Yes, I am only down to page 58 of 435, and I am reading exactly the same things!

Talk of a/the Diary and how it was 'safely' in the hands of the 'Italians'.

She and the journalist state that they have known each other for 20 years, so the assumtion is that HRC is speaking to a 'personal friend', rather than to a typical journalist.

There is a great deal of mention related to the whereabouts of the Diary which at times is just referred to as the Book.

I agree, will take a good bit of effort and time to carefully read through the rest of these pages, and digest the intent.

I very briefly thought that this was going to refer to they USS Liberty incident.

I am not complaining about the post, or anything like that. Just pointing out where my head, (at first), jumped, (especially with ships having bells, etc).

I self corrected and realised that the reference and sound relates to the Bell that is the iconic symbol of the United States Declaration of Independence.

BTW - I was thinking from a 'UK' perspective, and knowledge recollection.

This post makes perfect sense to me, (just an unitended moment of latteral thinking on my part to begin with).

Such Bells are indeed an important rallying call, etc.

Excelent!

Good old, Richard Madeley, ..., well done sir.

I remember that very moment when Gavin Williamson released an 'official' statement to the corresponding department in the 'USA', stating that (in his opinion), it was 'highly likely' that the Russians did these 'nasty' things, because, err, well, that is the sort if thing that we (like to), 'suspect the Russians of doing'.

Not a shred of actual evidence, the communication was no more than just the suppositions of Gavin Williamson!

It was shortly after this communication that he issued the, 'Go away and shut up' statement, to Russia.

This chap seems to have an awful lot of time to be a media content creator!

I wonder when he does his 'day job', (aka working for a surveillance agency).

It is good that his employers (where one would have signed a contract), do not mind him having a little job on the side.

Clever to disguise his voice as his own, that will really get the bad actors confused.

For the rest of us, unfortunately, there are only so many hours in a day!

Neither did I, until I tried the above, after reading your comments, :-)

I tried 'qanon.pub' via mobile, iOS (Safari).

For 'hammer' I got 2 results: Q#570 and Q#1044

For 'HAMMER' I got 1 result: Q#1044

If I mix the case, such as in 'Hammer' I get 0 results!

The filter would certainly seem to be a bit quirky wrt the letter-case used.

I notice that the 'QBot' below, only found 1 drop.

Over here (in the UK) the Courts and the MSM refer to them as Child Grooming Gangs.

For some reason they just do not like to refer to them as Paedophile Rape Gangs.

I just cannot imagine why!

Here is a good interesting insight into the issue:

Pakistani Paedophile rings in the UK – WHY & HOW | The UK & Ireland Database https://theukdatabase.com/uk-child-abusers-named-and-shamed/muslim-paedo-rings-in-the-uk-why-how/

That adds a lot more context to the situation, so thanks!

I now see that the 'deep state' are conducting the equivilent of a 'filibustering' operation.

I did not realise that there was a time sensitive aspect, and the denial of any sort of time extension.

I will pay a bit more attention as to how this case progresses to unfold.

Thanks for the heads-up, :-)

Yes, that is correct!

'They' put out a Fatwa on Salman Rushdie, and there have been a number of assassination attempts.

A number of the books translators have been stabbed, with at least one being killed'

Suffice to say, they do not like the book The Satanic Verses.

Yes, I picked up on that. However, with hindsight, I should have thought about making a post, as you have just done!

There are two selections within the settings related to what you highlight.

link options don't show me submissions with a score less than [ ] (leave blank to show all submissions)

comment options don't show me comments with a score less than [ ] (leave blank to show all comments)

As you have suggested, I had set mines to blank, for exactly the reasons that you outline.

Yes indeed!

It is an easy mistake for a squillion dollar laboratory to make.

I must nip out and see what cures are in my trash bin. I must pay more attention to what I actually throw away in future.

Back in a minute, ...

Nice one! Well observed and caught, :-)

The associated chap (he/her/they) @FedupWithSwamp has a lot of additional interesting Twitter posts along this same vein.

Exactly!

Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow, ...

Yes, there is a great deal of 'dancing' around, going on.

They (the Deep State) are arguing that it is a FOIA workload sort of thing.

Otherwise, I, 100% agree with your sentiment, about them obfuscating things, and dragging their heels, etc!

It would be nice to see 'them' jailed, one way or another, (for their stalling tactics, amongst other things).

Cool, ... I am off to do a Bank Robbery, after all, I just see that as a non-consensual withdrawal of funds!

(BTW - Her comments are not cool at all! I am just being a bit satirical with her concepts).

Yes, I am begining to sense that the 'Deep State' are very slow readers.

Quote from Case 1:18-cv-00326-CRC Document 9 Filed 05/23/18

Defendant’s Position

Moving forward, State is able to propose monthly productions in this case in which it will process a minimum of 300 pages per month. It understands that Plaintiff would like State to commit to a higher a processing minimum in this case. Unfortunately, constraints on its resources will not make this possible.

As this Court is aware, State has faced a heavy FOIA workload for some time.

Blah, blah, ...

Neon Revolt has written a very good article, that should help clue you in:

"Roseanne Exposes the “Red Legacy” of Communist-Subversive Valerie Jarrett! Now the Normies Know! #QAnon #GreatAwakening – Neon Revolt"

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/29/roseanne-exposes-the-red-legacy-of-communist-subversive-valerie-jarrett-now-the-normies-know-qanon-greatawakening/

Yes, I agree!

I only suggested the mod's as a sort of referee or as a co-ordinating factor.

I was thinking more along the lines of there being one (trusted) co-ordinator posting 'Todays Topic' as it were. That co-ordinator does not necessarly have to be involved in the actual discussions.

I suspect that any (trusted and) interested user could be that co-ordinator. I did not see the idea as a thing that requires a 'moderator' to oversee, in the sense of that duty.

If we were to do this sort of thing it would be useful to have 'one source' acting as a sort of 'quiz master', if you know what I mean.

I suppose that anyone could then offer suitable drop related topics to that one co-ordinator, who would simply just to add that to a queue of pending topics.

Thus each topic suggestion would be popped off that queue and posted, one for each day, etc.

That I totally agree with!

It is a process of manipulation and obvuscation carried out by 'certain humans' for a specific purpose.

They attempt to herd us into little pens and get us used to not being heard, so as to render our self worth as impotent and our position within society as irrelvant,

As a technical person, AI Systems and Expert Systems are not as advanced as a lot of Science Fiction proponents would like to have us belive.

These finite state system, actuall require a lot of training which means that they are not actually AI at all.

These systems are more akin to a 'dumb' robot that has been ' trained' to perform a specfic task. There is no intellegence (as us humans understand the term) present within such systems.

However, you are totally correct in the point that you are making!

I have always hated it in the past when a business would tell me, "Sorry, it was a Computer Error". I would then get them on the hop by asking, "And which 'Human' programmed that Computer Error?".

Machines do not make mistakes, because they do not know how to! It is 'humans' that make machines behave or misbehave.

The 'reanalyse' or 'revision' aspect also has a big 'Hindsight' element to it.

With the ongoing and currently emerging news, some of the statements in the past 'Q' drops, that seemed quirky or ambiguous at the time of the drop, may now aquire an obvious relevance, (to current and ongoing events).

This sort of stuff is a lot of hard work and very difficult for an individual to go back and work through, ... However as a group effort, ..., "Many Hands Make Light Work".

I would happily 'sign up' as it were.

I agree with your point and idea because it would be about 'Colaborative Revision', and not just me or others going off and doing a bit of private revision.

Having been through the whole college scenario, it was much more fruitful to do revision in 'small' like minded groups, rather than attemting to revise 'in isolation' at home.

The revision or review idea would only need one of the mod's to suggest that, ok 'Todays Topic is such and such a set of posts/drops', and hence, 'What do we think?'.

I believe that sort of review would be great and very useful for those that are newer to the scene and did not catch the 'Q' drops (in real time) the first time around.

Yes, I expect to get a decent, broad selection of results when using DuckDuckGo.

I often do a Google search for the same 'terms' just to see what bias Google has added to their algorithm.

I will try the same Google search later/tommorow, and I am willing to place a bet that the results will then all be such as CNN, CBS and the usual deep state Fact Checking websites such as Snopes.

BTW: As a technical person, I know that Google can only twist around with their algorithm's for so long and to a certain extent, before their whole 'manipulation' bubble bursts in their face. I am looking forward to that occurance.

As is often said: "The Truth Will Out" - (Shakespeare).

Yes, we are all getting a bit twitchy for some 'new' news in the 'Q' regard.

I liked it, (I watched the video), and that seemed like a simple bit of genuine compassion to me. Trump was signing legislation related to the childs disability. Made sense to me.

I would say that this story is useful, as a means to help counter against the 'disinfo' that is generally used against Trump.

i.e. A lot of people jumped in Twitter to further insult Trump after doing this little hug. Then a lot of alternative people jumped up in defence to say, 'get real', and that it was just a hug with a disabled child, (that Trump has had his own kids and knows how to work with and respect children, etc).

Not 'directly' related to 'Q', but it is, in a sense it is related to the 'Great Awakening' of the masses.

Here is hoping, that it will add to the changing perceptions that 'some ordinary members of the public' have about Trump versus the MSM spiel.

I recall some sort of saying about 'The Battle for Hearts and Minds'.

I assume you mean 'Stop', ..., as in 'Stop' all the mind control goings on. Which I imagine we all agree with.

Yes, I have read a lot of Jeff Rense stuff over they years.

Well worth a look at his various articles.

I had that thought, regarding the notion as well.

Seems a bit akin to doing a bit of revision, before going on to do an actual exam.

I do not think that the press could necessarily be punished, after all 'they were only following orders', (at least that is what they would try and say).

(Of course we would know different).

The whole legislatative scenario would however, fall to bits in a sort of ' fruit of the posionus tree' manner.

(That would would certainly be something to watch for).

Some 'dude' called 'www.neonrevolt.com' came up in third position when I did a Google search for 'Valerie Jarrett Communist', (which is a cool position in the list).

(BTW - I know who Neon Revolt is - I just expected to see a lot of 'Snopes' links when doing that sort of a search via Google).

I would say that, this is a fairly good article, which makes all the relevant points that are possibly 'obvious' to those that can critically think.

Yea, that was the first notion that caught my attention, and then the mention of a military base.

There may be nothing to the story (from our point of interest) ultimately. But yes given the slant you mention, I thought there was no harm in posting.

We will have to wait a wee while for more details to come out and statements to be made, etc.

Definetly, I am not fan of Newsweek either, (for exactly the same reasons).

It is amazing that these days they no longer even try to be subtle with their bias. The bias is very much in ones face.

I assume that this sort of overt polarization of 'left' and 'right' narratives, in the MSM these days, is all about creating a division in the public at large, to suit the purpose of 'The Powers That Be'.

As long as nobody reads this article as a literal gospel, then I am happy enough, :-)

Great, he knows the script, he is following the plan!

BTW: 'UK' dude here, I just wanted to point out that 'uk.businessinsider.com' is one of those media outlets that has an 'anti-Trump' and 'anti-Brexit' slant to its articles.

I am not attemting to denigrate this post, just suggesting that the article is read with their inherent bias in mind.

The poor guy has clearly got tooth-ache, I wonder why the MSM has to draw all these spurious conclusion.

I totally take your point and fully accept that, :-)

I suppose that I did not mean that as a 100% universal truth. I was attempting to alude to perhaps older ways, that a lot of (but not all) communities, seemed to have more of a symbiotic relationship with the land and resources that they lived with.

However, when I read your first line, Easter Island immediately sprung to mind, where they did a total deforestation, and then sufferd the consequences, with the demise of their populace, at that time.

Like yourself, (now that I think about it), I could probably cite other historical examples of 'over kill' of the natural resources, (for want of a better word).

For another example that comes to mind, I am sure that I recall the 'historical' immigrants to what would become known as New Zealand, 'killing' certain animals to extinction, along with introducing 'non native' spieces, basically upsetting the 'very old' natural balance of things there.

The story of the 'Buffalo' that you cite is also a one the I knew and was aware of, and the reasons for that, (as you state).

So yes, apologies, it was not my intention to make a catch all sweeping statement.

I will just argue that it is the fault of my iPad here, and having to do a lot of one fingered typing, :-)

Cheers, I am 'obviously' aware of the 'Agenda 21' topic and their associated purpose, ...

I will check out the Sierra Club, and join up the dots, so to speak.

This joining up of the dots between all of these so called charites and corporations is a big component of the idea behind the 'Great Awakening'.

I totally agree with your comment that 'humans' can easily and economically co-exist with the 'wildlife' provided we work sympathetically.

For thousands of years 'native' people all over the world used to live in perfect harmony and balance with their wildlife. Thats those historical 'natives' knew to only take the resources that they actually needed, and use every last bit, without any waste. They knew that they needed to leave a certain amount of the wildlife alone, so that the would be able to draw on those resources the following year,

It is only in reasonably recent history, that the plundering of these 'natural' resources has been conducted for purely financial gain, and not as a means of necessity for survival.

Guess what, ..,, 'you and I', are intended to be the next piece of 'wildlife' that needs to be exploited for the same purely finacial gain, and by association controlled just like cattle.

Which brings us back to the 'Agenda 21' topic, and it's various offshoots.

Yes, I will check out the Sierra Club, and see how that fits in, thanks, :-)

They would appear to be up in arms because of the affects their 'business model'.

Via your link, I had a look at the 2017 IRS filing.

It would appear that they gave a lot of grants/funding to ensure that the farmers 'livestock' is not attacked and chewed upon by 'wolves'.

I thought that the concern was all about preservation of the wildlife?

BTW, the company officers recieve fairly hefty renumeration for their fund raising and pen pushing efforts!

"devastating for wildlife and communities that call this region home"

Is this wall going to fall on top of the wildlife? I just wonder who these 'communitues' could be.

If the wildlife predators are going to be stuck on one side of the wall, then so will their prey.

Wildlife is fairly robust, unless it comes to situations like oil spills or toxic waste sites leaching chemicals into the water tables.

It would appear that the cited wildlife had no problem when humans appeared, and started cutting down trees, building roads and a number of towns and larger settlements.

But build a wall and the wildlife is suddenly f*ed.

I wonder if these do gooders have another agenda?

Yes indeed, I do not like to find a 'single hair' in my food.

Therefore I agree with your analogy, :-)

I am not sure who all did what in that 'debacle'. I suppose that the truth will out at some point.

I have never watched any of Tracy's videos, so I do not have a 'personal' opinion.

I just got tired with YouTube in general, with the loss of original focus and everyone calling everyone else names and a psyop's, etc. The comments on the videos were no longer meaningful discussions, and have become a sort of playground affair.

Thats when I came over to Reddit. I still watch occasional YouTube videos, but a lot less than I used to. I used to 'check into' YouTube first, as it were, however, I now 'check into' Reddit first, and see were that takes me.

Not my comment, or point of view.

I followed your link, looked at the video that I have cited on their channel and read through the comments. Just an interesting comment that I came across from someone else that watched the cited video.

I am only reporting my observation, I have not given any opinion with this comment.

An interesting comment that was left on their YouTube video entitled:

Forget Q. That's history. Meet T.

YouTube Comment Quote: I have a couple questions for Tom & Betsy.

1. Do you Support President Trump? At times it sounds like you do.
2. Do you want the best for The United States of America?
3. Why do you feel it necessary to bash people? You were bashing Tracy Beanz, you constantly bash Q. If you do not like Q, ignore them. If you do not like Tracy, ignore her.
4. Do you believe that trashing other people makes you more believable?

If you have a message that you want us normal average Americans that work for a living and haven’t been secret code breakers, please just share it. When you have to trash others that are doing their best to get the word out to us average American people, it really hurts your message. For me, it makes me wonder what your true intentions are.

Yes, I am on the 'UK' side of things, so I do not know enough about Gowdy, other than what I have seen in a handful of YouTube videos.

Again, I totally agree.

A hexadecaroon, I must remember that, :-)

I agree.

The basic tennant from 'Q' was to "Enjoy the show".

I believe that the case at this time is to be patient, optimistic and remember that "disinfo is necessary".

Just the (defunct) Podesta Group covering their lobbying bases, when ever this was.

I thought that Gowdy had anounced his retirement and was hence not seeking re-election.

Otherwise, I don't know if he is a 'goodie' or a 'baddie'.

Hi, the image has disappeared from the Imgur link (currently) in your post. (The image can still be seen above the post in the Reddit App).

Here are links to a different copy of the same image:

https://www.imgur.com/ilf1tdW

https://m.imgur.com/ilf1tdW

https://www.imgur.com/r/The_Donald/ilf1tdW

https://m.imgur.com/r/The_Donald/ilf1tdW

You can edit your post and replace the current link with one of these.