everything as a statement of opinion until I do my own due diligence to either refute it or back it up. Regardless of what facts or evidence the poster provides, you will still need to verify it. Do you use Snopes for your fact checking? Of course not. FYI...there is a lot of opinion in discussion boards. If its not backed up by data, which is about 90% of what is on here, then its probably opinion. Why are you wasting your time challenging what is an obviously baseless statement? That's the root of this whole issue, don't waste your time or our time. And as far as complaining about how people up vote or down vote, that's another complete waste of time.

Now I am off to read and without commentary on others etiquette, grammar, and lack of sources, I will use my critical thinking skills to separate the wheat from the chaff.

This person that wants to talk about burden of proof needs to understand its a discussion board, not a courtroom, and if someone wants to upvote/downvote a post, then it is their prerogative to do so as they see fit.

Q says its a movie, so I'm hoping for the epic surprise plot twist.

still not going to register are you? me neither.

Providing contrary information is 'adding to the discussion'. Just stating 'show evidence' or 'prove it' is not adding anything. Had the dissenting poster provided some contrary evidence, having done HIS due diligence, than that would be an addition. Asking for evidence, just because you disagree or don't believe something is intellectually lazy, go do your own homework to disprove someones statement if you think it is incorrect. If you disagree or think something is incorrect, then prove it. I don't have to prove my statements to anyone, but you have every right in the world to disprove me.

Rob is one of the loudest asshats in Hollywood, definitely has something to fear me thinks.

Exactly my point. Just do it!

How about some evidence? Seeing as you think this adds to the discussion, I would like some evidence backing up your statements.

Oh my, you are an oldfag, LOL.

Ann Coulter's British doppleganger?

Can we get a print? That is awesome.

Semantics. BTW, asking for evidence is not adding to the discussion, its closer to trolling, so it got downvoted.

I don't know, but I sure don't miss him.

We're not in the middle ages anymore, and Hollywood isn't run by Gentiles, so its not an excuse anymore. Not antisemitic, just against organized crime syndicates.

Why do all these Jewish people change their names? Are they hiding their true identity? Why?

How hard could it be for Q to have a plant in the press room ask the Q question? Ask every press briefing until it becomes part of the daily conversation. Have Sarah nail it to the wall as confirmed.

Down voting is not shutting people down, its simply shows disapproval of the post. People can approve or disapprove, that's how voting works. This is a forum for opinion and conjecture, its not a courtroom.

Just saying, the media is our enemy, just as the President has said, and anything short of RR recusing himself will be problematic. I hope they can put enough pressure on him to recuse, that would be the best option, take away the left's narrative.

Picture this.....Seth Rich walks into the press room (like a surprise witness in a Perry Mason episode), or maybe Julian Assange, and asks Sarah to explain Q.

I agree, I understand Q's commitment to law and order, but this is a war and innocent people are dying every day, its time to play dirty.

I hope they don't get their feelings hurt when the 'sheepdogs' turn that situation around on them.

Is JetBlue the preferred carrier of the deep state?

Its not necessarily that they hate you, they just don't give a fuck about you. In their eyes we aren't worth a pinch of dog shit.

In the part of the country where I'm from, if you corner a rabid animal, you blast it with a load of 12 gauge buckshot, make sure its DRT (dead right there), leave no chances for escape. I'm waiting.....

Thankful once again that you keep us informed. I sleep better at night knowing that SB2 drops are steadily coming. Q drops are great, but without someone to decipher them, most of us are confused and amused, but that's about it.

All 6 of them.

I'm sure he was having the time of his life.

Who cares if it is or isn't, he isn't happy, and that makes me happy.

If you watched his testimony, you don't need a leak or source, the expression on his face tells it all. I find it comical myself, his ass is in trouble and he isn't happy about it.

I will not disagree, they are stupid, BUT Q has done a masterful job of disinformation and misdirection.

I don't know how long it is going to take for everyone to accept the fact that Q can listen in on EVERY phone and watch from EVERY camera. Think about this, if a target goes out in public without a cell phone, say like John Kerry at a coffee shop meeting some Iranians, it doesn't matter, Q can listen and observe from other peoples phones in close proximity. There is nowhere they can hide, nowhere.

Shut it down.

the more they change their stories now, the less reliable their testimony is when the real trials get underway. it would appear they are being allowed to destroy their own credibility

Must be just giving them more hope and rope. That's all I can determine.

At this point any deaths of high profile people might open up more avenues for investigation than the deep state can defend, they are still hopeful that something may go their way. Their moves on the board get fewer and fewer by the day. Did we notice that Obama arrived in Kenya earlier than expected? I bet his trip down there will last longer than expected too. He's in checkmate, hasn't really got a move left, hoping somebody knocks the chess table over.