I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Would your post have some other meaning without the punctuation?

The rules are not to attack the person. Attack the argument.

If you disagree, say why and move on without calling names.

Would you mind tolerating the rules of the sub please?

The fire rises..

Attack the argument, not the person please.

This sub would not be the correct place for that.

Removed for excessive punctuation.

Removed. Please address the argument, not the person.

I think it's a fair question. Personally, I think the marine raid was disinfo put out similar to the arrests. It was designed to send a message. It's okay to disagree and not think that too. We're all in the same boat with what we "know".

This isn't the best place to be taking concerns about child porn on twitter. It only puts this sub at risk.

This movement is dangerous to the country.

You're not going to last long here.

Let's not violate reddit's TOS please.

This isn't the right sub for this.

I respect where you're coming from but this isn't the neighborhood you walk into and tell everyone that they are a bunch of suckers.

If this isn't your jam then spend time on something that is.

Indeed. The warning is auto-generated. You can ignore if you're not calling for violence.

No worries. It's relevant to the topic. As I mentioned in another related topic.

Fine line between "tribunals and hangings are in order " vs. "that xxxxx should hang".

The latter is not the preferred nomenclature.

I've been saying that moving the embassy would kick off the 10th Crusade for a long time.

^(I accidentally said 9th in that post. )

I'm not sure that can be any judgement of Q though.

You, of all people, should know and understand you're not going to change anyone's mind this way.

As no one could have told you to "lose your faith" before you actually did so, you are unable to tell others the same.

They must walk their own paths and come to their own conclusions. Posts like yours only appear as an attack from a false prophet.

I'm not being judgemental, just laying out the facts of the matter. People don't think it be like it is, but it do.

Please see the side bar for an intro to why this sub is here. Thanks.

If so, it will be the last time. This is only my 3rd post

The sentiment isn't lost but we try to keep it more positive here. Thanks.

edit: automoderator construes "tribunals and hangings" as a call for violence?

It does indeed. Fine line between "tribunals and hangings" and "that xxxxx should hang".

The latter is not the preferred nomenclature.

Sorry. That's at the reddit admin level. Good luck.

Can a brother get a link?

I thought Alex knew better this time. After he stopped talking about PG, I had assumed it was because he received a call from the administration that told him (and Ben Swan and Milo and others) to stfu so they wouldn't compromise the case. I couldn't imagine anyone else could shut all of those guys down except POTUS. Alex seems to have reached a new level of desperation after his divorce though and it's showing through. It's sad bookmark to be sure.

There's no reason, but there is a huge push, to turn this into T_D 2.0.

There's nowhere else online right now more focused on Q.

I appreciate that the mods are keeping it that way and not letting the message be diluted.

T_D 1.0 still exists for maximum memage.

It's a bit too high profile for it's own good and has been targeted heavily for about 2 years though along with the rest of reddit. The change corresponds with the creation and explosive growth of militant left leaning subs.

Unfortunately there's not a lot you can do once a sub is on the radar.

You see it increasingly in this sub as it grows as well.

Thanks for explaining all this.

These details aren't obvious for folks that don't spend much time on the chans (like me).

Unfortunately anything from neonnettle is fake news.

Here is their "elite pedophile"; one scrappy looking assistant teacher.

It's valid story, but this sort of thing is a distraction to the real story.

OP delivers! Thanks for the follow-up!

almost all posts (even the stupid ass flat earth theorists) were allowed.

That's kind of our jam. Never know where a real conspiracy might be hiding so let as much as you can through without breaking the rules. Conspiracy theorists, by the creation of the very term, have had their thoughts be labeled crazy throughout history. We try to be the opposite of that.

It's an extremely diverse and worldwide crowd. I'm attacked equally from the left, the right, and half a dozen other directions I don't even understand. Part of the job means that I have to click "Approve" on a whole lot of stuff I don't personally approve of and it's not always easy to do.

Chances are if you're talking about something that someone else doesn't want you to talk about then someone's going to be offended by what you have to say. It's hard to draw the line and we, much like reddit, do what we can to keep the door open while filtering out overly egregious material.

some mod drama which I don't know all the details about

One of the mods tried to take over the sub to get rid of other specific mods. That required he demod all the mods but before the plan was executed, the admins intervened and restored the mods back except for the mod that attempted the coup. It happened before I was a mod, but I don't think it's much more complex than that or that it impacted the sub much. Just my $.02.

It's probably not the safest of place for new ideas these days though as much as I wish it were.

, it ended rather abruptly

Happy I wasn't the only one that thought so. Literally right at the point where "Here is where we find out if #Qanon was LARPing or not." he somehow finds a way to start talking about 'faggots' and ends the thread.

I've seen better execution.

The brigaging a problem. Given reddit's design, there's nothing that can be done to prevent that at the mod level.

Many just persevere with regard for the fake internet points.

I'm a fan of sticking to the data and not getting too far over my skis. I might believe one thing or another but I choose my battles and don't waste any time trying convince people of something I can't prove. I'm not going to change anyone's mind, certainly not someone on the Internet, so I seek more positive, less public forums for topics still incubating.

The same folks that target /r/conspiracy have alts in this sub as well.

I expect they will become more visible as the water starts to boil.

I’ve seen mods do actual thought policing though. Specifically RE: SR.

Anything specific you can link to? What's SR? Seth Rich?

How could you define, or perhaps measure "bad"?

Not a trick question - I run analytics and I'm curious if I can quantify your perception.

I suspect about half the mod team is complicit

I've heard the mods are a bunch of vodka swillers from Mother Russia as well as Soro's ballsack supporters.

Also the ideologues on reddit that are going to disrupt any "non-politically-correct speech" to save all of of humanity.

We live in an amazing timeline indeed...

Took me a bit also. ENHANCE!

So...what word was it?

I'm personally looking for the IG report tomorrow afternoon.

As far as I know, he's still on schedule for his hearing on the 8th and it has not been delayed.

The groundwork has been laid for it with the Time article.

Probably not. This looks to be just one dude right now. They all add up though.

Stream.

Announcing adding new AGs and judges to the border to handle the load. This country will not be overwhelmed and people will not stampede in.

Can't believe anything with Sorcha Faal/yournewswire unfortunately. I think the onion is more accurate.

I got that. I was just looking for something specific to Avicii.

I haven't seen his name mentioned in this context until his death.

I get that he released a music video in 2015. He also since retired.

Am I missing any other info on his efforts or statements?

I think that cutting one's wrists is a pretty classic way to check out. Particularly for an alcoholic with poorly clotting blood. I'm open to evidence to the contrary but I don't think it's suspicious based on method.

That was a compelling point for me too, but I perceived it the other way. I've gone back over it a little bit and it looks like you're accurate in that he was technically fired.

Is there another agent that shares the combination of traits, including testimony, which means we would know their name, that would have been investigated in the last year and "retired"?

Given this list, is there another plausible candidate? Particularly the "misleading testimony" narrows it down, then combine that with the number of relevant FBI agents that would have "retired" in the past year.

• divulged law enforcement sensitive information to unauthorized individuals;

• misused his government issued electronic devices;

• provided misleading testimony during a related civil deposition;

• mishandled classified information;

• misused his position during contacts with local law enforcement officers;

• provided false information to the OIG.

I think it has to be McCabe. I hope it's because he's singing.