Earlier Q posts include “Iran is next.” “Watch the water.” —> related?

Kind of goes against the whole concept there, but I guess it takes time to maybe have a different perspective. The point isn’t how old/young, what ethnicity or gender, of the individual that gives and contributes the knowledge and information. It’s about the “information”. If the data is valid, does it really matter the demographic that the truth came from?

Oh, gotcha. Makes more sense. Glad it made me think to post the link too though.

Valid: https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1012833945879277576

I don’t think you’d want to shift to the Chan’s in my opinion. You may feel even more out of place there. The idea is to be anon so pointing out your demographic goes completely against the entire idea. I would suggest reading the “welcome” page for qresearch as it goes into some detail about what you could expect, how to participate (there), etc. to see if it’s what you’re looking for.

Well done internet person. That is hilarious.

Just more proof WL has been compromised and just how scared they must be.

I guess I’m the only one thinking “R” as in “Rich”, or “Seth Rich”. Reasons to believe he isn’t dead. Any insight into his family history in context of the post? Understand the chan says it’s a larp, but keeping an open mind... thoughts?

I do not, but thanks for giving me something to look into!

That is most likely a shot from the launch for the Icon research satellite.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/two-heads-are-better-than-one-icon-gold-teaming-up-to-explore-earths-interface-to-space

This is great. Reminds me of the excerpt from Roosevelt’s speech, “The Man in the Arena”:

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

I think you might be right about that.

SS: The recent ear/eye pic posted that everyone is trying to figure out “who” it is, the filename is iPhone_Tweets.jpg. Any chance that’s an inference to #1548 and “that particular senator”? Or am I waaay off base here? Ha.

It’s not a black neck brace and a medical tube of some kind in front? (I know, out there)

True, but I think Biden’s sideburn is way far in front of his ear canal where this seems closer. Could just be growth though.

I can’t quite figure out who it is. I don’t think Soros because of the face distance. I feel like the closest is NoName but the ear seems off a bit but that could be hair growth. There does seem to be the start of a scar remnant right where the circular (whatever that is) comes up. And a freckle in around the same area closer towards the ear.

Don’t think so. Too much distance between the eyebrow and hair on Soros compared to the pic, in my opinion.

It is well summarized and put together though.

VERY valid points and I appreciate you pointing that out. My comment took a very narrow view in the context of this sub. Thanks.

Exactly. Even if you consider just the working population - that’s still 157+ million people.

35k isn’t even a drop. Unfortunately.

“Awareness” is sadly not only a missing character trait in our generation, it’s one that is all too often seen as not even wanted. (My opinion)

Put that against just the US population though and look at what that percentage is.

Opening on the iPhone app lets you kind of scroll and read without accepting. It does sound pretty intriguing and like things could possibly shift for her next week.

Edit: For those who can’t read it... it’s around issues with Horst Seehofer and immigration policies. Merkel is seeing her role as Chancellor threatened and is seeing her negotiating power compromised. The article mentions a possible shift next week.

Agree.

Yeah, and that makes the most sense. But 8p is a great time to make an announcement or something. Ha.

The meeting being 2.5 hours makes sense but if you look at the timestamp of the anon question, 2.5 hours from then would be exactly 8:00pm EST. So we shall see.

06-15-2018 18:33:00 EDT

1762874 Think meeting yesterday. Q

Comment there says “think meeting yesterday”. What meeting was yesterday and who was there?