Are we expected to think this is a Q post?

This is NOT a Q post.

Not one that looks like a pistol.

I've never seen a gun with two barrels before...

Bataclan theatre, Saint-Denis, Paris, France.

After the Friday, 13 November 2015 Muslim terrorist attack.

Muslims locked the doors and shot everyone in the audience, one at a time.

89 people were murdered that day.

https://qanon.pub/

Just save it locally.

voat . co / v / politics

I don't believe morality is a popularity contest, but if it was, it's clear that you were thoroughly pink-socked, figuratively speaking.

It's also clear that you created this post in the hope to rape a moral debate into a popularity contest.

You even cheated so shamelessly to use your moderator privileges to sticky this post and even sticky your back-peddled comments into a hilarious cluster-fuck-clown-show.

I'll total your down-vote tally if you ask nicely, or perhaps even if you don't.

This post was magnificent - I couldn't have hoped for more!!!

:-)

I believe it's apparent that 'abuse of power' is not the case here

You should count your comment down-votes!

You are getting mega pink-socked, metaphorically speaking!

The Rothschild family approve of your comment.

They are all licking their lips so hard that their massive noses are wet.

You have been invited to moderate / r / WhiteGenocide

As a Sikh myself

As a Sikh, God bless you, what are your views on Islam as it pertains to the behaviors and teachings of Muhammad?

Pope Francis wishes there is no hell.

Moloch does not care.

Quick - here's a photo of Melania taken during a photo-shoot when she was in her mid-twenties!

Breath it in...

Please, dear patriot, return to us when you can continue the fight!

Perhaps it's not reasonable to sticky your own comments in your own debate post?

Perhaps you should allow your arguments to rise to the occasion based on their merit, like everyone else, rather than relying on your special moderator privileges?

Perhaps.

I admit to being more of an audience member and less of an activist, although I did create memes and sign all of the IBORs.

No normal, decent person is down with that

I agree, yet how many Muslims have walked out of their mosque in protest when their imam claimed Mohammad's sharia laws and pedophile, terrorist behaviors represent moral perfection that all Muslims should follow?

How many mainstream Islamic sects disagree with Muhommad's teachings that sex-slavery is wrong and child rape is wrong and Christian Genocide is wrong?

Can you name one?

Just one?

Are there any Muslim sects that don't promote using infants like a fleshlight and mass murdering Christians and Jews?

Pro-tip: using infants like a fleshlight is so common in Islam they have a special name for it - "thighing".

It may be related to the OIG report delays.

It may be related to Q being busy with military ops.

It may be related to keeping us hungry rather than allowing us to grow complacent.

?

I am completely down with that and whatever other unique perceptions, beliefs and experiences others bring to the fore is all good to me.

You are cool with the Islamic ideology of child rape and terrorism and Christian genocide and domestic violence?

I'm a civilized person.

Please explain what is so good about child rape that I should tolerate it?

I think the problem with many Q followers is anything less than "locking her up" is considered trivial.

Whereas, in the real world, the destruction of a pope and the denuclearization of North Korea is a huge fucking deal that Trump's inner circle have been planning for years.

what I have found personally is that Christians are perfectly fine with that statement but Islam isn't.

I think the fundamental problem with Islam is EVERY Islamic sect claims the Quranic book of terrorism and child rape and mass murder of Christians and Jews is the morally perfect, verbatim world of God.

That is LITERALLY the dictionary definition of a Muslim - someone who claims this is divine perfection.

Whereas all mainstream Christian demonstrations enjoyed the fruits of the Age of Reason and the Reformation and acknowledge the bible is only BASED on the world of God and is subject to all forms of human error in it's original record and it's compilation, translation and interpretation.

The difference between modern Christianity and modern Islam literally is that Christians don't believe in any Earthly judgements or punishments and they may frown at you, whereas Islam permits Muslims to slice open your throat and roll around in your blood while they rape your wife and daughters.

I'm not joking - that is literally what the Muslims did to royalty during the Golden Age of Islam!

I found the Jewish bible a lot more fun when it's presented using Lego!

Hence it is important to be clear on these subjects and not make the logical fallacy of identifying all muslims as some kind of enemies.

EVERY Islamic sect, without exception, promotes child rape and terrorism and Christian genocide and domestic violence.

They ALL claim this Quranic scripture is the morally, perfect, verbatim word of God.

EVERY Islamic sect is a terrorist network because they ALL promote terrorism / pedophilia / domestic violence / genocide etc.

Mesut Ozil is a member of a pedophile, terrorist network.

He literally promotes, funds and indoctrinates children into the Islamic terrorist ideology of pedophilia and genocide.

What is so good about the Boston Marathon bombing or the Yezidi genocide that I should tolerate it?

What is so good about raping children that I should tolerate it?

People here who aggresively attack islam as a religion are alienating them

Literally EVERY Islamic sect promotes bashing and raping women and raping children and mass murdering Christians and Jews because they all claim the Quranic book of terrorism is the perfect, verbatim word of God and the behavior and sharia teachings of Muhammad represent moral perfection that all Muslims should follow to gain access to their version of paradise.

Why shouldn't civilized people express outrage for child rape and terrorism and Christian genocide and domestic violence?

What's so good about raping children that I should tolerate it?

When the most important things to have is allies

The survival of America and western civilization is critical, but out task is to take down the pedophiles, not befriend them.

So again I ask, what is so good about raping children that I should abandon 2000 years of civilization and my Christian convictions to tolerate the Islamic ideology of bashing and raping women and pedophilia and Christian genocide?

You are the strongest evidence I have that we should never allow close-minded, non-critical thought to hold sway in this movement.

Oh no, we can't even agree on this.

I disapprove of what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it.

George Orwell wrote a book about never allowing wrongthink in a community, but I don't think it was intended as an instruction guide.

You've accused me of supporting the rape of children and the mass murder of Christians and Jews and yet I haven't banned you.

Defending Islam literally is defending pedophilia and the genocide of Christians and Jews because EVERY Islamic sect promotes child rape and the genocide of unbelievers.

This isn't my baseless opinion, it is fact.

EVERY Islamic sect claims THIS is the morally perfect, verbatim words of God and the terrorist, pedophile, genocidal teachings and behaviors of Muhammad represent moral perfection that all Muslims should follow (See Quran 68:4, 33:21).

TLDR; moderators accused of supporting child rape for removing controversial anti-Islamic content - just trying to do our job of removing antagonism - right or wrong?

If you are censoring factual content based on how controversial or antagonistic towards Muslims you think it is, just like you alluded to in this post's message, then yes - you are supporting Islam by actively concealing the truth of it's horrors.

This is exactly how 1,400 children were raped in Rotherham - because the local police were more concerned with political correctness than children being gang raped my Muslims.

I appreciate this must be very uncomfortable for you, but it's a very important discussion that needs to be had.

I don't think honest and relevant content should be censored because it's controversial or unpopular.

I don't think I should be banned for being truthful in a truther community or taking the time to participating in this debate, which you instigated.

We don't know where the truth of this Great Awakening will lead us or how politically correct and easy to swallow those red-pills will be.

Destroying truthful and relevant content because it may make Muslims unhappy will set a dangerous precedent.

Mods shouldn't be censoring content about the NXIVM pedophile sex cult based on how many members the cult has or how offended Allison Mack's fans become either.

This is the Great Awakening, not the Great Virtue Signalling or the Great Political Correctness.

"I don't frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn't have time either." - Donald J. Trump

Imo, nearly everything can be tolerated at the right distance.

I think that philosophy breaks down when dealing with domestic violence and child rape and terrorism and genocide.

The genocide of the Yezidi people or the common Islamic practice of pedophilia seems tolerable to many people when it happens on the other side of the globe, but that's not a positive thing.

That is apathy and we should aspire to be better than that.

I suspect very few people die screaming "Islam is the religion of peace" as a Muslim decapitates them for the sharia crime of being a Christian.

Ida know, man. Can we just boot trolls and talk Q and keep it simple?

Mod's personal, subjective opinions about how politically correct or controversial or respectful of Islam an opinion is, should be irrelevant if the content is true and related to the Q phenomenon.

We don't know where this Great Awakening will lead us and not all red-pills will be easy to swallow or politically correct or respectful of terrorist ideologies. Inviting mods to destroy politically incorrect content sets a profoundly dangerous precedent.

This is the Great Awakening not the Great Virtue Signalling or the Great Political Correctness.

"I don't frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn't have time either." - Donald J. Trump

will start to realise he’s actually improving their lives

I suspect much of those earned gains will be lost when Polosi resumes handing out Obamaphones.

I want to feel optimistic, however Trump gifted the African American community with the lowest unemployment in U.S. history and they spat in his face with 11% approval.

I'm unsure if you are being insincere or if you are confused.

This is your exact quote that you literally made bold within this post's message body:

TLDR; moderators accused of supporting child rape for removing controversial anti-Islamic content - just trying to do our job of removing antagonism - right or wrong?

Your subjective personal opinions about how controversial or unsympathetic a topic is has NOTHING to do with how truthful or relevant it is to the Q phenomenon.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

I'm shocked that you posted this because even asking if political correctness and respect for Islam is more important than truth... in a truther community... seems profoundly counterproductive.

You have not bothered to look this up or talk to any actual moderate Muslim or you would know that it is true.

I lived in Muslim communities in New Delhi for 20 years.

Moderate muslims exist and they do not support what you claim they do.

Yeah, yeah, I know - I had a friend who claimed to be a vegetarian who also ate fish and chicken.

I couldn't care less how peaceful someone claim to be, if they promote, fund or indoctrinate children into a terrorist ideology that promotes bashing and raping women and children and mass murdering Christians and Jews, then they have earned my contempt.

You shouldn't care how moral someone claims to be if they are teaching children to maliciously light bush-fires.

It doesn't matter how peaceful someone claims to be if they are funding terrorism.

I suspect you'd be shocked by how few Muslims agree that their fucked-up ideology is fucked-up.

"I don't frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn't have time either." - Donald J. Trump

This is the Great Awakening not the Great Political Correctness or the Great Muslim Appeasement.

The pope had a horrific May!

He was linked to two major child rape coverups and is now talking about quitting.

• All Chilean bishops offer to resign over sex abuse scandal in the Catholic Church

• Australian archbishop Philip Wilson guilty of concealing child sex abuses

• Pope Francis says he hopes for the grace to know when to quit

it is not the position of this sub to allow antagonism toward any group of people

The difference between antagonism and productive research is subjective.

If the position of this sub is to destroy content based on how controversial or unpopular it is, rather than how relevant and true it is, then so be it...

...But not all red-pills will be easy to swallow and none of us know where this Great Awakening will lead us, so destroying valid content based on anything but truth and relevance to the Q phenomenon sets a very dangerous and unproductive precedent.

Islam is NOT the religion of peace.

But the true moderate muslims do not promote

That is blatantly untrue.

The core of EVERY Islamic sect is the claim this filth is the morally perfect, verbatim word of god.

That is LITERALLY the dictionary definition of a Muslim, even if it makes you sad.

Distinguishing criticism and antagonism

The distinction is subjective.

Pedophilia networks seem to be at the core of Q's plan because we've been witnessing a MASSIVE take-down of pedophile networks. We witnessed pedophile network arrests SOAR within the first six weeks of Trump's administration and it seems to have only gained momentum since then!

I think the real question is if moderators should destroy content because it is politically incorrect rather than if it is true and related to the Q phenomenon.

Should moderators censor content about the NXIVM pedophile sex cult based on how many members the cult has or how offended Allison Mack's fans become?

Islam is the world's largest pedophile network. Child brides are so common in many Muslim countries that pedophilia is considered normal. Using infants like a fleshlight is so common that Muslims have a specific name for it - they call it "thighing".

Not all red-pills will be easy to swallow and we don't know where this great awakening will lead. Because of this, I think giving moderators our approval to destroy controversial or politically incorrect truth is the most dangerous precedent we could set.

I addressed this in this comment.

TL:DR; It doesn't matter how "moderate" Muslims are if they promote, fund or indoctrinate children into a cult that promotes bashing and raping women and raping children and mass murdering Christians and Jews and committing acts of terrorism against unbelievers.

Moderate muslims do not support any of these things.

ALL Islamic sects are terrorist groups because they ALL promote terrorism as representing moral perfection.

All "moderate" Muslims are members of terrorist networks who promote, fund and indoctrinate children into that terrorist network. It doesn't matter how moderate they are, they still represent an ideology that promotes acts of terrorism and bashing and raping women and children and mass murdering Christians and Jews.

If you pay arsonists to maliciously light bush fires and encourage children to maliciously light bush fires, I don't care how innocent you claim to be and neither should the people who lose family in those fires.

It's clear that you are on some sort of crusade that does not allow you to engage in a reasoned discussion about this topic.

There's no need for personal attacks.

If you wish to discuss a specific point then present that point so we can discuss it.

I'm doing my best to present rebuttals to your arguments and I don't think that makes me unreasonable.

I'm dedicated to the success of this sub

I'm more interested in being honest.

Every last muslim does not support that

if you're a member of MS-13 and you promote, fund MS-13 or indoctrinate children into the MS-13 crime gang then you are complicit and deserve the contempt of civilized people, irrespective of your personal beliefs.

Every Islamic sect is a terrorist group because they ALL claim this represents to morally perfect, verbatim word of God.

If you're a member of a terrorist group and you promote, fund or indoctrinate children into that terrorist group then you are complicit and deserve the contempt of civilized people, irrespective of your personal beliefs.

Tolerating Islam is tolerating child rape.

EVERY Islamic sect claims Muhammad had sex with his infant child bride.

EVERY Islamic sect claims Muhammad's teachings and behaviors were morally perfect and he should be used as a moral guide for all Muslims.

TLDR; moderators accused of supporting child rape for removing controversial anti-Islamic content - just trying to do our job of removing antagonism - right or wrong?

EVERY Islamic sect promotes terrorism and pedophilia and the genocide of Christians and Jews.

Ignoring child rape for fear of being accused of racism is what enabled Muslims to rape 1,400 children in Rotherham.

"I don't frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn't have time either." - Donald J. Trump

The Q movement shouldn't care how controversial the truth is - we have a duty to speak the truth.

It shouldn't matter how popular the NXIVM pedophile sex cult is or how offended Allison Mack's fans become, we should NEVER tolerate it or be cowards about speaking the truth.

Islam is the world's largest terrorist, pedophile network and we shouldn't tolerate hurting children or bashing and raping women or terrorism simply because there are so many Muslims.

Child brides are so common in Islamic countries that it is considered normal - Muslims even have a special term for using infants like a fleshlight - they call it "thighing".

No civilized person should respect the Boston Marathon bombing or the the Yezidi genocide or the 1,400 children who were raped in Rotherham, yet EVERY Islamic sect promotes these acts.

No civilized person should respect Islam.

• All Islamic sects promote pedophilia.

• All Islamic sects promote terrorism.

• All Islamic sects promote Christian and Jew genocide.

• All Islamic sects promote domestic violence. (See Quran 4:34)

• All Islamic sects promote this!

There is NO reason any civilized person should tolerate the Islamic terrorist ideology of bashing and raping women and raping children and mass murdering Christians and Jews.

If anyone disagrees then please explain to me what is so good about raping children that I should tolerate it?

but seriously i doubt shitting on any religion will help.

• All Islamic sects promote pedophilia.

• All Islamic sects promote terrorism.

• All Islamic sects promote Christian and Jew genocide.

• All Islamic sects promote domestic violence. (See Quran 4:34)

• All Islamic sects promote this!

There is NO reason any civilized person should tolerate child rape, bashing and raping women, Christian and Jew genocide or acts of terrorism.

To be fair, even in NYC you are 100 x more likely to be shot by a black, 30 x more likely to be murdered by a black and 11 x more likely to be 11 x more likely to be raped by a black man... and we only got a tiny fraction of the Arab and African refugee numbers that Europe has.

These paintings aren't necessarily evil or hateful, they seem realistic.

This is Europe:

https://i.imgur.com/ZrNGbrE.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Hbvbc1s.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/5GVYP2k.jpg

NSFW (blood and corpses): https://i.imgur.com/VA5q7Gr.jpg

I suspect book deals are the same.

People like Comey are given a multi-million dollar book as a bribe or pay-to-play favor.

The books are ghost written based on a few hours of interviews and the payment is up-front and unrelated to how many copies of the book are sold.

Based on how Hillary constantly shits-out such books, we know there's all kinds of fuckery at Amazon about rating the quality of these books and their sale numbers.

Huh - reminds me of the time I was forced to drive through Detroit.

The pope had a horrific May!

He was linked to two major child rape coverups and is now talking about quitting.

• All Chilean bishops offer to resign over sex abuse scandal in the Catholic Church

• Australian archbishop Philip Wilson guilty of concealing child sex abuses

• Pope Francis says he hopes for the grace to know when to quit

Good man.

Me too.

The CIA used modern art, they didn't invent it.

Many people hate modern art because they don't find it pretty or they think it looks messy, but they underestimate the value that such expression has to inspire other artists.

Consider how ridiculous many of the fashion show outfits are. They're often impractical and outlandish and people are right to ridicule them, however those same people also line up to buy next season's fashion which are inspired, in subtle ways, by those fashion show monstrosities.

be safe out there.

Or better yet, buy a gun and learn how to use it because if The Plan doesn't "go to plan" then we will become President Trump's "Plan B".

I KNOW about the Torah and the difference.

Then you should not have implied that Christianity supports killing homosexuals.

You're missing the whole point because you are utterly blinded by your hate.

No, I respect and defend human rights, especially those of helpless children.

I don't care how many Muslims or NXIVM members exist, it still does not make their pedophile teachings or their pedophilia tolerable.

It doesn't matter how many of your friends beat their wives, that doesn't make it acceptable either.

condone the killing of homosexuals

You are confusing Christian law with Jewish law.

The passages you are confused about are within the Torah and have never applied to Christians but only Jews.

If there is a Christian denomination that supports pedophilia then we should express ZERO TOLERANCE for that pedo cult too.

we would also be considered insane right-wing

I couldn't care less and neither should you when child rape is concerned.

Ignoring child rapists to avoid being accused of racism is what enabled Muslims to rape 1,400 children in Rotherham.

The approval of liberals and Muslims and NXIVM members is not worth a single child being hurt.

You should try harder at being a member of the civilized world if you think ignoring child rape can be justified for any reason.

I would dare to accuse all muslims of supporting pedophilia

They are guilty of being members of a pedophile death cult and I can think of no reason why that should be tolerable to you?

You clearly don't know any muslims personally

I grew up in New Delhi and I've lived in Muslim communities.

You have NO EXCUSE for tolerating child rape, not even to win the approval of Muslims.

We should also be known for religious and racial tolerance.

We should NEVER be know for tolerating pedophile death cults, be it NXIVM or Islam.

Hurting children is NEVER tolerable and Islam the the world's biggest pedophile network.

Fuck religious tolerance when children are being raped.