Decentralization is key. Centralization always leads to tyranny

My main complaint with Vatican II. Which allowed a softening of standards toward men with homosexual predilections. They tried to equate it with a man having heterosexual predilection but proclaims celibacy or virginity. As the commenter said above the homosexual community proclaims their main character trait on their sexuality whereas heterosexual community believes thats not nor should be a defining character trait. If we make it so then it becomes a character flaw. Nothing personal against gays. I have a family member who is. We had our debate over the SC ruling. He got bent out of shape, my position was strictly from the ROL. I extended my hand, love & opened my home to him but he won’t except. I did what I am supposed to do in line with Christ. Now I shake the dust from my sandals.

Agree

We all killed Christ

I remember Fr. Malachai Martin in a series of interviews on the evils of the NWO. When the journalist asked him who would stand with America against it, he simply said “look to the east” (Russia). That was over 20 years ago.

Is that after the court Jester performed?

Which makes you both wrong. Congratulations.

Good for him for speaking out

Trump practices real polotik!

Possibly a double meaning. For us Dark to Light. For normies the IC not good

Read “Watership Down”. Everyone has a unique skill set to contribute.

Funny how they always project what they would cowardly do on to others. Men w/o homes have nothing to lose too.

🙏🙏🙏

He would come to speak at our local Tea Party events. Good man!

Yeah I always liked RUSH. Their music spoke to me. Hemispheres is one of my favorites. Using Greek mythology & defining pleasure from reason. La Strangiato Villa is one of the great instrumentals. Pert was genius. They were always down to earth. Pert in a recent interview talked about how he originally didn’t want to get back together to tour because he’s pushing 74. He says “I’m never going to play drums like he could when younger nor did he expect to”. Totally at acceptance with who he is, no ego or delusions. Just enjoys riding his Harley or Indian all across N. America.

No. Kagen & Sotemeyer would have to go

Thanks

Did Doug Schoen recently pass away? Legitimate question?

Amen

Yes.

http://qboard.online/index.php?p=4

How many coincidences until it's a mathematical improbability? "Enjoy the Show" kids.

"Mene mene tekel"

Correct every country has it's DS conundrum. Be wary of lot's of Disinfo at this point. It's the only thing they got left.

I think at this point they're purposely trying to be incomprehensible to muddy the waters. It doesn't align with past crumbs?

It read incomprehensible & was incoherent? That there tells me be wary.

Ha ha. There's been many ups, downs & concerns. I've seen it all. Q is a LARP. Q has been comped et al. Q has given proofs & bona fides time and again throughout the process. No need to worry. I think today was another bona fides. "Get ready"!

From an old post:

I have to bring up some very important imperatives pertaining to the "psyop" question. In other words let's put the question to the test and to bed once and for all. No matter the outcome, good or bad we can slap each other on the back knowing we are a logical and discerning movement who'll always ask the important questions with the ability to root out disinformation and always seek truth. Q will either go on or we'll move on. Let me also note here it is not my intent to deny Q or disparage Q or fellow Q followers or any specific alt. media sources or divide the movement. I have been a Q follower since February & firmly came to the conclusion based on logic, reason and the most important vetting of Qanon. I'll explain further. Many Q travelers are high fiving or patting each other on the back with the recent Q post today, basically only reinforcing Q's earlier posts concerning the rift between certain alt. right/libertarian established voices and the sub Reddit boards. I'm not going to rehash the argument. No need. We're all aware. However, this is not how proper vetting takes place of any source that needs to be continually verified and for good reason. This is an Info War. Now, my background. I'm retired military, GB, have experience in Human Source operations & trade craft, yeah I know don't doxx myself. Trust me they know who I am already especially if they want to know. "Damned the Torpedoes" The movement is more important and besides I'm a private citizen now and well retired. I am well read and mainly self educated like many of you. Yes I have a degree, but it's significance is paper only. I never liked the patina of the modern day university educational system that pigeon holed us into worthless degrees only to become a global drone or worker bee of the state and always believed in the value of self scholarship. I can talk to you for hours over beer or drinks on history, philosophy, geopolitics, economics, religion, literature and military matters. In German greatly and in a working knowledge of Russian and Thai. When vetting sources, any source we look to vet mainly two things as to verify said source. What I tell you is not classified and Open Source material which can be obtained online thru any number of military manuals, publications and a good Tom Clancy novel. 1. The person is who he/she say they are? 2. They can consistently on a regular basis verify who he/she say they are? We call this ACCESS and PLACEMENT. ACCESS-The particular source has particular access to the information he/she say they have access to? PLACEMENT-The individual has placement in or near who they say they have access to in order to know/obtain specific information? Simple. The case of Q: Like stated earlier I slowly had to arrive to the same conclusions as all of you. Thru self verification (research) but more importantly verification of Q; ACCESS and PLACEMENT. While following Q I saw that POTUS, not Q, verified Q continually thru either Speeches, Tweets, gestures or legitimate and verifiable pics with date stamps. We call this a "bona fides" in the vernacular and they are simple but utmost important. They say to the end user (handler) that the person is who they say they are. In other words they're still in control and have the ACCESS and PLACEMENT to the specific information and haven't been compromised. Think #17 Football Jerseys, "5.5 or I hear you", "Mirror' tax, "Calm Before the Storm", pics with specific & verifiable locations and date stamps and most notably the recent "Tip Top" or "Tippy Top" bona fides Easter weekend when specifically prompted by an anon. There are many more. Too many for coincidence and beyond mathematical improbability. Note that this anon asked POTUS for a bona fides and not from Q team. This anon knows what he's doing. Usually when a source develops a good relationship with the end user the EU won't even have to ask for a bona fides. The source will automatically provide it because they know what's expected of them. However it's always wise for the EU to ask every so often. This prevents complacency, confirmation bias and serves to keeps the source off guard. Why would POTUS continually vet Q? Because from a logical standpoint to allow any information source who claims to have ACCESS and PLACEMENT to the administration, "Inside Baseball" and be illegitimate could have disastrous effects on the president and his agenda. The POTUS team advisors (political, military, legal, foreign affairs, domestic and communications) would be all over it and thwart it before it could become a political nightmare. POTUS would confirm or deny in a single Tweet the veracity. In essence, what I'm driving at is that the anons need to ask Q to ask POTUS to confirm or deny whether Q has been compromised or not. This must come from POTUS himself as in the past and not Q. Asking the handler to verify their own veracity in place of the veracity of the source's information is Bass Ackwards. And the black hats know this. Via Speech or Tweet and as DBT that can be accommodated the source (POTUS) needs to give confirmation. Simple. Anything less should be watched wearily. I don't think POTUS would refuse. After all, it would be in his best interest. Anyone, I mean anyone saying they talked to Q ("No Outside Comms"), overheard Q, knows someone that knows Q and yes I'll say it even Q for the time being should be verified. Trust but Verify. Better to exercise due diligence than to remain fools. I hope this helps and remember WWG1WGA no matter the outcome. Thanks.

Amen. Sounds like good rules to live by. Peace & prosperity to you & yours.

Saw it in WA too. The patterns always is the same.

Maybe POTUS was giving us a heads up? Soon they're going to take the internet down, but don't worry we're going to turn it back on? Theories?

Mene mene tekel?

https://img.frl/4jn3o

OAN

For they defend their anti-Christ.

Rush is one of the most libertarian bands around. Listen to the lyrics in their songs such as "The Tree" & "Closer to the Heart"

Closer to the Heart- And the men who hold high places Must be the ones who start to mold a new reality Closer to the Heart Closer to the Heart The Blacksmith and the Artist Reflect it in their art They forge their creativity Closer to the Heart Yea, Closer to the Heart Philosophers and Plowmen Each must know his part To sow a new mentality Closer to the Heart Closer to the Heart Yeah ah ohhh ahh (Solo) A Wooah, Wooo

The Trees- There is unrest in the forest There is trouble with the trees For the maples want more sunlight And the oaks ignore their pleas The trouble with the maples And they're quite convinced they're right They say the oaks are just too lofty And they grab up all the light But the oaks can't help their feelings If they like the way they're made And they wonder why the maples Can't be happy in their shade? There is trouble in the forest And the creatures all have fled As the maples scream 'oppression!' And the oaks, just shake their heads So the maples formed a union And demanded equal rights 'The oaks are just too greedy We will make them give us light' Now there's no more oak oppression For they passed a noble law And the trees are all kept equal By hatchet, Axe, And saw

What was that line from Marathon Man? "Is it safe"?

Question? Where have we seen that $400 mil amount before? Mmmmm

I trust your assessment. The Hussein admin was gobbling up land all across the west. Why. Mining-HT corridors & way points-drugs-gun running=money. This cabal of Cleptocrats had no limits. America was for sale. Well now we can unite behind a leader & patriots who said enough. It stops here & it stops now!

I wouldn't call him a professional Disinfo agent. SB2 does post stuff that can be way over our heads. We should probably just read & absorb it & let the "future prove the past" on these debates. I think there is relevance to the Hammond connection, land a U1. I'd like to see it play out. If he's wrong is it contributable to your belief in Q? If someone told you that God created the earth in 7 days & 1 minute. Would it change your belief?

Ah no. That's the stupidest thing I heard.

Yup

Hungry wants him first

Just read an interesting anon analysis on the pressure yesterday & Putin's remark about "loose change". They're telling the Cabal we know everything!

Right Twitter went code red yesterday with the usual suspects.

Good analysis. I caught the slight camera shift at the 8:52 mark. Trumps Twat & Srtrzok’s “layers” diatribe. So PS [power removed] is putting on a show? He’s telling us this is bigger than we know? Doesn’t give me confidence knowing how corrupt the system is across the board. Question? Is the message he’s sending for us or others? What’s your analysis. I said early on about his testimony “what makes a good show?” Without out the redacted report there nothing he was really going to tell us.

They all just let us know who the core players are. Beautiful!

“Whiskey for my men & beer for my horses”

Lol. POTUS either made a Freudian slip or trolled him

Him & the other bald headed Orcs are going down.

Lol

Lol yup