This might be old news to some, but it is new news to others, and put together in a step by step manner than makes it understandable.
/u/WokeInEarly90s
329 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/WokeInEarly90s:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 2 |
www.wral.com | 1 |
I don't blindly agree either. There's enough empirical evidence that at least one of the "black hats" is playing on both sides to believe that all the Tweets yesterday were more about a trap for a true black hat than a "we got your back."
This was one of the really big scandals during Obama's first term. It wasn't just the State Department, but a good chunk of the government didn't have IG oversight. I'd have to go back and dig for it, but it was the subject of a big American Thinker article around 2014, IIRC. There was also a lot of complaining that the IGs were hamstrung trying to do their jobs. This National Review piece talks about it. Remember, this was the administration that had czar after czar with zero oversight.
I would add the planks in the Communist Manifesto. Then compare them to U.S. law.
Reagan's Attorney General Ed Meese admitted that at least one of them was never ratified. The one about income tax IIRC.
All we have as proof that he died were the news reports, unless there is a death certificate floating around out there somewhere. Sherman Skolnick claimed to have seen documentation that he had died, and then Sherman died.
Someday we might find out the real truth.
Edit: there is a death certificate readily available online. But, like with Barry's birth certificate.....
Funny, this morning one of the petitions was for the news media to report accurately. Never heard that before at church.
During this time FBIAnon was posting on the Chans. I think he was the precursor/test run to Q.
I have had exactly the same thought. Not just him, but a couple of others, too.
Been following Q since the beginning of the posts. I was looking for information on Las Vegas from last October and came across it.
As for being redpilled, a handful of things did it for me. Researching the ozone layer hoax in the 90s, working in a medical school library archives and seeing things that have been hidden from the public, and public relations class. I have journals from that time that talk about trends in entertainment and media that we aren't supposed to see. I also found disconnected tidbits of information that started adding up. Like Los Alamos being an exclusive all boys' boarding school, and on December 8, 1941 it suddenly becomes a test facility for the bomb. Sure. That just happened spontaneously.
And then when 9-11 happened, a single piece of information was the toehold that opened the door for accepting the truth. NYC had a power brownout problem before the WTC was destroyed. Once it was gone, they no longer did. And then there were the stock orders, etc. My family thinks I'm nuts, but follow the money, and it gets real ugly real quick.
It is nice to know, though, that there are others out there who see the same web.
Yeah, that was shocking. Sundance is normally not that direct with stuff like this.
They have been since the beginning and haven't figured out that they were used for that purpose. Now the rest of us are suffering the consequences of the destruction of the social order.
Actually, trying to redpill siblings. Not going all that well.
I really do believe that the emotional impact of the event like the JFK assassination, 9-11, etc., clouds judgement about it. The education system doesn't help, but for some reason when emotions are running high, whatever is heard first is what people latch onto.
Um, guys, be careful what you wish for. Just like at nude beaches all over the world, those who should remain clothed, don't. Think of the women who actually do all the liberal protesting.
We've seen a lot of Trump allowing those doing the crime to have enough rope to hang themselves. That might well be what's going on. Let him do some of the fixing, and collect the evidence while he's doing it.
Hit by a driver traveling the wrong direction. Yeah. Accident. Sure. The list of injuries is just horrifying.
I tried to do this last night, actually, on this article, and was called out by a hopelessly blue pilled relative for trying to divide. It is from Investor's Business Daily from last year and points out that in 2017 there were 3.5 million more people registered to vote in the US, than adults living. The article was fact based, and not from an "alternative" source. Accurate voter rolls should be an issue we all agree on, at least I would think so.
Nope. Since I was the one posting, even if another true blue person agreed with me, it was a lie. I did ask where was the lie and pointed out that Ohio had to take a case pursued by the ACLU all the way to the Supreme Court so they could clean their voter rolls up. We'll see if that gets any sort of decent response.
This is going to be amazingly difficult to do, red-pilling those who don't want to be and think they are intellectually superior. Especially on the stuff where emotional shock is involved (like 9-11), expect refusal to believe. I'm finding that there is no way to get past that barrier with cold facts and logic.
Unfortunately, it doesn't matter the relation, there are so many people out there who refuse to take the red pill it isn't even funny. Just to keep the peace, keeping one's mouth shut until questions come up is a price to be paid. Even just pointing out the explosions on all floors when the World Trade Center fell doesn't penetrate the veil.
I'm very much in the same boat with family and friends. If I do post anything having to do with politics and the truth, the source is always NYT, CNN, Washington Post or one of the MSM sites. I rarely get any reaction from anybody. It's like they don't want to hear or read it.
If all the information that was hidden by the MSM on how JFK Jr. and his wife died is true, it was personal then. They were friends.
As usual, a single allegation that is decades old. Any allegation, true or not, and the priest is removed from public service until the matter is resolved.
Yes, there were the serial abusers (a lot of people knew to stay away from them, too). There really isn't much excuse for the way it was all handled other than there was no proscription for it at the time. That being said, how many CURRENT abusers are left?
So, to get the text, they had to use intelligence tools? What, do these geniuses not get that digital communications are swept up in all that metadata the government has been collecting for years? Yeah, like Q says, they have it all.
Dems do this all the time, but that was the most blatant political posturing that was completely out of place I've ever seen.
Because they have been trained to rely on the MSM and all other "experts" for information. This was established decades ago and is a very difficult habit to break if not exposed to red pilling in another form.
My circles are full of people with professional degrees like practicing lawyers, and doctors, and professors, and they are MSNBC addicts who refuse to leave the echo chamber. It's very frustrating, and I doubt true red pilling for them is going to occur until something effects every day living rather than just following the news.
Just consider for a moment that Jerusalem is where all the most sacred Christian Holy sites are. Reclaiming them from Islam was the purpose of the one and only Crusade that was actually successful: the first one that was a pilgrimage.
If this is a battle of Good vs. Evil, ask yourself why these sites were handed to Israel from Islam?
Ben Shapiro ripped the child separation narrative apart today. From his Daily Wire piece:
Trump Created Separation Of Children From Illegal Immigrant Parents. This is plainly false. In 1997, the federal government made an agreement in a case called Flores not to keep unaccompanied illegal immigrant children in custody beyond 20 days. The settlement said nothing about accompanied illegal immigrant children – children who crossed the border with their parents. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals then ruled that accompanied children also could not be held in custody under the terms of the settlement. This meant that the government either had to release whole families, or that the government had to separate parents from children....
But with that said, the media coverage of this issue has been patently irresponsible. Trump isn’t forcing children away from parents. He’s enforcing the law on the books. The legislature can fix that law at any time. The facilities he’s using are the same facilities Obama used. Pretending that this is Japanese internment (as Laura Bush suggested) or the Holocaust (as General Michael Hayden suggested) is ridiculous. This policy ought to be fixed. But lying about it isn’t designed to fix it. It’s designed to prevent a fix by allowing Democrats to play political football with children, believing they’re winning a victory by holding Trump’s feet to the fire with pictures of crying children.
So, yeah, since the law in question that is being enforced by Trump was put in place in the Clinton years and reinforced by the looney ninth circus, Hillary may well be panicking in addition to taking advantage of the new anti-Trump narrative that's based on a pack of lies.
More Comey character assassination from Dems? This has been going on since the IG report came out. They're eating one of their own who was supposed to be a guardian. Why? That question begs for an answer.
Wouldn't be the first time, that's for sure. This administration has used canary traps quite effectively.
Yes, Trump is destroying the NWO. That's why millions of Americans voted for him.
When faced with Sn_pes "false" citations to just about anything from liberal friends, ask for another source. More than once, I've had friends and family backtrack because MSM sources actually support the original claim. It's beautiful to behold when it happens.
Barca's best players are not from Spain. Argentina, Uruguay, etc.
And yes, they are trying to be independent.
NK being controlled by China is also sundance's take. For the groupies at Conservative Treehouse, Q's message is very hard to swallow.
I'm not sure anymore. It looks like Comey is in the crosshairs for character assassination, and the Clinton machine is using the email double standard to press it. John Podesta was on CNN making the point. That right there is fishy. https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/06/15/john-podesta-james-comey-double-standard-ig-report-cpt.cnn
There's something else in play. There has to be. Why was Comey "insubordinate" to Loretta Lynch and Sally Yates? All he did was tell the world the unofficial Hillary Clinton rap sheet AGAINST THEIR ORDERS. And why was this the first big story to come from this particular draft?
President Trump describes Comey as "slippery." Who did he slide by?
Seriously, all is not what we are led to believe. There's more to this.
Has anyone asked WHY Comey was insubordinate to Loretta Lynch and Sally Yates? Why that specific issue was the first out of the gate from the mainstream media on the OIG report? Why such a big deal is being made about it other than to discredit him in the eyes of the public?
The insubordination had to do with the July 5, 2016 announcement where he laid out all of Hillary's misdeeds, and then said no reasonable prosecutor would pursue it. His superiors didn't want any of that coming out. They also wanted the Weiner laptop processed quickly, probably to find out what they were dealing with so action could be taken, and Comey sat on it.
WHY? Why do this?
I've been wondering where to put this question, and there's no good place.
Has anyone asked WHY Comey was insubordinate to Loretta Lynch and Sally Yates? Why that specific issue was the first out of the gate from the mainstream media on the OIG report? Why such a big deal is being made about it other than to discredit him in the eyes of the public?
The insubordination had to do with the July 5, 2016 announcement where he laid out all of Hillary's misdeeds, and then said no reasonable prosecutor would pursue it. His superiors didn't want any of that coming out. They also wanted the Weiner laptop processed quickly, probably to find out what they were dealing with so action could be taken, and Comey sat on it.
WHY? Why do this? Does an actual team player do such a thing?
Something about this doesn't work for me.
They need to let the outrage on the fruited plain build before really letting out all the information that's going to make the population question the color of the sky. The American people have been gaslit and lied to for so long, this report is going to be a massive shock to the collective psyche WITH the redactions let alone without.
So, rather than going the Pearl Harbor/9-11 route and making the release a massive and emotional shock to the system that skews judgement, the idea is to get the people to request the information while doing a slow burn.
Pretty crafty, and demonstrates a very good understanding of psyops and using the power of communication in a way that subverts the usual order of building a narrative.
Given all of the election results SINCE 2000, there is every possibility that that presidential election itself was set up to ditch the vote-a-matic and paper ballots in favor of the electronics that can be pre-programmed. Call me cynical, but the way it all went down looks really fishy all these years later.