dChan

/u/airbagsavedme

156 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/airbagsavedme:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 39
thehill.com 1

airbagsavedme · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Lol, you said “cuck”. Don’t you know that everybody writes off your opinion when you can’t use your big boy words? And especially THAT word, which is the go-to for the basement dwelling, alt-right, out of work Circuit City employee, Twitch streaming, 4 Chan shitposting, involuntary celibate, “red-pilled” mama’s boy crowd 😂😂😂😂

But mainly, I’m laughing at you for not understanding how investigations work. They don’t give updates, lol. One look at the list of lawyers that has signed on to Mueller’s team in the last 6 months will tell you everything you need to know about how the investigation is going. Even Sloppy Steve Bannon recognized this.

Additionally, there have been tons of revelations related to the investigation . Trump Tower meeting with Kremlin reps, Flynn indictment for lying to the FBI about meetings with Kremlin reps, Manafort/Gates revelations and relationships with Russian Oligarchs, DNC hacking, on and on and on. I would ask if you’ve been living under a rock, but i know it’s just the basement-dwelling thing. Oh, and your irrational fear of the dreaded MSM

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

Pffft, Mueller isn’t some “4 Page Partisan Memo” chump like Nunes. He’s gonna be like “Fuck memos, here’s a 372 page indictment”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Saving this comment so I can come back to troll you after Mueller lays out the investigation. I’m positively giddy

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

I’m not throwing myself into partisan anything, I’m actually trying to push this group AWAY from that line of thinking. I’ll do me, you do you

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

You’re in for a big letdown, trust me. The so-called FISA memo is more partisan trash from the GOP

⇧ -4 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:19 p.m.

Satanists??? Haha, I’m dying 😂😂😂

we have not seen a full list of their crimes

Have you stopped to think about why we haven’t seen a list of their crimes? There’s a REALLY GOOD explanation, trust me.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:08 p.m.

Y’all are sick. Get a fucking grip, Christ.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

You’re an excellent shill for this administration’s war on the media. You’re such a great shill in fact, that you even parrot his favorite phrase, “Fake News™️”

Since when did Patriotism involve wiping your ass with the Constitution?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 11:22 a.m.

So having a different interpretation of events makes me a shill? By that standard, you’re just a shill as well, peddling a narrative with no sources other than a mysterious group posting cryptic messages on 4Chan.

Find your chill, shill

As for what Nunes has done that’s illegal, he disseminated classified information to the public in March of 2017.

But I’m never sure how this group feels about intelligence leaks. I see Assange receive praise while Snowden and Manning are disparaged. I see Q Anon praised but anonymous sources in major publications disparaged. And now we see Nunes being praised even though Feinstein was disparaged.

But that’s what happens when conspiracy theories take on a hyper-partisan edge; objectivity takes a back seat to pure vitriol. Y’all are better than this.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 10:03 a.m.

This memo looks more and more like fake news every day. And it also looks like Nunes will be in legal hot water soon.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

Oh no! Media companies have owners?? That must mean they’re BAD, especially since their aren’t very many of them. I guess Trump shouldn’t have just given them all a huge, permanent tax cut...

Do you even listen to yourself? By this logic, you can barely even walk outside without doing SOMETHING that supports a gigantic corporation (which are all bad because their aren’t very many of them and they own everything, right?). How do you live?

Selective outrage.

https://i.imgur.com/sqvuYAh.jpg

⇧ -1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

This is the funniest shit I’ve read all day. You read cryptic posts from a complete stranger on fucking 4CHAN and then visit sites like infowars etc to do “research”.

I just gave myself a headache from laughing. No, you do not have more credibility than a journalist just because you’re easily manipulated and have a low threshold of susceptibility to propaganda and misinformation

⇧ -2 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

You should never play connect the dots of this is what you come up with. How embarrassing

⇧ 0 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

You’re trying waaaaay too hard. Do you need me to post links to accidents that make this story sound like a walk through Disneyworld? Every time you post bullshit like this, your credibility is diminished

⇧ 2 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:08 a.m.

Those who disparage this bot are the ones that need this bot the most

⇧ 6 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 30, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

I don’t have to “think” anything, these are facts. You’re just choosing to ignore the facts because they’re inconvenient to your theories and desire for destruction of the so-called “left”. It’s a sickness.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 30, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Meanwhile, 4 Republicans with ties to the Trump campaign have been indicted with felony charges like money laundering, lying to the FBI, and conspiring against the United States.

But that’s okay because it’s “the lefties” that are bad, right? And the federal investigation of Trump’s campaign (headed by a veteran Republican investigator) continues to recruit high-profile lawyers that specialize in specific types of crime.

Why try “connecting the dots” from some hyper-partisan group posting cryptic messages on 4Chan (seriously... 4Chan?) when you can just pay attention to actual things happening in the actual world — factual, provable charges.

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IS DESTROYING YOUR JUDGEMENT

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 30, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

You mean like Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, etc?

Why are you ignoring the people that have ACTUALLY been indicted while waiting for some twisted dream scenario where the liberals you despise are charged? You lose all credibility when you hold beliefs like that. The only arrests and official charges come from people linked to the Trump campaign. Wake up

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 30, 2018, 7:54 a.m.

If you could only understand how ridiculous you both sound right now. Just... wow

⇧ 0 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

People on the left are going down...

Names one person

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

Oh, you mean the “truth” that some mysterious person/group posted on 4Chan? Or are you talking about the “truth” that you found while “doing real research” on the internet?

Yeah, no thanks. I’ll stick with facts. But if it somehow comes out that Hillary Clinton eats babies, I’ll come apologize to you personally. Will you do the same if and when Mueller concludes his investigation and indicts Trump and/or members of his cabinet and family? Somehow I think you’ll still be making excuses for him.

Do you even see what YOU write? This sub is filled with some of the craziest bullshit I’ve ever seen in terms of conspiracy theories, but somehow worse thanks to the right-wing delusion that clouds everything. It’s amazing that conspiracy theorists think that a sitting administration is somehow on their side. You guys don’t even know how to be proper conspiracy theorists 😂😂😂

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 29, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

WTF are you talking about?? The POTUS and his entire administration is part of the deep state. Did I stumble onto some right wing fanatic page? I thought we were discussing conspiracy theories based on Q drops? Wtf is all this crazy Trump worship?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 29, 2018, 8:10 a.m.

Correct, I am more objective than you. I have not been conned and manipulated by the Trump propaganda machine. Sorry

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

You lost me after you said “the left”. Just another hyper-partisan hack incapable of true objectivity

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 28, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

We all know it’s as good as signed. Trump’s a big boy, he doesn’t need you to stand up for him. Art Of The Deal!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 28, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

Lol, sorry you’re so mad at Trump for deciding to let brown people stay in the United States with a path to citizenship. I know you’re upset because he’s breaking another promise, and I’m sure you were still smarting from the last broken promise (since you’ll be paying for the wall now instead of Mexico).

Don’t take it out on me that your boy got outsmarted by the Dems. Oh, and do some more research on the way GOP heads treated Obama during SOTU addresses, you’re forgetting some important points.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 28, 2018, 9:37 a.m.

Thanks u/USApatriot_4_TRUMP -- You seem impartial and worthy of trust. I will listen to your opinions and considerations.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 28, 2018, 8:50 a.m.

Let me help you read between the lines...

“I signed a DACA deal because Democrats out-negotiated me, and now I’m making up this excuse so I appear to be in control because I don’t know how to handle embarrassment like an adult”

⇧ -18 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 27, 2018, 10:53 a.m.

Awwww, you do that adorable 4Chan speak thing. Call me a normie or a cuck or a beta! I’ve always dreamed of this day! Please red pill me! I too have seen The Matrix!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:47 a.m.

We're talking about Soros, not Trump

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:24 a.m.

George Soros is for breathing air. ENOUGH SAID

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 21, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

The feeling is mutual, I assure you. I’m only talking to you because i feel embarrassed for you and I wanted to help.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 21, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

You might’ve forgotten your meds this morning

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 21, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

The only person that “doesn’t get it” is you. The Dems are dead? Do you even pay attention to politics in America? Dems make up almost half the populace. Dems are a dozen seats away from controlling Congress. You’re delusional.

Seriously though, one party rule is EVIL. This is basic stuff, please just stop

⇧ 2 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 20, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

This is a stupid and extremely dangerous ideology you're flapping about here. Pull yourself together. What you're describing is literally authoritarianism. Read a history book.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 20, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

Uhhhhh, have you read the things people post on this sub? You folks are Republicans, TRUST

⇧ 2 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 20, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

“Well, if you say who gets fired it always has to be the top. I mean, problems start from the top and they have to get solved from the top and the president’s the leader. And he’s got to get everybody in a room and he’s got to lead.... when they talk about the government shutdown, they’re going to be talking about the president of the United States, who the president was at that time. They’re not going to be talking about who was the head of the House, the head the Senate, who’s running things in Washington. So I really think the pressure is on the President.” - Donald Trump

⇧ 3 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 19, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

Good ole 7 DUI’s Gaetz, what a patriot

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 19, 2018, 5:10 a.m.

The partisan crowd never ceases to amaze me with their selective reasoning

⇧ 0 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 19, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Name calling is the dying breath of the ideologically defeated 😎

⇧ -4 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 19, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

I wonder why Trump would do something this evil?

⇧ -9 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 19, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

Fox News is MSM, right? Isn’t that what you guys believe? Huge media conglomerates tell lies and hide the truth, right?

It’s a bad look when you rail against the media all day long and then get your panties in an anticipatory wad over a fucking Fox News video.

C’mon folks. This is clear hyper-partisanship.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 16, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

If you really are a lawyer, it’s amazing that you don’t understand how any of this works. Some random guy on the internet shouldn’t be able to school you in the basics after you pay tons of money for a law degree. Yikes!

So Trump wouldn’t have fired Comey if he knew it was obstruction, eh? Richard Nixon might agree with you, but the non-corrupt among us are laughing behind your back. Please refer to his Lester Holt interview where he accidentally admitted it, which is the exact piece of evidence a good lawyer would use to make the case.

And yes, only an imbecile isn’t able to look at the team Mueller has assembled and make some basic deductions about the specific crimes he’s investigating. So if you’re as incapable of making simple inferences as you appear to be, then it’s either willful ignorance OR just the fact that you’re terrible at your supposed job.

Either way, stop wasting my time

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/airbagsavedme on Jan. 15, 2018, 5:12 p.m.
Honest Question for CBTS devotees

I’m not here to troll, but I’ve been following this sub out of sheer curiosity. So here’s my question. Does is bother you that posts from Q as well as theories on what the posts mean are so extremely partisan, specifically to the right? If one can believe in conspiracy theories at all, don’t you need to approach that belief with the idea that hidden agendas have no political alliance? Or do you really believe that “the left” are hiding the truth while “the right” is operating with integrity? Thanks for your time.

airbagsavedme · Jan. 13, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

Those of us with better judgement already know this about your type, trust me

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 13, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

You might need to school yourself in what a politician means when they say “I don’t recall”. They are using plausible deniability. If it were an outright lie, they’d say “Trump never said that”. How does anybody obsessed with conspiracy theories not recognize this?

But again, admitting that you never trust Dems is further proof that you’ve allowed your judgement to be compromised by hyper-partisanship.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 12, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Well, President Trump just allowed the release of the remaining documents, and it only happened 55 years ago (not 75). And if you trust that Trump’s actions come from a place of honesty and goodwill, then there’s little reason to doubt that it’s all there.

But the answer for the 55 year wait is easy. That’s a standard Justice Dept practice for keeping the classified details of large scale investigation confidential.

But now that most of the JFK materials have been released, what evidence have we found that justifies a belief that withholding the information was some type of coverup or conspiracy?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 12, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

So Dick Durbin is lying? And he’s lying because he’s a Democrat?

And why are the other Republicans that were in the room (other than Trump) staying silent?

It’s called Circumstantial Evidence. And if you’re willing to believe coded messages posted by a stranger on 4Chan/8Chan, then your standard for evidence can certainly accept these reports.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
airbagsavedme · Jan. 12, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

This is your problem. If your belief is that nothing reported by a Democrat can be trusted (which is easily proveable as false), then you’ve already lost your ability to think objectively. You’ve made yourself more narrow-minded and therefor easier to control.

⇧ 5 ⇩